PAGE 1
City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan UpdateFinal ReportSeptember 2012
PAGE 2
i KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... 7ES 1. ES 2. ES 3. ES 4. ES 5. ES 6. ES 7. Section 1 Background and Purpose ........................................................................................................................ 1 1 Section 2 Data Collection and Evaluation .............................................................................................................. 2 1 2.2.2.1.1. Data Collection and Evaluation .......................................................................................... 2 32.2.2.1.2. Subbasin Problem Identification and Prioritization ................................................. 2 42.2.2.1.3. Model Development and Results ........................................................................................ 2 52.2.2.1.4. 2000 SWMP Priority List of Projects and Recommendations ............................... 2 52.2.2.1.5. Activities Subsequent to the 2000 SWMP ....................................................................... 2 5 Section 3 Stormwater Model Update ...................................................................................................................... 3 1
PAGE 3
Table of Contents ii KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Section 4 Water Quality and Regulatory Review ................................................................................................ 4 1 Section 5 Alternatives Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 5 1
PAGE 4
Table of Contents iii KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 5.3.5.3.1. FEMA grants ............................................................................................................................. 5 31Section 6 Floodplain Management .......................................................................................................................... 6 1 6.2.2.1.1. Activities 520 and 530 .......................................................................................................... 6 116.2.2.1.2. Activity 430 ............................................................................................................................... 6 116.2.2.1.3. Remaining Activities with Point Losses (Activities 620, 410, 310, 320, 440, 330, 630, and 340) .................................................................................................................................... 6 12 6.2.2.2.1. Activity 420 ............................................................................................................................... 6 126.2.2.2.2. Activity 510 ............................................................................................................................... 6 126.2.2.2.3. Activities 450 and 610 .......................................................................................................... 6 136.2.2.2.4. Activities 370 and 540 .......................................................................................................... 6 136.2.2.2.5. Activities 350 and 360 .......................................................................................................... 6 13 6.2.3.2.1. Activity 350 ............................................................................................................................... 6 146.2.3.2.2. Activities 360 and 370 .......................................................................................................... 6 146.2.3.2.3. Activity 420 ............................................................................................................................... 6 146.2.3.2.4. Activity 450 ............................................................................................................................... 6 146.2.3.2.5. Activity 510 ............................................................................................................................... 6 156.2.3.2.6. Activity 540 ............................................................................................................................... 6 156.2.3.2.7. Activity 610 ............................................................................................................................... 6 15 Section 7 Recommended Plan ................................................................................................................................... 7 1
PAGE 5
Table of Contents iv KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Tables Figures
PAGE 6
Table of Contents v KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved
PAGE 7
Table of Contents vi KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Appendices
PAGE 8
ES 7 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Executive Summary ES 1. Introduction and Background Figure ES 1 Figure ES 1 Location Map
PAGE 9
Executive Summary ES 8 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved ES 2. Methodology ES 3. Level of Service (LOS)
PAGE 10
Executive Summary ES 9 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved ES 4. Alternatives Analysis Figure ES 2 ES 5. Water Quality and Regulatory Review ES 6. Floodplain Management NFIP CRS Coordinators Manual NFIP CRS Example Plans NFIP CRS 2012 CRS Coordinator Manual Changes
PAGE 11
Biscayne Canal West Problem Area Biscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 Arch Creek South/Biscayne Canal East Problem Area Arch Creek South Problem Area Arch Creek North/ Arch Creek South Problem Area Biscayne Canal East Problem Area 2 BW1-9 B E6-1 BE4-9 BE2-2 BE2-1 BW1-1A ACS3-1 ACS2-2 ACS2-1 ACS1-7 ACS1-2 ACN1-8 ACN1-6 ACN1-5 BW1-10A ACN1-4A BW2-5 BE6-3 BE2-3 BE1-7 BE1-6 BE1-4 BW3-1D BW3-1C BW3-1B BW3-1A BE1-18 BE1-17 BE1-16 BE1-15 BE1-13 BE1-12 BE1-10 BE2-4A BW3-2A BW1-15A BW2-8 BW2-3 BW2-2 BW1-6 BW1-5 BW1-2 BE7-4 BE7-3 BE7-1 BE6-2 BE4-8 BE4-6 BE4-5 BE4-4 BE4-3 BE4-2 BE4-1 BE3-3 BE3-2 BE2-8 BE2-7 BE2-5 BE2-4 BW2-4C BW2-4B BW2-4A BW2-1B BW2-1A BW1-20 BW1-1B BW1-17 BW1-12 BW1-11 ACS5-1 ACS4-2 ACS3-9 ACS3-8 ACS3-6 ACS3-4 ACS3-3 ACS3-2 ACS2-4 ACS2-3 ACS1-6 ACS1-4 ACS1-3 ACS1-1 ACN3-6 ACN1-3 ACN1-2 ACN1-1 ACN1-0 BW3-4B G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\FigES-2_032712.mxd perneznybj 03/27/12 01,7503,500 875 Feet Figure ES-2 City of North Miami P roblem Area and Proposed Capital Improvement Locations Problem Areas City-Confirmed, Alternatives Evaluated Improvement Already Designed, Under Construction, or Complete City Reports No Flooding System Not Maintained By City, Not Evaluated Flooding Due to Tidal Boundary Condition Unconfirmed Modeled Problem Area, Alternatives Evaluated Model Node Fails 100 Yr LOS Model Node Fails 10 Yr LOS Model Node Fails 5-Yr LOS Model Subbasins City Limits
PAGE 12
Executive Summary ES 11 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved ES 7. Recommended Plan Tables ES 1 ES 2
PAGE 13
Table ES1City ofNorth MiamiStormwaterMasterPlanEstimated Conceptual Capital CostSummaryProblemArea SWMP Update Section Reported ProblemArea Max.Depth ofFlooding Design Storm Event Tier 1Total Costs Additional Tier 2Costs Additional Tier 3Costs Total Project Cost (All Tiers)* BiscayneCanal West ProblemArea 5.1.1 0.105year CityR/W$0(Alt1local, meet LOS) County R/W$300,000 CityR/W$430,000 (Alt2regional) County R/W$1,080,000 $430,000 BiscayneCanal EastProblemArea 1 5.1.2 1.30 5year$3,700,000 (does not meet LOS) $2,900,000 (mostly meets LOS1) $1,350,000 (meets LOS) $7,950,000 Arch Creek South/Biscayne Canal EastProblemArea 5.1.3 2.505year $7,200,000 (mostly meets LOS1) $20,300,000 (meets LOS) $27,500,000 Arch Creek South ProblemArea 5.1.4 1.005year$1,500,000 (does not meet LOS) $4,800,000 (mostly meets LOS1) $500,000 (meets LOS) $6,800,000 Arch Creek North/ArchCreek South ProblemArea 5.1.5 2.805 year$8,300,000 (does not meet LOS)$6,600,000 (meets LOS) $14,900,000 BiscayneCanal EastProblemArea 2 5.1.6 0.705year$350,000 (meets LOS) $360,000 $57,940,0001Flooding is alleviated atatleast50percentofthedeficient model nodesTotals:
PAGE 14
Table ES2City ofNorth MiamiStormwaterMasterPlanUpdate PhasedCapital ImprovementScheduleProblemArea SWMP Update Section Reported ProblemArea 20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022 20312032 20412042 20512052 2061 BiscayneCanal West ProblemArea 5.1.1 BiscayneCanal EastProblemArea 1 5.1.2 Arch Creek South/Biscayne Canal EastProblemArea 5.1.3 Arch Creek South ProblemArea 5.1.4 Arch Creek North/ArchCreek South ProblemArea 5.1.5 BiscayneCanal EastProblem Area 2 5.1.6 1Total costsinclude theprecedingtier'stotal cost(e.g.,Tier2costsareinclusive ofTier1costs) Tier1Implementation Tier2Implementation Tier3Implementation
PAGE 15
1 1 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Section 1Background and Purpose 1.1. Background Figure 1 1 1.2. Purpose Figure 1 1 Location Map
PAGE 16
Section 1Background and Purpose 1 2 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved
PAGE 17
2 1 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Section 2Data Collection and Evaluation 2.1. Base Map Features Figure 2 1 2.2. Existing Studies and Modeling 2.2.1. Existing Stormwater Models Section 3 Section 4
PAGE 18
BIscayne BayAtlantic Ocean NE 135TH STI 95 EXNE 10TH AVNE 12TH AVNE 6TH AVNE 143RD ST NE 142ND STNE 141ST STNW 131ST STNW 135TH STNE 139TH ST NE NORTH MIAMI BD NE 131ST STNE 127TH ST NE 125TH STNE 2ND AVNW 2ND AV NW 7TH AVN MIAMI AVNE 13TH AVNE 8TH AVNE 123RD STNW 8TH AV NW 12TH AVNE 163RD STNE 16TH AVNW 10TH AV NW 15TH AVNW 4TH AV NW 16TH AVNW 13TH AVNW 120TH STNW 122ND STNE 4TH AVNE 151ST STNE 145T H STSUNNY ISLES BDNW 1ST AVBAY VISTA BDNE 144TH STNE 126TH STNE 119TH STLAUREL LAKEYSTONE BDCANAL DRN BAYSHORE DRPIONEER BDNE 124TH STNW 128TH STNE 146TH STUNNAMEDNW 132ND STNE 17TH AVBROAD CYNE 138TH STNW 129TH STNW 130TH STALAMANDA DRNE 11TH PLNE 3RD CTOPA LOCKA BDNW MIAMI CTNE 11TH CT NE MIAMI PLIXORA RDNE 14TH AVW DIXIE HYNE 136TH STNE 137TH STNW 6TH AVARCH CREEK DRNW 5TH CTNE 11TH AVNE 120TH RDNE 7TH CTNE 7TH AVARCH CREEK RDNE 16TH CTNE 122ND STNE 19TH DRNE 1ST CTNE 150TH STNE 149TH STNW 121ST STNE 9TH CTBAYVIEW LANW 123RD STNW 134TH STNW 133RD STI 95 RAMPNE 130TH STNE 9TH AVNE 132ND STNE 134TH STNE 140TH STNE 5TH AVNE 118TH STNE 121ST STBISCAYNE BAY DRBISCAYNE BDNW 4TH PLNW 17TH AVNW 5TH AVNE 5TH CTNE 133RD RDNE 156TH STNE 128TH STNE 129TH ST NE 123RD TENE 133RD STNE 12TH CTMAGNOLIA RDNW 3RD AVN US HIGHWAY 1NW 136TH STNE 15TH AVNE 12TH PLNE 10TH CTNE 120TH STNW 3RD CTNW 119TH STNE 2ND CTNE 151ST STNE 11TH CTUNNAMEDNW 133RD STNE 122ND STUNNAMEDNE 123RD STW DIXIE HYNE 137TH STUNNAMEDSUNNY ISLES BDUNNAMEDNW 132ND STUNNAMEDNE 136TH STNW 120TH STNE 4TH AVNE 144TH STNW 132ND STNW 121ST STI 95 RAMPNE 134TH STNW 1ST AVNW 121ST STNE 138TH ST NE 151ST STNE 134TH STIXORA RDOPA LOCKA BD NE 124TH STNE 7TH AVUNNAMEDNW 6TH AVUNNAMEDNW 5TH AVNE 5TH AVNE 151ST STUNNAMEDNE 122ND STUNNAMED NW 134TH STNW 130TH ST X:\85438_83809_N.Miami_MP\GIS 02,5005,000 1,250 FeetCity of North Miami Base Map Legend City Limits Parcels Roadways: CLASS 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Figure 1-1Data Sources: City of North Miami and Bing Web Services aerial photography Figure2-1
PAGE 19
Section 2Data Collection and Evaluation 2 3 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 2.2.2. Existing Studies and Reports 2.2.2.1. City of North Miami Phase II SWMP Report (2000 SWMP) 2.2.2.1.1. DataCollectionand Evaluation
PAGE 20
Section 2Data Collection and Evaluation 2 4 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 2.2.2.1.2. Subbasin Problem Identification and Prioritization
PAGE 21
Section 2Data Collection and Evaluation 2 5 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 2.2.2.1.3. Model Developmentand Results Appendix A 2.2.2.1.4. 2000 SWMP Priority List ofProjects and Recommendations 2.2.2.1.5. Activities Subsequent to the 2000 SWMP 2.2.2.2. 2009 City of North Miami Floodplain Management Plan
PAGE 22
Section 2Data Collection and Evaluation 2 6 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 2.2.2.3. Tidal Boundary Condition Investigation, Coastal Systems International Inc. (CSI, 2010) 2.3. Stormwater Inventory and Neighborhood Surveys 2.3.1. Stormwater Atlas
PAGE 23
Section 2Data Collection and Evaluation 2 7 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 2.3.2. Neighborhood Surveys Figure 2 2 2.4. Aerial Imagery and Topographic Data Figure 2 3 2.5. Land Use Figure 2 4
PAGE 24
BIscayne BayAtlantic Ocean NE 135TH STI 95 EXNE 10TH AVNE 12TH AVNE 6TH AVNE 143RD ST NE 142ND STNE 141ST STNW 131ST STNW 135TH STNE 139TH ST NE NORTH MIAMI BD NE 131ST STNE 127TH ST NE 125TH STNE 2ND AVNW 2ND AV NW 7TH AVN MIAMI AVNE 13TH AVNE 8TH AVNE 123RD STNW 8TH AV NW 12TH AVNE 163RD STNE 16TH AVNW 10TH AV NW 15TH AVNW 4TH AV NW 16TH AVNW 13TH AVNW 120TH STNW 122ND STNE 4TH AVNE 151ST STNE 145T H STSUNNY ISLES BDNW 1ST AVBAY VISTA BDNE 144TH STNE 126TH STNE 119TH STLAUREL LAKEYSTONE BDCANAL DRN BAYSHORE DRGRIFFING BDPIONEER BDNE 124TH STNW 128TH STNE 146TH STUNNAMEDNW 132ND STNE 17TH AVBROAD CYNE 138TH STNW 129TH STNW 130TH STALAMANDA DRNE 11TH PLNE 3RD CTOPA LOCKA BDNW MIAMI CTNE 11TH CT NE MIAMI PLIXORA RDNE 14TH AVW DIXIE HYNE 136TH STNE 137TH STNW 6TH AVARCH CREEK DRNW 5TH CTNE 11TH AVNE 120TH RDNE 7TH CTNE 7TH AVARCH CREEK RDNE 16TH CTNE 122ND STNE 19TH DRNE 1ST CTNE 150TH STNE 149TH STNW 121ST STNE 9TH CTBAYVIEW LANW 123RD STNW 134TH STNW 133RD STI 95 RAMPNE 130TH STNE 9TH AVNE 132ND STNE 134TH STNE 140TH STNE 5TH AVNE 118TH STNE 121ST STBISCAYNE BAY DRBISCAYNE BDNW 4TH PLNW 17TH AVNW 5TH AVNE 5TH CTNE 133RD RDNE 156TH STNE 128TH STNE 129TH ST NE 123RD TENE 133RD STNE 12TH CTMAGNOLIA RDNW 3RD AVN US HIGHWAY 1NW 136TH STNE 15TH AVNE 12TH PLNE 10TH CTNE 120TH STNW 3RD CTNW 119TH STNE 2ND CTNE 151ST STNE 11TH CTUNNAMEDNW 133RD STNE 122ND STUNNAMEDNE 123RD STW DIXIE HYNE 137TH STUNNAMEDSUNNY ISLES BDUNNAMEDNW 132ND STUNNAMEDNE 136TH STNW 120TH STNE 4TH AVNE 144TH STNW 132ND STNW 121ST STI 95 RAMPNE 134TH STNW 1ST AVNW 121ST STNE 138TH ST NE 151ST STNE 134TH STIXORA RDOPA LOCKA BD NE 124TH STNE 7TH AVUNNAMEDNW 6TH AVUNNAMEDNW 5TH AVNE 5TH AVNE 151ST STUNNAMEDNE 122ND STUNNAMED NW 134TH STNW 130TH ST X:\85438_83809_N.Miami_MP\GIS 02,5005,000 1,250 FeetCity of North Miami Existing Survey CoverageFigure 1-2Data Sources: City of North Miami and Bing Web Services aerial photography Legend Existing Survey Coverage City Limits Figure2-2
PAGE 25
BIscayne BayAtlantic OceanI-95ARCH CREEK RDN US HWY 1 X:\85438_83809_N.Miami_MP\GIS 02,5005,000 1,250 Feet City of North Miami LiDAR Topography Legend City Limits Miami-Dade 10ft DEM: (Elevation, Feet-NAVD88) -12.9 -0.8 -0.8 0 0 0.5 0.5 1 1.0 1.5 1.5 2 2.0 2.5 2.5 3 3.0 3.5 3.5 4 4.0 4.5 4.5 5 5.0 5.5 5.5 6 6.0 6.5 6.5 7 7.0 7.5 7.5 8 8.0 8.5 8.5 9 9.0 9.5 9.5 10 10.0 10.5 10.5 11 11.0 11.5 11.5 12 12.0 12.5 12.5 13 13.0 13.5 13.5 14 14.0 14.5 14.5 15 Figure 1-3Data Sources: SFWMD and Bing Web Services aerial photography Figure2-3
PAGE 26
BIscayne BayAtlantic OceanI-95ARCH CREEK RDN US HWY 1 X:\85438_83809_N.Miami_MP\GIS 02,5005,000 1,250 Feet City of North Miami Existing Land Use Legend City of North Miami Limits Land Use Coverage 2000: Description Wooded/ Forest Commercial Water Cemetery Upland Vegetation Recreational Institutional Communication and Utilities Agriculture Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Open Land Wetlands Industrial Roads Figure 1-4Data Sources: SFWMD and Bing Web Services aerial photography Figure2-4
PAGE 27
Section 2Data Collection and Evaluation 2 11 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 2.6. Soil Parameters 2.6.1. NRCS Soils Coverage Figure 2 5 2.6.2. Soil Borings 2.7. Identified Problem Areas Figure 2 6
PAGE 28
BIscayne BayAtlantic OceanI-95ARCH CREEK RDN US HWY 1 X:\85438_83809_N.Miami_MP\GIS 02,5005,000 1,250 FeetCity of North Miami Soil Classification Legend City of North Miami Limits NRCS Soils: HSG A A/D B B/D C/D No HSGUrban Land WATER Figure 1-5Data Sources: National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Bing Web Services aerial photography Figure2-5
PAGE 29
BIscayne BayAtlantic Ocean NE 3rd Court (historical flooding) 143rd Street and NE 12th Avenue (pump station experiences clogging) 131st Street (manatees in City stormwater infrastructure) 123rd Street (manatees in City stormwater infrastructure)NE 135TH STI 95 EXNE 10TH AVNE 12TH AVNE 6TH AVNE 143RD ST NE 142ND STNE 141ST STNW 131ST STNW 135TH STNE 139TH ST NE NORTH MIAMI BD NE 131ST STNE 127TH ST NE 125TH STNE 2ND AVNW 2ND AV NW 7TH AVN MIAMI AVNE 13TH AVNE 8TH AVNE 123RD STNW 8TH AV NW 12TH AVNE 163RD STNE 16TH AVNW 10TH AV NW 15TH AVNW 4TH AV NW 16TH AVNW 13TH AVNW 120TH STNW 122ND STNE 4TH AVNE 151ST STNE 145TH STSUNNY ISLES BDNW 1ST AVBAY VISTA BDNE 144TH STLAUREL LACANAL DRPIONEER BDNE 124TH STNW 128TH STUNNAMEDNW 132ND STNE 17TH AVBROAD CYNE 138TH ST NW 129TH STNW 130TH STOPA LOCKA BDNW MIAMI CTNE 11TH CTNE MIAMI PLIXORA RDNE 14TH AVW DIXIE HYNE 136TH STNE 137TH STNW 6TH AVARCH CREEK DRNW 5TH CTNE 11TH AVNE 7TH CTNE 7TH AVARCH CREEK RDNE 122ND STNE 1ST CTNE 150TH STNE 149TH STNW 121ST STNE 9TH CTNW 123RD STNW 134TH STNW 133RD STI 95 RAMPNE 9TH AVNE 132ND STNE 134TH STNE 140TH STNE 5TH AVBISCAYNE BAY DRBISCAYNE BDNW 4TH PLNW 17TH AVNW 5TH AVNE 5TH CTNE 133RD RDNE 156TH STNE 123RD TENE 133RD STMAGNOLIA RDNW 136TH STNE 10TH CTNE 120TH STNW 119TH STNE 2ND CTNE 145TH STNW 134TH STNW 6TH AVNE 151ST STNW 132ND STUNNAMEDNW 6TH AVNW 121ST STSUNNY ISLES BDNW 121ST STNW 120TH STNW 5TH AVNE 134TH STNE 5TH AVNW 130TH STUNNAMEDNE 7TH AVNE 4TH AVNE 151ST STNE 8TH AVUNNAMEDUNNAMEDNE 11TH AVNE 123RD STNE 140TH STNE 124TH STNE 136TH STNE 151ST STNW 1ST AVUNNAMED X:\85438_83809_N.Miami_MP\GIS 02,5005,000 1,250 FeetCity of North Miami Identified Problem AreasFigure 1-6Data Sources: City of North Miami and Bing Web Services aerial photography Legend Identified Problem Areas City Limits Figure2-6
PAGE 30
Section 2Data Collection and Evaluation 2 14 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 2.8. Summary of Data Gaps
PAGE 31
3 1 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Section 3Stormwater Model Update 3.1. US EPA Stormwater Management Model (SWMM)
PAGE 32
Section 3Stormwater Model Update 3 2 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Figures 3 1 3 3 3.2. Stormwater Model Update 3.2.1. XP SWMM Conversion 3.2.2. Hydrologic Model Updates
PAGE 33
! ! ! ! ! ! ! .# 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0" / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! .# 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0" / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / JAC AC2 G58 AC3 AC1 JAC WWAC Ruck G58S WWAC Ruck RkEnd BW6-1 BW5-1 BW4-1 BW3-4 BW3-2 BW2-9 BW2-8 BW2-7 BW2-6 BW2-5 BW2-3 BW2-2 BW1-9 BW1-8 BW1-7 BW1-6 BW1-5 BW1-4 BW1-3 BW1-2 BE7-5 BE7-4 BE7-3 BE7-1 BE6-3 BE6-2 BE6-1 BE5-1 BE4-9 BE4-8 BE4-7 BE4-6 BE4-5 BE4-4 BE4-3 BE4-2 BE4-1 BE3-3 BE3-2 BE3-1 BE2-8 BE2-7 BE2-5 BE2-4 BE2-3 BE2-2 BE2-1 BE1-9 BE1-7 BE1-6 BE1-5 BE1-3 BE1-2 BE1-1 RkEnd BW6-1 BW5-1 BW4-1 BW3-4 BW3-2 BW2-9 BW2-8 BW2-7 BW2-6 BW2-5 BW2-3 BW2-2 BW1-9 BW1-8 BW1-7 BW1-6 BW1-5 BW1-4 BW1-3 BW1-2 BE7-4 BE7-3 BE6-2 BE6-1 BE5-1 BE4-9 BE4-8 BE4-7 BE4-6 BE4-5 BE4-4 BE4-3 BE4-2 BE4-1 BE3-3 BE3-2 BE3-1 BE2-8 BE2-7 BE2-5 BE2-4 BE2-3 BE2-2 BE2-1 BE1-9 BE1-7 BE1-6 BE1-5 BE1-3 BE1-2 BE1-1 JRuck2 BW3-3B BW3-3A BW3-1I BW3-1H BW3-1G BW3-1F BW3-1E BW3-1D BW3-1C BW3-1A BW2-4C BW2-4B BW2-4A BW2-1B BW2-1A BW2-11 BW2-10 BW1-22 BW1-21 BW1-20 BW1-1C BW1-1B BW1-1A BW1-19 BW1-18 BW1-17 BW1-16 BW1-14 BW1-13 BW1-12 BW1-11 BW1-10 BE1-20 BE1-17 BE1-16 BE1-13 BE1-12 BE1-10 ACS5-1 ACS4-2 ACS4-1 ACS3-9 ACS3-8 ACS3-7 ACS3-6 ACS3-5 ACS3-4 ACS3-3 ACS3-2 ACS3-1 ACS2-7 ACS2-6 ACS2-5 ACS2-4 ACS2-3 ACS2-2 ACS2-1 ACS1-9 ACS1-8 ACS1-7 ACS1-6 ACS1-5 ACS1-4 ACS1-3 ACS1-2 ACS1-1 ACN3-6 ACN1-9 ACN1-8 ACN1-7 ACN1-6 ACN1-5 ACN1-4 ACN1-3 ACN1-2 ACN1-1 ACN1-0 BW3-4B BW3-2A BW1-15 BE2-4A BW3-3B BW3-3A BW3-1I BW3-1H BW3-1G BW3-1F BW3-1E BW3-1D BW3-1C BW2-4B BW2-4A BW2-1B BW2-1A BW2-11 BW2-10 BW1-22 BW1-21 BW1-20 BW1-1C BW1-1B BW1-19 BW1-18 BW1-17 BW1-14 BW1-13 BW1-12 BW1-10 BE1-16 ACS5-1 ACS4-2 ACS4-1 ACS3-8 ACS3-7 ACS3-6 ACS3-5 ACS3-4 ACS3-3 ACS3-2 ACS3-1 ACS2-6 ACS2-4 ACS2-2 ACS1-9 ACS1-8 ACS1-7 ACS1-6 ACS1-5 ACS1-4 ACS1-3 ACS1-2 ACS1-1 ACN3-6 ACN1-8 ACN1-7 ACN1-6 ACN1-5 ACN1-4 ACN1-3 ACN1-2 ACN1-1 ACN1-0 BW1-15 BW3-4B BE2-4A BW1-19A BW1-15C BW1-15B BW1-15A ACS3-10 ACN1-10 Out_G58 BW2-10A BW1-20A BW1-19B BW1-17A BW1-13A BW1-10A ACN1-4A BW1-15C BW1-15B BW1-15A BW1-19B BW1-10A BW1-20A BW1-17A BW1-13A OutBW5-1 OutBW3-4 OUTBW1-4 OutBE7-2 OutBE4-9 OutBE4-5 OutBE4-3 OutBE1-4 OutBE1-3 OutBE1-1 BW6-1-EX BW5-1-EX BW3-4-DW BW3-2-EX BW3-2-DW BW2-9-DW BW2-8-EX BW2-7-EX BW2-7-DW BW2-6-EX BW2-5-DW BW2-3-EX BW2-3-DW BW2-2-EX BW1-9-DW BW1-8-EX BW1-8-DW BW1-7-EX BW1-7-DW BW1-6-EX BW1-6-DW BW1-5-EX BW1-4-DW BW1-2-EX BE6-3-EX BE6-2-EX BE6-1-DW BE4-5-EX BE4-3-EX BE4-1-EX BE3-2-EX BE2-5-EX BE2-4-EX BE2-3-EX BE2-2-EX BE1-9-DW BE1-7-EX BE1-6-EX BE1-6-DW BE1-5-EX BE1-5-DW BE1-3-EX BE1-1-EX BE6-1-DW OutBE7-2 OutBE1-1 OutBE4-5 OutBE4-3 OutBW3-4 BW1-8-DW BW6-1-EX BW2-7-EX BW2-6-EX BW1-7-EX BW1-5-EX BE6-2-EX BE4-1-EX BE2-2-EX BE1-5-EX BE1-1-EX OutBW5-1D OutBE3-3B OUTACS5-1 OutACS1-8 OutACS1-7 OutACS1-6 OutACS1-3 OutACS1-2 OutACN1-0 Out3BE4-3 Out2BE4-3 BW3-3A-EX BW3-2A-DW BW3-1F-DW BW3-1E-EX BW3-1E-DW BW3-1D-DW BW3-1C-EX BW3-1C-DW BW3-1B-DW BW2-2-DW2 BW2-11-EX BW2-11-DW BW1-22-EX BW1-21-DW BW1-1C-EX BW1-1B-EX BW1-1A-EX BW1-19-DW BW1-18-DW BW1-17-EX BW1-16-EX BW1-14-EX BW1-13-EX BW1-12-EX BW1-11-EX BW1-10-DW BE1-14-DW BE1-11-DW BE1-10-DW ACS5-1-EX ACS4-1-DW ACS3-8-EX ACS3-6-EX ACS3-5-EX ACS3-4-EX ACS3-2-EX ACS2-4-EX ACS2-2-EX ACS2-1-EX ACS2-1-DW ACS1-9-DW ACS1-5-DW ACN3-6-EX ACN1-8-DW ACN1-7-EX ACN1-7-DW ACN1-6-DW ACN1-5-EX ACN1-4-EX ACN1-3-EX ACN1-2-EX ACN1-1-EX BW3-1B-DW BW3-2A-DW BW2-11-DW BE1-11-DW ACN1-7-DW Out3BE4-3 Out2BE4-3 OutACS1-3 OutACS1-7 OutACS1-8 OUTACS3-6 OutACS2-6 OutACS2-5 OutACN1-0 BW3-3A-EX BW3-1E-EX BW1-11-EX ACS3-5-EX ACS3-2-EX ACS2-4-EX ACS2-1-EX ACN1-3-EX ACN1-2-EX ACN1-1-EX OutBW1-15C OutBE3-3B2 Out3ACS1-6 Out2BW1-23 Out2ACS1-6 Out2ACN1-0 BW1-19B-DW BW1-19A-DW BW1-15A-EX BW1-15A-DW Out2BW1-23 OutBW1-15C BW1-15A-DW2 BW3-1G-OFOUT BW3-1G-OFOUT ACS3-5HU BE1-1HU BW3-1HHU ACS2-4HU BE4-3HU ACS1-7HU BW1-8HU BW3-3AHU BW3-3BHU ACN1-10HU BW3-2HU BW1-2HU ACN1-1HU ACS1-3HU ACN1-4HU ACN1-0HU BW6-1HU BW1-20HU ACS1-2HU BE4-5HU BW1-17HU BW3-4HU BW3-1GHU BE2-8HU BW3-1IHU ACN1-5HU ACN1-6HU BW1-4HU BW2-5HU ACS1-6HU BW3-1BHU BW2-6HU BW1-14HU BE4-1HU BW5-1HU ACN1-9HU ACN3-6HU BW2-11HU ACS2-1HU ACS3-2HU BW1-18HU ACS1-8HU ACS2-6HU BE3-2HU BE1-2HU BE7-4HU BW1-6HU BW2-7HU BW1-13HU BW1-15BHU BE3-3HU ACS2-5HU ACS3-6HU BE2-7HU ACS3-4HU ACN1-3HU BW1-16HU BE7-1HU ACS1-1HU BW3-1DHU ACS2-3HU BE2-1HU BW1-7HU BW3-1FHU ACN1-7HU BW1-1CHU BE4-7HU BE2-4HU BE4-6HU ACS3-9HU ACS3-8HU BE1-7HU ACS5-1HU ACS2-2HU BW1-3HU BW3-1EHU BE7-2HU BW1-15CHU ACN1-2HU BW1-11HU BW1-1BHU BW2-1AHU BE3-1HU ACS3-3HU BE4-8HU BW2-8HU BW4-1HU BE5-1HU BW2-1BHU BW2-4BHU BW2-4AHU ACS3-1HU BE4-2HU BE7-3HU BW2-4CHU ACS1-4HU BW1-5HU ACS2-7HU BE1-17HU BW1-9HU BW1-15AHU ACN1-8HU ACS4-1HU BW1-10HU BE2-5HU BW2-9HU BW1-22HU BE1-9HU BE1-3HU BE6-2HU BE6-1HU BE1-4HU ACS4-2HU BE4-9HU BW1-19AHU BW3-1CHU BW2-3HU BE2-2HU BW1-1AHU BE2-3HU ACS1-5HU BW1-19BHU BW2-2HU BE6-3HU BW2-10HU BE1-5HU BE1-6HU BE1-19HU BE1-16HU BW1-21HU BW1-12HU BE1-8HU BE1-18HU BE1-14HU BE1-10HU BE1-20HU ACS3-7HU BE7-5HU BE1-15HU BE1-13HU BE1-11HU BW3-1AHU BW1-23HU BE4-4HU BE1-12HU ACS1-9HU ACS3-10HU City of North Miami SWMM SchematicC:\\Projects\CNM\Report\Figure 2-1 SWMM Schematic.mxd Legend Hydrologic Unit SWMM NodeType! .JUNCTION# 0OUTFALL" /STORAGE SWMM LinkType PIPE OVERLAND PUMP WEIR Figure 3-1 0 2,500 5,000 1,250 Feet City of North Miami
