LDR   05582nam^^22003613a^4500
001        FI13010917_00001
005        20130801112005.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        130129n^^^^^^^^xx^^^^^^o^^^^^|||^0^eng^d
024 8    |a FI13010917
245 00 |a Annual report for fiscal year 2007 |h [electronic resource] |b office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) |y English.
260        |a Washington, D.C. : |b U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), |c 2007.
300        |a Document, Internet Resource, Computer File
506        |a Refer to main document/publisher for use rights.
510        |a (2007). Annual report for fiscal year 2007: Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA). United States Agency for International Development—Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA).
520 3    |a This is a USAID/OFDA report about the work accomplished by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) through the implementation of the Disaster Assistance Support Program (DASP). The report essentially emphasizes the extent to which the DASP has technically assisted different countries and ensured coordination between USFS specialists and their colleagues around the world in order to reduce vulnerability to wildfire. The report presents the objective of the DASP, its methodology, and the results obtained by USAID/OFDA as a result of the implementation of this program. Created in 1985, the DASP’s main objective is to technically support the USAID, the Bureau for Democracy, the Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance (DCHA), the Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) in terms of managing and planning disaster prevention, preparedness and response in the world. The methodology used by the USFS, through the DASP, consists of developing and implementing what have been called the Incident Command System (ICS) and the U.S. Government’s management system. In doing so, the USFS manages and keeps updating USAID/OFDA’s procedures in order to improve disaster planning, management and response. Examples of such a methodology include the establishment of the Disaster Assistance Response Team (DART), the Field Operations Guide (FOG) for assessing disaster and providing effective response, the Response Management Team (RMT) whose goal is to facilitate a forum where stakeholders can share their experiences for better future actions. In terms of outcomes, the report asserts that in FY 2007, USAID/OFDA, as a result of the implementation of the DASP, provided successful responses to 77 disasters that struck more than 94 million people in 57 countries and donated more than $479 million for emergency relief supplies. This is basically a report that stresses the extent to which USAID/OFDA has implemented a new program or strategy for more effective disaster planning, management and response.
520 0    |a General Risk Management
520 0    |a General Risk Reduction
520 2    |a Articles: p. 5: OFDA at Glance; Director’s Message; p. 7: Year in Review; p. 11: How the USG Provides International Humanitarian Assistance; p. 17: Principled Humanitarianism; p. 19: Focus on Protection; p. 25: Africa; p. 39: Combating Drought in Southeastern Kenya; p. 43: Bolstering the Healing Process: Continuous Health Care in Liberia; p. 49: FSAU Nutrition Surveillance in Somalia: A Critical Resource in a Crisis Environment; p. 55: At the Forefront: OFDA Advocates for IDP Assistance in Eastern Chad; p. 57: By Road, Plane, and Barge: OFDA Assists Displaced Southern Sudanese to Return Home; p. 63:Tackling Food Insecurity and Promoting Developmental Relief in Southern Africa; p. 67: Asia and Pacific; p. 73: OFDA Disaster Risk Reduction Programs Pay Dividends in Bangladesh; p. 83: Europe, Middle East, and Central Asia; p. 91: Innovative Livelihood Programs in Lebanon; p. 95: Latin America and the Caribbean; p. 106: Experts and Expats: Responding to Disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean; p. 109: Disaster Risk Reduction; p. 121: Stemming the Spread of Cassava Mosaic Disease in East and Central Africa; Maps: p. 9: Global Responses; p. 27: Africa Responses; p. 48: Mozambique Floods; p. 57: Southern Sudan and Three Areas IDP Returns; p. 69: Asia and the Pacific Responses; p. 85: Europe, Middle East, and Central Asia Responses; p. 93: Southeastern Europe Wildfires; p. 97: Latin American and Caribbean Responses; p. 102: Hurricanes Dean and Felix; p. 114: Latin American and Caribbean Disaster Risk Reduction Programs; p. 116 Asia and the Pacific Disaster Risk Reduction Programs; p. 119: Africa and Europe, Middle East, and Central Asia Disaster Risk Reduction Programs; Figures: p. 7: Fast Facts for FY 2007; p. 7: Assistance By Sector; p. 8: Largest Responses; p. 8: Funding By Region; p. 8: Responses By Type; p. 13: Funding by Agency Type; p. 16: USAID Organizational Chart; p. 16: OFDA Organizational Chart; p. 124: Funding Summary
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Florida International University, |d 2013. |f (dpSobek) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
650    1 |a United States. Agency for International Development. Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance.
650    1 |a Humanitarian assistance.
650    1 |a Internally displaced persons.
650    1 |a Risk management.
650    1 |a Disaster relief.
700        |a Disaster Risk Reduction Program, Florida International University (DRR/FIU), |e summary contributor.
710 2    |a U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
710 2    |a Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA).
830    0 |a dpSobek.
852        |a dpSobek
856 40 |u http://dpanther.fiu.edu/dpService/dpPurlService/purl/FI13010917/00001 |y Click here for full text
992 04 |a http://dpanther.fiu.edu/sobek/content/FI/13/01/09/17/00001/FI13010917thm.jpg


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.