LDR   03353nam^^22003613a^4500
001        FIMA000034_00001
005        20151202134922.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        151202n^^^^^^^^xx^^^^^^o^^^^^|||^u^eng^d
245 00 |a Ecohydrology as a tool for the survival of the threatened serengeti ecosystem |h [electronic resource] |y English.
260        |a [S.l.] : |b Elsevier B.V., |c 2013-01-09.
300        |a Article
506        |a Please contact the owning institution for licensing and permissions. It is the users responsibility to ensure use does not violate any third party rights.
520 3    |a The results of 10 years of monitoring water quality and quantity during the period 1996–2006 in the three rivers (Mbalageti, Grumeti and Mara) draining the Serengeti ecosystem are presented, together with river gauging data starting in 1948, rainfall data starting in 1960, and animal population data starting in 1960. Water quality remained unchanged in the Mbalageti and Grumeti rivers; these rivers are seasonal and they dry out during a drought. The Mara River is perennial and is vital to maintain the ecosystem during a drought. Its quality has changed, with increased contribution from groundwater, with higher pH and visibility and decreasing salinity. The flow rate during a drought has decreased by 68% since 1972. This is attributed to deforestation of its upper catchment in the Mau forest in Kenya and to extraction of water for irrigation in Kenya upstream of the ecosystem. Hydrological modeling suggests that the Mara River would now dry out for two months and one month respectively if the 1949–1952 and the 1972–1973 severe droughts occurred again. Ecohydrologic modeling suggests that this would in turn lead to the collapse of the herbivore population from the lack of drinking water. This model also suggests that providing drinking water to the animals at artificial water holes spread throughout the ecosystem would lead to decadal time-scale booms and busts of the herbivore population. The Serengeti ecosystem stability is maintained by the annual migration that partitions the ecosystem in seasonally used compartments. It is thus necessary to restore the natural hydrology of the Mara River in Kenya, and this requires remediation measures in Kenya. If that does not occur, disaster prevention measures are needed by providing water in weirs, dams, and artificial wetlands along the Mara River in the Serengeti National Park, as well as extending by 5 km the western edge of the park so as to reach Lake Victoria to provide acces to permanent water.
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Florida International University, |d 2015. |f (dpSobek) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
535 1    |a Florida International University.
561        |a Restricted access
650        |a Migration.
650        |a Kenya.
650        |a Tanzania.
650        |a Water quality.
650        |a Hydrology.
700 1    |a Gereta, Emmanuel J..
700 1    |a Mwangomo, Ephraim.
700 1    |a Wolanski, Eric.
773 0    |t Ecohydrology as a tool for the survival of the threatened serengeti ecosystem
830    0 |a dpSobek.
830    0 |a Mara River Basin.
852        |a dpSobek |c Mara River Basin
856 40 |u http://dpanther.fiu.edu/dpService/dpPurlService/purl/FIMA000034/00001 |y Click here for full text
856 42 |3 Host material |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642359309700655 |y Ecohydrology as a tool for the survival of the threatened serengeti ecosystem
997        |a Mara River Basin


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.