PAGE 34
! ! ! ! ! .# 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0" / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ! ! ! ! .# 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0" / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Ruck Ruck RkEnd BW6-1 BW5-1 BW4-1 BW3-4 BW3-2 BW2-9 BW2-8 BW2-7 BW2-6 BW2-5 BW2-3 BW2-2 BW1-9 BW1-8 BW1-7 BW1-6 BW1-5 BW1-4 BW1-3 BW1-2 BE7-5 BE7-4 BE7-3 BE7-2 BE7-1 BE5-1 BE4-9 BE4-8 BE4-7 BE2-8 BE1-3 BE1-2 RkEnd BW6-1 BW5-1 BW4-1 BW3-4 BW3-2 BW2-9 BW2-8 BW2-7 BW2-6 BW2-5 BW2-3 BW2-2 BW1-9 BW1-8 BW1-7 BW1-6 BW1-5 BW1-4 BW1-3 BW1-2 BE7-5 BE7-4 BE7-3 BE7-2 BE7-1 BE5-1 BE4-9 BE4-8 BE4-7 BE2-8 BE1-3 BE1-2 JRuck2 JRuck1 BW3-3B BW3-3A BW3-1I BW3-1H BW3-1G BW3-1F BW3-1E BW3-1D BW3-1C BW3-1B BW3-1A BW2-4C BW2-4B BW2-4A BW2-1B BW2-1A BW2-11 BW2-10 BW1-23 BW1-22 BW1-21 BW1-20 BW1-1C BW1-1B BW1-1A BW1-19 BW1-18 BW1-17 BW1-16 BW1-14 BW1-13 BW1-12 BW1-11 BW1-10 BE1-11 BE1-10 OUTBW6 OutBE1 BW3-4B BW3-2A BW1-15 BW3-3B BW3-3A BW3-1I BW3-1H BW3-1G BW3-1F BW3-1E BW3-1D BW3-1C BW3-1A BW2-4C BW2-4B BW2-4A BW2-1B BW2-1A BW2-11 BW2-10 BW1-22 BW1-21 BW1-20 BW1-1C BW1-1B BW1-1A BW1-19 BW1-18 BW1-17 BW1-16 BW1-14 BW1-13 BW1-12 BW1-11 BW1-10 BE1-11 BE1-10 OutBE1 BW1-15 BW3-4B BW3-2A RkWWell BW1-19A BW1-15C BW1-15B BW1-15A BW2-10A BW1-20A BW1-19B BW1-17A BW1-13A BW1-10A BW1-19A BW1-15C BW1-15B BW1-15A BW1-10A BW2-10A BW1-20A BW1-17A BW1-13A OutBW5-1 OutBW3-4 OUTBW3-3 OutBE7-2 OutBE7-1 OutBE4-9 OutBE1-3 BW6-1-EX BW5-1-EX BW4-1-EX BW3-4-DW BW3-2-EX BW3-2-DW BW2-9-DW BW2-8-EX BW2-8-DW BW2-7-EX BW2-7-DW BW2-6-EX BW2-5-EX BW2-5-DW BW2-3-EX BW2-3-DW BW2-2-EX BW2-2-DW BW1-9-DW BW1-8-EX BW1-8-DW BW1-7-EX BW1-7-DW BW1-6-EX BW1-6-DW BW1-5-EX BW1-4-DW BW1-2-EX BE7-2-EX BE5-1-EX BE1-3-EX BE1-2-EX BW2-3-DW BW2-5-DW BW3-2-DW BW3-4-DW BW2-9-DW OutBE7-2 OutBW3-4 BW2-2-DW BW1-9-DW BW1-8-DW BW1-7-DW BW1-6-DW BW1-4-DW OutBE4-9 OutBE1-3 BW6-1-EX BW3-2-EX BW2-8-EX BW2-7-EX BW2-6-EX BW2-5-EX BW1-8-EX BW1-7-EX BW1-6-EX BW1-2-EX BE5-1-EX BE1-3-EX BE1-2-EX OutBW5-1D OutBW5-1C OUTBW2-11 OUTBW1-22 OutBW1-21 Out4BE7-1 Out3BE7-1 Out2BE7-4 Out2BE4-9 BW3-4B-DW BW3-3A-EX BW3-2A-DW BW3-1F-DW BW3-1E-EX BW3-1E-DW BW3-1D-DW BW3-1C-EX BW3-1C-DW BW3-1B-EX BW3-1B-DW BW3-1A-DW BW2-4B-EX BW2-4A-EX BW2-2-DW2 BW2-1B-DW BW2-11-EX BW2-11-DW BW1-22-EX BW1-21-DW BW1-1C-EX BW1-1B-EX BW1-1A-EX BW1-1A-DW BW1-19-DW BW1-18-DW BW1-17-EX BW1-16-EX BW1-14-EX BW1-14-DW BW1-13-EX BW1-12-EX BW1-12-DW BW1-11-EX BW1-10-EX BW1-10-DW BE1-11-DW BE1-10-DW BW3-1D-DW BW3-1E-DW BW3-1F-DW BW1-14-DW BW3-1C-DW BW3-1B-DW BW1-18-DW BW3-2A-DW BW3-4B-DW BW2-11-DW BW1-19-DW BW1-21-DW BE1-10-DW BE1-11-DW Out4BE7-1 BW1-16-EX BW1-10-DW OUTBW2-11 BW3-3A-EX BW3-1E-EX BW3-1C-EX BW2-4B-EX BW2-4A-EX BW1-22-EX BW1-1B-EX BW1-1A-EX BW1-17-EX BW1-14-EX BW1-13-EX BW1-12-EX BW1-11-EX OUTBW3-3A2 OutBW2-11B OutBW1-15C OutBE1-10B Out2BW1-23 BW2-10A-DW BW1-19B-DW BW1-19A-DW BW1-15A-EX BW1-15A-DW BW1-19B-DW Out2BW1-23 BW1-15A-DW OUTBW3-3A2 OutBW2-11B OutBW1-15C BW1-15A-DW2 BW1-15A-DW2 BW3-1G-OFOUT BW3-1G-OFOUT BW14 BW2-5B BW2-8 BW1-20-OF BW1-17-OF BE1-3 BW3-1G-OF3 BW3-1E BW2-6 BW2-9 BW1-17-OF2 BW3-1G BW3-1H-OF3 BW1-8 BE4-7 BW1-6 BW2-5-OF3 BE7-3-OF BW1-15A-OF4 BW3-1C BW1-18 BW2-5 BW3-1F BW3-1H-OF BW3-4-OF BW1-18-OF3 BW1-4-OF3 BW3-3A-OF3 BW3-3A-OF2 BW1-8-OF BW1-16 BW1-15A BW1-7A BE1-1-OF3 BE1-9A BW1-11 BE1-2-OF BW1-6-OF BW1-7 BW1-12-OF BW2-9-OF BW1-20A BW3-1E-OF3 BW1-11-OF4 BW2-4C2 BW1-3 BW3-2A2 BE4-7B BW3-1G-OF2 BE1-9 BW3-1D BE7-5-OF2 BE2-8 BW1-3-OF BW2-10-OF BE4-7-OF BW3-1C-OF BW3-1D-OF BW2-4A1 BW1-19-OF BE1-7 BW1-4-OF4 BW2-4B BW2-10A BW2-5-OF2 BW1-11-OF BW1-9-OF4 BW1-2 BW1-3-OF3 BW3-1H-OF2 BW1-10A-OF2 BE4-8B BW3-1D-OF2 BW2-3-OF BW2-1A-OF BW1-19B BW1-9-OF BW2-4B2 BW3-1E-OF BW1-16-OF BW1-11-OF2 BW3-4 BW2-2 BW3-1F-OF2 BE1-10 BW1-19A-OF BW2-5-OF7 BW1-1B-OF BW1-16-OF3 BE7-1-OF4 BW3-1E-OF2 BW1-1B-OF3 BW1-10A-OF3 BE1-6-OF4 BW1-5 BW1-9 BW1-18-OF BE7-5-OF BW1-22 BW2-3 BW2-1B BW3-1F-OF BE2-8-OF BE4-6-OF BW1-17 BW1-18-OF2 BE1-8-OF BE1-6-OF5 BE7-4B BW1-15A-OF3 BW1-16-OF2 BW3-1I BW2-8-OF BW3-2A BW1-10-OF Ruck1 BE1-6-OF3 BW1-1A-OF3 BW1-1C-OF2 BE1-11-OF3 BW3-1HHU BW1-15AHU BW1-8HU BW3-3AHU BW3-2HU BW1-2HU BW6-1HU BW1-20HU BW1-17HU BW3-4HU BW3-1GHU BW3-1IHU BW1-4HU BW2-5HU BW2-6HU BW1-14HU BW5-1HU BW2-11HU BW1-18HU BE7-4HU BW1-6HU BW2-7HU BW1-13HU BW1-15BHU BE2-8HU BW1-16HU BE7-1HU BW3-1DHU BW1-10HU BW1-7HU BW3-1FHU BW2-9HU BW1-22HU BW3-1BHU BW1-1CHU BE4-7HU BW3-3BHU BW1-3HU BW3-1EHU BW1-15CHU BW1-11HU BW1-1BHU BW2-1AHU BE4-8HU BW2-8HU BW4-1HU BE5-1HU BW1-19AHU BE4-9HU BW2-1BHU BW2-4BHU BW2-4AHU BW3-1CHU BE1-3HU BW2-3HU BE7-2HU BW1-19BHU BW2-2HU BE7-3HU BW2-4CHU BW2-10HU BW1-5HU BW1-21HU BW1-9HU BE7-5HU BE1-10HU BE4-6HU BW3-1AHU BE4-5HU BE1-1HU BE1-2HU BW1-1AHU BW1-12HU BW1-23HU BE1-11HU BE1-7HU City of North Miami SWMM Schematic West SectionC:\\Projects\COMB\Report\Figure 2-2 SWMM Schematic West.mxd Legend Hydrologic Unit SWMM NodeType! .JUNCTION# 0OUTFALL" /STORAGE SWMM LinkType PIPE OVERLAND PUMP Figure 3-2 0 1,500 3,000 750 Feet City of North Miami
PAGE 35
Major Ou all Major Ou all
PAGE 36
Section 3Stormwater Model Update 3 6 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Appendix G Figures 3 4 3 5 Figure 3 6 Table B1 Appendix B Figure 3 7 Table 3 1
PAGE 37
BW3-1HHU BW1-15AHU BW1-8HU BW3-3AHU BW3-2HU BW1-2HU BW6-1HU BW1-20HU BE4-3HU BE4-5HU BW3-4HU BW1-17HU BW3-3BHU BW3-1GHU BE2-8HU BW3-1IHU BW1-4HU BW2-5HU BW2-6HU BW1-14HU BW5-1HU ACN1-4HU BW2-11HU BE1-1HU BW3-1BHU BW1-18HU BE1-2HU BE7-4HU BW1-6HU BW2-7HU BW1-13HU BW1-15BHU BE2-7HU BW1-16HU BE7-1HU BW3-1DHU BW1-10HU BW1-7HU BE2-5HU BW3-1FHU BW2-9HU BW1-22HU BE1-9HU BE4-7HU BW1-1CHU BE4-6HU BE1-7HU BE1-3HU BW1-3HU BE7-2HU BW3-1EHU BW1-15CHU BW1-11HU BW1-1BHU BE3-1HU BE4-8HU BW2-1AHU BW2-8HU BE5-1HU BW4-1HU BE4-9HU BW1-19AHU BW2-1BHU BW2-4BHU BW2-4AHU BW3-1CHU BW2-3HU BW1-1AHU BW2-2HU BW1-19BHU BE7-3HU BW2-4CHU BW2-10HU BW1-5HU BE2-4HU BW1-21HU BW1-12HU BE1-10HU BW1-9HU BE4-1HU BE7-5HU BE2-3HU BW3-1AHU BE4-4HU BE1-6HU BE1-8HU BE1-11HU BW1-23HU BE2-2HU BE1-14HU BE1-5HU BE1-12HU BE3-2HU BE4-2HU I 95 EX NE 7TH AV NW 131ST ST NW 135TH ST NE 6TH AV NW 2ND AV NE 2ND AV NW 7TH AV N MIAMI AV NW 12TH AV NW 8TH AV NW 10TH AV NW 15TH AV NW 16TH AV NW 13TH AV NW 125TH ST NW 4TH AV NW 120TH ST NW 124TH ST NW 122ND ST NW 126TH ST NE 8TH AV NW 127TH ST NE 4TH AV NW 1ST AV NE 127TH ST NE 135TH ST NW NORTH MIAMI BD NE 125TH ST NE 139TH ST NW 128TH ST NE 141ST ST NE 131ST ST NE 140TH ST NE 142ND ST NW 132ND ST NE 137TH ST NW 1ST CT UNNAMED NW 129TH ST NW 130TH ST NE 3RD AV OPA LOCKA BD NE 3RD CT NW MIAMI CT NE 138TH ST NE MIAMI PL W DIXIE HY NW 6TH AV NW 5TH CT NW 6TH CT NE 136TH ST NE 124TH ST NE 123RD ST NE 122ND ST NW 11TH AV NE 126TH ST NE 121ST ST NE 1ST CT NW 121ST ST NW 123RD ST NW 134TH ST NW 132ND TE NW 133RD ST I 95 RAMP NE 130TH ST NE 132ND ST NE 134TH ST NE 5TH AV NE 119TH ST NW 4TH PL NW 17TH AV NW 5TH AV NE MIAMI CT NE 128TH ST NE 129TH ST NE 132ND TE NE 121ST TE NE 133RD ST NE 1ST AV NW 3RD AV NW 139TH ST NE 6TH CT NW 5TH PL NW 136TH ST NW 120TH TE NW 138TH ST NE 120TH ST NE 123RD TE NW 3RD CT NW 4TH CT NW 119TH ST GRATIGNY RD NW 140TH TE NW 139TH TE NW 142ND ST NE 118TH ST S BISCAYNE RIVER DR NE 127TH TE NW 130TH ST NE 129TH ST NW 121ST ST W DIXIE HY NW 1ST CT NW 127TH ST NW 128TH ST NW 122ND ST NE 120TH ST NE 123RD ST I 95 RAMP NW 128TH ST NE 133RD ST NE MIAMI CT NW 133RD ST NW 1ST CT NW 126TH ST NW 134TH ST NW 123RD ST NW 6TH AV NW 136TH ST NW 5TH PL NE MIAMI CT NW 132ND ST NE 119TH ST NW 130TH ST NW 6TH AV NW 121ST ST NE 131ST ST NW 121ST ST NE 128TH ST NW 134TH ST NW 122ND ST UNNAMED NW 129TH ST NE 130TH ST NW 134TH ST NW 129TH ST NE 3RD CT I 95 RAMP NW 5TH AV NW 120TH ST NW 123RD ST NE 8TH AV OPA LOCKA BD NW 136TH ST NE 1ST AV NW 124TH ST NE 125TH ST NE 4TH AV NW 130TH ST W DIXIE HY NE 121ST ST NE 124TH ST NE MIAMI CT NW 128TH ST NW 132ND ST NW 121ST ST UNNAMED NW 127TH ST City of North Miami Hydrologic Units West SectionC:\\Projects\COMB\Report\Figure 3-4 Subbasins West.mxd Legend Hydrologic Unit Figure 3-4 0 1,500 3,000 750 Feet City of North Miami
PAGE 38
ACS3-5HU BE1-1HU BE4-3HU ACS2-4HU ACS1-7HU BW1-15AHU BW3-3AHU BW3-3BHU ACN1-10HU BW3-2HU ACN1-1HU ACS1-3HU ACN1-4HU ACN1-0HU BW6-1HU BW1-20HU ACS1-2HU BE4-5HU BW1-17HU BW3-4HU BE2-8HU ACN1-5HU ACN1-6HU BW2-5HU ACS1-6HU BW3-1BHU BW2-6HU BE4-1HU BW5-1HU ACN1-9HU ACN3-6HU BW2-11HU ACS2-1HU ACS3-2HU BW1-18HU ACS1-8HU ACS2-6HU BE3-2HU BE1-2HU BE7-4HU BW2-7HU BE3-3HU ACS2-5HU ACN1-8HU ACS3-6HU BE2-7HU ACS3-4HU ACS4-1HU ACN1-3HU BW1-16HU BE7-1HU ACS1-1HU ACS2-3HU BE2-1HU BE2-5HU ACN1-7HU BW2-9HU BW1-22HU BE1-9HU BE4-7HU BE2-4HU BE4-6HU ACS3-9HU ACS3-8HU BE1-7HU ACS5-1HU ACS2-2HU BE1-3HU BE6-2HU BW1-14HU BE7-2HU BE6-1HU ACN1-2HU BE3-1HU ACS3-3HU BE4-8HU ACS4-2HU BW2-8HU BW4-1HU BE5-1HU BE4-9HU BW1-19AHU BW3-1CHU ACS3-1HU BE2-2HU BE4-2HU BE2-3HU ACS1-5HU BW1-19BHU BE6-3HU BE7-3HU BW2-4AHU ACS1-4HU BW1-13HU BW2-10HU ACS2-7HU BE1-17HU BE1-16HU BW1-21HU BW2-2HU BW2-3HU BE1-10HU ACS3-7HU BE7-5HU BE1-13HU BW3-1AHU BW1-15BHU BW3-1DHU BE4-4HU BE1-12HU ACS3-10HU BE1-4HU BE1-5HU BE1-6HU BE1-19HU BE1-8HU BE1-18HU BE1-14HU BE1-20HU BE1-15HU BE1-11HU BW1-23HU ACS1-9HU NE 135TH ST I 95 EX NE 10TH AV NE 12TH AV NE 6TH AV NE 143RD ST NE 142ND ST NE 141ST ST NE 139TH ST NE 131ST ST NE 127TH ST NE 125TH ST NW 2ND AV NE 2ND AV NW 7TH AV N MIAMI AV NE 13TH AV NE 123RD ST NE 8TH AV NW 8TH AV NE 16TH AV NW 4TH AV NE 4TH AV NE 145TH ST NW 125TH ST NW 131ST ST NW 135TH ST NW 1ST AV NE 144TH ST NE 126TH ST NE 119TH ST LAUREL LA KEYSTONE BD N BAYSHORE DR NE 151ST ST CANAL DR BISCAYNE BD NE 124TH ST NW 128TH ST NE 146TH ST NW NORTH MIAMI BD OPA LOCKA BD N US HIGHWAY 1 NE 17TH AV NW 1ST CT NE 138TH ST ALAMANDA DR SANS SOUCI BD NE 11TH PL NE 3RD CT NW MIAMI CT NE 11TH CT NE MIAMI PL IXORA RD NE 14TH AV W DIXIE HY NE 136TH ST NE 137TH ST NW 126TH ST NW 6TH AV NW 124TH ST NW 127TH ST NW 134TH ST NW 129TH ST NW 130TH ST NW 122ND ST NW 132ND ST ARCH CREEK DR NE 20TH AV NW 5TH CT SESAME ST BROAD CY NE 122ND RD NE 118TH RD NE 11TH AV NE 120TH RD NE 7TH CT EMERALD DR NE 7TH AV NE 122ND ST NE 19TH DR NE 132ND RD NE 1ST CT UNNAMED NE 149TH ST S HIBISCUS DR NW 121ST ST NW 120TH ST N HIBISCUS DR NE 121ST RD BAYVIEW LA NE 119TH RD NE 9TH CT NW 123RD ST I 95 RAMP NE 130TH ST NE 132ND ST NE 9TH AV NE 134TH ST NE 19TH AV NE 140TH ST NE 118TH ST NE 5TH AV NE 121ST ST NW 4TH PL NE 19TH CT NW 5TH AV NE 5TH CT NE 133RD RD NE 131ST RD NE 128TH ST NE 129TH ST NE 132ND TE NE 121ST TE NE 133RD ST NE 12TH CT PALM RD MAGNOLIA DR NW 3RD AV NE 20TH DR ORTEGA LA KEYSTONE TE NE 6TH CT NW 139TH ST NW 5TH PL NE 15TH AV NE 8TH CT NW 138TH ST NE 120TH ST BISCAYNE ISLA TE ARCH CREEK TE NW 3RD CT NE 21ST DR NE 131ST LA KEYSTONE ISLAND DR PINE RD CORONADO DR IXORA CT NE 18TH AV CYPRUS RD NE 116TH RD NW 139TH TE BANYAN RD HICKORY RD KEYSTONE RD AURALIA RD NW 142ND ST CHERRY RD IXORA CR S BISCAYNE RIVER DR NW 119TH ST UNNAMED NE 126TH ST N BAYSHORE DR NW 1ST CT NE 123RD ST NW 122ND ST NE 16TH AV NE 11TH AV UNNAMED NE 139TH ST NW 120TH ST NE 130TH ST BISCAYNE BD NE 151ST ST NE 134TH ST NE 137TH ST NE 132ND ST NW 5TH AV UNNAMED UNNAMED NE 138TH ST NE 17TH AV IXORA RD UNNAMED UNNAMED NE 136TH ST NE 124TH ST NE 124TH ST NE 119TH ST NE 122ND ST NE 9TH AV NE 7TH AV W DIXIE HY NE 140TH ST UNNAMED NE 14TH AV NE 9TH AV NE 127TH ST NE 118TH ST NE 126TH ST NE 123RD ST NE 121ST TE NE 128TH ST NE 124TH ST NW 121ST ST UNNAMED NE 122ND ST NE 140TH ST UNNAMED UNNAMED NE 120TH ST NE 131ST ST UNNAMED NE 11TH CT NE 144TH ST NE 124TH ST NE 121ST ST NW 6TH AV NE 119TH ST NE 149TH ST NW 126TH ST NE 8TH AV NE 4TH AV NE 146TH ST UNNAMED UNNAMED UNNAMED UNNAMED NW 123RD ST NE 128TH ST City of North Miami Hydrologic Units East SectionC:\\Projects\COMB\Report\Figure 3-5 Subbasins East.mxd Legend Hydrologic Unit Figure 3-5 0 2,000 4,000 1,000 Feet City of North Miami C-8 C-8
PAGE 39
ACS3-5HU BE1-1HU BW3-1HHU ACS2-4HU BE4-3HU ACS1-7HU BW1-15AHU BW1-8HU BW3-3AHU BW3-3BHU ACN1-10HU BW3-2HU BW1-2HU ACN1-1HU ACS1-3HU ACN1-4HU ACN1-0HU BW6-1HU BW1-20HU ACS1-2HU BE4-5HU BW1-17HU BW3-4HU BW3-1GHU BE2-8HU BW3-1IHU ACN1-5HU BW1-4HU BW2-5HU ACS1-6HU BW2-6HU BW1-14HU BE4-1HU BW5-1HU ACN1-9HU ACN3-6HU BW2-11HU ACS2-1HU ACS3-2HU BW1-18HU ACS1-8HU ACS2-6HU BE3-2HU BE1-2HU BE7-4HU BW1-6HU BW2-7HU BW1-13HU BW1-15BHU BE3-3HU ACS2-5HU ACN1-8HU ACS3-6HU BE2-7HU ACS3-4HU ACN1-3HU BW1-16HU ACS1-1HU BW3-1DHU ACS2-3HU BE2-1HU BW1-10HU BW1-7HU BE2-5HU BW3-1FHU BW2-9HU BW1-22HU BW1-1CHU BE2-4HU BE4-6HU ACS3-8HU BE1-7HU ACS5-1HU BE1-3HU BE6-2HU BW1-3HU BW3-1EHU BW1-15CHU ACN1-2HU BW1-1BHU ACS3-3HU BW4-1HU BE5-1HU BE4-9HU BW2-3HU BE4-2HU ACS1-5HU BW1-5HU ACN1-6HU BW3-1BHU ACS4-1HU BE7-1HU ACN1-7HU BE1-9HU BE4-7HU ACS3-9HU ACS2-2HU BE7-2HU BE6-1HU BE1-4HU BW1-11HU BW2-1AHU BE3-1HU BE4-8HU ACS4-2HU BW2-8HU BW1-19AHU BW2-1BHU BW2-4BHU BW2-4AHU BW3-1CHU ACS3-1HU BE2-2HU BW1-1AHU BE2-3HU BW1-19BHU BW2-2HU BE6-3HU BE7-3HU BW2-4CHU ACS1-4HU BW2-10HU BE1-5HU ACS2-7HU BE1-6HU BE1-19HU BE1-17HU BE1-16HU BW1-21HU BW1-12HU BE1-8HU BE1-18HU BE1-14HU BE1-10HU BW1-9HU BE1-20HU ACS3-7HU BE7-5HU BE1-15HU BE1-13HU BE1-11HU BW3-1AHU BW1-23HU BE4-4HU BE1-12HU ACS1-9HU ACS3-10HU NE 135TH ST I 95 EX NE 10TH AV NE 12TH AV NE 6TH AV NE 143RD ST NE 142ND ST NE 141ST ST NW 131ST ST NW 135TH ST NE 139TH ST NE 131ST ST NE 127TH ST NE 2ND AV NW 7TH AV N MIAMI AV NE 13TH AV NE 123RD ST NE 8TH AV NE 163RD ST NE 16TH AV NW 16TH AV NW 13TH AV NW 125TH ST NW 120TH ST NW 122ND ST NW 126TH ST NW 127TH ST NE 151ST ST NE 4TH AV NE 145TH ST SUNNY ISLES BD NW 1ST AV BAY VISTA BD NE 144TH ST NE 119TH ST LAUREL LA KEYSTONE BD N BAYSHORE DR CANAL DR NE 124TH ST NE NORTH MIAMI BD NE 146TH ST UNNAMED NW 132ND ST NE 138TH ST BROAD CY NW 129TH ST NW 130TH ST ALAMANDA DR SANS SOUCI BD OPA LOCKA BD NW MIAMI CT IXORA RD NE 14TH AV NW 6TH AV ARCH CREEK DR NE 20TH AV NW 5TH CT NE 122ND RD NE 118TH RD NE 120TH RD NE 7TH AV NE 122ND ST NE 19TH DR NE 149TH ST N HIBISCUS DR NE 121ST RD NE 119TH RD NW 123RD ST NW 134TH ST I 95 RAMP NE 130TH ST NE 132ND ST NE 9TH AV NE 140TH ST BISCAYNE BAY DR NE 118TH ST NE 5TH AV NE 121ST ST BISCAYNE BD NW 17TH AV NE 19TH CT NW 5TH AV NE 5TH CT NE 156TH ST NE 128TH ST NE 129TH ST NE 121ST TE PALM RD N US HIGHWAY 1 NW 139TH ST NE 21ST DR ARCH CREEK TE NE 22ND DR NW 119TH ST CORONADO DR N UNIVERSITY DR CYPRUS RD NE 152ND ST HICKORY RD UNNAMED UNNAMED NW 5TH AV NW 134TH ST UNNAMED UNNAMED NW 126TH ST NE 129TH ST NE 128TH ST NE 122ND ST NW 123RD ST SUNNY ISLES BD NW 134TH ST NW 122ND ST NE 151ST ST UNNAMED NE 123RD ST NE 131ST ST NE 118TH ST NE 151ST ST NE 151ST ST UNNAMED UNNAMED NE 119TH ST UNNAMED NW 130TH ST IXORA RD City of North Miami Hydrologic Units (Comparison)C:\\Projects\COMB\Report\Figure 3-6 Subbasins Compare.mxd Legend Hydrologic Unit (Current SWMP) 2000 SWMP Hydrologic Unit Figure 3-6 0 5,100 10,200 2,550 Feet City of North Miami C-8 C-8 I-95 I-95 Biscayne Bay
PAGE 40
ACS3-5HU BE1-1HU BE4-3HU BW3-1HHU ACS2-4HU ACS1-7HU BW1-8HU BW1-15AHU BW3-3AHU BW3-3BHU ACN1-10HU BW3-2HU BW1-2HU ACN1-1HU ACS1-3HU ACN1-4HU ACN1-0HU BW6-1HU BW1-20HU ACS1-2HU BE4-5HU BW3-4HU BW1-17HU BE2-8HU BW3-1GHU BW3-1IHU ACN1-5HU BW1-4HU BW2-5HU ACS1-6HU BW2-6HU BW1-14HU BE4-1HU BW5-1HU ACN1-9HU ACN3-6HU BW2-11HU ACS2-1HU ACS3-2HU BE3-2HU ACS1-8HU BW1-18HU ACS2-6HU BE1-2HU BE7-4HU BW1-6HU BW2-7HU BE3-3HU BE2-7HU BW1-13HU ACS2-5HU ACN1-8HU BW1-15BHU ACS3-6HU ACS3-4HU ACN1-3HU BW1-16HU BE2-1HU ACS1-1HU BW3-1DHU ACS2-3HU BW1-10HU BW1-7HU BE2-5HU BW3-1FHU BW2-9HU BW1-22HU BE2-4HU BE4-6HU BW1-1CHU ACS3-9HU ACS3-8HU BE1-7HU BE1-3HU ACS5-1HU BE6-2HU BW1-3HU BW3-1EHU ACN1-2HU BW1-15CHU BW1-1BHU BE3-1HU BE4-8HU BE5-1HU BW2-8HU BE4-9HU BW4-1HU ACS3-3HU BW2-3HU BE4-2HU BE2-3HU ACS1-5HU BW2-10HU BW1-5HU BE1-17HU BE1-16HU BW1-21HU BW1-9HU ACN1-6HU BW3-1BHU ACS4-1HU BE7-1HU ACN1-7HU BE1-9HU BE4-7HU ACS2-2HU BE7-2HU BE6-1HU BE1-4HU BW1-11HU BW2-1AHU ACS4-2HU BW1-19AHU BW2-1BHU BW2-4BHU BW2-4AHU BW3-1CHU ACS3-1HU BE2-2HU BW1-1AHU BW2-2HU BE6-3HU BW1-19BHU BE7-3HU BW2-4CHU ACS1-4HU BE1-5HU BE1-6HU ACS2-7HU BE1-19HU BE1-8HU BW1-12HU BE1-18HU BE1-14HU BE1-10HU BE1-20HU ACS3-7HU BE7-5HU BE1-15HU BE1-13HU BE1-11HU BW3-1AHU BW1-23HU BE4-4HU BE1-12HU ACS1-9HU ACS3-10HU City of North Miami Land UseC:\\Projects\CNM\Report\Figure 3-7 Land Use.mxd Legend Hydrologic Unit Land UseType 1 Forest, Open & Park 4 Low Density Residential 5 Medium Density Residential 6 High Density Residential 7 Light Industrial, Commercial & Industrial 10 Watercourses & Waterbodies Figure 3-7 0 2,500 5,000 1,250 Feet City of North Miami
PAGE 41
Section 3Stormwater Model Update 3 11 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table 3 1 Hydrologic Parameters by Land Use Parameter/ Land Use Category Open /Park Golf Course Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential/ Single Family High Density Residential Low Rise Light Industrial/ Commercial Heavy Industrial Wet lands Water Bodies % Impervious 5.0 5.0 15.0 35.0 82.0 90.0 90.0 100.0 100.0 % DCIA 1.0 1.0 7.5 23.0 65.0 81.0 81.0 100.0 100.0 Impervious Mannings n 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.300 0.024 Pervious Mannings n 0.40 0.300 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.25 N/A N/A Impervious Initial Abstraction (inches) 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.50 0.10 Pervious Initial Abstraction (inches) 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 N/A N/A % Impervious 5.0 5.0 15.0 35.0 82.0 90.0 90.0 100.0 100.0 Figure 3 8 Table B2 Appendix B
PAGE 42
ACS3-5HU BE1-1HU BE4-3HU BW3-1HHU ACS2-4HU ACS1-7HU BW1-8HU BW1-15AHU BW3-3AHU BW3-3BHU ACN1-10HU BW3-2HU BW1-2HU ACN1-1HU ACS1-3HU ACN1-4HU ACN1-0HU BW6-1HU BW1-20HU ACS1-2HU BE4-5HU BW3-4HU BW1-17HU BE2-8HU BW3-1GHU BW3-1IHU ACN1-5HU BW1-4HU BW2-5HU ACS1-6HU BW3-1BHU BW2-6HU BW1-14HU BE4-1HU BW5-1HU ACN1-9HU ACN3-6HU BW2-11HU ACS2-1HU ACS3-2HU BE3-2HU ACS1-8HU BW1-18HU ACS2-6HU BE1-2HU BE7-4HU BW1-6HU BW2-7HU BE3-3HU BE2-7HU BW1-13HU ACS2-5HU ACN1-8HU BW1-15BHU ACS3-6HU ACS3-4HU ACN1-3HU BW1-16HU BE2-1HU ACS1-1HU BW3-1DHU ACS2-3HU BW1-10HU BW1-7HU BE2-5HU BW3-1FHU BW2-9HU BE1-9HU BE4-7HU BW1-22HU BE2-4HU BE4-6HU BW1-1CHU ACS3-9HU ACS3-8HU BE1-7HU BE1-3HU ACS5-1HU ACS2-2HU BE6-2HU BW1-3HU BW3-1EHU BE6-1HU ACN1-2HU BW1-15CHU BW1-11HU BW1-1BHU BE3-1HU BE4-8HU BE5-1HU BW2-8HU BE4-9HU BW4-1HU ACS3-3HU BW1-19AHU BW2-3HU ACS3-1HU BE4-2HU BE2-3HU BW2-2HU ACS1-5HU BE6-3HU BW1-19BHU BE7-3HU ACS1-4HU BW2-10HU BW1-5HU ACS2-7HU BE1-17HU BE1-16HU BW1-21HU BW1-12HU BE1-10HU BW1-9HU ACS3-7HU BE1-13HU BE1-12HU ACN1-6HU ACS4-1HU BE7-1HU ACN1-7HU BE7-2HU BE1-4HU BW2-1AHU ACS4-2HU BW2-1BHU BW2-4BHU BW2-4AHU BW3-1CHU BE2-2HU BW1-1AHU BW2-4CHU BE1-5HU BE1-6HU BE1-19HU BE1-8HU BE1-18HU BE1-14HU BE1-20HU BE7-5HU BE1-15HU BE1-11HU BW3-1AHU BW1-23HU BE4-4HU ACS1-9HU ACS3-10HU City of North Miami Soil ClassificationC:\\Projects\COMB\Report\Figure 3-8 Soils.mxd Legend Hydrologic Unit Soil ClassifcationHydrologic Group A (>12 ft-NAVD) B (10-12 ft-NAVD) C (8-10 ft-NAVD) D (<8 ft-NAVD) Figure 3-8 0 2,500 5,000 1,250 Feet City of North Miami
PAGE 43
Section 3Stormwater Model Update 3 13 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table 3 2 Table 3 2 Global Soil Parameters Soil Type Max Infiltration Rate (in/hr) Min Infiltration Rate (in/hr) Decay Rate (1/sec x 10 4) Dry Time (days) Soil Storage (in) A 12.0 1.00 5.56 1.0 6.75 B 9.0 0.50 5.56 1.0 5.0 C 6.0 0.25 5.56 1.0 3.8 D 4.0 0.10 5.56 1.0 1.4 3.2.3. Hydraulic Model Updates
PAGE 44
Section 3Stormwater Model Update 3 14 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Tables B3 B5 Appendix B
PAGE 45
Section 3Stormwater Model Update 3 15 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table B6 Appendix B Figure C 1 Appendix C Table 3 3 Appendix B Table 3 3 FEMA Stillwater Elevations at Location Transect No. 8 Stillwater Elevations (ft NAVD) 10 Year 50 Year 100 Year 500 Year 5.5 6.0 6.3 7.2 Source: FEMA Flood Insurance Study September 2009
PAGE 46
Section 3Stormwater Model Update 3 16 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 3.2.4. Model Validation Figure 3 9 Figure 3 10 Table D 1 Appendix D 3.3. Design Storm Simulations Table 3 4 Figures E 1 E 5 Appendix E
PAGE 47
S29 S27 S29Z S28Z City of North Miami SFWMD Rain Gauge Locations, Precip Totals Validation Storm October 3, 2000 C:\\Projects\CNM\Report\Figure 3-9 Validation Storm Rain Gauges.mxd Legend Rain Gauge Hydrologic Unit Figure 3-9 0 2 4 1 Miles City of North Miami (12.1") (11.5") (15.1") no data I-95 I-95 Biscayne Bay Atlantic Ocean C-8 C-8 Palmetto Expwy Biscayne Blvd Biscayne Blvd NE 163rd ST
PAGE 48
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ACS3-5HU BE1-1HU BW3-1HHU ACS2-4HU BE4-3HU ACS1-7HU BW1-15AHU BW1-8HU BW3-3AHU BW3-3BHU ACN1-10HU BW3-2HU BW1-2HU ACN1-1HU ACS1-3HU ACN1-4HU ACN1-0HU BW6-1HU BW1-20HU ACS1-2HU BE4-5HU BW3-4HU BW1-17HU BW3-1GHU BE2-8HU BW3-1IHU ACN1-5HU ACN1-6HU BW1-4HU BW2-5HU ACS1-6HU BW3-1BHU BW2-6HU BW1-14HU BE4-1HU BW5-1HU ACN1-9HU ACN3-6HU BW2-11HU ACS2-1HU ACS3-2HU BW1-18HU ACS1-8HU ACS2-6HU BE3-2HU BE1-2HU BE7-4HU BW1-6HU BW2-7HU BW1-13HU BW1-15BHU BE3-3HU ACS2-5HU ACN1-8HU BE2-7HU ACS3-6HU ACS3-4HU ACS4-1HU ACN1-3HU BW1-16HU BE7-1HU ACS1-1HU BW3-1DHU BE2-1HU ACS2-3HU BW1-10HU BW1-7HU BE2-5HU BW3-1FHU BW2-9HU BW1-22HU BE4-7HU BW1-1CHU BE2-4HU BE4-6HU ACS3-9HU ACS3-8HU BE1-7HU ACS5-1HU ACS2-2HU BE1-3HU BE6-2HU BW1-3HU BW3-1EHU BE7-2HU BW1-15CHU BE6-1HU ACN1-2HU BW1-11HU BW1-1BHU BE3-1HU BW2-1AHU BE4-8HU ACS3-3HU ACS4-2HU BW2-8HU BE5-1HU BW4-1HU BE4-9HU BW1-19AHU BW2-4BHU BW2-4AHU BW3-1CHU ACS3-1HU BW2-3HU BE2-2HU BE4-2HU BW1-1AHU BE2-3HU ACS1-5HU BW1-19BHU BW2-2HU BE6-3HU BE7-3HU ACS1-4HU BW2-10HU BW1-5HU ACS2-7HU BE1-17HU BE1-16HU BW1-21HU BW1-12HU BE1-10HU BW1-9HU ACS3-7HU BE1-13HU ACN1-7HU BE1-9HU BE1-4HU BW2-1BHU BW2-4CHU BE1-5HU BE1-6HU BE1-19HU BE1-8HU BE1-18HU BE1-14HU BE1-20HU BE7-5HU BE1-15HU BE1-11HU BW3-1AHU BW1-23HU BE4-4HU BE1-12HU ACS1-9HU ACS3-10HU I 95 EX NE 135TH ST NE 10TH AV NE 12TH AV NE 6TH AV NE 143RD ST NE 142ND ST NE 141ST ST NW 131ST ST NW 135TH ST NE 139TH ST NE 131ST ST NE NORTH MIAMI BD NE 125TH ST NW 2ND AV NE 2ND AV NW 7TH AV N MIAMI AV NE 13TH AV NE 8TH AV NW 12TH AV NW 8TH AV NE 16TH AV NW 10TH AV NW 15TH AV NW 16TH AV NW 13TH AV NW 125TH ST NW 4TH AV NW 120TH ST NW 124TH ST NW 122ND ST NW 126TH ST NW 127TH ST NE 4TH AV NE 145TH ST NW 1ST AV NE 144TH ST NE 126TH ST NE 127TH ST NE 119TH ST NW NORTH MIAMI BD BISCAYNE BD CANAL DR NW 128TH ST NE 146TH ST NW 132ND ST N US HIGHWAY 1 NE 17TH AV NW 1ST CT NE 138TH ST NW 129TH ST NW 130TH ST SANS SOUCI BD NE 11TH PL OPA LOCKA BD NE 3RD CT LAUREL LA NW MIAMI CT NE 11TH CT NE MIAMI PL IXORA RD NE 14TH AV W DIXIE HY NE 136TH ST NE 137TH ST NE 124TH ST NE 151ST ST NW 6TH AV NE 20TH AV NW 5TH CT KEYSTONE BD SESAME ST NE 118TH RD NE 11TH AV GRIFFING BD NE 7TH CT N BAYSHORE DR EMERALD DR NE 123RD ST ARCH CREEK RD NE 20TH LA NE 7TH AV NE 122ND ST NE 16TH CT NE 19TH DR ALAMANDA DR NE 132ND RD NE 121ST ST NE 1ST CT UNNAMED NE 137TH TE NE 149TH ST NW 121ST ST NE 13TH PL NE 9TH CT NW 123RD ST NW 134TH ST NW 133RD ST I 95 RAMP TRESSLER ST NE 130TH ST NE 132ND ST NE 9TH AV NE 134TH ST NE 140TH ST NE 118TH ST NE 5TH AV NE 119TH RD N HIBISCUS DR S HIBISCUS DR NE 120TH RD NW 17TH AV NE 19TH CT NW 5TH AV NE 5TH CT NE 131ST RD NE MIAMI CT NE 128TH TE NE 128TH ST NE 129TH ST NE 132ND TE NE 121ST TE NE 133RD ST NE 12TH CT NW 3RD AV NE 20TH DR NW 139TH ST NE 6TH CT NW 5TH PL NW 136TH ST NW 138TH ST NE 120TH ST NW 119TH ST NE 2ND CT IXORA LA GRATIGNY RD CORONADO DR NE 120TH TE NE 18TH AV NE 6TH PL NE 147TH ST NE 116TH RD BANYAN RD NE 152ND ST NE 15TH CT AURALIA RD NE 117TH RD NE 135TH TE S BISCAYNE RIVER DR NW 134TH ST NE 122ND ST NE 134TH ST NW 126TH ST NE 131ST ST NE 122ND ST NW 5TH AV N US HIGHWAY 1 NE 140TH ST NE 124TH ST UNNAMED W DIXIE HY NE 125TH ST NE 123RD ST UNNAMED NW 136TH ST ARCH CREEK RD NW 130TH ST NW 128TH ST NE 8TH AV NE 119TH ST NE 118TH ST NE 124TH ST NE 120TH ST NW 123RD ST NW 124TH ST UNNAMED NE 11TH AV UNNAMED NE 119TH ST NE 130TH ST NW 134TH ST OPA LOCKA BD NW 130TH ST UNNAMED NE 9TH AV NW 130TH ST NE 139TH ST W DIXIE HY UNNAMED I 95 RAMP UNNAMED NE 133RD ST NE 140TH ST NE 11TH CT NE 128TH ST NE 146TH ST NW 122ND ST UNNAMED NE 127TH ST UNNAMED NW 126TH ST NE 122ND ST NW 6TH AV NW 120TH ST NE 7TH AV NE 137TH ST NW MIAMI CT UNNAMED NE 149TH ST NE 122ND ST NE 18TH AV NE 144TH ST NW 132ND ST NW 128TH ST NE 128TH ST NE 128TH ST NE 4TH AV NE 7TH CT NW 134TH ST NW 6TH AV NW 122ND ST NW 132ND ST NE 14TH AV NW 132ND ST NW 123RD ST NW 127TH ST NE 130TH ST City of North Miami Model Validation Locations October 3, 2000 Storm EventC:\\Projects\CNM\Report\Figure 3-10 Validation Storm Oct 3 2000.mxd Legend^ _Validation_Photo Hydrologic Unit Oct 3 2000 FEMA Map Flooding Figure 3-10 0 2,500 5,000 1,250 Feet City of North Miami
PAGE 49
Section 3Stormwater Model Update 3 19 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table 3 3 Rainfall Depths for Design Storm Simulations Design Storm Event Rainfall Volume (in) 2 year, 24 hour 4.2 5 year, 24 hour 5.9 10 year, 72 hour 9.9 25 year, 72 hour 11.0 100 year, 72 hour 14.0 3.3.1. Level of Service (LOS) Table 3 5 Table 3 4 PERA LOS Definition Type of Infrastructure Design Storm Event LOS Criteria Biscayne Canal (Primary) 100 Year Top of Bank Miami Dade County Canals (Secondary) 25 Year Top of Bank Residential, commercial and public structures 100 Year 15 feet from front step Principal Arterial (Evacuation Routes) 100 Year Impassable at 8 inches above top of crown Minor Arterial (4 lane roads in high traffic areas) 10 Year To outer edges of traffic lanes Collector Roads (2 lane roads on residential and commercial areas) 5 Year (except 10 year for a bridge or culvert in the canal system) To crown of street Local roads (residential roads) 5 Year To crown of street or within 15 feet of occupied structure, whichever is lower Biscayne Canal (Primary) 100 Year Top of Bank Miami Dade County Canals (Secondary) 25 Year Top of Bank Residential, commercial and public structures 100 Year 15 feet from front step
PAGE 50
Section 3Stormwater Model Update 3 20 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Type of Infrastructure Design Storm Event LOS Criteria Principal Arterial (Evacuation Routes) 100 Year Impassable at 8 inches above top of crown Minor Arterial (4 lane roads in high traffic areas) 10 Year To outer edges of traffic lanes Collector Roads (2 lane roads on residential and commercial areas) 5 Year (except 10 year for a bridge or culvert in the canal system) To crown of street Local roads (residential roads) 5 Year To crown of street or within 15 feet of occupied structure, whichever is lower Source: City of North Miami Phase II Stormwater Master Plan (Atkins, 2000) 3.3.2. Design Storm Event Modeling Results Figures 3 11 3 14 Tables F 1 F 2 Appendix F Figure 3 15
PAGE 51
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ACS3-5HU BE1-1HU BE4-3HU BW3-1HHU ACS2-4HU ACS1-7HU BW1-8HU BW1-15AHU BW3-3AHU BW3-3BHU ACN1-10HU BW3-2HU BW1-2HU ACN1-1HU ACS1-3HU ACN1-4HU ACN1-0HU BW6-1HU BW1-20HU ACS1-2HU BE4-5HU BW3-4HU BW1-17HU BE2-8HU BW3-1GHU BW3-1IHU ACN1-5HU BW1-4HU ACN1-6HU BW2-5HU ACS1-6HU BW3-1BHU BW2-6HU BW1-14HU BE4-1HU BW5-1HU ACN1-9HU ACN3-6HU BW2-11HU ACS2-1HU ACS3-2HU BE3-2HU ACS1-8HU BW1-18HU ACS2-6HU BE1-2HU BE7-4HU BW1-6HU BW2-7HU BE3-3HU BE2-7HU BW1-13HU ACS2-5HU ACN1-8HU BW1-15BHU ACS3-6HU ACS3-4HU ACS4-1HU ACN1-3HU BE7-1HU BW1-16HU BE2-1HU ACS1-1HU BW3-1DHU ACS2-3HU BW1-10HU BW1-7HU BE2-5HU BW3-1FHU BW2-9HU BE1-9HU BE4-7HU BW1-22HU BE2-4HU BW1-1CHU ACS3-9HU ACS3-8HU BE1-7HU BE1-3HU ACS5-1HU ACS2-2HU BW1-3HU BW3-1EHU BE6-1HU ACN1-2HU BW1-15CHU BW1-11HU BW1-1BHU BE3-1HU BE4-8HU BE5-1HU BW2-8HU BE4-9HU BW4-1HU ACS3-3HU BW1-19AHU BW3-1CHU BW2-3HU BE2-2HU BE4-2HU BE2-3HU BW1-1AHU BW2-2HU ACS1-5HU BE6-3HU BW1-19BHU ACS1-4HU BW2-10HU BW1-5HU ACS2-7HU BE1-17HU BE1-16HU BW1-21HU BW1-12HU BE1-10HU BW1-9HU ACS3-7HU BE1-13HU BE4-4HU ACN1-7HU BE4-6HU BE6-2HU BE7-2HU BE1-4HU BW2-1AHU ACS4-2HU BW2-1BHU BW2-4BHU BW2-4AHU ACS3-1HU BE7-3HU BW2-4CHU BE1-5HU BE1-6HU BE1-19HU BE1-8HU BE1-18HU BE1-14HU BE1-20HU BE7-5HU BE1-15HU BE1-11HU BW3-1AHU BW1-23HU BE1-12HU ACS1-9HU ACS3-10HU I 95 EX NE 135TH ST NE 10TH AV NE 12TH AV NE 6TH AV NE 143RD ST NE 142ND ST NE 141ST ST NW 131ST ST NW 135TH ST NE 139TH ST NE 131ST ST NE 127TH ST NE 125TH ST NW 2ND AV NE 2ND AV NW 7TH AV N MIAMI AV NE 13TH AV NE 8TH AV NW 12TH AV NW 8TH AV NE 16TH AV NW 10TH AV NW 15TH AV NW 16TH AV NW 13TH AV NW 125TH ST NW 4TH AV NW 120TH ST NW 124TH ST NW 122ND ST NW 126TH ST NW 127TH ST NE 4TH AV NE 145TH ST NW 1ST AV NE 144TH ST NE 126TH ST NE 119TH ST NW NORTH MIAMI BD BISCAYNE BD NW 128TH ST NE 146TH ST NW 132ND ST N US HIGHWAY 1 NE 17TH AV NW 1ST CT NE 138TH ST NW 129TH ST NW 130TH ST NE 11TH PL NE 3RD AV CANAL DR OPA LOCKA BD NE 3RD CT NW MIAMI CT NE 11TH CT NE MIAMI PL IXORA RD NE 14TH AV W DIXIE HY NE 136TH ST NE 137TH ST NW 6TH AV SANS SOUCI BD NE 20TH AV NW 5TH CT NW 6TH CT SESAME ST NE 151ST ST NE 11TH AV GRIFFING BD LAUREL LA NE 7TH CT N BAYSHORE DR EMERALD DR NE 123RD ST ARCH CREEK RD NE 20TH LA NE 7TH AV NE 122ND ST NE 16TH CT NE 19TH DR NE 132ND RD NE 121ST ST NE 124TH ST NE 1ST CT UNNAMED NE 150TH ST NE 149TH ST NW 121ST ST NE 13TH PL NW 128TH TE NE 9TH CT NW 123RD ST NATURAL BRIDGE RD NW 134TH ST KEYSTONE BD NW 133RD ST I 95 RAMP TRESSLER ST NE 130TH ST NE 132ND ST NE 9TH AV NE 134TH ST NE 140TH ST NE 118TH ST NE 5TH AV NE 118TH RD NW 17TH AV NE 19TH CT NW 5TH AV NE 5TH CT ALAMANDA DR NE MIAMI CT NE 128TH TE NE 128TH ST NE 129TH ST NE 132ND TE NE 123RD TE NE 121ST TE NE 133RD ST NW 3RD AV NE 20TH DR NE 5TH PL NE 6TH CT NW 139TH ST NW 5TH PL NW 136TH ST NW 138TH ST NE 120TH ST NW 119TH ST NE 131ST LA NE 2ND CT IXORA LA GRATIGNY RD NE 120TH TE NE 18TH AV VENICE LA NE 124TH TE NE 147TH ST NE 116TH RD NE 152ND ST AURALIA RD NW 142ND ST NE 117TH RD NE 122ND TE S BISCAYNE RIVER DR NE 153RD ST NE 9TH AV UNNAMED NE 140TH ST LAUREL LA NW 134TH ST NW 130TH ST NE 8TH AV NE 131ST ST UNNAMED UNNAMED NW 1ST AV NE 3RD CT NW 120TH ST NE 122ND ST UNNAMED NW 136TH ST NW 129TH ST NE 119TH ST UNNAMED NW 128TH ST NE 122ND ST NW 134TH ST NW 6TH AV UNNAMED NE 120TH ST UNNAMED NW 122ND ST NW 123RD ST UNNAMED NW 126TH ST UNNAMED NW 130TH ST NW 130TH ST UNNAMED NE 130TH ST NW 134TH ST NE 120TH ST NE 123RD ST NW 6TH AV NE 122ND ST NE 139TH ST NW 132ND ST NE 119TH ST NE 130TH ST UNNAMED NE 134TH ST W DIXIE HY NW 132ND ST NE 4TH AV NE 124TH ST NW 122ND ST NE 16TH AV NW 124TH ST UNNAMED NE 138TH ST UNNAMED UNNAMED NE 128TH ST NE 118TH ST OPA LOCKA BD NW 5TH AV NE 146TH ST NE 128TH ST NE 128TH ST NE 137TH ST NW 127TH ST NE 7TH AV NW 123RD ST NW 124TH ST UNNAMED NW 128TH ST NW MIAMI CT NW 126TH ST I 95 RAMP City of North Miami LOS Results for 2-Year Design Storm Event Simulation Local and Arterial StreetsC:\\Projects\CNM\Report\Figure 3-11 2yrLOS.mxd Legend^ _Location Does Not Meet 2yr LOS Hydrologic Unit Figure 3-11 0 2,500 5,000 1,250 Feet City of North Miami
PAGE 52
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ACS3-5HU BE1-1HU BE4-3HU BW3-1HHU ACS2-4HU ACS1-7HU BW1-8HU BW1-15AHU BW3-3AHU BW3-3BHU ACN1-10HU BW3-2HU BW1-2HU ACN1-1HU ACS1-3HU ACN1-4HU ACN1-0HU BW6-1HU BW1-20HU ACS1-2HU BE4-5HU BW3-4HU BW1-17HU BE2-8HU BW3-1GHU BW3-1IHU ACN1-5HU BW1-4HU ACN1-6HU BW2-5HU ACS1-6HU BW3-1BHU BW2-6HU BW1-14HU BE4-1HU BW5-1HU ACN1-9HU ACN3-6HU BW2-11HU ACS2-1HU ACS3-2HU BE3-2HU ACS1-8HU BW1-18HU ACS2-6HU BE1-2HU BE7-4HU BW1-6HU BW2-7HU BE3-3HU BE2-7HU BW1-13HU ACS2-5HU ACN1-8HU BW1-15BHU ACS3-6HU ACS3-4HU ACS4-1HU ACN1-3HU BE7-1HU BW1-16HU BE2-1HU ACS1-1HU BW3-1DHU ACS2-3HU BW1-10HU BW1-7HU BE2-5HU BW3-1FHU BW2-9HU BE1-9HU BE4-7HU BW1-22HU BE2-4HU BW1-1CHU ACS3-9HU ACS3-8HU BE1-7HU BE1-3HU ACS5-1HU ACS2-2HU BW1-3HU BW3-1EHU BE6-1HU ACN1-2HU BW1-15CHU BW1-11HU BW1-1BHU BE3-1HU BE4-8HU BE5-1HU BE4-9HU BW4-1HU ACS3-3HU BW1-19AHU BW3-1CHU BW2-3HU ACS3-1HU BE2-2HU BE4-2HU BE2-3HU BW1-1AHU BW2-2HU ACS1-5HU BE6-3HU BW1-19BHU ACS1-4HU BW2-10HU BW1-5HU ACS2-7HU BE1-17HU BE1-16HU BW1-21HU BW1-12HU BE1-10HU BW1-9HU ACS3-7HU BE1-13HU ACN1-7HU BE4-6HU BE6-2HU BE7-2HU BE1-4HU BW2-8HU BW2-1AHU ACS4-2HU BW2-1BHU BW2-4BHU BW2-4AHU BE7-3HU BW2-4CHU BE1-5HU BE1-6HU BE1-19HU BE1-8HU BE1-18HU BE1-14HU BE1-20HU BE7-5HU BE1-15HU BE1-11HU BW3-1AHU BW1-23HU BE4-4HU BE1-12HU ACS1-9HU ACS3-10HU I 95 EX NE 135TH ST NE 10TH AV NE 12TH AV NE 6TH AV NE 143RD ST NE 142ND ST NE 141ST ST NW 131ST ST NW 135TH ST NE 139TH ST NE 131ST ST NE 127TH ST NE 125TH ST NW 2ND AV NE 2ND AV NW 7TH AV N MIAMI AV NE 13TH AV NE 8TH AV NW 12TH AV NW 8TH AV NE 16TH AV NW 10TH AV NW 15TH AV NW 16TH AV NW 13TH AV NW 125TH ST NW 4TH AV NW 120TH ST NW 124TH ST NW 122ND ST NW 126TH ST NW 127TH ST NE 4TH AV NE 145TH ST NW 1ST AV NE 144TH ST NE 126TH ST NE 119TH ST NW NORTH MIAMI BD BISCAYNE BD NW 128TH ST NE 146TH ST NW 132ND ST N US HIGHWAY 1 NE 17TH AV NW 1ST CT NE 138TH ST NW 129TH ST NW 130TH ST NE 11TH PL CANAL DR OPA LOCKA BD NE 3RD CT NW MIAMI CT NE 11TH CT NE MIAMI PL IXORA RD NE 14TH AV W DIXIE HY NE 136TH ST NE 137TH ST NW 6TH AV SANS SOUCI BD NE 20TH AV NW 5TH CT NW 6TH CT SESAME ST NE 151ST ST NE 11TH AV GRIFFING BD LAUREL LA NE 7TH CT N BAYSHORE DR EMERALD DR NE 123RD ST ARCH CREEK RD NE 20TH LA NE 7TH AV NE 122ND ST NE 16TH CT NE 19TH DR NE 132ND RD NE 121ST ST NE 124TH ST NE 1ST CT UNNAMED NE 150TH ST NE 149TH ST NW 121ST ST NE 13TH PL NE 9TH CT NW 123RD ST NATURAL BRIDGE RD NW 134TH ST KEYSTONE BD NW 133RD ST I 95 RAMP TRESSLER ST NE 130TH ST NE 132ND ST NE 9TH AV NE 134TH ST NE 140TH ST NE 118TH ST NE 5TH AV NE 118TH RD NW 17TH AV NE 19TH CT NW 5TH AV NE 5TH CT NE 133RD RD ALAMANDA DR NE MIAMI CT NE 128TH TE NE 128TH ST NE 129TH ST NE 132ND TE NE 121ST TE NE 133RD ST NW 3RD AV NE 20TH DR NE 5TH PL NE 6TH CT NW 139TH ST NW 5TH PL NW 136TH ST NW 138TH ST NE 120TH ST NW 119TH ST NE 131ST LA NE 2ND CT IXORA LA GRATIGNY RD NE 120TH TE NE 18TH AV VENICE LA NE 124TH TE NE 147TH ST NE 116TH RD NE 152ND ST AURALIA RD NW 142ND ST NE 117TH RD NE 122ND TE S BISCAYNE RIVER DR NE 153RD ST NW 129TH ST UNNAMED NW 122ND ST NW 136TH ST NE 131ST ST NW 130TH ST NE 137TH ST W DIXIE HY NE 8TH AV NE 130TH ST W DIXIE HY NE 128TH ST NW 120TH ST UNNAMED NW 130TH ST NW 128TH ST NW MIAMI CT NE 124TH ST NE 122ND ST NE 122ND ST NE 7TH AV NW 123RD ST NE 119TH ST NW 6TH AV NW 1ST AV UNNAMED NE 128TH ST NE 120TH ST UNNAMED NE 4TH AV NE 130TH ST NW 130TH ST NE 14TH AV UNNAMED NE 124TH ST NW 123RD ST NE 120TH ST UNNAMED NE 3RD CT NW 126TH ST UNNAMED I 95 RAMP UNNAMED NW 134TH ST NE 138TH ST NW 132ND ST NE 139TH ST UNNAMED UNNAMED NE 9TH AV UNNAMED NW 122ND ST NE 16TH AV NE 122ND ST NW 6TH AV NW 124TH ST UNNAMED UNNAMED NE 128TH ST NE 140TH ST OPA LOCKA BD NW 5TH AV NE 146TH ST NE 128TH ST NW 127TH ST NE 123RD ST NE 118TH ST NW 124TH ST W DIXIE HY UNNAMED NW 126TH ST NW 134TH ST City of North Miami LOS Results for 5-Year Design Storm Event Simulation Local and Arterial StreetsC:\\Projects\CNM\Report\Figure 3-12 5yrLOS.mxd Legend^ _Location Does Not Meet 5yr LOS CNM 2000 SWMP Basin Priority Ranking Hydrologic Unit Figure 3-12 0 2,500 5,000 1,250 Feet City of North Miami
PAGE 53
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ACS3-5HU BE1-1HU BE4-3HU BW3-1HHU ACS2-4HU ACS1-7HU BW1-8HU BW1-15AHU BW3-3AHU BW3-3BHU ACN1-10HU BW3-2HU BW1-2HU ACN1-1HU ACS1-3HU ACN1-4HU ACN1-0HU BW6-1HU BW1-20HU ACS1-2HU BE4-5HU BW3-4HU BW1-17HU BE2-8HU BW3-1GHU BW3-1IHU ACN1-5HU BW1-4HU ACN1-6HU BW2-5HU ACS1-6HU BW3-1BHU BW2-6HU BW1-14HU BE4-1HU BW5-1HU ACN1-9HU ACN3-6HU BW2-11HU ACS2-1HU ACS3-2HU BE3-2HU ACS1-8HU BW1-18HU ACS2-6HU BE1-2HU BE7-4HU BW1-6HU BW2-7HU BE3-3HU BE2-7HU BW1-13HU ACS2-5HU ACN1-8HU BW1-15BHU ACS3-6HU ACS3-4HU ACS4-1HU ACN1-3HU BE7-1HU BW1-16HU BE2-1HU ACS1-1HU BW3-1DHU ACS2-3HU BW1-10HU BW1-7HU BE2-5HU BW3-1FHU BW2-9HU BE1-9HU BE4-7HU BW1-22HU BE2-4HU BE4-6HU BW1-1CHU ACS3-9HU ACS3-8HU BE1-7HU BE1-3HU ACS5-1HU ACS2-2HU BE6-2HU BW1-3HU BW3-1EHU BE6-1HU ACN1-2HU BW1-15CHU BW1-11HU BW1-1BHU BE3-1HU BE4-8HU BE5-1HU BW2-8HU BE4-9HU BW4-1HU ACS3-3HU ACS4-2HU BW1-19AHU BW3-1CHU BW2-3HU BE2-2HU BE4-2HU BE2-3HU BW2-2HU ACS1-5HU BE6-3HU BW1-19BHU BE7-3HU ACS1-4HU BW2-10HU BW1-5HU ACS2-7HU BE1-17HU BE1-16HU BW1-21HU BW1-12HU BE1-10HU BW1-9HU ACS3-7HU BE1-13HU BE4-4HU BE1-12HU ACN1-7HU BE7-2HU BE1-4HU BW2-1AHU BW2-1BHU BW2-4BHU BW2-4AHU ACS3-1HU BW1-1AHU BW2-4CHU BE1-5HU BE1-6HU BE1-19HU BE1-8HU BE1-18HU BE1-14HU BE1-20HU BE7-5HU BE1-15HU BE1-11HU BW3-1AHU BW1-23HU ACS1-9HU ACS3-10HU I 95 EX NE 135TH ST NE 10TH AV NE 12TH AV NE 6TH AV NE 143RD ST NE 142ND ST NE 141ST ST NW 131ST ST NW 135TH ST NE 139TH ST NE 131ST ST NE 127TH ST NE 125TH ST NW 2ND AV NE 2ND AV NW 7TH AV N MIAMI AV NE 13TH AV NE 8TH AV NW 12TH AV NW 8TH AV NE 16TH AV NW 10TH AV NW 15TH AV NW 16TH AV NW 13TH AV NW 125TH ST NW 4TH AV NW 120TH ST NW 124TH ST NW 122ND ST NW 126TH ST NW 127TH ST NE 4TH AV NE 145TH ST NW 1ST AV NE 144TH ST NE 126TH ST NE 119TH ST NW NORTH MIAMI BD BISCAYNE BD PIONEER BD NW 128TH ST NE 146TH ST NW 132ND ST NE 17TH AV NW 1ST CT NE 138TH ST NW 129TH ST NW 130TH ST NE 11TH PL NE 3RD AV CANAL DR OPA LOCKA BD NE 3RD CT NW MIAMI CT NE 11TH CT NE MIAMI PL IXORA RD NE 14TH AV W DIXIE HY NE 136TH ST NE 137TH ST NW 6TH AV SANS SOUCI BD NE 20TH AV NW 5TH CT NW 6TH CT SESAME ST NE 151ST ST NE 11TH AV GRIFFING BD LAUREL LA NE 7TH CT N BAYSHORE DR EMERALD DR NE 123RD ST ARCH CREEK RD NE 20TH LA NE 7TH AV NE 122ND ST NE 16TH CT NE 19TH DR NE 132ND RD NE 121ST ST NE 124TH ST NE 1ST CT UNNAMED NE 137TH TE NE 149TH ST NW 121ST ST NE 13TH PL NE 9TH CT NW 123RD ST NATURAL BRIDGE RD NW 134TH ST KEYSTONE BD NW 133RD ST I 95 RAMP TRESSLER ST NE 130TH ST NE 132ND ST NE 9TH AV NE 134TH ST NE 140TH ST NE 118TH ST NE 5TH AV NE 118TH RD NW 17TH AV NE 19TH CT NW 5TH AV NE 5TH CT NE 133RD RD ALAMANDA DR NE 131ST RD NE MIAMI CT NE 128TH TE NE 128TH ST NE 129TH ST NE 132ND TE NE 123RD TE NE 133RD ST NW 3RD AV NE 20TH DR NE 5TH PL NE 6TH CT NW 139TH ST NW 5TH PL NW 136TH ST NW 138TH ST NE 120TH ST NW 119TH ST NE 131ST LA NE 2ND CT IXORA LA GRATIGNY RD NE 120TH TE NE 18TH AV VENICE LA NE 124TH TE NE 147TH ST NE 116TH RD NE 152ND ST NE 15TH CT AURALIA RD NW 142ND ST NE 117TH RD NE 122ND TE S BISCAYNE RIVER DR NE 153RD ST NE 124TH ST UNNAMED NW 1ST AV NE 119TH ST NW 120TH ST NE 118TH ST NE 120TH ST NE 128TH ST NW 132ND ST UNNAMED NE 122ND ST NW 130TH ST NE 134TH ST NE 149TH ST NW 123RD ST NE 123RD ST NE 131ST ST NW 136TH ST NE 138TH ST UNNAMED NW 130TH ST NW 122ND ST NW 134TH ST NE 126TH ST NW 6TH AV NE 144TH ST NW 132ND ST NW 129TH ST ARCH CREEK RD NW 126TH ST NE 4TH AV NE 5TH AV NE 7TH AV W DIXIE HY NE 8TH AV UNNAMED NE 130TH ST NW 134TH ST NE 120TH ST NE 9TH AV NE 122ND ST NE 139TH ST NE 127TH ST NE 119TH ST UNNAMED I 95 RAMP NW 132ND ST UNNAMED NW 128TH ST NE 140TH ST UNNAMED NE 133RD ST W DIXIE HY UNNAMED NW 5TH AV NW 122ND ST UNNAMED NE 137TH ST NW 129TH ST NE 16TH AV NW 124TH ST NE 124TH ST UNNAMED OPA LOCKA BD NE 133RD ST NE 146TH ST NE 128TH ST NW 6TH AV NW 127TH ST NE 122ND ST NW 134TH ST NW 124TH ST UNNAMED NE 124TH ST NW 128TH ST NW MIAMI CT NW 123RD ST NW 126TH ST NE 130TH ST City of North Miami LOS Results for 10-Year Design Storm Event Simulation Arterial Streets OnlyC:\\Projects\CNM\Report\Figure 3-13 10yrLOS.mxd Legend^ _Location Does Not Meet 10yr LOS Hydrologic Unit Figure 3-13 0 2,500 5,000 1,250 Feet City of North Miami
PAGE 54
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ACS3-5HU BE1-1HU BE4-3HU BW3-1HHU ACS2-4HU ACS1-7HU BW1-8HU BW1-15AHU BW3-3AHU BW3-3BHU ACN1-10HU BW3-2HU BW1-2HU ACN1-1HU ACS1-3HU ACN1-4HU ACN1-0HU BW6-1HU BW1-20HU ACS1-2HU BE4-5HU BW3-4HU BW1-17HU BE2-8HU BW3-1GHU BW3-1IHU ACN1-5HU BW1-4HU ACN1-6HU BW2-5HU ACS1-6HU BW3-1BHU BW2-6HU BW1-14HU BE4-1HU BW5-1HU ACN1-9HU ACN3-6HU BW2-11HU ACS2-1HU ACS3-2HU BE3-2HU ACS1-8HU BW1-18HU ACS2-6HU BE1-2HU BE7-4HU BW1-6HU BW2-7HU BE3-3HU BE2-7HU BW1-13HU ACS2-5HU ACN1-8HU BW1-15BHU ACS3-6HU ACS3-4HU ACS4-1HU ACN1-3HU BE7-1HU BW1-16HU BE2-1HU ACS1-1HU BW3-1DHU ACS2-3HU BW1-10HU BW1-7HU BE2-5HU BW3-1FHU BW2-9HU BE1-9HU BE4-7HU BW1-22HU BE2-4HU BE4-6HU BW1-1CHU ACS3-9HU ACS3-8HU BE1-3HU ACS5-1HU ACS2-2HU BE6-2HU BW1-3HU BW3-1EHU BE6-1HU ACN1-2HU BW1-15CHU BW1-11HU BW1-1BHU BE3-1HU BE4-8HU BE5-1HU BW2-8HU BE4-9HU BW4-1HU ACS3-3HU ACS4-2HU BW1-19AHU BW3-1CHU BW2-3HU ACS3-1HU BE2-2HU BE4-2HU BE2-3HU BW1-1AHU BW2-2HU ACS1-5HU BE6-3HU BW1-19BHU BE7-3HU ACS1-4HU BW2-10HU BW1-5HU ACS2-7HU BE1-17HU BE1-16HU BW1-21HU BW1-12HU BE1-10HU BW1-9HU ACS3-7HU BE1-13HU BE1-12HU ACN1-7HU BE1-7HU BE7-2HU BE1-4HU BW2-1AHU BW2-1BHU BW2-4BHU BW2-4AHU BW2-4CHU BE1-5HU BE1-6HU BE1-19HU BE1-8HU BE1-18HU BE1-14HU BE1-20HU BE7-5HU BE1-15HU BE1-11HU BW3-1AHU BW1-23HU BE4-4HU ACS1-9HU ACS3-10HU I 95 EX NE 135TH ST NE 10TH AV NE 12TH AV NE 6TH AV NE 143RD ST NE 142ND ST NE 141ST ST NW 131ST ST NW 135TH ST NE 139TH ST NE 131ST ST NE 127TH ST NE 125TH ST NW 2ND AV NE 2ND AV NW 7TH AV N MIAMI AV NE 13TH AV NE 8TH AV NW 12TH AV NW 8TH AV NE 16TH AV NW 10TH AV NW 15TH AV NW 16TH AV NW 13TH AV NW 125TH ST NW 4TH AV NW 120TH ST NW 124TH ST NW 122ND ST NW 126TH ST NW 127TH ST NE 4TH AV NE 145TH ST NW 1ST AV NE 144TH ST NE 126TH ST NE 119TH ST NW NORTH MIAMI BD BISCAYNE BD NW 128TH ST NE 146TH ST NW 132ND ST NE 17TH AV NW 1ST CT NE 138TH ST NW 129TH ST NW 130TH ST NE 11TH PL NE 3RD AV CANAL DR OPA LOCKA BD NE 3RD CT NW MIAMI CT NE 11TH CT NE MIAMI PL IXORA RD NE 14TH AV W DIXIE HY NE 136TH ST NE 137TH ST NW 6TH AV SANS SOUCI BD NE 20TH AV NW 5TH CT NW 6TH CT SESAME ST NE 151ST ST NE 11TH AV GRIFFING BD LAUREL LA NE 7TH CT N BAYSHORE DR EMERALD DR NE 123RD ST ARCH CREEK RD NE 20TH LA NE 7TH AV NE 122ND ST NE 16TH CT NE 19TH DR NE 132ND RD NE 121ST ST NE 124TH ST NE 1ST CT UNNAMED NE 137TH TE NE 149TH ST NW 121ST ST NE 13TH PL NE 9TH CT NW 123RD ST NATURAL BRIDGE RD NW 134TH ST KEYSTONE BD NW 133RD ST I 95 RAMP TRESSLER ST NE 130TH ST NE 132ND ST NE 9TH AV NE 134TH ST NE 140TH ST NE 118TH ST NE 5TH AV NE 118TH RD NW 17TH AV NE 19TH CT NW 5TH AV NE 5TH CT NE 133RD RD ALAMANDA DR NE 131ST RD NE MIAMI CT NE 128TH TE NE 128TH ST NE 129TH ST NE 132ND TE NE 123RD TE NE 121ST TE NE 133RD ST NW 3RD AV NE 20TH DR NE 5TH PL NE 6TH CT NW 139TH ST NW 5TH PL NW 136TH ST NW 138TH ST NE 120TH ST NW 119TH ST NE 131ST LA NE 2ND CT IXORA LA GRATIGNY RD NE 120TH TE NE 18TH AV VENICE LA NE 124TH TE NE 147TH ST NE 116TH RD NW 139TH TE NE 152ND ST NE 15TH CT AURALIA RD NW 142ND ST NE 117TH RD NE 122ND TE S BISCAYNE RIVER DR NE 153RD ST NE 120TH ST NW 136TH ST NW 134TH ST NE 124TH ST NE 138TH ST W DIXIE HY NE 131ST ST NE 7TH AV NW 134TH ST NE 119TH ST NW 120TH ST NE 127TH ST NW 124TH ST NW 128TH ST UNNAMED NE 9TH AV NW 132ND ST NE 124TH ST NE 144TH ST UNNAMED LAUREL LA NW 130TH ST UNNAMED NW 1ST AV NE 16TH AV NE 137TH ST NE 140TH ST UNNAMED NW 132ND ST NW 129TH ST UNNAMED NW 126TH ST NE 4TH AV NE 126TH ST NW 122ND ST NE 8TH AV NE 122ND ST UNNAMED NE 130TH ST NW 134TH ST NE 120TH ST NW 130TH ST NW 5TH PL NE 123RD ST NW 130TH ST UNNAMED NE 139TH ST NW 6TH AV UNNAMED NW 132ND ST NE 119TH ST NE 122ND ST NE 130TH ST UNNAMED NE 3RD CT NE 134TH ST NE 14TH AV UNNAMED NW 5TH AV NW 122ND ST NW 129TH ST NW 123RD ST NE 122ND ST NW 6TH AV UNNAMED NE 124TH ST UNNAMED UNNAMED NE 118TH ST OPA LOCKA BD NE 133RD ST NE 146TH ST NE 128TH ST NE 128TH ST NW 127TH ST ARCH CREEK RD NW 123RD ST W DIXIE HY UNNAMED NW 128TH ST NW MIAMI CT NE 149TH ST NW 126TH ST I 95 RAMP City of North Miami LOS Results for 100-Year Design Storm Event Simulation Emergency Routes OnlyC:\\Projects\CNM\Report\Figure 3-14 100yrLOS.mxd Legend^ _Location Does Not Meet 100yr LOS Hydrologic Unit Figure 3-14 0 2,500 5,000 1,250 Feet City of North Miami
PAGE 55
Biscayne Canal West Problem Area Biscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 Arch Creek South/Biscayne Canal East Problem Area Arch Creek South Problem Area Arch Creek North/ Arch Creek South Problem Area Biscayne Canal East Problem Area 2 BW1-9 B E6-1 BE4-9 BE2-2 BE2-1 BW1-1A ACS3-1 ACS2-2 ACS2-1 ACS1-7 ACS1-2 ACN1-8 ACN1-6 ACN1-5 BW1-10A ACN1-4A BW2-5 BE6-3 BE2-3 BE1-7 BE1-6 BE1-4 BW3-1D BW3-1C BW3-1B BW3-1A BE1-18 BE1-17 BE1-16 BE1-15 BE1-13 BE1-12 BE1-10 BE2-4A BW3-2A BW1-15A BW2-8 BW2-3 BW2-2 BW1-6 BW1-5 BW1-2 BE7-4 BE7-3 BE7-1 BE6-2 BE4-8 BE4-6 BE4-5 BE4-4 BE4-3 BE4-2 BE4-1 BE3-3 BE3-2 BE2-8 BE2-7 BE2-5 BE2-4 BW2-4C BW2-4B BW2-4A BW2-1B BW2-1A BW1-20 BW1-1B BW1-17 BW1-12 BW1-11 ACS5-1 ACS4-2 ACS3-9 ACS3-8 ACS3-6 ACS3-4 ACS3-3 ACS3-2 ACS2-4 ACS2-3 ACS1-6 ACS1-4 ACS1-3 ACS1-1 ACN3-6 ACN1-3 ACN1-2 ACN1-1 ACN1-0 BW3-4B G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig3-15_Modeled Problem Areas.mxd perneznybj 03/27/12 01,7503,500 875 Feet Figure 3-15 City of North Miami M odeled Problem Areas Problem Areas City-Confirmed, Alternatives Evaluated Improvement Already Designed, Under Construction, or Complete City Reports No Flooding System Not Maintained By City, Not Evaluated Flooding Due to Tidal Boundary Condition Unconfirmed Modeled Problem Area, Alternatives Evaluated Model Node Fails 100 Yr LOS Model Node Fails 10 Yr LOS Model Node Fails 5-Yr LOS Model Subbasins City Limits
PAGE 56
Section 3Stormwater Model Update 3 26 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Appendix F Figure 3 16 Table G 1 Appendix G Table G2
PAGE 57
19AVEHU 117RDHU ALMNDAHU NBAYSHRHU LAURELAHU HIBISCUSHU BAYVIEWHU 18DRVHU E135STHU W135STHU MAGNOLIAHU IXORAHU 119RDHU BISCAYNEBAYHU 121RDHU CORONADOHU SANSOUHU KEYSTONEDRHU NE 135TH ST NE 123RD ST LAUREL LA KEYSTONE BD N BAYSHORE DR CANAL DR BISCAYNE BD NE NORTH MIAMI BD NE 124TH ST N US HIGHWAY 1 NE 17TH AV BROAD CY ALAMANDA DR SANS SOUCI BD IXORA RD ARCH CREEK DR NE 122ND RD NE 118TH RD NE 120TH RD EMERALD DR UNNAMED ARCH CREEK RD NE 19TH DR NE 122ND ST N HIBISCUS DR NE 121ST RD NE 127TH ST NE 119TH RD NATURAL BRIDGE RD NE 126TH ST NE 137TH TE TRESSLER ST NE 125TH ST NE 121ST ST MOE FELD LA NE 123RD TE PALM RD NE 16TH AV NE 20TH DR ORTEGA LA NE 130TH ST ARCH CREEK TE NE 22ND DR CORONADO TE NE 120TH ST CORONADO LA PINE RD CORONADO DR MAPLE RD VENICE LA CYPRUS RD BANYAN RD HICKORY RD VENICE PARK DR CHERRY RD NE 117TH RD NE 124TH LA IXORA CR OLEANDER RD HIBISCUS CR LAUREL LA UNNAMED UNNAMED UNNAMED NE 117TH RD NE 16TH AV LAUREL LA UNNAMED UNNAMED N BAYSHORE DR NE 122ND ST UNNAMED UNNAMED UNNAMED NE 17TH AV C:\\Projects\CNM\Report\Figure 3-16 Rational Method.mxd 0 2,500 5,000 1,250 FeetCity of North Miami Rational Method Hydrologic Units for San Souci & Keystone Legend Hydrologic Unit City of North MiamiFigure 3-16 Biscayne Bay
PAGE 58
4 1 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Section 4Water Quality and Regulatory Review 4.1. Best Management Practices (BMP) Inventory Appendix H Figure 4 1 Figure 4 2 Figure 4 1 Exfiltration Trench Example
PAGE 59
Section 4Water Quality and Regulatory Review 4 2 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 4.1.1. BMP Performance Figure 4 3 Table 4 1 Figure 4 2 Example Recharge Well Inventory
PAGE 60
Section 4Water Quality and Regulatory Review 4 3 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table 4 1 Pollutant Removal Efficiencies for Exfiltration and Recharge Well BMPs Parameter % Removal Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) 75 Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 75 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 85 Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 80 Total Phosphorus (TP) 55 Dissolved Phosphorus (DP) 55 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) 50 Nitrite plus Nitrate Nitrogen (NO2N + NO3N) 50 Lead (Pb) 80 Copper (Cu) 80 Zinc (Zn) 80 Cadmium (Cd) 80 1 Sources: Beaufort County BMP Manual, CDMs Water Quality Matrix, and the SFWMD BMP Manual, which references the work of Schueler (Controlling Urban Runoff, 1987). 4.2. Water Quality Data Evaluation Figure 4 4 Figure 4 3 Average Annual Volume Capture
PAGE 61
$ + $ + $ + $ + $ + $ + $ +BIscayne BayAtlantic Ocean BB06 BB04 AC06 AC03 AC02 AC01 BB05A X:\85438_83809_N.Miami_MP\GIS 02,5005,000 1,250 FeetCity of North Miami Figure 3-4 DERM Water Quality Monitoring Stations Legend$ +Water Quality Monitoring Site City Limits Aerial Source: Bing Web Services aerial photography CityofNorthMiami PERAWaterQualitySamplingStationsFigure4-4
PAGE 62
Section 4Water Quality and Regulatory Review 4 5 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table 4 2A Table 4 2B 4.2.1. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) 4.2.2. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD5) 4.2.3. Nitrate and Nitrite Nitrogen (NO2N + NO3N) 4.2.4. Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) 4.2.5. Total Phosphorus (TP)
PAGE 63
Table 42ACity ofNorth MiamiStormwaterMasterPlanUpdate WaterQuality TrendAnalysis (CurrentConditions)RsPTrendAvgMedianRsPTrendAvgMedianRsPTrendAvgMedianRsPTrendAvgMedianRsPTrendAvgMedianRsPTrendAvgMedianRsPTrendAvgMedian Biochemical Oxygen Demand Chemical Oxygen Demand 0.5710.1500---120.291240.6140.0001increasing6629 Nitrate and Nitrite -0.0670.438---0.060.060.1960.020increasing0.070.07-0.1510.0725---0.11580.0850.1700.0431increasing0.040.03-0.0340.685---0.030.02-0.1010.233---0.030.02 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 0.2250.337 ---0.210.16 0.1610.5730 ---0.981.015-0.5150.0002decreasing1.41.3 Total Phosphorus 0.1640.054 ---0.010.010.1270.137 ---0.010.01-0.5520.0000decreasing0.090.074-0.3230.0020decreasing0.130.12-0.1260.144 ---0.010.010.1610.063 ---0.010.010.1510.079 ---0.0060.004 Total Dissolved Solids 0.0360.9050 ---14290147540.5270.0007increasing4821780 Total Suspended Solids 0.5710.150 ---9896 0.0710.8430 ---48500.6030.0001increasing23120.1790.660 ---81820.60.242 ---83660.0360.905 ---9386 Lead Zinc -0.0730.6480 ---7.95.3-0.3850.0272decreasing9.55.0 Copper CadmiumNotes: 1.Trendanalysis is basedon SpearmanRankCorrelation nonparametrictest. 2.TheCorrelation RankCoefficient (Rsvalue)indicates whether thetrendis increasing (positive value)ordecreasing(negativevalue)with time. 3.Probability valuePoflessthan orequal to0.05wasconsidered statistically significant. 4.Formoststations and parameters, no statistically significant trendwasidentified.Parameter BDL BDL Station5.BDL denotesmajorityofdatawasbelow detectionlimits and atrendanalysis could not beperformed.BDL BDL BDL BB05A AC06 BB06 ACO1ACO2ACO3 BDL BDL BB04 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
PAGE 64
Table 42BCity ofNorth MiamiWaterQuality TrendAnalysis (PreviousPermit Cycle)ParameterAvgMedianAvgMedianAvgMedianAvgMedianAvgMedianAvgMedianAvgMedian Biochemical Oxygen Demand Chemical Oxygen Demand 29292322 Nitrate and Nitrite 0.070.060.070.070.14230.0900.030.020.030.020.030.02 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 0.030.03 1.001.001.91.9 Total Phosphorus 0.010.010.010.010.110.1090.180.180.010.010.010.010.0070.004 Total Dissolved Solids 690529 Total Suspended Solids 126 Lead Zinc 8.05.412.510.3 Copper CadmiumNotes: 1.Datais forYear2000 2005monitored dataBDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Parameter Station ACO1ACO2 ACO3 AC06 BB04BB05A BB06
PAGE 65
Section 4Water Quality and Regulatory Review 4 8 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 4.2.6. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 4.2.7. Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 4.2.8. Lead (Pb) 4.2.9. Zinc (Zn) 4.2.10. Copper (Cu) 4.2.11. Cadmium (Cd) 4.3. Impaired Waters Summary Figure 4 5 Table 4 3
PAGE 66
$ + $ + $ + $ + $ + $ + $ + BIscayne BayAtlantic Ocean WBID 3226M1, Lower Arch Creek Basin Impaired for Mercury (in fish tissue) WBID 3226L, Upper Oleta River Basin (outside of City Limits) Impaired for Mercury (in fish tissue), and Fecal Coliform BB06 BB04 AC06 AC03 AC02 AC01 BB05A X:\85438_83809_N.Miami_MP\GIS 02,5005,000 1,250 FeetCity of North Miami Figure 3-5 Impaired WBIDs Legend Impaired WBID Basin Area$ +Water Quality Monitoring Site City Limits Aerial Source: Bing Web Services aerial photography Figure4-5 CityofNorthMiami ImpairedWaters
PAGE 67
Section 4Water Quality and Regulatory Review 4 10 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table 4 3 Verified List of Impairments WBID Water Segment Name Water Body Type Parameters Assessed Using the Impaired Surface Waters Rule (IWR) Concentration of Criterion or Threshold Not Met Current Integrated Category Final Assessment Priority for TMDL Development Comments 3226L Oleta River (Upper Segment) Estuary Fecal Coliform 400 Counts / 100 mL 5 Low Impaired based on number of exceedances. This will be added to the 303(d) list. 3226L Oleta River (Upper Segment) Estuary Mercury (in fish tissue) Exceeds DoH Threshold (< 0.3 ppm) 5 High* Verified impairment based on DOH marine fish consumption advisory data from 2004 3226M1 Arch Creek (Lower Segment) Estuary Mercury (in fish tissue) Exceeds DoH Threshold (< 0.3 ppm) 5 High* Verified impairment based on DOH marine fish consumption advisory data from 2004. Water quality standards are not attained anda TMDLis required. 4.4. Regulatory Framework
PAGE 68
Section 4Water Quality and Regulatory Review 4 11 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 4.4.1. FDEP TMDL Program 4.4.2. US EPA Numeric Nutrient Rule
PAGE 69
Section 4Water Quality and Regulatory Review 4 12 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 4.4.3. State of Florida Numeric Nutrient Criteria Development Table 4 4 Table 4 4 Draft Numeric Standards for Biscayne Bay Estuary Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen Chlorophyll a Biscayne Bay Northern North Bay 0.012 mg/L 0.30 mg/L 1.7 g/L Standard is defined as annual geometric meansthat shall not be exceededmore than once in a three year period.
PAGE 70
Section 4Water Quality and Regulatory Review 4 13 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 4.4.4. SFWMD and FDEP Unified Statewide Stormwater Rule Draft Environmental Resource Permit Stormwater Quality Applicants Handbook, Design Requirements for Stormwater Treatment Systems in Florida 4.4.5. US EPA NPDES MS4 Revisions 4.4.6. State NPDES MS4 Revisions
PAGE 71
Section 4Water Quality and Regulatory Review 4 14 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Appendix M
PAGE 72
Section 4Water Quality and Regulatory Review 4 15 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved
PAGE 73
5 1 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5.1. Alternative Analysis Overview 5.1.1. Biscayne Canal West Problem Area Figure 5 1 Figure 5 2
PAGE 76
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 4 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 5.1.1.1. Alternative 1 Table 5 1 Appendix I Table I 1 Table 5 1 Biscayne Canal West Problem Area Model Results Deficient Node Existing Stage (5 yr/24 hr) Critical Stage Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Stage Meets LOS? Stage Meets LOS? BW1 1B 10.2 10.1 10.1 Yes 10.1 Yes 5.1.1.2. Alternative 2 Appendix I Table I 2 5.1.2. Biscayne Canal East Problem Area 1
PAGE 77
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 5 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 5.1.2.1. Tier 1 Figures 5 3 5 4 (Table 5 2) Appendix I Table I 3.Table 5 2 Biscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 Model Results Deficient Node Existing Stage (5 yr/24 hr) Critical Stage Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Stage Meets LOS? Stage Meets LOS? Stage Meets LOS? BE1 1 3.2 2.33.1 No 1.9 Yes 1.9 Yes BE1 2 3.0 2.42.9 No 1.9 Yes 1.9 Yes BE2 8 6.5 5.25.5 No 5.1 Yes 5.1 Yes BE7 1 2.9 2.72.9 No 2.8 No 2.6 Yes BE7 3 3.7 2.53.7 No 3.5 No 2.4 Yes BE7 4 3.1 3.03.1 No 3.0 Yes 3.0 Yes 5.1.2.2. Tier 2 Figures 5 5 5 6
PAGE 78
BE7-1 BE1-2 BE1-1 G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig5-3_G_Tier1North.mxd perneznybj 02/13/12 0 400 800 200 Feet Figure 5-3 B iscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 (North) Tier 1 Alternatives Exfiltration Only City of North Miami S tormwater Master Plan Existing Pump Station Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Existing Exfiltration Trenches Existing Stormwater Pipes Model Nodes Not Meeting Existing LOS City Limits Tier 1 Replace 1,220 LF of collection system with equivalent length of 18" exfiltration trench Tier 1 Install 3,000 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in 139th St right-of-way and under Ruck Park Tier 1 Install 300 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in right-of-way along 141st St Existing 80 cfs Ruck Park Pump Station
PAGE 79
BE7-4 BE7-3 BE2-8 G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig5-4_G_Tier1South.mxd perneznybj 02/13/12 0 400 800 200 Feet Figure 5-4 B iscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 (South) Tier 1 Alternatives Exfiltration Only City of North Miami S tormwater Master Plan Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Existing Exfiltration Trenches Existing Stormwater Pipes Model Nodes Not Meeting Existing LOS City Limits Tier 1 Install 7,980 LF of 18" exfiltration trench within City right-of-way in area bounded by NE 135th St (N), NE 130th St (S), NE 4th Ave (W), and NE 6th Ave (E)
PAGE 80
BE7-1 BE1-2 BE1-1 G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig5-3_G_Tier1North.mxd perneznybj 02/13/12 0 400 800 200 Feet Figure 5-5 B iscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 (North) Tier 2 Alternatives Exfiltration, Storage, and Outfall Upgrades City of North Miami S tormwater Master Plan Existing Pump Station Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Existing Exfiltration Trenches Proposed Stormwater Pipes Existing Stormwater Pipes Model Nodes Not Meeting Existing LOS City Limits Tier 1 Replace 1,220 LF of collection system with equivalent length of 18" exfiltration trench Tier 1 Install 3,000 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in 139th St right-of-way and under Ruck Park Tier 1 Install 300 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in right-of-way along 141st St Existing 80 cfs Ruck Park Pump Station Tier 2 Upgrade 100 LF 15" outfall to 24" RCP Tier 2 Replace 36" trunkline with 1,040 LF of 5' x 10' CBC to provide in-system storage and increase conveyance to and utilization of Ruck Park Pump Station
PAGE 81
BE7-4 BE7-3 BE2-8 G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig5-6_G_Tier2South.mxd perneznybj 02/13/12 0 400 800 200 Feet Figure 5-6 B iscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 (South) Tier 2 Alternatives Exfiltration, Storage, and Outfall Upgrades City of North Miami S tormwater Master Plan Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Existing Exfiltration Trenches Proposed Stormwater Pipes Existing Stormwater Pipes Model Nodes Not Meeting Existing LOS City Limits Tier 1 Install 7,980 LF of 18" exfiltration trench within City right-of-way in area bounded by NE 135th St (N), NE 130th St (S), NE 4th Ave (W), and NE 6th Ave (E) Tier 2 Upgrade 1,180 LF of 42" outfall to 48" RCP Tier 2 Upgrade 265 LF of 15" outfall to 24" RCP Tier 2 Install new trunkline along 131st St; 1,100 LF 24" RCP
PAGE 82
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 10 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Appendix I Table I 4. 5.1.2.1. Tier 3 Figure 5 7 Figure 5 8 Appendix I Table I 5. 5.1.3. Arch Creek South/Biscayne Canal East Problem Area
PAGE 83
BE7-1 BE1-2 BE1-1 G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig5-3_G_Tier1North.mxd perneznybj 02/13/12 0 400 800 200 Feet Figure 5-7 B iscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 (North) Tier 3 Alternatives Exfiltration, Storage, and Outfall Upgrades City of North Miami S tormwater Master Plan Existing Pump Station Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Existing Exfiltration Trenches Proposed Stormwater Pipes Existing Stormwater Pipes Model Nodes Not Meeting Existing LOS City Limits Tier 1 Replace 1,220 LF of collection system with equivalent length of 18" exfiltration trench Tier 1 Install 3,000 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in 139th St right-of-way and under Ruck Park Tier 1 Install 300 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in right-of-way along 141st St Existing 80 cfs Ruck Park Pump Station Tier 3 Upgrade 100 LF 15" outfall to 30" RCP Tier 2 Replace 36" trunkline with 1,040 LF of 5' x 10' CBC to provide in-system storage and increase conveyance to and utilization of Ruck Park Pump Station
PAGE 84
BE7-4 BE7-3 BE2-8 G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig5-8_G_Tier2South.mxd perneznybj 02/13/12 0 400 800 200 Feet Figure 5-8 B iscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 (South) Tier 3 Alternatives Exfiltration, Storage, and Outfall Upgrades City of North Miami S tormwater Master Plan Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Existing Exfiltration Trenches Proposed Stormwater Pipes Existing Stormwater Pipes Model Nodes Not Meeting Existing LOS City Limits Tier 1 Install 7,980 LF of 18" exfiltration trench within City right-of-way in area bounded by NE 135th St (N), NE 130th St (S), NE 4th Ave (W), and NE 6th Ave (E) Tier 3 Upgrade 1,180 LF of 42" outfall to 4' x 7' CBC Tier 2 Upgrade 265 LF of 15" outfall to 24" RCP Tier 2 Install new trunkline along 131st St; 1,100 LF 24" RCP
PAGE 85
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 13 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 5.1.3.1. Tier 1 Figure 5 9 Table 5 3 Appendix I Table I 6. Table 5 3 Arch Creek South/Biscayne Canal East Problem Area Model Results Deficient Node Existing Stage (5 yr/24 hr) Critical Stage Tier 1 Tier 2 Stage Meets LOS? Stage Meets LOS? ACS1 1 6.1 5.7 5.7 Yes 5.6 Yes ACS1 2 6.3 5.8 5.7 Yes 5.7 Yes ACS1 3 6.3 3.8 5.7 No 3.6 Yes ACS1 4 6.8 6.1 6.8 No 5.6 Yes BE4 1 7.1 5.7 5.7 Yes 5.7 Yes BE4 2 6.6 6.0 6.0 Yes 6.0 Yes BE4 3 6.1 6.0 5.7 Yes 5.7 Yes BE4 4 6.9 6.6 5.7 Yes 5.7 Yes BE4 5 6.3 6.0 6.2 No 6.0 Yes BE4 9 5.4 4.9 5.3 No 4.6 Yes
PAGE 86
BE4-9 BE4-5 BE4-4 BE4-3 BE4-2 BE4-1 ACS1-4 ACS1-3 ACS1-2 ACS1-1 G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig5-9_M_Tier1.mxd perneznybj 02/13/12 0 800 1,600 400 Feet Figure 5-9 A rch Creek South/Biscayne Canal East Problem Area Tier 1 Alternative Exfiltration Only City of North Miami S tormwater Master Plan Model Nodes Not Meeting Existing LOS Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Existing Exfiltration Trenches Existing Stormwater Pipes City Limits Tier 1 Install 19,310 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in City right-of way in area bounded by NE 125th Street (N), City Limit (S), N Dixie Hwy (W), and Railroad (E) Tier 1 Install 1,570 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in City right-of way in area bounded by NE 125th Street N Dixie Hwy, and Biscayne Canal Tier 1 Install 3,470 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in City right-of way in area bounded by NE 128th Street (N), NE 125th Street (S), N Dixie Hwy (W), and NE 12th Ave (E)
PAGE 87
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 15 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 5.1.3.2. Tier 2 Figure 5 10 Appendix I Table I 7. 5.1.4. Arch Creek South Problem Area
PAGE 88
BE4-9 BE4-5 BE4-4 BE4-3 BE4-2 BE4-1 ACS1-4 ACS1-3 ACS1-2 ACS1-1 G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig5-10_M_Tier2.mxd perneznybj 02/13/12 0 1,000 2,000 500 Feet Figure 5-10 A rch Creek South/Biscayne Canal East Problem Area Tier 2 Alternatives Exfiltration, Storage, and Outfall Upgrades City of North Miami S tormwater Master Plan Update Proposed Pump Station Model Nodes Not Meeting Existing LOS Proposed Force Main Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Existing Exfiltration Trenches Proposed Stormwater Pipes Existing Stormwater Pipes Underground Storage Vaults City Limits Tier 1 Install 19,310 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in City right-of way in area bounded by NE 125th Street (N), City Limit (S), N Dixie Hwy (W), and Railroad (E) Tier 1 Install 1,570 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in City right-of way in area bounded by NE 125th Street N Dixie Hwy, and Biscayne Canal Tier 1 Install 3,470 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in City right-of way in area bounded by NE 128th Street (N), NE 125th Street (S), N Dixie Hwy (W), and NE 12th Ave (E) Tier 2 Install 0.7 acre, 10-foot deep underground storage vault in Griffing Park; 40 cfs pumped outfall to upgraded Dixie Hwy outfall Tier 2 Upsize 1,750 LF of 60" outfall to 66" RCP Tier 2 Upsize 570 LF of 24" outfall to 30" RCP Tier 2 Install 1,070 LF of 36" RCP Tier 2 Upsize 200 LF 18" RCP to 36" RCP Tier 2 5,170 LF of 48" force main to Griffing Park storage facility Tier 2 Install 0.5-acre, 9-foot deep underground facility containing wet well and 120 cfs pump station Tier 2 Upsize 1,210 LF of 18" outfall to 24" RCP
PAGE 89
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 17 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 5.1.4.1. Tier 1 Figure 5 11 Table 5 4 Table I 8. Table 5 4 Arch Creek South Problem Area Model Results Deficient Node Existing Stage (5 yr/24 hr) Critical Stage Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Stage Meets LOS? Stage Meets LOS? Stage Meets LOS? ACS2 1 5.2 4.8 5.1 No 4.7 Yes 4.7 Yes ACS2 2 4.6 3.6 4.6 No 4.2 No 3.6 Yes 5.1.4.2. Tier 2 Figure 5 12 Table I 9. 5.1.4.3. Tier 3 Figure 5 13
PAGE 90
ACS2-2 ACS2-1 G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig4-11_Q_Tier1.mxd perneznybj 02/03/12 0 300 600 150 Feet Figure 5-11 A rch Creek South Problem Area Tier 1 Alternatives Exfiltration Only City of North Miami S tormwater Master Plan Update Model Nodes Not Meeting Existing LOS Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Existing Exfiltration Trenches Existing Stormwater Pipes City Limits Tier 1 Install additional 4,790 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in City right-of-way in area bounded by NE 143rd St (N), NE 140th St (S), NE 13th Ave (W), and Arch Creek (E)
PAGE 93
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 21 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Appendix I Table I 10. 5.1.5. Arch Creek North/Arch Creek South Problem Area 5.1.5.1. Tier 1 Figure 5 14 Table 5 5 Appendix I Table I 11.
PAGE 94
BE6-2 ACS3-8 ACS3-5 ACS3-4 ACS3-3 ACN3-6 G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig5-14_UV_Tier1.mxd perneznybj 02/13/12 0 800 1,600 400 Feet Figure 5-14 A rch Creek North/Arch Creek South Problem Area Tier 1 Alternatives Exfiltration Only City of North Miami S tormwater Master Plan Update Model Nodes Not Meeting Existing LOS Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Existing Exfiltration Trenches Existing Stormwater Pipes Tier 1 Install additional 7,230 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in City right-of-way in area bounded by NE 140th St (N), NE 136th St (S). NE 12th Ave (W), and NE 6th Ct (E) Tier 1 Install additional 18,720 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in City right-of-way in area bounded by NE 135th St (N), NE 125th St (S). NE 12th Ave (W), and Railroad (E)
PAGE 95
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 23 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table 5 5 Arch Creek North/Arch Creek South Problem Area Model Results Deficient Node Existing Stage (5 yr/24 hr) Critical Stage Tier 1 Tier 2 Stage Meets LOS? Stage Meets LOS? ACN3 6 6.0 5.2 5.2 Yes 5.2 Yes ACS3 3 6.5 5.7 6.4 No 5.6 Yes ACS3 4 7.5 6.8 7.1 No 5.0 Yes ACS3 5 6.0 4.5 4.8 No 4.4 Yes ACS3 8 6.1 3.3 5.8 No 2.9 Yes BE6 2 8.5 7.2 8.2 No 6.5 Yes 5.1.5.2. Tier 2 Figure 5 15
PAGE 96
BE6-2 ACS3-8 ACS3-5 ACS3-4 ACS3-3 ACN3-6 G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig5-15_UV_Tier2.mxd perneznybj 02/13/12 0 800 1,600 400 Feet Figure 5-15 A rch Creek North/Arch Creek South Problem Area Tier 2 Alternatives Exfiltration, Storage, and Outfall Upgrades City of North Miami S tormwater Master Plan Update Model Nodes Not Meeting Existing LOS Proposed Pump Station Proposed Force Main Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Existing Exfiltration Trenches Proposed Stormwater Pipes Existing Stormwater Pipes Wet Detention Pond Tier 1 Install additional 7,230 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in City right-of-way in area bounded by NE 140th St (N), NE 136th St (S). NE 12th Ave (W), and NE 6th Ct (E) Tier 2 Install 40 cfs pump station in low lying area and install 1,150 LF 30" force main to proposed pond Tier 2 1.5 acre wet detention pond; pumped outfall to Arch Creek; footprint to conform to natural features of park Tier 2 Install 1,700 LF 48" RCP Tier 2 Upsize 100 LF of 24" outfall to 30" RCP Tier 2 1,450 LF 30" Force Main to upgraded outfall Tier 2 Replace 1,560 LF 15" RCP with 36" RCP Tier 2 Replace 265 LF 15" RCP with 36" RCP Tier 2 Replace 1,970 LF 42" RCP with 5' x 5' CBC Tier 2 Upsize 1,400 LF of 42" outfall to 48" RCP Tier 1 Install additional 18,720 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in City right-of-way in area bounded by NE 135th St (N), NE 125th St (S). NE 12th Ave (W), and Railroad (E) Tier 2 Install 400 LF 60" RCP to proposed pond
PAGE 97
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 25 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Appendix I Table I 12. 5.1.6. Biscayne Canal East Problem Area 2 Figure 5 16 Table 5 6 Table I 13 Table 5 6 Biscayne Canal East Problem Area 2 Model Results Deficient Node Existing Stage (5 yr/24 hr) Critical Stage Tier 1 Stage Meets LOS? BE3 2 7.2 6.5 6.5 Yes
PAGE 98
BE3-2 G:\North Miami\Alternatives Analysis\Figures\Revised\Fig5-16_X_Alt.mxd perneznybj 02/13/12 0 200 400 100 Feet Figure 5-16 B iscayne Canal East Problem Area 2 Tier 1 Alternatives Exfiltration Only City of North Miami S tormwater Master Plan Model Nodes Not Meeting Existing LOS Proposed Exfiltration Trenches Existing Exfiltration Trenches Existing Stormwater Pipes Tier 1 Install additional 900 LF of 18" exfiltration trench in City right-of-way in area bounded by NE 130th St (N), NE 129th St (S). Dixie Hwy (W), and NE 10th Ave (E)
PAGE 99
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 27 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 5.2. Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Needs Appendix J Table 5 7 Table 5 7 Stormwater Assets Asset Quantity Units Exfiltration Trench 122,879 Linear feet Pollution Control Box unknown N/A Pump Stations unknown N/A Major Outfalls 7 N/A Catch Basins 2,172 N/A Canal Ends 31 N/A Auger Wells 238 N/A 5.2.1. Structural Controls Inspection and Maintenance 5.2.1.1. Exfiltration Trenches/French Drains
PAGE 100
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 28 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 5.2.1.2. Pollution Control Boxes 5.2.1.3. Stormwater Pump Station 5.2.1.4. Major Outfalls 5.2.1.5. Pipes/Culverts, Catch Basins/Inlets and Stormwater Conveyances 5.2.1.6. Auger Wells 5.3. Stormwater Funding Evaluation
PAGE 101
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 29 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 5.3.1. Customer Usage and Growth 5.3.2. Projected Financial Results at Prevailing Rates 5.3.3. Projected Financial Results with Stormwater Rate Adjustments 5.3.4. Comparison of Stormwater Utility RatesTable 5 8 5.3.5. Grant and Loan Opportunities 5.3.5.1. Water Management District (WMD)
PAGE 102
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 30 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 5.3.5.2. State of Florida 5.3.5.3. Federal Government
PAGE 103
Section 5Alternatives Analysis 5 31 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 5.3.5.3.1. FEMA grants Hazard Mitigation Grant Program: Flood Mitigation Assistance Program Repetitive Flood Claims Program Pre disaster Mitigation Program
PAGE 104
6 1 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Section 6Floodplain Management 6.1. Floodplain Management Plan (FPMP) Review 2007 Coordinators Manual Coordinators Manual Coordinators Manual Example Plans Example Plans Coordinators Manual 2007 Coordinators Manual 2012 CRS Coordinator Manual Changes 2012 Changes 2007 Coordinators Manual Example Plans 2012 Changes 6.1.1. Anticipated Impact of 2012 CRS Policy Changes to North Miami FPMP 2007 Coordinators Manual
PAGE 105
Section 6Floodplain Management 6 2 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 2012 Changes 2007 Coordinators Manual 2007 Coordinators Manual 2012 Changes 2012 Changes 6.1.2. Recommendations for the North Miami FPMP 2012 Changes 2012 Changes
PAGE 106
Section 6Floodplain Management 6 3 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Step 5 Step 6 Step 8 Table 6 1 Table 6 1 Application and Recertification Program Data1 Number of buildings in the SFHA (bSF) as of last report 2 Number of new manufactured homes installed since last report 3 Number of other 1 4 family structures constructed since last report 4 Number of all other structures constructed/installed since last report 5 Number of buildings removed/demolished since last report 6 Number of buildings affected by map revisions since last report (+ or ) 7 Number of buildings affected by corporate limits changes (+ or ) 8 Current total number of buildings in the SFHA (bSF) (sum of lines 1 7) 9 Number of substantial improvement/damage projects since last report 10 Number of repetitive loss properties mitigated since last report 11 Number of LOMRs and map revisions (not LOMAs) since last report 12 Acreage o f area(s) (aSFHA) as of the last report 13 Acreage of area(s) affected by map revisions since last report (+ or ) 14 Acreage of area(s) affected by corporate limits changes (+ or ) 15 Current acreage of the SFHA (aSFHA) (sum of lines 11 13)
PAGE 107
Section 6Floodplain Management 6 4 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved : 6.1.3. Floodplain Management Summary 2007 Coordinators Manual
PAGE 108
Section 6Floodplain Management 6 5 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 6.2. Community Rating System (CRS) Program 2007 Coordinators Manual Table 6 2 Table 6 3
PAGE 109
Section 6Floodplain Management 6 6 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table 6 2 List of CRS Program Activities Category 300: Public Information Subactivities 310 Elevation Certificates 320 Map Information Service 330 Outreach Projects 340 Hazard Disclosure 350 Flood Protection Information 360 Flood Protection Assistance 370 Flood Insurance Promotion Category 400: Mapping and Regulatory Subactivities 410 Additional Flood Data 420 Open Space Preservation 430 Higher Regulatory Standards 440 Flood Data Maintenance 450 Stormwater Management Category 500: Flood Damage Reduction Subactivities 510 Floodplain Management 520 Acquisition and Relocation 530 Flood Protection 540 Drainage System Maintenance Category 600: Flood Preparedness Subactivities 610 Flood Warning Program 620 Levee Safety 630 Dam Safety Table 6 3 CRS Class Ratings Minimum Total Points CRS Class Rating 4,500 1 4,000 2 3,500 3 3,000 4 2,500 5 2,000 6 1,500 7 1,000 8 500 9 0 10
PAGE 110
Section 6Floodplain Management 6 7 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 6.2.1. CRS Program Updates 2012 Changes Appendix K 2012 Changes 6.2.1.1. Class 4 Prerequisites Table 6 4 6.2.2. Impact of Proposed 2012 Changes on North Miami Figure 6 1 2012 Changes Table 6 5 2012 Changes 2012 Changes
PAGE 111
Section 6Floodplain Management 6 8 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table 6 4 Minimum Requirements for Class 4, 7, and 9 Ratings Item Activities (Subactivities) Minimum Points Class 9 Prerequisite Additional text added to statement signed by CEO of community (see CRS Guidance for exact wording of text) Class 5 Prerequisite Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule score of 5/5 10 1 Class 4All Activities Participated In 3,000 2 Activity 430 (Freeboard subactivity) 100 3 Activity 430 (Subactivities other than Freeboard) 250 4 Activity 450 (Watershed Management Plan) 80 5 Activity 450 (Watershed Management Plan) manages runoff for storms up to and including the 100 year event 25 6 Activity 450 (Watershed Management Plan) Impact Adjustment None; The Watershed Management Plan must be demonstrated to cover at least 50% of growth 7 Activity 510 50% of total available points in Activity, partially comprised of at least 50% of available points in steps 2, 5, and 8 8 Activities 420 (Natural Functions Open Space & Natural Shoreline Protection subactivities); Activity 430 (Prohibition of Fill subactivity); Activity 440 (Additional Map Data Natural Functions Layer subactivity); Activity 450 (Low Impact Development; Watershed Management Plan Items c, e, f, and g; Erosion and Sediment Control; and Water Quality subactivities); Activity 510 (Natural Floodplain Fu nctions Plan subactivity) Not yet determined; Minimum points will be the cumulative points for the listed subactivities 9 Category 600 Prerequisites Inventory of levees resulting in flooding of developed area if failed with a map of affected areas; Inventory of dams resulting in flooding of developed areas if failed with a map of areas affected; Assessment of the impact of a flood caused by failure of the levees and dams on life and property. None; Documentation of the activities listed is required without points assigned for doing so 10 Activity 610 Not yet determined; Minimum points will be the cumulative points for all subactivities in Activity 610
PAGE 112
Section 6Floodplan Management 6 9KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Figure 6 1 Comparison of Points by CRS Activity
PAGE 113
Section 6Floodplan Management 6 10KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table 6 5 CRS Program Points by Activity Category/Activity 2007 CRS Guidance Points North Miami Score 2012 Changes Points Category 300: Public Information Subactivities 310 Elevation Certificates 172 65 116 320 Map Information Service 140 140 90 330 Outreach Projects 380 277 350 340 Hazard Disclosure 81 20 80 350 Flood Protection Information 102 60 127 360 Flood Protection Assistance 71 57 112 370 Flood Insurance Promotion* 0 0 140 Category Total 946 619 1,015 Category 400: Mapping and Regulatory Subactivities 410 Additional Flood Data 1,346 11 752 420 Open Space Preservation 900 405 1,970 430 Higher Regulatory Standards 2,740 449 1,862 440 Flood Data Maintenance 239 189 202 450 Stormwater Management 670 467 755 Category Total 5,895 1,521 5,541 Category 500: Flood Damage Reduction Subactivities 510 Floodplain Management 359 140 657 520 Acquisition and Relocation 3,200 20 1,866 530 Flood Protection 2,800 0 1,540 540 Drainage System Maintenance** 330 330 478 Category Total 6,689 490 4,541 Category 600: Flood Preparedness Subactivities 610 Flood Warning Program 255 164 395 620 Levee Safety 900 0 237 630 Dam Safety 175 67 158 Category Total 1,330 231 790 Total Points 15,040 2,861 11,887 New Activity introduced in 2012 Guidance ** Total Points for Activity Not Finalized
PAGE 114
Section 6Floodplan Management 6 11KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 6.2.2.1. Activities with Point Losses 2012 Changes Table 6 6 Table 6 6 Points Losses Outlined in 2012 Changes Activity Points Lost in 2012 Changes document North Miami Score North Miami Points at Risk of Being Lost 520 Acquisition and Relocation 1,334 20 20 530 Flood Protection 1,260 0 0 430 Higher Regulatory Standards 878 449 449 620 Levee Safety 663 0 0 410 Additional Flood Data 594 11 11 310 Elevation Certificates 56 65 56 320 Map Information Service 50 140 50 440 Flood Data Maintenance 37 189 37 330 Outreach Projects 30 277 30 630 Dam Safety 17 67 17 340 Hazard Disclosure 1 20 1 Total 4,920 1,238 671 6.2.2.1.1. Activities 520 and 530 2012 Changes 6.2.2.1.2. Activity 430 2012 Changes
PAGE 115
Section 6Floodplan Management 6 12KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 6.2.2.1.3. Remaining Activities withPoint Losses (Activities 620,410, 310,320, 440,330, 630,and 340) 6.2.2.2. Activities with Point Gains 2012 Changes Table 6 7 Table 6 7 Point Gains Outlined in 2012 Guidance Activity Total Points in 2012 Changes document North Miami Score Additional Points Available to North Miami 420 Open Space Preservation 1,970 405 1,565 510 Floodplain Management 657 140 517 540 Drainage System Maintenance** 478 330 148 370 Flood Insurance Promotion* 140 0 140 610 Flood Warning Program 395 164 231 450 Stormwater Management 755 467 288 360 Flood Protection Assistance 112 57 55 350 Flood Protection Information 127 60 67 Total 4,634 1,623 3,011 Activity 370is new in the 2012 Changes document ** Total Points for Activity Not Finalized 6.2.2.2.1. Activity 420 6.2.2.2.2. Activity 510 2012 Changes
PAGE 116
Section 6Floodplan Management 6 13KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 6.2.2.2.3. Activities 450 and 610 2012 Changes 6.2.2.2.4. Activities 370 and 540 2012 Changes 2012 Changes 2012 Changes 6.2.2.2.5. Activities 350 and 360 2012 Changes 2012 Changes 6.2.3. Recommendations for North Miami CRS Program 2012 Changes 6.2.3.1. Inventory Actual Point Gains and Losses 2012 Changes 6.2.3.2. New Subactivity Participation
PAGE 117
Section 6Floodplan Management 6 14KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 6.2.3.2.1. Activity 350 6.2.3.2.2. Activities 360 and 370 6.2.3.2.3. Activity 420 6.2.3.2.4. Activity 450 2012 Changes 2012 Changes
PAGE 118
Section 6Floodplan Management 6 15KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 6.2.3.2.5. Activity 510 2012 Changes 2012 Changes 2012 Changes 6.2.3.2.6. Activity 540 2012 Changes 6.2.3.2.7. Activity 610 2012 Changes 6.2.3.3. Program for Public Information Creation 2012 Changes Table 6 8
PAGE 119
Section 6Floodplan Management 6 16KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Table 6 8 Impact of Creation of a PPI Activity 2012 Changes Points Available without PPI 2012 Changes Additional Points Available with PPI 330 Outreach Projects 275 75 340 Hazard Disclosure 66 14 350 Flood Protection Information 98 29 360 Flood Protection Assistance 75 37 540 Drainage System Maintenance 463 15 Total Additional Points Possible with PPI 170 Appendix L 6.2.3.4. Submittal Layout and Organization Table 6 9 Table 6 9 Example of Table Layout for Organization of CRS Submittal to FEMA Category/Activity North Miami Points Claimed Documentation CRS Application Page Numbers Category 300: Public Information Activities 310 Elevation Certificates Elevation Certificates 56 Pages 68115 Elevation Certificates for post FIRM Buildings 56 Pages 6885 Elevation Certificates for pre FIRM Buildings 15 Pages 86115 Total 127 To include all Categories, Activities, and Subactivities
PAGE 120
Section 6Floodplan Management 6 17KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 6.2.3.5. Conclusion Table 6 10 Table 6 10 Potential Activities Gain Activity Additional Points Available to North Miami in 2012 Changes 370 Flood Insurance Promotion* 140 540 Drainage System Maintenance** 148 510 Floodplain Management 517 Activity 370is new in the 2012 Changes document ** Total Points for Activity Not Finalized
PAGE 121
7 1 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Section 7Recommended Plan 7.1. Project Phasing Table 7 1 Table 7 2 Table 7 3
PAGE 122
Table 71City ofNorth MiamiStormwaterMasterPlanUpdate SummaryofRecommended ImprovementsProblemArea SWMP Update Section Historic ProblemArea Tier 1 Tier2 Tier3 BiscayneCanal West ProblemArea 5.1.1 Installation of680ftofexfiltration trenches (Alternative 1County r/w) 5.1.1 Additional 1,800 ftofexfiltration trenchesand conveyance utilizing BenFranklin Park (Alternative 2regional option) BiscayneCanal EastProblemArea 1 5.1.2 Installation of12,500 ftofexfiltration trenches Additional storage and conveyance upgrades(in system storage, upsizing outfalls) Furtheroutfall upgrades Arch Creek South/Biscayne Canal EastProblemArea 5.1.3 Installation of24,350 ftofexfiltration trenches Additional storage and conveyance upgrades (underground storage vaults,stormwater pump station, upsizing ofexisting outfalls) Arch Creek South ProblemArea 5.1.4 Installation of4,790 ftofexfiltration trenches Additional storage and conveyance upgrades (underground storage vaults,upsizing ofexisting outfalls) Furtheroutfall upgrades Arch Creek North/ArchCreek South ProblemArea 5.1.5 Installation of25,950 ftofexfiltration trenches Additional storage and conveyance upgrades(piping, upsizing outfalls, stormwater pump station, wet detention atElaine Gordon Park) BiscayneCanal EastProblem Area 2 5.1.6 Installation of900ftofexfiltration trenches
PAGE 123
Table 72City ofNorth MiamiStormwaterMasterPlanEstimated Conceptual Capital CostSummaryProblemArea SWMP Update Section Reported ProblemArea Max.Depth ofFlooding Design Storm Event Tier 1Total Costs Additional Tier 2Costs Additional Tier 3Costs Total Project Cost (All Tiers)* BiscayneCanal West ProblemArea 5.1.1 0.105year CityR/W$0(Alt1local, meet LOS) County R/W$300,000 CityR/W$430,000 (Alt2regional) County R/W$1,080,000 $430,000 BiscayneCanal EastProblemArea 1 5.1.2 1.30 5year$3,700,000 (does not meet LOS) $2,900,000 (mostly meets LOS1) $1,350,000 (meets LOS) $7,950,000 Arch Creek South/Biscayne Canal EastProblemArea 5.1.3 2.505year $7,200,000 (mostly meets LOS1) $20,300,000 (meets LOS) $27,500,000 Arch Creek South ProblemArea 5.1.4 1.005year$1,500,000 (does not meet LOS) $4,800,000 (mostly meets LOS1) $500,000 (meets LOS) $6,800,000 Arch Creek North/ArchCreek South ProblemArea 5.1.5 2.805 year$8,300,000 (does not meet LOS)$6,600,000 (meets LOS) $14,900,000 BiscayneCanal EastProblemArea 2 5.1.6 0.705year$350,000 (meets LOS) $360,000 $57,940,0001Flooding is alleviated atatleast50percentofthedeficient model nodesTotals:
PAGE 124
Table 73City ofNorth MiamiStormwaterMasterPlanUpdate PhasedCapital ImprovementScheduleProblemArea SWMP Update Section Reported ProblemArea 20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022 20312032 20412042 20512052 2061 BiscayneCanal West ProblemArea 5.1.1 BiscayneCanal EastProblemArea 1 5.1.2 Arch Creek South/Biscayne Canal EastProblemArea 5.1.3 Arch Creek South ProblemArea 5.1.4 Arch Creek North/ArchCreek South ProblemArea 5.1.5 BiscayneCanal EastProblem Area 2 5.1.6 1Total costsinclude theprecedingtier'stotal cost(e.g.,Tier2costsareinclusive ofTier1costs) Tier1Implementation Tier2Implementation Tier3Implementation
PAGE 125
Section 7Recommended Plan 7 5 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved 7.2. Other Recommendations Filling of Data Gaps Stormwater Model Update Water Quality and Regulatory Review
PAGE 126
Section 7Recommended Plan 7 6 KM3233.NM_SWMP_Final_Report.docx 2012 CDM Smith All Rights Reserved Floodplain Management Update 2012 CRS Coordinator Manual Changes. 2012 CRS Coordinator Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinator Manual Changes Project/Permitting Coordination
PAGE 127
Appendix A 2000 SWMP Priority Subbasins
PAGE 128
BW1-14 BW1-12 BW1-9 BW1-10 BW1-13 BW1-11 BW1-8 BW2-1 BW2-3 BW2-4 BW2-2 BW1-7 BW1-6 BW1-5 BW1-4 BW1-3 BW1-2 BW1-1 KEYSTONE1 KEYSTONE BE4-4 ACN1-4 ACN1-1 ACN1-2 ACN1-3BE7-1BE5-1BE4-7BE4-8 BE4-6 BE4-9 BE4-5 BE2-7 BE2-8 BE2-6 BE2-5 BE1-3 BE1-2 BW6-1 BW5-1 BW2-11 BW2-10BW2-9BW2-7 BW1-21 BW1-22 BW1-17 BW4-1 BW1-20 BW1-19 BW1-18 BW1-16 BW1-15 BW3-2 BW3-3 BW3-4 BE1-1 BE3-1 BW3-1 BW2-5 BW2-6BW2-8BE6-3 ACS2-3 ACS5-1 SANSOUCI BE6-2 BE6-1 ACS1-8 ACS1-7 ACS1-6 ACS1-5 ACS1-4 ACS1-3 ACS1-2 ACS1-1 ACS4-1 ACN3-6 ACS3-6 ACS3-5 ACS3-4 ACS3-2 ACS3-3 ACS3-1 BE3-3 BE4-3 BE4-2 BE4-1 ACN1-8 ACS2-2 ACS2-1ACN1-7 ACN1-6ACN1-5 BE2-4 BE2-3 BE2-2 BE3-2 BE2-1 BAY OLETA1 5 16 15 2 9 12 4 11 7 10 8 20 6 3 18 13 17 19 14 N E W S 01000200030004000 Feet Figure 5-2 City of North Miami Phase II Stormwater Master Plan Revised Priority BasinsCity Limits LEGEND Phase I Sub-Basin Priority Ranking Sub-BasinsEx:BW 1-1 Drainage Basin Sub-Basin10Water Features Dated: 9/28/00
PAGE 129
Project Number Basin Rankin g Basin/SubbasinDescriptionRequiredUnitsUnit Cost Per Estimated Construction Cost Engineering and Contingencies Cost Total Estimate 36-inch RCP 1600LF 65 $ /LF104,000 $ 31,200 $ $ 135,200 Catch basins 8ea 2,200 $ /ea17,600 $ 5,280 $ $ 22,880 SUB-TOTAL Project 1 $ 121,600 $ 36,480 $ 158,080 21 ACN1-1 French Drains 159LF 500 $ /LF79,500 $ 23,850 $ $ 103,350 31 ACN1-2 French Drains 105LF 500 $ /LF52,500 $ 15,750 $ $ 68,250 41 ACN1-5 French Drains 321LF 500 $ /LF160,500 $ 48,150 $ $ 208,650 51 ACN1-7 French Drains 449LF 500 $ /LF224,500 $ 67,350 $ $ 291,850 24-inch RCP 1300LF 45 $ /LF58,500 $ 17,550 $ $ 76,050 36-inch RCP 2200LF 65 $ /LF143,000 $ 42,900 $ $ 185,900 36-inch RCP 1700LF 65 $ /LF110,500 $ 33,150 $ $ 143,650 Rail Road Crossing 200LF 300 $ /LF60,000 $ 18,000 $ $ 78,000 Catch basins 24ea 2,200 $ /ea52,800 $ 15,840 $ $ 68,640 SUB-TOTAL Project 13 $ 424,800 $ 127,440 $ 552,240 72 ACN3-6 French Drains 518LF 500 $ /LF259,000 $ 77,700 $ $ 336,700 82 ACS1-5 French Drains 386LF 500 $ /LF193,000 $ 57,900 $ $ 250,900 92 ACS3-5 French Drains 1693LF 500 $ /LF846,500 $ 253,950 $ $ 1,100,450 102 BE4-1 French Drains 67LF 500 $ /LF33,500 $ 10,050 $ $ 43,550 112 BE4-4 French Drains 128LF 500 $ /LF64,000 $ 19,200 $ $ 83,200 123 ACS1-4 French Drains 242LF 500 $ /LF121,000 $ 36,300 $ $ 157,300 134 BE1-1 French Drains 591LF 500 $ /LF295,500 $ 88,650 $ $ 384,150 144 BE1-2 French Drains 655LF 500 $ /LF327,500 $ 98,250 $ $ 425,750 154 BE1-3 French Drains 1665LF 500 $ /LF832,500 $ 249,750 $ $ 1,082,250 165 ACS2-1 French Drains 234LF 500 $ /LF117,000 $ 35,100 $ $ 152,100 175 ACS2-2 French Drains 269LF 500 $ /LF134,500 $ 40,350 $ $ 174,850 18 5 ACS3-1 French Drains 469LF 500 $ /LF234,500 $ 70,350 $ $ 304,850 195 ACS3-3 French Drains 135LF 500 $ /LF67,500 $ 20,250 $ $ 87,750 205 ACS3-4 French Drains 579LF 500 $ /LF289,500 $ 86,850 $ $ 376,350 215 ACS3-5 French Drains 1693LF 500 $ /LF846,500 $ 253,950 $ $ 1,100,450 225 BE6-3 French Drains 64LF 500 $ /LF32,000 $ 9,600 $ $ 41,600 237 BW3-4 French Drains 1093LF 500 $ /LF546,500 $ 163,950 $ $ 710,450 247 BW4-1 French Drains 1060LF 500 $ /LF530,000 $ 159,000 $ $ 689,000 258 BE2-8 French Drains 1954LF 500 $ /LF977,000 $ 293,100 $ $ 1,270,100 268 BE4-7 French Drains 378LF 500 $ /LF189,000 $ 56,700 $ $ 245,700 279 BE2-7 French Drains 134LF 500 $ /LF67,000 $ 20,100 $ $ 87,100 289 BE3-1 French Drains 359LF 500 $ /LF179,500 $ 53,850 $ $ 233,350 2910 BW3-3 French Drains 1245LF 500 $ /LF622,500 $ 186,750 $ $ 809,250 3010 BW3-4 French Drains 1093LF 500 $ /LF546,500 $ 163,950 $ $ 710,450 3111 BW3-4 French Drains 1093LF 500 $ /LF546,500 $ 163,950 $ $ 710,450 3212 BE3-1 French Drains 359LF 500 $ /LF179,500 $ 53,850 $ $ 233,350 3214 BW2-7 French Drains 402LF 500 $ /LF201,000 $ 60,300 $ $ 261,300 3319 BW1-1 French Drains 57LF 500 $ /LF28,500 $ 8,550 $ $ 37,050 3319 BW1-3 French Drains 36LF 500 $ /LF18,000 $ 5,400 $ $ 23,400 3419 BW1-5 French Drains 172LF 500 $ /LF86,000 $ 25,800 $ $ 111,800 3419 BW1-9 French Drains 49LF 500 $ /LF24,500 $ 7,350 $ $ 31,850 3520 ACS1-2 French Drains 328LF 500 $ /LF164,000 $ 49,200 $ $ 213,200 3520 BE4-3 French Drains 246LF 500 $ /LF123,000 $ 36,900 $ $ 159,900 62 Arch Creek South2Table 7-1 Priority List of Projects11 Arch Creek North1 7-7
PAGE 130
Project Number Basin Rankin g Basin/SubbasinDescriptionRequiredUnitsUnit Cost Per Estimated Construction Cost Engineering and Contingencies Cost Total Estimate Table 7-1 Priority List of Projects 36 20BE4-5French Drains225LF 500 $ /LF112,500 $ 33,750 $ $ 146,250 Total 10,898,900 $ 3,269,670 $ 14,168,570 $ 1Proposed Arch Creek 36-inch interceptor within NE 144th Street will provide relief for: ACN 1-1, ACN 1-2, ACN 1-3, ACN 1-4, and ACN 1-5. 2Proposed NE 130th Street 36-inch intertceptor (east of NE 9th Avenue to Arch Creek) will provide relief for: ACS 3-5, ACS3-6, BE3-2 and BE3-3. 7-7
PAGE 131
Appendix B SWMM5Input Parameters
PAGE 132
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 1 of 2 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-1: SWMM Hydrologic Data Impervious Pervious Impervious Pervious (HUs) (ft) (Ac) (%) (%) (in) (in) (in/hr) (in/hr) (in) ACN1-0HU 1,963 58.6 21.1% 0.32 0.015 0.218 0.1 0.230 3.60 0.10 1.38 ACN1-10HU 1,999 76.1 33.3% 0.36 0.015 0.207 0.1 0.223 3.41 0.09 1.31 ACN1-1HU 1,646 62.5 26.9% 0.19 0.015 0.212 0.1 0.226 3.47 0.09 1.31 ACN1-2HU 823 22.5 21.1% 0.33 0.015 0.216 0.1 0.229 3.81 0.11 1.65 ACN1-3HU 926 30.1 23.0% 0.35 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.227 4.42 0.17 2.10 ACN1-4HU 1,440 59.3 23.4% 0.11 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.226 4.75 0.19 2.83 ACN1-5HU 1,954 44.9 23.0% 0.45 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.227 4.33 0.16 2.20 ACN1-6HU 1,248 43.2 21.7% 0.18 0.015 0.215 0.1 0.228 3.41 0.09 1.19 ACN1-7HU 1,151 27.3 16.7% 0.27 0.015 0.221 0.1 0.232 3.51 0.09 1.23 ACN1-8HU 1,507 31.5 23.6% 0.43 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.226 4.45 0.17 2.20 ACN1-9HU 1,318 37.9 26.9% 0.26 0.015 0.212 0.1 0.226 3.40 0.09 1.23 ACN3-6HU 1,803 37.8 53.3% 0.53 0.015 0.188 0.1 0.210 4.09 0.17 1.95 ACS1-1HU 1,197 29.1 47.6% 0.20 0.015 0.193 0.1 0.213 3.04 0.08 1.08 ACS1-2HU 1,968 51.0 39.1% 0.12 0.015 0.203 0.1 0.220 3.20 0.08 1.12 ACS1-3HU 2,894 59.3 35.0% 0.43 0.015 0.207 0.1 0.223 3.76 0.12 1.58 ACS1-4HU 867 15.7 54.4% 0.67 0.015 0.197 0.1 0.216 5.17 0.26 2.76 ACS1-5HU 1,275 17.5 73.6% 0.52 0.015 0.145 0.1 0.183 3.14 0.13 1.53 ACS1-6HU 2,215 41.9 55.8% 1.05 0.015 0.181 0.1 0.206 3.67 0.14 1.75 ACS1-7HU 2,187 74.4 72.4% 0.41 0.015 0.146 0.1 0.184 2.72 0.10 1.20 ACS1-8HU 2,040 34.9 78.2% 0.27 0.015 0.142 0.1 0.181 2.16 0.05 0.75 ACS1-9HU 390 6.6 77.0% 0.75 0.015 0.143 0.1 0.182 2.78 0.11 1.26 ACS2-1HU 1,519 36.8 24.9% 0.49 0.015 0.212 0.1 0.226 4.21 0.15 2.21 ACS2-2HU 1,393 24.1 43.9% 0.50 0.015 0.198 0.1 0.217 3.54 0.11 1.60 ACS2-3HU 1,129 28.7 78.6% 0.46 0.015 0.141 0.1 0.181 3.32 0.15 1.83 ACS2-4HU 2,990 81.8 74.7% 0.26 0.015 0.154 0.1 0.188 3.86 0.19 2.21 ACS2-5HU 1,148 31.5 78.0% 0.54 0.015 0.142 0.1 0.181 2.77 0.10 1.32 ACS2-6HU 1,868 34.7 46.3% 0.51 0.015 0.193 0.1 0.214 3.30 0.10 1.39 ACS2-7HU 1,113 14.2 30.2% 0.49 0.015 0.211 0.1 0.225 3.38 0.09 1.22 ACS3-10HU 662 6.4 45.2% 0.68 0.015 0.298 0.1 0.222 4.95 0.23 2.47 ACS3-1HU 1,242 18.8 46.4% 0.31 0.015 0.192 0.1 0.213 3.95 0.15 2.05 ACS3-2HU 1,522 36.7 25.2% 0.16 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.226 4.15 0.14 2.12 ACS3-3HU 1,014 21.0 21.8% 0.24 0.015 0.215 0.1 0.228 3.70 0.11 1.55 ACS3-4HU 1,627 30.9 23.0% 0.44 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.227 5.48 0.25 3.37 ACS3-5HU 2,754 109.6 41.7% 0.30 0.015 0.203 0.1 0.220 4.74 0.22 2.32 ACS3-6HU 1,722 31.0 17.9% 0.60 0.015 0.261 0.1 0.231 4.36 0.16 2.04 ACS3-7HU 1,975 11.0 8.2% 1.82 0.015 0.371 0.1 0.241 4.19 0.13 1.77 ACS3-8HU 915 25.4 28.3% 0.44 0.015 0.212 0.1 0.224 3.93 0.13 1.90 ACS3-9HU 1,411 25.5 51.9% 0.49 0.015 0.247 0.1 0.210 3.16 0.09 1.26 ACS4-1HU 2,203 30.1 73.4% 0.72 0.017 0.148 0.1 0.185 3.84 0.20 1.95 ACS4-2HU 1,325 20.9 64.9% 0.39 0.015 0.227 0.1 0.214 3.04 0.08 1.06 ACS5-1HU 1,432 24.1 48.3% 0.32 0.015 0.271 0.1 0.225 3.34 0.08 1.17 BE1-10HU 882 11.3 59.4% 0.30 0.015 0.181 0.1 0.206 2.83 0.07 1.00 BE1-11HU 1,117 9.6 64.3% 0.27 0.015 0.184 0.1 0.208 3.14 0.09 1.33 BE1-12HU 694 7.6 80.6% 0.21 0.015 0.141 0.1 0.180 2.21 0.06 0.83 BE1-13HU 948 10.0 67.8% 0.22 0.015 0.186 0.1 0.209 2.91 0.07 1.02 BE1-14HU 925 11.3 80.7% 0.19 0.015 0.140 0.1 0.180 2.20 0.06 0.83 BE1-15HU 1,032 10.2 77.5% 0.23 0.015 0.154 0.1 0.189 3.27 0.13 1.91 BE1-16HU 901 12.8 20.6% 0.16 0.015 0.218 0.1 0.229 3.70 0.11 1.51 BE1-17HU 1,167 13.1 40.0% 0.27 0.015 0.198 0.1 0.217 3.36 0.10 1.37 BE1-18HU 1,073 11.6 75.5% 0.21 0.015 0.151 0.1 0.187 4.07 0.19 2.44 BE1-19HU 1,026 13.2 79.2% 0.18 0.015 0.147 0.1 0.184 3.87 0.18 2.33 BE1-1HU 2,034 78.6 33.6% 0.33 0.015 0.206 0.1 0.222 3.58 0.11 1.40 BE1-20HU 757 10.8 78.5% 0.24 0.015 0.150 0.1 0.186 2.53 0.08 1.09 BE1-2HU 1,239 28.9 40.7% 0.26 0.015 0.198 0.1 0.217 3.16 0.08 1.14 BE1-3HU 1,047 20.7 37.2% 0.50 0.015 0.201 0.1 0.219 3.27 0.09 1.23 BE1-4HU 1,398 19.4 71.6% 0.35 0.015 0.151 0.1 0.187 3.02 0.11 1.40 BE1-5HU 1,302 13.4 60.9% 0.23 0.015 0.163 0.1 0.194 4.54 0.22 2.70 BE1-6HU 1,230 12.4 55.4% 0.24 0.015 0.175 0.1 0.202 3.73 0.14 2.16 BE1-7HU 1,622 21.4 40.4% 0.18 0.015 0.198 0.1 0.217 3.97 0.14 2.11 Max Inf Rate Min Inf Rate Soil Storage Existing Conditions Manning's Roughness Initial Abstractions Hydrologic Units Width Area % DCIA Slope
PAGE 133
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 2 of 2 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-1: SWMM Hydrologic Data Impervious Pervious Impervious Pervious (HUs) (ft) (Ac) (%) (%) (in) (in) (in/hr) (in/hr) (in) Max Inf Rate Min Inf Rate Soil Storage Existing Conditions Manning's Roughness Initial Abstractions Hydrologic Units Width Area % DCIA Slope BE1-8HU 1,094 11.0 62.8% 0.23 0.015 0.163 0.1 0.195 2.78 0.08 1.19 BE1-9HU 1,489 22.7 80.8% 0.15 0.015 0.140 0.1 0.180 2.44 0.08 1.12 BE2-1HU 1,254 25.1 26.7% 0.20 0.015 0.215 0.1 0.228 6.14 0.30 3.65 BE2-2HU 1,059 15.9 15.6% 0.29 0.015 0.223 0.1 0.233 5.45 0.23 3.42 BE2-3HU 1,082 15.4 16.2% 0.17 0.015 0.224 0.1 0.233 4.99 0.20 2.96 BE2-4HU 1,392 22.3 35.6% 0.14 0.015 0.215 0.1 0.228 4.61 0.18 2.64 BE2-5HU 1,339 24.1 20.0% 0.30 0.015 0.217 0.1 0.229 4.87 0.19 2.92 BE2-7HU 1,373 27.1 37.0% 0.12 0.015 0.208 0.1 0.223 4.15 0.15 2.19 BE2-8HU 1,768 40.5 23.1% 0.36 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.227 4.11 0.14 2.06 BE3-1HU 1,297 18.4 71.9% 0.33 0.015 0.146 0.1 0.184 2.59 0.08 1.21 BE3-2HU 1,383 29.8 25.7% 0.15 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.226 3.99 0.13 1.93 BE3-3HU 1,391 27.5 24.5% 0.13 0.015 0.212 0.1 0.226 4.12 0.14 2.09 BE4-1HU 1,941 33.1 27.8% 0.30 0.015 0.212 0.1 0.226 3.48 0.09 1.33 BE4-2HU 896 15.6 59.6% 0.14 0.015 0.180 0.1 0.205 2.84 0.07 1.03 BE4-3HU 2,257 71.1 44.1% 0.12 0.015 0.197 0.1 0.216 3.15 0.08 1.15 BE4-4HU 785 7.5 42.5% 0.27 0.015 0.205 0.1 0.221 3.88 0.13 1.91 BE4-5HU 2,173 42.1 65.1% 0.17 0.015 0.166 0.1 0.196 2.59 0.07 0.92 BE4-6HU 1,737 22.3 29.7% 0.23 0.015 0.210 0.1 0.225 3.60 0.10 1.50 BE4-7HU 1,658 22.6 24.0% 0.32 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.226 3.39 0.09 1.21 BE4-8HU 1,194 18.3 23.3% 0.29 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.226 3.37 0.08 1.18 BE4-9HU 1,651 18.0 45.8% 0.21 0.015 0.197 0.1 0.216 3.09 0.08 1.08 BE5-1HU 1,429 18.2 23.0% 0.43 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.227 3.48 0.09 1.30 BE6-1HU 1,518 19.5 26.6% 0.40 0.015 0.212 0.1 0.226 6.64 0.34 3.83 BE6-2HU 1,729 20.3 31.5% 0.77 0.015 0.209 0.1 0.224 5.86 0.28 3.50 BE6-3HU 1,063 14.8 25.3% 0.29 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.226 4.58 0.18 2.64 BE7-1HU 1,228 25.4 40.5% 0.24 0.015 0.268 0.1 0.222 3.25 0.08 1.14 BE7-2HU 1,664 20.0 70.5% 0.64 0.015 0.156 0.1 0.186 2.30 0.06 0.81 BE7-3HU 1,212 14.4 28.6% 0.50 0.015 0.210 0.1 0.224 3.61 0.11 1.52 BE7-4HU 1,856 28.7 33.7% 0.68 0.015 0.257 0.1 0.226 3.36 0.08 1.18 BE7-5HU 968 9.4 75.2% 0.24 0.015 0.187 0.1 0.192 2.47 0.06 0.86 BW1-10HU 1,871 29.2 23.0% 0.15 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.227 6.56 0.34 3.80 BW1-11HU 2,208 22.1 23.0% 0.25 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.227 6.02 0.29 3.59 BW1-12HU 1,292 12.9 40.0% 0.34 0.015 0.206 0.1 0.222 6.03 0.30 3.55 BW1-13HU 2,430 32.4 23.2% 0.17 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.227 6.80 0.36 3.90 BW1-14HU 2,220 40.2 35.3% 0.14 0.015 0.209 0.1 0.224 6.25 0.31 3.65 BW1-15AHU 2,346 84.0 65.9% 0.07 0.015 0.183 0.1 0.207 5.58 0.29 3.23 BW1-15BHU 1,825 36.0 59.9% 0.12 0.015 0.191 0.1 0.212 5.83 0.30 3.38 BW1-15CHU 1,793 25.9 48.0% 0.16 0.015 0.200 0.1 0.218 6.80 0.37 3.82 BW1-16HU 1,402 30.1 23.0% 0.29 0.015 0.213 0.1 0.227 8.21 0.52 4.58
PAGE 134
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 1 of 3 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-2: SWMM Soils Data A B C D ACN1-0HU 0.0% 0.0% 8.3% 91.7% ACN1-10HU 0.0% 0.0% 8.5% 91.5% ACN1-1HU 0.0% 0.0% 6.9% 93.1% ACN1-2HU 0.0% 0.5% 21.1% 78.4% ACN1-3HU 0.0% 16.9% 19.9% 63.3% ACN1-4HU 0.0% 0.0% 81.5% 18.5% ACN1-5HU 0.0% 6.1% 41.3% 52.7% ACN1-6HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ACN1-7HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ACN1-8HU 0.0% 13.7% 29.8% 56.5% ACN1-9HU 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 97.4% ACN3-6HU 3.3% 20.3% 14.3% 62.1% ACS1-1HU 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 99.0% ACS1-2HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ACS1-3HU 0.5% 6.3% 11.7% 81.5% ACS1-4HU 7.1% 31.9% 26.8% 34.2% ACS1-5HU 3.0% 21.1% 18.4% 57.4% ACS1-6HU 1.0% 13.5% 22.6% 62.9% ACS1-7HU 1.5% 9.6% 13.7% 75.1% ACS1-8HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ACS1-9HU 3.5% 11.0% 13.7% 71.7% ACS2-1HU 0.0% 0.0% 51.2% 48.8% ACS2-2HU 0.0% 0.0% 26.9% 73.1% ACS2-3HU 0.4% 24.8% 45.3% 29.5% ACS2-4HU 10.2% 11.1% 58.7% 20.0% ACS2-5HU 0.0% 12.9% 24.2% 62.9% ACS2-6HU 0.0% 0.0% 18.0% 82.0% ACS2-7HU 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 97.2% ACS3-10HU 8.4% 20.7% 18.0% 52.9% ACS3-1HU 0.0% 7.4% 43.9% 48.7% ACS3-2HU 0.0% 0.0% 46.7% 53.3% ACS3-3HU 0.0% 0.0% 17.4% 82.6% ACS3-4HU 0.0% 16.4% 83.6% 0.0% ACS3-5HU 10.7% 15.1% 15.8% 58.4% ACS3-6HU 2.2% 6.5% 23.7% 67.5% ACS3-7HU 0.0% 2.2% 16.8% 80.9% ACS3-8HU 0.0% 0.0% 37.1% 62.9% ACS3-9HU 0.0% 2.5% 9.2% 88.3% ACS4-1HU 11.5% 33.5% 8.8% 46.1% ACS4-2HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ACS5-1HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% BE1-10HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 99.7% BE1-11HU 0.0% 0.0% 18.9% 81.1% BE1-12HU 0.0% 0.0% 6.6% 93.4% BE1-13HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% BE1-14HU 0.0% 0.0% 6.4% 93.6% BE1-15HU 0.0% 0.0% 76.1% 23.9% BE1-16HU 0.0% 0.0% 14.5% 85.5% BE1-17HU 0.0% 0.0% 15.1% 84.9% BE1-18HU 0.0% 34.9% 65.1% 0.0% BE1-19HU 0.0% 29.3% 70.7% 0.0% BE1-1HU 0.0% 6.7% 3.6% 89.7% BE1-20HU 0.0% 0.0% 21.1% 78.9% BE1-2HU 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 97.2% BE1-3HU 0.0% 0.0% 6.2% 93.8% BE1-4HU 0.0% 17.5% 15.8% 66.6% BE1-5HU 0.0% 40.7% 59.3% 0.0% BE1-6HU 0.0% 0.0% 74.4% 25.6% BE1-7HU 0.0% 0.0% 54.7% 45.3% BE1-8HU 0.0% 0.0% 20.6% 79.4% Soil Type Hydrologic Units
PAGE 135
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 2 of 3 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-2: SWMM Soils Data A B C D Soil Type Hydrologic Units BE1-9HU 0.0% 0.0% 29.5% 70.5% BE2-1HU 0.0% 40.2% 59.8% 0.0% BE2-2HU 0.0% 5.6% 94.4% 0.0% BE2-3HU 0.0% 0.3% 79.8% 19.9% BE2-4HU 0.0% 0.0% 71.2% 28.8% BE2-5HU 0.0% 0.0% 83.0% 17.0% BE2-7HU 0.0% 0.0% 52.3% 47.7% BE2-8HU 0.0% 0.0% 43.3% 56.7% BE3-1HU 0.0% 0.0% 32.1% 67.9% BE3-2HU 0.0% 0.0% 37.5% 62.5% BE3-3HU 0.0% 0.0% 45.1% 54.9% BE4-1HU 0.0% 0.0% 8.0% 92.0% BE4-2HU 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 97.3% BE4-3HU 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% 96.4% BE4-4HU 0.0% 0.0% 39.8% 60.2% BE4-5HU 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 98.7% BE4-6HU 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% BE4-7HU 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 98.6% BE4-8HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% BE4-9HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% BE5-1HU 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 94.1% BE6-1HU 0.0% 63.8% 36.2% 0.0% BE6-2HU 0.0% 36.8% 63.2% 0.0% BE6-3HU 0.0% 0.0% 72.4% 27.6% BE7-1HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% BE7-2HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% BE7-3HU 0.0% 0.0% 18.3% 81.7% BE7-4HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 99.7% BE7-5HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% BW1-10HU 0.0% 58.8% 41.2% 0.0% BW1-11HU 0.0% 37.7% 62.3% 0.0% BW1-12HU 0.0% 46.8% 53.2% 0.0% BW1-13HU 0.0% 68.8% 31.2% 0.0% BW1-14HU 0.0% 52.8% 47.2% 0.0% BW1-15AHU 0.0% 60.6% 39.4% 0.0% BW1-15BHU 0.0% 59.5% 40.5% 0.0% BW1-15CHU 0.0% 87.1% 12.9% 0.0% BW1-16HU 24.1% 75.9% 0.0% 0.0% BW1-17HU 0.0% 41.2% 58.8% 0.0% BW1-18HU 0.3% 64.9% 34.8% 0.0% BW1-19AHU 77.8% 22.2% 0.0% 0.0% BW1-19BHU 67.9% 32.1% 0.0% 0.0% BW1-1AHU 0.0% 87.9% 12.1% 0.0% BW1-1BHU 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% BW1-1CHU 0.0% 66.2% 33.8% 0.0% BW1-20HU 5.3% 27.8% 62.6% 4.3% BW1-21HU 0.0% 5.2% 10.8% 84.0% BW1-22HU 0.0% 3.0% 8.7% 88.2% BW1-23HU 0.0% 24.0% 0.1% 75.9% BW1-2HU 0.0% 57.9% 42.1% 0.0% BW1-3HU 0.0% 85.4% 14.6% 0.0% BW1-4HU 0.0% 55.8% 44.2% 0.0% BW1-5HU 0.0% 40.7% 59.3% 0.0% BW1-6HU 0.0% 28.6% 71.4% 0.0% BW1-7HU 0.0% 75.9% 24.1% 0.0% BW1-8HU 0.0% 54.0% 46.0% 0.0% BW1-9HU 0.0% 64.6% 35.4% 0.0% BW2-10HU 36.7% 63.2% 0.1% 0.0% BW2-11HU 15.3% 9.7% 8.9% 66.0% BW2-1AHU 0.0% 66.5% 33.5% 0.0%
PAGE 136
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 3 of 3 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-2: SWMM Soils Data A B C D Soil Type Hydrologic Units BW2-1BHU 0.0% 62.3% 37.7% 0.0% BW2-2HU 0.0% 51.8% 48.2% 0.0% BW2-3HU 0.0% 76.0% 24.0% 0.0% BW2-4AHU 0.0% 62.0% 38.0% 0.0% BW2-4BHU 0.0% 41.4% 58.6% 0.0% BW2-4CHU 0.0% 69.5% 30.5% 0.0% BW2-5HU 0.0% 64.1% 35.9% 0.0% BW2-6HU 9.6% 49.8% 40.5% 0.0% BW2-7HU 1.9% 68.7% 29.4% 0.0% BW2-8HU 99.9% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% BW2-9HU 55.2% 42.8% 2.0% 0.0% BW3-1AHU 48.1% 50.7% 1.3% 0.0% BW3-1BHU 44.4% 55.6% 0.0% 0.0% BW3-1CHU 6.7% 47.7% 45.6% 0.0% BW3-1DHU 0.0% 74.3% 25.7% 0.0% BW3-1EHU 0.0% 88.6% 11.4% 0.0% BW3-1FHU 1.9% 70.1% 0.0% 28.0% BW3-1GHU 17.8% 70.7% 0.0% 11.4% BW3-1HHU 33.5% 59.8% 6.7% 0.0% BW3-1IHU 0.0% 99.5% 0.5% 0.0% BW3-2HU 49.1% 50.3% 0.6% 0.0% BW3-3AHU 1.2% 3.4% 4.1% 91.3% BW3-3BHU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% BW3-4HU 5.2% 12.3% 24.7% 57.8% BW4-1HU 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% BW5-1HU 10.6% 5.1% 6.5% 77.7% BW6-1HU 0.9% 11.3% 2.7% 85.1%
PAGE 137
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 1 of 10 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-3: SWMM Hydraulic Link Data (Pipes and Overland Flow) Link Link No. of Depth Width Length Manning's U/S Inv. D/S Inv. Name Type Barrels (ft) (ft) (ft) Roughness (NAVD ft) (NAVD ft) AC1 Overland N/A N/A N/A 750 0.030 -10.0 -10.0 AC2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 720 0.030 -10.0 -10.0 AC3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 1,050 0.030 -10.0 -10.0 AC-FM.1 Force Main 1 3 N/A 3,980 0.012 -2.6 -2.6 ACN1-0 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 900 0.014 -1.0 -2.0 ACN1-0-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.5 3.4 ACN1-0-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.0 3.9 ACN1-1 Culvert 1 2 N/A 700 0.014 0.3 -0.6 ACN1-10 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 650 0.014 -1.5 -2.0 ACN1-10-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.2 3.1 ACN1-10-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.2 3.1 ACN1-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.3 3.2 ACN1-1-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.4 3.3 ACN1-2 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 650 0.014 0.5 -0.7 ACN1-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.8 3.7 ACN1-2-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.4 3.3 ACN1-3 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 620 0.014 0.2 -1.0 ACN1-3B Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 620 0.014 0.2 -1.0 ACN1-3-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.6 3.5 ACN1-3-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.6 3.5 ACN1-4 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 295 0.014 3.5 0.0 ACN1-4A Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 885 0.014 0.0 -1.5 ACN1-4-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.8 5.7 ACN1-4-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.0 5.9 ACN1-5 Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 1,050 0.014 -1.5 -2.2 ACN1-5B Culvert 1 3 N/A 1,600 0.014 -1.0 -2.4 ACN1-5-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.4 3.3 ACN1-6 Culvert 1 3 N/A 970 0.014 -0.6 -1.5 ACN1-6-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.9 3.8 ACN1-7 Culvert 1 2 N/A 650 0.014 -1.1 -2.0 ACN1-7-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.3 4.2 ACN1-7-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.2 4.1 ACN1-7-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.3 4.2 ACN1-7-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.1 4.0 ACN1-8-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.1 4.0 ACN1-8-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.4 3.3 ACN1-8-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.1 4.0 ACN1-8-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 50 0.030 4.1 4.0 ACN1-9 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 900 0.014 -2.0 -2.5 ACN3-6-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.7 4.6 ACS1-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.7 4.6 ACS1-1-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.9 5.8 ACS1-2 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 575 0.014 1.5 0.7 ACS1-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.7 5.6 ACS1-2-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.1 5.0 ACS1-2-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.7 4.6 ACS1-2-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.8 5.7 ACS1-3 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 300 0.014 0.5 0.0 ACS1-3A Culvert 1 3 N/A 1,150 0.014 0.0 -1.0 ACS1-3A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.8 5.7 ACS1-3A-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.3 6.2 ACS1-3-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.0 5.9 ACS1-4 Culvert 1 1 N/A 150 0.014 2.4 2.0 ACS1-4-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.1 6.0 ACS1-4-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.4 6.3 ACS1-5 Culvert 1 3.5 N/A 1,500 0.014 -1.0 -3.5 ACS1-5-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.6 6.5 ACS1-5-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.5 5.4 ACS1-6 Culvert 1 4 N/A 100 0.014 -8.0 -8.8 ACS1-6-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.5 2.4 Existing Conditions Conduits
PAGE 138
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 2 of 10 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-3: SWMM Hydraulic Link Data (Pipes and Overland Flow) Link Link No. of Depth Width Length Manning's U/S Inv. D/S Inv. Name Type Barrels (ft) (ft) (ft) Roughness (NAVD ft) (NAVD ft) Existing Conditions Conduits ACS1-6-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.0 2.9 ACS1-7 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 1,600 0.014 3.9 0.7 ACS1-7-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.0 3.9 ACS1-8 Culvert 1 2 N/A 880 0.014 1.1 -0.8 ACS1-8-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.1 3.0 ACS1-8-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.7 3.6 ACS1-9 Culvert 1 4 N/A 790 0.014 -4.9 -8.0 ACS1-9-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.6 3.5 ACS2-1 Culvert 1 2 N/A 1,000 0.014 -3.4 -3.9 ACS2-1A Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 1,000 0.014 0.0 -0.5 ACS2-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.1 4.0 ACS2-2 Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 600 0.014 -3.9 -4.2 ACS2-2A Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 150 0.014 -0.5 -0.7 ACS2-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.1 3.0 ACS2-3 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 100 0.014 -2.5 -2.7 ACS2-3b Culvert 2 1.5 N/A 100 0.014 -2.5 -2.7 ACS2-3-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.7 3.6 ACS2-5 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 330 0.014 -2.0 -2.4 ACS2-5-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.5 2.4 ACS2-6 Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 500 0.014 -2.9 -3.5 ACS2-6-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.8 3.7 ACS2-6-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.4 3.3 ACS2-7 Culvert 1 2 N/A 770 0.014 -3.1 -3.4 ACS2-7-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.0 4.9 ACS3-1 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 300 0.014 2.2 1.7 ACS3-10 Culvert 1 3.5 N/A 1,400 0.014 -3.4 -4.9 ACS3-10-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.3 7.2 ACS3-10-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.9 6.8 ACS3-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.7 6.6 ACS3-1-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.4 7.3 ACS3-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.8 6.7 ACS3-2-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.4 6.3 ACS3-2-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.3 7.2 ACS3-3 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 265 0.014 2.2 1.3 ACS3-3-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.6 5.5 ACS3-3-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.9 5.8 ACS3-4 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 360 0.014 1.7 1.2 ACS3-4-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.9 6.8 ACS3-4-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.6 7.5 ACS3-5 Culvert 1 2 N/A 300 0.014 -2.1 -2.4 ACS3-6 Culvert 1 2 N/A 100 0.014 -1.0 -1.2 ACS3-6-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.5 3.4 ACS3-7 Culvert 1 1 N/A 100 0.030 3.0 2.0 ACS3-7-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.6 5.5 ACS3-8 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 650 0.014 1.5 1.2 ACS3-8A Culvert 1 2 N/A 1,600 0.014 1.2 -1.0 ACS3-8A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 50 0.030 7.7 7.6 ACS3-8A-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.8 6.7 ACS3-8B Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 610 0.014 1.2 0.3 ACS3-8-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.3 7.2 ACS3-8-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.5 4.4 ACS3-9-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.7 2.6 ACS4-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.0 3.9 ACS4-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.1 4.0 ACS4-2-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.2 3.1 ACS5-1 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 100 0.014 -1.3 -1.5 ACS5-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.0 2.9 BE1-1 Culvert 1 3 N/A 340 0.014 -5.0 -5.6 BE1-10 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 650 0.014 -1.6 -2.5 BE1-10A Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 265 0.014 -3.6 -3.9
PAGE 139
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 3 of 10 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-3: SWMM Hydraulic Link Data (Pipes and Overland Flow) Link Link No. of Depth Width Length Manning's U/S Inv. D/S Inv. Name Type Barrels (ft) (ft) (ft) Roughness (NAVD ft) (NAVD ft) Existing Conditions Conduits BE1-10B Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 265 0.014 -3.5 -3.9 BE1-10-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.0 4.9 BE1-10-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.0 4.9 BE1-11 Culvert 1 5 N/A 150 0.014 -5.5 -5.6 BE1-11-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.7 6.6 BE1-11-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.8 6.7 BE1-11-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.5 6.4 BE1-11-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.8 6.7 BE1-12 Culvert 1 4 N/A 1,380 0.014 -1.0 -2.1 BE1-12-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.2 6.1 BE1-12-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.5 6.4 BE1-12-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.0 6.9 BE1-13 Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 950 0.014 0.7 0.0 BE1-13-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.4 6.3 BE1-13-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.5 6.4 BE1-13-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.4 6.3 BE1-13-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.9 6.8 BE1-14 Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 1,200 0.014 -1.0 -2.0 BE1-14-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.3 6.2 BE1-14-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.3 6.2 BE1-14-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.2 6.1 BE1-14-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.3 7.2 BE1-15 Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 1,600 0.014 0.5 -1.0 BE1-15-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.2 7.1 BE1-15-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.5 7.4 BE1-15-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.3 7.2 BE1-15-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.6 7.5 BE1-16 Culvert 1 3.5 N/A 670 0.014 0.3 -0.6 BE1-16-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.7 5.6 BE1-17 Culvert 1 3.5 N/A 1,970 0.014 -0.6 -3.4 BE1-17-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.7 4.6 BE1-17-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.1 7.2 BE1-18 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 1,800 0.014 2.0 0.0 BE1-18-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.9 8.8 BE1-18-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.1 8.0 BE1-18-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.7 8.6 BE1-18-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.0 8.9 BE1-19 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 900 0.014 -1.0 -2.5 BE1-19-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.3 8.2 BE1-19-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.1 8.0 BE1-19-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.2 8.1 BE1-19-OF5 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.1 8.0 BE1-1A Culvert 1 3 N/A 850 0.014 -3.6 -4.7 BE1-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.5 3.4 BE1-1-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.0 2.9 BE1-1-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.8 2.6 BE1-20 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 800 0.014 -2.5 -3.1 BE1-20-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.2 5.1 BE1-20-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.3 5.2 BE1-20-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.2 5.1 BE1-20-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.3 5.2 BE1-20-OF5 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.2 8.1 BE1-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.1 3.0 BE1-2-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 50 0.030 3.0 2.9 BE1-3 Culvert 1 1 N/A 650 0.014 -3.0 -3.9 BE1-3-2 Culvert 1 1.75 N/A 500 0.014 -2.5 -3.0 BE1-3B Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 100 0.010 -2.0 -2.5 BE1-3-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.5 2.4 BE1-4 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 1,500 0.014 5.0 3.5 BE1-4-OF Culvert 1 1 N/A 100 0.030 *
PAGE 140
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 4 of 10 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-3: SWMM Hydraulic Link Data (Pipes and Overland Flow) Link Link No. of Depth Width Length Manning's U/S Inv. D/S Inv. Name Type Barrels (ft) (ft) (ft) Roughness (NAVD ft) (NAVD ft) Existing Conditions Conduits BE1-4-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.4 5.3 BE1-5 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 1,600 0.014 3.5 2.0 BE1-5-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.5 8.4 BE1-5-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.4 8.3 BE1-5-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.4 8.3 BE1-5-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.5 8.4 BE1-5-OF5 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.5 8.4 BE1-6 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 1,000 0.014 2.0 1.0 BE1-6-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.1 7.0 BE1-6-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.5 7.4 BE1-6-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.0 6.9 BE1-6-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.0 6.9 BE1-6-OF5 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.1 7.0 BE1-7 Culvert 1 3.5 N/A 1,250 0.014 -2.9 -4.7 BE1-7A Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 1,300 0.014 1.0 -1.0 BE1-7-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.6 7.5 BE1-7-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.1 7.0 BE1-8 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 1,900 0.014 -1.0 -3.0 BE1-8-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.4 6.3 BE1-8-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.7 6.6 BE1-8-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.7 6.6 BE1-8-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.1 7.0 BE1-8-OF5 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.3 7.2 BE1-9 Culvert 1 5 N/A 1,600 0.014 -4.0 -5.5 BE1-9A Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 943 0.014 -2.4 -3.6 BE1-9-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.6 6.5 BE1-9-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.5 6.4 BE1-9-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.0 6.9 BE1-9-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.9 6.8 BE1-9-OF5 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.2 7.1 BE2-1 Culvert 1 2 N/A 670 0.014 1.0 0.8 BE2-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.1 8.0 BE2-1-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.1 8.0 BE2-2 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 500 0.024 1.7 1.0 BE2-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.6 7.5 BE2-3A Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 640 0.014 -0.4 -1.4 BE2-3B Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 700 0.014 -1.9 -2.9 BE2-4 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 590 0.014 -0.1 -0.9 BE2-4A Culvert 1 2.25 N/A 690 0.014 0.6 -0.4 BE2-4A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.6 7.5 BE2-4A-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 50 0.030 7.5 7.4 BE2-4B Culvert 1 2.25 N/A 695 0.014 -0.9 -1.9 BE2-5 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 640 0.014 1.4 -0.4 BE2-5-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.2 7.1 BE2-5-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.0 6.9 BE2-7 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 700 0.014 -0.3 -1.9 BE2-7-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.0 6.9 BE2-7-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.8 6.7 BE2-7-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.7 7.6 BE2-8 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 800 0.024 2.0 -2.0 BE2-8-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.0 5.9 BE3-1 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 330 0.014 1.8 1.3 BE3-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.7 6.6 BE3-2-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.1 7.2 BE3-2-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.4 6.3 BE3-2-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.6 7.5 BE3-2-OF5 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.9 6.8 BE3-3-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.2 6.1 BE3-3-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.2 7.1 BE4-1A Culvert 1 3 N/A 750 0.014 0.0 -1.0
PAGE 141
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 5 of 10 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-3: SWMM Hydraulic Link Data (Pipes and Overland Flow) Link Link No. of Depth Width Length Manning's U/S Inv. D/S Inv. Name Type Barrels (ft) (ft) (ft) Roughness (NAVD ft) (NAVD ft) Existing Conditions Conduits BE4-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.7 6.6 BE4-1-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.8 6.7 BE4-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.0 5.9 BE4-2-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.0 5.9 BE4-3 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 200 0.014 0.6 -0.3 BE4-3-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.8 5.7 BE4-3-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.0 5.9 BE4-3-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.3 6.2 BE4-3-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.4 5.3 BE4-3-OF5 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.9 5.8 BE4-3-OF6 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.0 5.9 BE4-3-OF7 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.5 5.4 BE4-4 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 300 0.014 2.2 1.8 BE4-4-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.6 6.5 BE4-4-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.6 6.5 BE4-5 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 200 0.014 2.0 1.8 BE4-5-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.9 5.8 BE4-6-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.0 5.9 BE4-6-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.8 5.7 BE4-7 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 615 0.014 2.0 1.1 BE4-7B Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 950 0.014 -2.0 -2.4 BE4-7-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.0 5.9 BE4-7-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.3 6.2 BE4-7-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.5 6.4 BE4-8 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 500 0.014 -0.1 -0.8 BE4-8B Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 500 0.014 -0.1 -0.8 BE4-8-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.3 5.2 BE4-8-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.6 5.5 BE4-9 Culvert 1 2 N/A 570 0.014 -2.5 -3.3 BE4-9-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.7 3.6 BE5-1 Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 300 0.014 -3.5 -3.8 BE5-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.4 3.3 BE6-1 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 300 0.014 1.5 0.0 BE6-1A Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 1,000 0.014 2.0 -1.0 BE6-1B Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 300 0.014 1.7 0.0 BE6-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.8 7.7 BE6-1-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.9 7.8 BE6-2 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 460 0.014 1.5 0.0 BE6-2B Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 1,200 0.010 2.2 1.7 BE6-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.1 8.0 BE6-2-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.1 8.0 BE6-3 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 365 0.014 4.1 3.6 BE7-1 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 100 0.014 -2.8 -3.3 BE7-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.5 2.4 BE7-1-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.5 2.4 BE7-1-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.5 2.4 BE7-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.6 2.5 BE7-3 Culvert 1 3.5 N/A 1,008 0.014 -4.7 -6.1 BE7-3-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.1 3.0 BE7-3-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.5 3.4 BE7-3-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.5 3.4 BE7-4 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 265 0.014 -3.5 -3.9 BE7-4B Culvert 1 1.75 N/A 650 0.014 -2.5 -2.8 BE7-4-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.5 2.4 BE7-5 Culvert 1 3.5 N/A 170 0.014 -6.1 -6.4 BE7-5-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.3 4.2 BE7-5-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.7 3.6 BW1-10 Culvert 1 3.5 N/A 750 0.014 1.6 0.5 BW1-10A Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 775 0.014 2.2 1.6 BW1-10A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1
PAGE 142
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 6 of 10 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-3: SWMM Hydraulic Link Data (Pipes and Overland Flow) Link Link No. of Depth Width Length Manning's U/S Inv. D/S Inv. Name Type Barrels (ft) (ft) (ft) Roughness (NAVD ft) (NAVD ft) Existing Conditions Conduits BW1-10A-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.4 9.3 BW1-10A-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW1-10-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 50 0.030 9.3 9.2 BW1-10-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.1 9.0 BW1-10-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.7 9.6 BW1-10-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.5 9.4 BW1-11 Culvert 1 3 N/A 1,180 0.014 2.1 1.6 BW1-11-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.7 9.6 BW1-11-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.7 9.6 BW1-11-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.7 8.6 BW1-11-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.1 9.0 BW1-12 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 570 0.014 2.4 1.8 BW1-12-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.0 8.9 BW1-13 Culvert 1 4.5 N/A 650 0.014 -0.2 -0.5 BW1-13A Culvert 1 3.5 N/A 720 0.014 0.5 0.1 BW1-13A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.0 7.9 BW1-13A-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 50 0.030 9.1 9.0 BW1-14 Culvert 1 2 N/A 800 0.014 0.9 -0.2 BW1-15A Culvert 1 4.5 N/A 1,400 0.014 -0.5 -3.1 BW1-15A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.1 9.0 BW1-15A-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.1 9.0 BW1-15A-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.0 8.9 BW1-15A-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.3 9.2 BW1-15A-OF5 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.3 9.2 BW1-15A-OF6 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW1-15B Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 2,000 0.014 2.5 1.5 BW1-15C Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 1,300 0.014 2.0 1.5 BW1-15C-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 10.0 9.9 BW1-16 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 900 0.024 2.0 0.5 BW1-16-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.3 9.2 BW1-16-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.3 9.2 BW1-16-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.7 9.6 BW1-17 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 600 0.014 2.0 0.5 BW1-17A Culvert 1 5 N/A 700 0.014 -3.1 -3.4 BW1-17A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 50 0.030 9.1 9.0 BW1-17-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.5 8.4 BW1-17-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.3 8.2 BW1-18 Culvert 1 5 N/A 1,350 0.014 -3.5 -4.1 BW1-18-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW1-18-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.3 9.2 BW1-18-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.1 9.0 BW1-19 Culvert 1 5 N/A 650 0.014 -4.1 -4.4 BW1-19A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 11.4 11.3 BW1-19A-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 11.7 11.6 BW1-19B Culvert 1 2 N/A 1,265 0.014 4.0 -1.0 BW1-19B2 Culvert 1 5 N/A 520 0.014 -4.4 -4.7 BW1-19-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 10.4 10.3 BW1-1A Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 400 0.014 5.3 4.7 BW1-1A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.5 9.4 BW1-1A-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.5 9.4 BW1-1A-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.6 9.5 BW1-1A-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.6 9.5 BW1-1A-OF5 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.6 9.5 BW1-1A-OF6 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.6 9.5 BW1-1B-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.9 9.8 BW1-1B-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.9 9.8 BW1-1B-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.9 9.8 BW1-1B-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.9 9.8 BW1-1C Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 180 0.014 5.7 5.3 BW1-1C-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.9 9.8
PAGE 143
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 7 of 10 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-3: SWMM Hydraulic Link Data (Pipes and Overland Flow) Link Link No. of Depth Width Length Manning's U/S Inv. D/S Inv. Name Type Barrels (ft) (ft) (ft) Roughness (NAVD ft) (NAVD ft) Existing Conditions Conduits BW1-1C-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.5 9.4 BW1-2 Culvert 1 2 N/A 930 0.014 6.1 5.1 BW1-20A Culvert 1 5 N/A 1,420 0.014 -4.7 -5.4 BW1-20-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 7.8 7.7 BW1-21 Culvert 1 2 N/A 350 0.014 -1.0 -2.0 BW1-21-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.3 3.2 BW1-21-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.8 3.7 BW1-21-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.2 3.1 BW1-21-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.7 3.6 BW1-22 Culvert 1 5 N/A 730 0.014 -5.4 -5.8 BW1-22-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.5 3.4 BW1-22-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.5 3.4 BW1-23 Culvert 1 5 N/A 150 0.014 -4.5 -5.0 BW1-23-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.3 6.2 BW1-23-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 6.1 6.0 BW1-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.9 8.8 BW1-3 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 950 0.014 4.7 3.8 BW1-3-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.5 9.4
PAGE 144
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 8 of 10 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-3: SWMM Hydraulic Link Data (Pipes and Overland Flow) Link Link No. of Depth Width Length Manning's U/S Inv. D/S Inv. Name Type Barrels (ft) (ft) (ft) Roughness (NAVD ft) (NAVD ft) Existing Conditions Conduits BW1-3-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.5 9.4 BW1-3-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.5 9.4 BW1-3-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.5 9.4 BW1-4 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 260 0.014 5.4 4.1 BW1-4-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.9 8.8 BW1-4-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.4 9.3 BW1-4-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.1 9.0 BW1-4-OF5 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.9 8.8 BW1-5 Culvert 1 2 N/A 715 0.014 5.1 4.1 BW1-5-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.0 8.9 BW1-6 Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 1,490 0.014 4.1 2.2 BW1-6-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.9 8.8 BW1-7 Culvert 1 2 N/A 905 0.014 5.3 4.1 BW1-7A Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 180 0.014 2.0 1.5 BW1-7-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW1-7-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW1-8 Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 1,460 0.014 4.1 2.1 BW1-8-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.9 8.8 BW1-9 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 710 0.014 3.8 2.2 BW1-9-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW1-9-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW1-9-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.7 8.6 BW1-9-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.3 9.2 BW2-10 Culvert 1 6 N/A 800 0.014 -2.8 -3.2 BW2-10A Culvert 1 6 N/A 1,050 0.014 -3.2 -4.7 BW2-10-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.7 9.6 BW2-10-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 10.1 10.0 BW2-11 Culvert 1 6 N/A 850 0.014 -4.7 -5.1 BW2-11B Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 150 0.014 -0.5 -1.0 BW2-11C Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 150 0.014 -0.5 -1.0 BW2-11-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.6 3.5 BW2-1A Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 950 0.014 4.8 3.2 BW2-1A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.4 9.3 BW2-1A-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.1 9.0 BW2-1B Culvert 1 3 N/A 665 0.014 3.2 1.5 BW2-1B-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.8 8.7 BW2-1B-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.7 8.6 BW2-2 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 915 0.014 2.7 1.5 BW2-2-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.3 9.2 BW2-2-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW2-2-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW2-3 Culvert 1 3 N/A 650 0.014 1.5 0.3 BW2-3-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW2-4A1 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 1,000 0.014 3.4 1.4 BW2-4A2 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 700 0.014 3.4 2.5 BW2-4A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.6 8.5 BW2-4A-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.3 9.2 BW2-4A-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.3 9.2 BW2-4B Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 1,000 0.014 4.4 3.2 BW2-4B2 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 800 0.014 2.5 0.5 BW2-4B-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.5 8.4 BW2-4B-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.1 9.0 BW2-4B-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.5 8.4 BW2-4C1 Culvert 1 2 N/A 750 0.014 6.6 5.6 BW2-4C2 Culvert 1 2 N/A 1,300 0.014 6.6 4.8 BW2-4C-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.0 8.9 BW2-4C-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.6 9.5 BW2-4C-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.6 9.5 BW2-4C-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.5 9.4 BW2-5 Culvert 1 3 N/A 1,400 0.014 0.3 -2.1
PAGE 145
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 9 of 10 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-3: SWMM Hydraulic Link Data (Pipes and Overland Flow) Link Link No. of Depth Width Length Manning's U/S Inv. D/S Inv. Name Type Barrels (ft) (ft) (ft) Roughness (NAVD ft) (NAVD ft) Existing Conditions Conduits BW2-5B Culvert 1 3.5 N/A 1,900 0.014 0.4 -0.5 BW2-5-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 10.0 9.9 BW2-5-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.3 9.2 BW2-5-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW2-5-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW2-5-OF5 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.4 9.2 BW2-5-OF6 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW2-5-OF7 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.4 9.2 BW2-6 Culvert 1 6 N/A 1,280 0.014 -2.1 -2.8 BW2-7 Culvert 1 3 N/A 370 0.014 -1.5 -2.1 BW2-7-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW2-8 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 1,000 0.014 -1.4 -2.8 BW2-8-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 10.3 10.2 BW2-9 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 1,280 0.024 4.4 1.5 BW2-9-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.7 9.6 BW3-1A Culvert 1 2 N/A 650 0.024 2.4 2.2 BW3-1A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 10.0 9.9 BW3-1A-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW3-1B Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 800 0.014 3.0 2.5 BW3-1C Culvert 1 3 N/A 1,300 0.014 1.5 0.4 BW3-1C-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 8.9 8.8 BW3-1D Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 1,000 0.014 2.5 1.5 BW3-1D-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.2 9.1 BW3-1D-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.1 9.0 BW3-1D-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.0 8.9 BW3-1D-OF4 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.3 9.2 BW3-1E Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 1,500 0.014 4.0 2.5 BW3-1E-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.0 8.9 BW3-1E-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.4 9.3 BW3-1E-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 10.1 10.2 BW3-1F Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 1,500 0.014 5.5 4.0 BW3-1F-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.8 9.7 BW3-1F-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.9 9.8 BW3-1G Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 900 0.014 6.0 5.5 BW3-1G-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.010 10.7 10.6 BW3-1G-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.010 10.6 10.5 BW3-1G-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 10.6 10.5 BW3-1H-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 10.0 9.9 BW3-1H-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.8 9.7 BW3-1H-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 9.7 9.6 BW3-1I Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 180 0.014 2.0 1.5 BW3-1I-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 10.0 9.9 BW3-1I-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 10.1 10.0 BW3-2A Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 530 0.024 2.2 1.3 BW3-2A2 Culvert 1 3 N/A 1,280 0.014 0.9 -2.1 BW3-2A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 10.1 10.0 BW3-3A Culvert 1 4.5 N/A 170 0.014 -4.5 -4.9 BW3-3A2 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 150 0.014 0.0 -1.0 BW3-3A-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.1 3.0 BW3-3A-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.9 2.8 BW3-3A-OF3 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.7 2.6 BW3-3B Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 100 0.014 -1.0 -2.0 BW3-3B-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.0 2.9 BW3-4 Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 830 0.014 -1.5 -4.1 BW3-4B Culvert 1 3.5 N/A 720 0.014 -4.1 -4.5 BW3-4B-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.1 3.0 BW3-4-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 4.8 4.7 BW3-4-OF2 Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 5.0 4.9 BW4-1 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 150 0.014 0.0 -1.0 BW4-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 2.9 2.8
PAGE 146
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 10 of 10 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-3: SWMM Hydraulic Link Data (Pipes and Overland Flow) Link Link No. of Depth Width Length Manning's U/S Inv. D/S Inv. Name Type Barrels (ft) (ft) (ft) Roughness (NAVD ft) (NAVD ft) Existing Conditions Conduits BW5-1 Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 100 0.014 0.0 -0.5 BW5-1B Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 150 0.014 0.0 -0.5 BW5-1C Culvert 1 1.25 N/A 150 0.014 0.0 -0.5 BW5-1-OF Overland N/A N/A N/A 100 0.030 3.3 3.2 BW6-1 Culvert 1 2 N/A 190 0.014 -0.2 -0.5 Dis-AC1.1 Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 100 0.012 -2.6 -2.6 Dis-AC2.1 Culvert 1 2.5 N/A 100 0.012 -2.6 -2.6 G58_1 Culvert 1 5 N/A 224 0.024 -9.0 -9.0 G58_2 Culvert 1 6 N/A 207 0.024 -9.0 -9.0 G58_3 Culvert 1 6 N/A 190 0.024 -9.0 -9.0 G58_4 Culvert 1 6 N/A 173 0.024 -9.0 -9.0 OutBW1-15 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 300 0.014 1.5 0.0 PACN1-8 Culvert 1 4 N/A 50 0.014 -2.2 -2.5 Ruck1 Culvert 1 3 N/A 700 0.014 -5.6 -6.6 RuckFM1 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 10 0.010 7.9 -8.2 RuckFM2 Culvert 1 1.5 N/A 10 0.010 7.9 -8.2 RuckIn Culvert 1 5 N/A 200 0.014 -7.1 -7.1 RuckOut Force Main 1 5 N/A 1,500 0.014 -8.2 -8.2
PAGE 147
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 1 of 1 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-4: SWMM Hydraulic Link Data (Pumps, Exfiltration, Drainage Wells) Pump Max Capacity Pump Max Capacity Pump Max Capacity Name (cfs) Name (cfs) Name (cfs) ACN1-1-EX 8.1 BE1-7-DW 10.5 BW1-6-DW 3.0 ACN1-2-EX 24.6 BE1-7-EX 2.5 BW1-6-EX 3.4 ACN1-3-EX 6.9 BE1-8-DW 9.0 BW1-7-DW 13.5 ACN1-4-EX 16.1 BE1-9-DW 25.5 BW1-7-EX 0.9 ACN1-5-EX 1.2 BE2-2-EX 0.2 BW1-8-DW 12.0 ACN1-6-DW 1.5 BE2-3-EX 0.1 BW1-8-EX 3.1 ACN1-7-DW 9.0 BE2-4-EX 0.1 BW1-9-DW 1.5 ACN1-7-EX 7.6 BE2-5-EX 11.3 BW2-10A-DW 3.0 ACN1-8-DW 10.5 BE3-1-EX 4.3 BW2-11-DW 1.5 ACN3-6-EX 27.1 BE3-2-EX 6.0 BW2-11-EX 0.9 ACPmp1.1 43.4 BE4-1-EX 7.1 BW2-1B-DW 1.5 ACPmp2.1 43.4 BE4-3-DW 19.5 BW2-1B-EX 2.9 ACS1-3-EX 3.4 BE4-3-EX 6.2 BW2-2-DW 1.5 ACS1-4-EX 0.9 BE4-5-DW 4.5 BW2-2-DW2 4.5 ACS1-5-DW 18.0 BE4-5-EX 0.1 BW2-2-EX 1.6 ACS1-6-DW 3.0 BE5-1-EX 0.1 BW2-3-DW 6.0 ACS1-8-DW 1.5 BE6-1-DW 12.0 BW2-3-EX 1.0 ACS1-9-DW 15.0 BE6-2-EX 1.1 BW2-4A-EX 8.9 ACS2-1-DW 1.5 BE6-3-EX 3.1 BW2-4B-EX 3.0 ACS2-1-EX 5.0 BE7-2-EX 0.1 BW2-5-DW 16.5 ACS2-2-EX 1.9 BW1-10-DW 1.5 BW2-5-EX 7.8 ACS2-4-EX 2.7 BW1-10-EX 0.1 BW2-6-EX 22.1 ACS3-1-DW 1.5 BW1-11-EX 0.2 BW2-7-DW 1.5 ACS3-2-DW 3.0 BW1-12-DW 1.5 BW2-7-EX 5.0 ACS3-2-EX 4.3 BW1-12-DW2 3.0 BW2-8-DW 12.0 ACS3-3-EX 1.9 BW1-12-EX 0.3 BW2-8-EX 0.9 ACS3-4-EX 4.4 BW1-13-EX 4.9 BW2-9-DW 15.0 ACS3-5-EX 25.4 BW1-14-DW 1.5 BW3-1A-DW 9.0 ACS3-6-EX 0.4 BW1-14-EX 8.3 BW3-1B-DW 10.5 ACS3-8A-DW 3.0 BW1-15A-DW 1.5 BW3-1B-EX 2.8 ACS3-8-EX 0.7 BW1-15A-DW2 50.0 BW3-1C-DW 21.0 ACS4-1-DW 1.5 BW1-15A-EX 5.0 BW3-1C-EX 0.6 ACS5-1-DW 6.0 BW1-16-EX 0.2 BW3-1D-DW 7.5 ACS5-1-EX 0.1 BW1-17-EX 4.4 BW3-1E-DW 12.0 BE1-10-DW 18.0 BW1-18-DW 18.0 BW3-1E-EX 0.4 BE1-11-DW 7.5 BW1-19A-DW 15.0 BW3-1F-DW 3.0 BE1-12-DW 12.0 BW1-19B-DW 7.5 BW3-2A-DW 9.0 BE1-13-DW 10.5 BW1-19-DW 12.0 BW3-2-DW 24.0 BE1-14-DW 3.0 BW1-1A-DW 7.5 BW3-2-EX 0.2 BE1-18-DW 3.0 BW1-1A-EX 4.6 BW3-3A-EX 2.5 BE1-19-DW 15.0 BW1-1B-EX 3.3 BW3-4B-DW 3.0 BE1-1-EX 12.8 BW1-1C-EX 5.1 BW3-4-DW 4.5 BE1-2-EX 7.5 BW1-21-DW 15.0 BW4-1-EX 3.4 BE1-3-EX 0.6 BW1-21-EX 0.2 BW5-1-EX 3.0 BE1-5-DW 7.5 BW1-22-EX 0.1 BW6-1-EX 0.4 BE1-5-EX 0.9 BW1-2-EX 7.8 RuckPmp1 40.0 BE1-6-DW 18.0 BW1-4-DW 15.0 RuckPmp2 40.0 BE1-6-EX 0.5 BW1-5-EX 2.1 Existing Conditions Pumps Existing Conditions Pumps Existing Conditions Pumps
PAGE 148
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 1 of 7 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-5: SWMM Hydraulic Node DataAC1 Junction -10.0 1.0 AC2 Junction -10.0 1.0 AC3 Junction -10.0 1.0 ACN1-0 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN1-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN1-10 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN1-1-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACN1-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN1-2-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACN1-3 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN1-3-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACN1-4 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN1-4A Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN1-4-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACN1-5 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN1-5-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACN1-6 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN1-6-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACN1-7 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN1-7-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACN1-7-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACN1-8 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN1-8-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACN1-9 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN3-6 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACN3-6-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS1-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS1-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS1-3 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS1-3A Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS1-3-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS1-4 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS1-4-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS1-5 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS1-5-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS1-6 Storage Junction -9.0 1.0 ACS1-6-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS1-7 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS1-8 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS1-8-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS1-9 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS1-9-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS2-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS2-1-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS2-1-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS2-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS2-2-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS2-3 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS2-4 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS2-4-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS2-5 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS2-6 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS2-7 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS3-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS3-10 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS3-1-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS3-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS3-2-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS3-2-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS3-3 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 Existing ConditionsNodes Node Name Node Type Invert (ft NAVD) Initial Stage (ft NAVD)
PAGE 149
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 2 of 7 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-5: SWMM Hydraulic Node Data Existing ConditionsNodes Node Name Node Type Invert (ft NAVD) Initial Stage (ft NAVD) ACS3-3-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS3-4 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS3-4-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS3-5 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS3-5-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS3-6 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS3-6-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS3-7 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS3-8 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS3-8A Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS3-8A-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS3-8-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS3-9 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS4-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS4-1-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS4-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS5-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 ACS5-1-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A ACS5-1-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-10 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-10-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-11 Storage Junction -7.0 1.0 BE1-11-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-12 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-12-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-13 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-13-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-14 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-14-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-15 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-16 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-17 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-18 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-18-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-19 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-19-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-1-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-2 Storage Junction -6.0 1.0 BE1-20 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-2-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-3 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-3-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-4 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-5 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-5-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-5-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-6 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-6-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-6-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-7 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-7-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-7-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-8 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-8-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE1-9 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE1-9-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE2-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE2-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE2-2-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A
PAGE 150
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 3 of 7 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-5: SWMM Hydraulic Node Data Existing ConditionsNodes Node Name Node Type Invert (ft NAVD) Initial Stage (ft NAVD) BE2-3 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE2-3-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE2-4 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE2-4A Junction -5.0 1.0 BE2-4-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE2-5 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE2-5-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE2-7 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE2-8 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE3-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE3-1-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE3-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE3-2-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE3-3 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE4-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE4-1-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE4-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE4-3 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE4-3-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE4-3-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE4-4 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE4-5 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE4-5-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE4-5-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE4-6 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE4-7 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE4-8 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE4-9 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE5-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE5-1-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE6-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE6-1-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BE6-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE6-2-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE6-3 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE6-3-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE7-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE7-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE7-2-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BE7-3 Storage Junction -7.0 1.0 BE7-4 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BE7-5 Storage Junction -7.0 1.0 BW1-10 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-10A Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-10-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-10-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-11 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-11-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-12 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-12-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-12-DW2 Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-12-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-13 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-13A Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-13-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-14 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-14-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-14-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-15 Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-15A Storage Junction -5.0 1.0
PAGE 151
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 4 of 7 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-5: SWMM Hydraulic Node Data Existing ConditionsNodes Node Name Node Type Invert (ft NAVD) Initial Stage (ft NAVD) BW1-15A-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-15A-DW2 Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-15A-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-15B Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-15C Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-16 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-16-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-17 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-17A Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-17-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-18 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-18-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-19 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-19A Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-19A-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-19B Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-19B-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-19-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-1A Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-1A-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-1A-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-1B Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-1B-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-1C Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-1C-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-20 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-20A Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-21 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-21-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-21-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-22 Storage Junction -6.0 1.0 BW1-22-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-23 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-2-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-3 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-4 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-4-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-5 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-5-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-6 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-6-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-6-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-7 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-7-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-7-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-8 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-8-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-8-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW1-9 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW1-9-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-10 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-10A Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-10A-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-11 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-11-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-11-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-1A Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-1B Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-1B-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A
PAGE 152
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 5 of 7 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-5: SWMM Hydraulic Node Data Existing ConditionsNodes Node Name Node Type Invert (ft NAVD) Initial Stage (ft NAVD) BW2-1B-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-2-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-2-DW2 Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-2-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-3 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-3-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-3-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-4A Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-4A-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-4B Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-4B-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-4C Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-5 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-5-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-5-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-6 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-6-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-7 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-7-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-7-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-8 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-8-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-8-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW2-9 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW2-9-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-1A Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-1A-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-1B Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-1B-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-1B-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-1C Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-1C-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-1C-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-1D Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-1D-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-1E Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-1E-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-1E-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-1F Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-1F-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-1G Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-1G-OFOUT Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-1H Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-1I Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-2 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-2A Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-2A-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-2-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-2-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-3A Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-3A-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-3B Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-4 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-4B Junction -5.0 1.0 BW3-4B-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW3-4-DW Outfall 0.0 N/A BW4-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW4-1-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW5-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0
PAGE 153
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 6 of 7 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-5: SWMM Hydraulic Node Data Existing ConditionsNodes Node Name Node Type Invert (ft NAVD) Initial Stage (ft NAVD) BW5-1-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A BW6-1 Storage Junction -5.0 1.0 BW6-1-EX Outfall 0.0 N/A D-PS-AC1 Storage Junction -2.6 -2.6 D-PS-AC2 Storage Junction -2.6 -2.6 G58 Junction -10.0 1.0 G58S Junction -9.3 1.0 JAC Storage Junction -2.6 -2.6 Out2ACN1-0 Outfall 0.0 1.0 Out2ACS1-6 Outfall 0.0 1.0 OUT2ACS4-1 Outfall 0.0 1.0 OUT2ACS5-1 Outfall 0.0 1.0 Out2BE1-3 Outfall 0.0 1.0 Out2BE4-3 Outfall 0.0 Out2BE4-9 Outfall 0.0 1.0 Out2BE7-1 Outfall 0.0 1.0 Out2BE7-4 Outfall 0.0 1.0 Out2BW1-23 Outfall 0.0 Out3ACN1-0 Outfall 0.0 1.0 Out3ACS1-6 Outfall 0.0 1.0 Out3BE4-3 Outfall 0.0 N/A Out3BE7-1 Outfall 0.0 1.0 Out4BE7-1 Outfall 0.0 1.0 OutACN1-0 Outfall -5.0 1.0 OutACS1-2 Outfall 0.0 N/A OutACS1-3 Outfall 0.0 N/A OutACS1-6 Outfall -8.8 1.0 OutACS1-7 Outfall 0.0 N/A OutACS1-8 Outfall 0.0 N/A OutACS4-1 Outfall 0.0 1.0 OUTACS5-1 Outfall -1.5 1.0 OutBE1 Outfall -8.2 1.0 OutBE1-1 Outfall 0.0 N/A OUTBE1-10 Outfall -3.9 1.0 OutBE1-10B Outfall -3.9 1.0 OutBE1-11 Outfall -6.0 1.0 OutBE1-3 Outfall -3.8 1.0 OutBE1-4 Outfall 0.0 1.0 OutBE3-3B Outfall -2.0 1.0 OutBE3-3B2 Outfall 0.0 1.0 OutBE4-3 Outfall 0.0 N/A OutBE4-5 Outfall 0.0 N/A OutBE4-9 Outfall -4.3 1.0 OutBE5-1 Outfall -3.8 1.0 OutBE7-1 Outfall -3.8 1.0 OutBE7-2 Outfall 0.0 1.0 OutBE7-4 Outfall -3.9 1.0 OutBW1-15C Outfall -5.0 N/A OutBW1-21 Outfall -3.9 1.0 OUTBW1-22 Outfall -5.8 1.0 OUTBW1-22A Outfall 0.0 1.0 OutBW1-23 Outfall -5.0 1.0 OUTBW1-4 Outfall -1.0 1.0 OUTBW2-11 Outfall -5.1 1.0 OutBW2-11B Outfall -1.0 1.0 OUTBW2-11C Outfall -1.0 1.0 OUTBW3-3 Outfall -5.0 1.0 OUTBW3-3A2 Outfall -2.5 1.0 OUTBW3-3A3 Outfall 0.0 1.0 OutBW3-4 Outfall 3.5 N/A
PAGE 154
Appendix B SWMM Hydologic Data 7 of 7 Appendix B-1 to B-5 SWMM Attributes.xls 3/2/2012 Appendix B-5: SWMM Hydraulic Node Data Existing ConditionsNodes Node Name Node Type Invert (ft NAVD) Initial Stage (ft NAVD) OutBW5-1 Outfall -0.5 1.0 OutBW5-1B Outfall -0.5 1.0 OutBW5-1C Outfall -0.5 1.0 OutBW5-1D Outfall 0.0 1.0 OUTBW6 Outfall -0.5 1.0 OUTMBE2 Outfall -6.4 1.0 RkEnd Storage Junction -8.2 -8.2 RkWWell Storage Junction -7.1 1.0 Ruck Storage Junction -7.1 1.0 WWAC Storage Junction -9.8 1.0 Out_G58 Outfall -10.0 1.0
PAGE 155
Appendix B Exfiltration Estimation 1 of 2Appendix B-6 Exfiltration.xls 3/2/2012 Table B-6: Exfiltration Rating Curve Estimation using SFWMD Equation = K s H 2 W + 2K s [D u (H 2 0.5D u ) + D s H 2 ] Equation where: = flow rate per foot of trench (cfs/ft); Ks = hydraulic conductivity of the soils in cfs/ft2/ft of head H2 = depth of water (ft) W = width of trench (ft) Du = unsaturated trench depth (ft) Ds = saturated trench depth (ft)Variable Ks W H2DuDs Width Depth Unsat. Saturated Estimated GW Trench # Hydraulic @ of toTrench Trench Flow Hydrologic Elev. Length Conductivity Trench Water Depth Depth Rate Unit (ft-NAVD) (ft) (cfs/ft 2 /ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (cfs)ACN1-1HU 1.0 300 0.0011900 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 8.1 ACN1-2HU 1.0 907 0.0011900 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 24.6 ACN1-3HU 1.0 1586 0.0001900 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 6.9 ACN1-4HU 1.0 1872 0.0001900 3.50 5.0 3.5 0.5 16.1 ACN1-5HU 1.0 319 0.0001600 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 1.2 ACN1-7HU 1.0 310 0.0011000 3.25 2.0 0.5 3.5 7.6 ACN3-6HU 1.0 875 0.0007800 3.50 4.0 2.5 1.5 27.1 ACS1-3HU 1.0 92 0.0011500 3.50 3.0 1.5 2.5 3.4 ACS1-4HU 1.0 416 0.0000530 3.50 4.0 2.5 1.5 0.9 ACS2-1HU 1.0 1174 0.0001310 3.50 3.0 1.5 2.5 5.0 ACS2-2HU 1.0 440 0.0001310 3.50 3.0 1.5 2.5 1.9 ACS2-4HU 1.0 380 0.0001310 3.50 6.0 4.5 0.0 2.7 ACS3-2HU 1.0 116 0.0008700 3.00 5.0 3.5 0.5 4.3 ACS3-3HU 1.0 750 0.0000640 3.50 4.0 2.5 1.5 1.9 ACS3-4HU 1.0 612 0.0001310 3.50 6.0 4.5 0.0 4.4 ACS3-5HU 1.0 3123 0.0002520 3.50 3.0 1.5 2.5 25.4 ACS3-6HU 1.0 66 0.0001310 3.25 5.2 3.7 0.3 0.4 ACS3-8HU 1.0 300 0.0000690 3.50 3.0 1.5 2.5 0.7 ACS5-1HU 1.0 29 0.0000585 3.00 2.0 0.5 3.5 0.0 BE1-1HU 1.0 4017 0.0001400 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 12.8 BE1-2HU 1.0 2350 0.0001400 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 7.5 BE1-3HU 1.0 759 0.0000370 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 0.6 BE1-5HU 1.0 82 0.0001500 3.50 7.0 5.5 0.0 0.9 BE1-6HU 1.0 600 0.0000160 3.50 6.0 4.5 0.0 0.5 BE1-7HU 1.0 218 0.0002100 3.50 6.0 4.5 0.0 2.5 BE2-2HU 1.0 268 0.0000160 3.50 6.0 4.5 0.0 0.2 BE2-3HU 1.0 83 0.0000160 3.50 6.0 4.5 0.0 0.1 BE2-4HU 1.0 90 0.0000160 3.50 6.0 4.5 0.0 0.1 BE2-5HU 1.0 3199 0.0000780 3.50 5.0 3.5 0.5 11.3 BE3-1HU 1.0 120 0.0009000 3.50 4.0 2.5 1.5 4.3 BE3-2HU 1.0 152 0.0009200 3.00 5.0 3.5 0.5 6.0 BE4-1HU 1.0 204 0.0009200 3.00 4.0 2.5 1.5 7.1 BE4-3HU 1.0 219 0.0009000 3.25 3.0 1.5 2.5 6.2 BE4-5HU 1.0 62 0.0000450 3.25 3.0 1.5 2.5 0.1
PAGE 156
Appendix B Exfiltration Estimation 2 of 2Appendix B-6 Exfiltration.xls 3/2/2012 Variable K s W H2DuDsWidth Depth Unsat. Saturated Estimated GW Trench # Hydraulic @ of toTrench Trench Flow Hydrologic Elev. Length Conductivity Trench Water Depth Depth Rate Unit (ft-NAVD) (ft) (cfs/ft2/ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (cfs) BE5-1HU 1.0 106 0.0000350 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 0.1 BE6-2HU 1.0 210 0.0001000 3.50 6.0 4.5 0.0 1.1 BE6-3HU 1.0 515 0.0001310 3.50 5.0 3.5 0.5 3.1 BE7-2HU 1.0 97 0.0000670 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 0.1 BW1-10HU 1.0 50 0.0000280 3.25 8.0 6.5 0.0 0.1 BW1-11HU 1.0 80 0.0000280 3.25 8.0 6.5 0.0 0.2 BW1-12HU 1.0 40 0.0000960 3.00 8.0 6.5 0.0 0.3 BW1-13HU 1.0 587 0.0000960 3.25 8.0 6.5 0.0 4.9 BW1-14HU 1.0 965 0.0000960 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 8.3 BW1-15AHU 1.0 510 0.0001100 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 5.0 BW1-16HU 1.0 20 0.0000840 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 0.2 BW1-17HU 1.0 560 0.0001100 3.50 7.0 5.5 0.0 4.4 BW1-1AHU 1.0 530 0.0000970 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 4.6 BW1-1BHU 1.0 520 0.0000700 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 3.3 BW1-1CHU 1.0 804 0.0000700 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 5.1 BW1-21HU 1.0 360 0.0000280 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 0.2 BW1-22HU 1.0 20 0.0000280 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 0.0 BW1-2HU 1.0 575 0.0001900 3.50 7.0 5.5 0.0 7.8 BW1-4HU 1.0 275 0.0001900 3.25 8.0 6.5 0.0 4.6 BW1-5HU 1.0 162 0.0001900 3.25 7.0 5.5 0.0 2.1 BW1-6HU 1.0 258 0.0001900 3.25 7.0 5.5 0.0 3.4 BW1-7HU 1.0 359 0.0000280 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 0.9 BW1-8HU 1.0 1250 0.0000280 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 3.1 BW2-11HU 1.0 1093 0.0000350 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 0.9 BW2-1BHU 1.0 575 0.0000560 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 2.9 BW2-2HU 1.0 325 0.0000560 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 1.6 BW2-3HU 1.0 100 0.0001100 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 1.0 BW2-4AHU 1.0 920 0.0001100 3.25 8.0 6.5 0.0 8.9 BW2-4BHU 1.0 381 0.0001100 3.50 7.0 5.5 0.0 3.0 BW2-5HU 1.0 795 0.0001100 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 7.8 BW2-6HU 1.0 2933 0.0000840 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 22.1 BW2-7HU 1.0 659 0.0000840 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 5.0 BW2-8HU 1.0 263 0.0000297 3.50 9.0 7.5 0.0 0.9 BW3-1BHU 1.0 555 0.0000570 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 2.8 BW3-1CHU 1.0 155 0.0000570 3.50 7.0 5.5 0.0 0.6 BW3-1EHU 1.0 51 0.0000970 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 0.4 BW3-2HU 1.0 33 0.0000570 3.50 8.0 6.5 0.0 0.2 BW3-3AHU 1.0 509 0.0001500 3.50 3.0 1.5 2.5 2.5 BW4-1HU 1.0 993 0.0001500 3.50 2.0 0.5 3.5 3.4 BW5-1HU 1.0 3349 0.0000280 3.50 3.0 1.5 2.5 3.0 BW6-1HU 1.0 449 0.0000280 3.50 3.0 1.5 2.5 0.4 Source: Estimated from historical data from USGS monitoring wells located within the City of North Miami # Source: City of North Miami GIS shapefile @ Source: City of North Miami Soil Boring logs
PAGE 157
Appendix C FederalEmergency ManagementAgency (FEMA) Flood Insurance StudyInformationThe following are figures and pages taken from the FEMA Flood Insurance Study for North Miami as part of the City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan.
PAGE 163
Appendix D SWMM5Model Validation Results
PAGE 164
Appendix D SWMM Validation ResultsTable D-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for Validation Storm October 3, 2000.Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) Denotes that no survey was available and elevation was estimated from LIDARWeir Elev = -2.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 1.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 3.4 ft-NAVDNodeRoad Crown Location Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft)Validation (Photo) Location Estimation Flood Depth (ft)Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) ACN1-0NE 151st St & NE 8th Ave *4.05.41.4 5.41.40.05.41.40.0 ACN1-1NE 146th St & NE 8th Ave3.55.41.9 5.41.90.05.41.90.0 ACN1-2NE 145th St W of NE 10th Ave 3.55.52.0 5.52.00.05.52.00.0 ACN1-3NE 144th St W of NE 10th Ave3.35.52.2 5.52.20.05.52.20.0 ACN1-4NE 142nd St & NE 9th Ave7.26.56.5-0.06.5-0.0 ACN1-4ANE 143rd St & NE 9th Ave 3.75.51.8 5.51.80.05.51.80.0 ACN1-5NE 143rd St & NE 10th Ave 3.15.52.4 5.52.40.05.52.40.0 ACN1-6NE 145th St & NE 10th Ave 3.45.52.1 5.52.10.05.52.10.0 ACN1-7NE 147th St & NE 11th Ct3.95.51.61.05.51.60.05.51.60.0 ACN1-8NE 143rd St & NE 12th Ave4.25.51.3 5.51.30.05.51.30.0 ACN1-9NE 144th St W of NE 14th Ave2.55.53.0 5.53.00.05.53.00.0 ACN1-10NE 146th St W of NE 14th Ave2.55.53.0 5.53.00.05.53.00.0 ACN3-6NE 127th St W of NE 12th Ave 5.27.22.0 7.22.00.07.22.00.0 ACS1-1NE 126th St W of NE 11th Ave5.77.21.5 7.21.50.07.21.50.0 ACS1-2NE 123rd St W of NE 10th Ave5.86.70.91.06.70.90.06.70.90.0 ACS1-3NE 121st St W of NE 11th Ave *3.86.72.92.06.72.90.06.83.00.0 ACS1-3ANE 125th St W of NE 11th Ave *7.27.17.2-0.07.2-0.0 ACS1-4NE 12th Ave N of NE 124th St *6.17.21.1 7.21.10.07.21.10.0 ACS1-5NE 13th Ave N of NE 125th St6.67.20.6 7.20.60.07.20.60.0 A CS1-6NE 125th St E of NE 15th Ave1.72.91.2 2.91.20.02.91.20.0 A CS1-7NE 121st St & NE 14th Ave *4.25.00.8 5.00.80.05.00.80.0 A CS1-8NE 124th St W of NE 17th Ave 4.24.14.1-0.04.1-0.0 ACS1-9NE 15th Ave S of NE 124th St *4.64.04.0-0.04.0-0.0 ACS2-1NE 143rd St & NE 16th Ave4.85.00.2 5.00.20.05.81.00.8 Appendix D1SWMM_Validation_model_results_North_Miami_Validation.xls 3/7/2012 1of7
PAGE 165
Appendix D SWMM Validation ResultsTable D-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for Validation Storm October 3, 2000.Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) Denotes that no survey was available and elevation was estimated from LIDARWeir Elev = -2.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 1.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 3.4 ft-NAVDNodeRoad Crown Location Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft)Validation (Photo) Location Estimation Flood Depth (ft)Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) ACS2-2NE 142nd St E of NE 17th Ave 3.64.40.8 4.40.80.05.82.21.4 ACS2-3NE 144th St & NE 18th Ave4.04.70.7 4.70.70.05.81.81.2 ACS2-4NE 149th St & NE 18th Ave *6.811.14.3 11.14.30.011.14.30.0 ACS2-5NE 142nd St & NE 18th Ave *3.63.43.80.20.45.82.22.4 ACS2-6NE 144th St & NE 18th Ave3.94.40.5 4.40.50.05.81.91.4 ACS2-7NE 144th St & NE 15th Ave *4.05.61.6 5.61.60.05.81.80.2 ACS3-1NE 137th St & NE 12th Ave 6.87.70.9 7.70.90.07.70.90.0 ACS3-10NE 135th St E of NE 16th Ave *7.35.96.2-0.36.8-0.9 ACS3-2NE 11th Ave S of NE 133rd St 6.87.40.6 7.40.60.07.40.60.0 ACS3-3NE 13th Ave N of NE 134th St 5.77.31.6 7.31.60.07.41.70.1 ACS3-4NE 138th St W of NE 16th Ave6.87.81.0 7.81.00.07.81.00.0 ACS3-5NE 132nd St W of NE 14th Ave4.57.32.8 7.32.80.07.32.80.1 ACS3-6NE 137th St E of NE 16th Ave3.54.40.9 4.51.00.05.72.21.2 ACS3-7NE 16th Ave N of NE 135th St 6.76.06.1-0.16.1-0.1 ACS3-8NE 136th St W of NE 15th Ave3.37.34.0 7.34.00.07.44.10.1 ACS3-8ANE 137th St & NE 16th Ave 7.26.06.0-0.06.5-0.5 ACS3-9Unnamed *3.03.30.3 3.70.70.45.72.72.3 ACS4-1Emerald NE of NE 16th Ave4.74.64.6-0.04.6-0.0 ACS4-217th Ave (Moefeld) N of NE 127th S t 3.84.30.5 4.30.50.04.30.50.0 ACS5-1NE 127th St E of 17th Ave (Moefeld ) 3.24.00.8 4.00.80.04.00.80.0 BE1-1NE 141st St & NE 4th Ave *2.33.71.41.53.71.40.03.71.40.0 BE1-2NE 139th St & NE 4th Ave *2.43.71.3 3.71.30.03.71.30.0 BE1-3NE 137th St & NE 4th Ave *3.33.30.0 3.30.00.03.30.00.0 BE1-4NE 6th Ave S of NE 151st St *5.76.20.5 6.20.50.06.20.50.0 Appendix D1SWMM_Validation_model_results_North_Miami_Validation.xls 3/7/2012 2of7
PAGE 166
Appendix D SWMM Validation ResultsTable D-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for Validation Storm October 3, 2000.Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) Denotes that no survey was available and elevation was estimated from LIDARWeir Elev = -2.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 1.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 3.4 ft-NAVDNodeRoad Crown Location Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft)Validation (Photo) Location Estimation Flood Depth (ft)Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) BE1-5NE 6th Ave S of NE 140th St *9.58.88.8-0.08.8-0.0 BE1-6NE 138th St & NE 6th Ave *7.97.77.7-0.07.7-0.0 BE1-7NE 136th St & NE 6th Ave *7.67.70.1 7.70.10.07.70.10.0 BE1-8NE 131st St & NE 6th Ave *7.27.40.2 7.40.20.07.40.20.0 BE1-9NE 127th St & NE 6th Ave *7.65.25.2-0.05.2-0.0 BE1-10NE 125th St & NE 3rd Ave *5.85.80.0 5.80.00.05.80.00.0 BE1-11Dixie Hwy NE of Grieffing *6.12.02.0-0.02.0-0.0 BE1-12NE 125th St & NE 9th Ave 7.06.66.6-0.06.6-0.0 BE1-13NE 125th St & NE 10th Ave *7.07.10.1 7.20.20.07.20.20.0 BE1-14Dixie Hwy & NE 129th St *7.17.40.3 7.40.30.07.40.30.0 BE1-15Dixie Hwy & NE 134th St *7.87.90.0 7.90.00.07.90.00.0 BE1-16NE 135th St & NE 13th Ave *6.27.31.1 7.31.10.07.41.20.1 BE1-17NE 135th St W of NE 16th Ave *5.17.32.2 7.32.20.07.42.30.1 BE1-18Dixie Hwy & NE 136th St *8.78.78.7-0.08.7-0.0 BE1-19Dixie Hwy & NE 141st St *9.68.68.6-0.08.6-0.0 BE1-20Dixie Hwy & NE 145th St *6.75.65.6-0.05.8-0.1 BE2-1NE 137th St W of NE 9th Ave 8.38.60.3 8.60.30.08.60.30.0 BE2-2NE 137th St W of NE 9th Ave 8.38.40.1 8.40.10.08.40.10.0 BE2-3NE 135th St & NE 7th Ave *7.37.90.6 7.90.60.07.90.60.0 BE2-4NE 132nd St E of NE 8th Ave 7.27.90.7 7.90.70.07.90.70.0 BE2-4ANE 135th St & NE 8th Ave *7.88.00.2 8.00.20.08.00.20.0 BE2-5NE 138th St & NE 7th Ave7.07.80.8 7.80.80.07.80.80.0 BE2-7NE 132nd St W of NE 7th Ave7.17.90.8 7.90.80.07.90.80.0 BE2-8NE 132nd St & NE 4th Ave *5.27.32.1 7.32.10.07.32.10.0 Appendix D1SWMM_Validation_model_results_North_Miami_Validation.xls 3/7/2012 3of7
PAGE 167
Appendix D SWMM Validation ResultsTable D-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for Validation Storm October 3, 2000.Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) Denotes that no survey was available and elevation was estimated from LIDARWeir Elev = -2.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 1.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 3.4 ft-NAVDNodeRoad Crown Location Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft)Validation (Photo) Location Estimation Flood Depth (ft)Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) BE3-1NE 129th St & NE 7th Ave 6.07.41.4 7.41.40.07.41.40.0 BE3-2NE 129th St & NE 8th Ave 6.57.40.9 7.40.90.07.40.90.0 BE3-3NE 129th St & NE 11th Ave 6.77.40.7 7.40.70.07.40.70.0 BE4-1NE 127th St W of NE 8th Ave 5.77.41.7 7.41.70.07.41.70.0 BE4-2NE 123rd St & of NE 9th Ave 6.06.70.7 6.70.70.06.70.70.0 BE4-3NE 8th Ave N of NE 121st St 6.06.50.5 6.50.50.06.50.50.0 BE4-4NE 7th Ave N of NE 125th St 6.67.10.5 7.10.50.07.10.50.0 BE4-5NE 124th St & NE 6th Ave 6.06.50.5 6.50.50.06.50.50.0 BE4-6NE 5th Ave N of NE 125th St 6.16.50.4 6.50.40.06.50.40.0 BE4-7NE 4th Ave S of NE 129th St 6.46.60.2 6.60.20.06.60.20.0 BE4-8NE 3rd Ave S of NE 126th St 5.75.90.2 5.90.20.05.90.20.0 BE4-9NE 123rd St & Grieffing *4.95.50.6 5.50.60.05.50.60.0 BE5-1NE 129th St & Grieffiing *5.33.73.7-0.03.7-0.0 BE6-1NE 11th Ave S of NE 138th St 8.48.50.1 8.50.10.08.50.10.0 BE6-2NE 138th St E of NE 13th Ave 7.28.71.5 8.71.50.08.71.50.0 BE6-3NE 141st St & NE 14th Ave 6.68.62.0 8.62.00.08.62.00.0 BE7-1NE 3rd Ave S of NE 138th St 2.73.20.5 3.20.50.03.20.50.0 BE7-2NE 2nd Ct S of NE 141st St *2.83.10.3 3.10.30.03.10.30.0 BE7-3NE 4th Ave S of NE 135th St *2.54.21.7 4.21.70.04.21.70.0 BE7-4NE 131st St E of Grieffiing *3.03.40.4 3.40.40.03.40.40.0 BE7-5Grieffiing N of NE 135th St & *4.22.22.2-0.02.2-0.0 BW1-1ANW 12th Ave N of NW 133rd St9.710.40.7 10.40.70.010.40.70.0 BW1-1BNW 132nd St E of NW 16th Ave 10.110.40.3 10.40.30.010.40.30.0 BW1-1CNW 13th Ave N of NW 132nd St9.510.40.9 10.40.90.010.40.90.0 Appendix D1SWMM_Validation_model_results_North_Miami_Validation.xls 3/7/2012 4of7
PAGE 168
Appendix D SWMM Validation ResultsTable D-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for Validation Storm October 3, 2000.Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) Denotes that no survey was available and elevation was estimated from LIDARWeir Elev = -2.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 1.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 3.4 ft-NAVDNodeRoad Crown Location Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft)Validation (Photo) Location Estimation Flood Depth (ft)Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) BW1-2NW 13th Ave N of NW 128th St9.010.41.4 10.41.40.010.41.40.0 BW1-3NW 130th St E of NW 13th Ave 9.610.40.8 10.40.80.010.40.80.0 BW1-4NW 16th Ave N of NW 123rd St9.610.40.8 10.40.80.010.40.80.0 BW1-5NW 15th Ave N of NW 127th St9.210.41.2 10.41.20.010.41.20.0 BW1-6NW 126th St E of NW 15th Ave 8.710.41.7 10.41.70.010.41.70.0 BW1-7NW 121st St & NW 16th Ave 9.810.40.6 10.40.60.010.40.60.0 BW1-8NW 121st St & NW 13th Ave 9.710.40.7 10.40.70.010.40.70.0 BW1-9NW 121st St E of NW 11th Ave 9.010.41.4 10.41.40.010.41.40.0 BW1-10NW 125th St & NW 11th Ave 9.610.40.8 10.40.80.010.40.80.0 BW1-10ANW 12th Ave S of NW 125th St9.510.40.9 10.40.90.010.40.90.0 BW1-11NW 121st St E of NW 11th Ave 9.310.41.1 10.41.10.010.41.10.0 BW1-12NW 120th St W of NW 11th Ave 9.010.41.4 10.41.40.010.41.40.0 BW1-13NW 126th St E of NW 8th Ave 9.410.30.9 10.30.90.010.30.90.0 BW1-13ANW 125th St E of NW 9th Ave 9.410.40.9 10.40.90.010.40.90.0 BW1-14NW 8th Ave S of NW 122nd St9.510.40.9 10.40.90.010.40.90.0 BW1-15ANW 122nd St W of NW 7th Ave 9.410.30.9 10.30.90.010.30.90.0 BW1-15BNW 119th St W of NW 10th Ave 10.011.71.7 11.71.70.011.71.70.0 BW1-15CNW 15th Ave S of NW 119th St9.210.61.4 10.61.40.010.61.40.0 BW1-16NW 4th Ave S of NW 127th St9.810.30.4 10.30.40.010.30.40.0 BW1-17NW 4th Ave S of NW 121st St8.89.70.9 9.70.90.09.70.90.0 BW1-18NW 4th Ave N of NW 124th St8.99.50.6 9.50.60.09.50.60.0 BW1-19NW 125th St W of NW 1st Ave 10.37.67.6-0.07.6-0.0 BW1-19ANW 1st Ave N of NW 127th St10.811.70.9 11.70.90.011.70.90.0 BW1-20NW 120th St E of NW 1st Ave 7.69.41.8 9.41.80.09.41.80.0 Appendix D1SWMM_Validation_model_results_North_Miami_Validation.xls 3/7/2012 5of7
PAGE 169
Appendix D SWMM Validation ResultsTable D-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for Validation Storm October 3, 2000.Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) Denotes that no survey was available and elevation was estimated from LIDARWeir Elev = -2.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 1.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 3.4 ft-NAVDNodeRoad Crown Location Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft)Validation (Photo) Location Estimation Flood Depth (ft)Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) BW1-21NE 1st Ave S of NE 125th St3.84.40.6 4.40.60.04.40.60.0 BW1-22NE 123rd Rd W of NE 2nd Ave 3.84.60.8 4.60.80.04.60.80.0 BW1-23Dixie Hwy NE of NE 119th St *6.11.01.0-0.01.0-0.0 BW2-1ANW 134th St W of NW 11th Ave 9.310.41.1 10.41.10.010.41.10.0 BW2-1BNW 131st St W of NW 10th Ave 9.210.31.1 10.31.10.010.31.10.0 BW2-2NW 134th St E of NW 8th Ave 9.010.31.3 10.31.30.010.31.30.0 BW2-3NW 131st St W of NW 8th Ave 9.010.31.3 10.31.30.010.31.30.0 BW2-4ANW 8th Ave S of NW 128th St9.010.31.3 10.31.30.010.31.30.0 BW2-4BNW 128th St W of NW 10th Ave 8.910.41.5 10.41.50.010.41.50.0 BW2-4CNW 129th St E of NW 11th Ave 9.410.41.0 10.41.00.010.41.00.0 BW2-5NW 6th Ave S of NW 130th St9.010.31.3 10.31.30.010.31.30.0 BW2-6NW 131st St W of NW 5th Ave 9.010.21.2 10.21.20.010.21.20.0 BW2-7NW 5th Ave S of NW 129th St9.510.30.8 10.30.80.010.30.80.0 BW2-8NW 133rd St W of NW 2nd Ave 10.110.80.7 10.80.70.010.80.70.0 BW2-9NW 130th St W of NW 2nd Ave 9.710.30.6 10.30.60.010.30.60.0 BW2-10NW 132nd St W of NW 2nd Ave 9.88.38.3-0.08.3-0.0 BW2-11NE 130th St W of NE 2nd Ave 3.94.10.2 4.10.20.04.10.20.0 BW3-1ANW 6th Ave S of NW 137th St *9.810.30.5 10.30.50.010.30.50.0 BW3-1BNW 7th Ave S of NW 140th St *11.412.61.2 12.61.20.012.61.20.0 BW3-1CNW 6th Ave S of NW 135th St 8.910.31.4 10.31.40.010.31.40.0 BW3-1DNW 135th St W of NW 8th Ave 9.410.30.9 10.30.90.010.30.90.0 BW3-1ENW 135th St & NW 13th Ave *9.210.41.2 10.41.20.010.41.20.0 BW3-1FNW 135th St W of NW 15th Ave *10.010.40.4 10.40.40.010.40.40.0 BW3-1GNW 135th St W of NW 18th Ave *9.59.80.3 9.80.30.09.80.30.0 Appendix D1SWMM_Validation_model_results_North_Miami_Validation.xls 3/7/2012 6of7
PAGE 170
Appendix D SWMM Validation ResultsTable D-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for Validation Storm October 3, 2000.Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm Oct 3, 2000 Storm (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) (15.2-inch) Denotes that no survey was available and elevation was estimated from LIDARWeir Elev = -2.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 1.0 ft-NAVD Weir Elev = 3.4 ft-NAVDNodeRoad Crown Location Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft)Validation (Photo) Location Estimation Flood Depth (ft)Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) Oct 3, 2000 No Name Storm Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Model Flood Depth (ft) Diff in Peak Stage (ft) BW3-1HNW 17th Ave S of NW 130th St *9.510.61.1 10.61.10.010.61.10.0 BW3-1INW 17th Ave S of NW 123rd St *9.210.61.4 10.61.40.010.61.40.0 BW3-2NW 5th Ave S of NW 137th St *10.410.50.1 10.50.10.010.50.10.0 BW3-2ANW 135th St W of NW 5th Ave *10.310.210.2-0.010.2-0.0 BW3-3ANE 2nd Ave S of NE 135th St2.73.60.9 3.60.90.03.60.90.0 BW3-3BNE 139th St W of Biscayne Riv Dr *2.73.60.9 3.60.90.03.60.90.0 BW3-4Miami Ave S of NE 135th St5.55.50.0 5.50.00.05.50.00.0 BW3-4BNE 1st Ave N of NE 135th St *2.53.61.1 3.61.10.03.61.10.0 BW4-1NE 133rd St W of NE 2nd Ave3.53.60.1 3.60.10.03.60.10.0 BW5-1NE 127th St & NE 1st Ave3.54.40.9 4.40.90.04.40.90.0 BW6-1NE 2nd Ave N of NE 121st St4.55.20.7 5.20.70.05.20.70.0 Appendix D1SWMM_Validation_model_results_North_Miami_Validation.xls 3/7/2012 7of7
PAGE 171
Appendix E SFWMD Rainfall Distributions
PAGE 172
Figure E-3: SFWMD 10-Year, 72-Hour Design Storm (9.9-inch)Appendix E SFWMD Hydrographs 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 4 8 12 16 20 24Cumulative inchesHours 2yr 4.2 in
PAGE 173
Figure E-3: SFWMD 10-Year, 72-Hour Design Storm (9.9-inch) Appendix E SFWMD Hydrographs 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 4 8 12 16 20 24Cumulative inchesHours 5yr 5.9 in
PAGE 174
Figure E-3: SFWMD 10-Year, 72-Hour Design Storm (9.9-inch) Appendix E SFWMD Hydrographs 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Cumulative inchesHours 10yr 9.9 in
PAGE 175
Figure E-3: SFWMD 10-Year, 72-Hour Design Storm (9.9-inch)Appendix E SFWMD Hydrographs 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Cumulative inchesHours 25yr 11in
PAGE 176
Figure E-3: SFWMD 10-Year, 72-Hour Design Storm (9.9-inch)Appendix E SFWMD Hydrographs 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Cumulative inchesHours 100yr 14in
PAGE 177
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 1 of 2 1.0 Sum = 4.2 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 0:00 0.005325 24-hour depth 4.2 in 0.00 0:00 0.02237 0.000 0:15 0.005325 24 peak int 0.6 in/hr 0.25 0:15 0.02237 0.022 0:30 0.005325 0.50 0:30 0.02237 0.045 0:45 0.005325 0.75 0:45 0.02237 0.067 1:00 0.005325 1.00 1:00 0.02237 0.089 1:15 0.005325 1.25 1:15 0.02237 0.112 1:30 0.005325 1.50 1:30 0.02237 0.134 1:45 0.005325 1.75 1:45 0.02237 0.157 2:00 0.005325 2.00 2:00 0.02237 0.179 2:15 0.005325 2.25 2:15 0.02237 0.201 2:30 0.005325 2.50 2:30 0.02237 0.224 2:45 0.005325 2.75 2:45 0.02237 0.246 3:00 0.005325 3.00 3:00 0.02237 0.268 3:15 0.005325 3.25 3:15 0.02237 0.291 3:30 0.005325 3.50 3:30 0.02237 0.313 3:45 0.005325 3.75 3:45 0.02237 0.335 4:00 0.005325 4.00 4:00 0.02237 0.358 4:15 0.005325 4.25 4:15 0.02237 0.380 4:30 0.005325 4.50 4:30 0.02237 0.403 4:45 0.005325 4.75 4:45 0.02237 0.425 5:00 0.005325 5.00 5:00 0.02237 0.447 5:15 0.005325 5.25 5:15 0.02237 0.470 5:30 0.005325 5.50 5:30 0.02237 0.492 5:45 0.005325 5.75 5:45 0.02237 0.514 6:00 0.005325 6.00 6:00 0.02237 0.537 6:15 0.005325 6.25 6:15 0.02237 0.559 6:30 0.005325 6.50 6:30 0.02237 0.581 6:45 0.005325 6.75 6:45 0.02237 0.604 7:00 0.005325 7.00 7:00 0.02237 0.626 7:15 0.005325 7.25 7:15 0.02237 0.649 7:30 0.005325 7.50 7:30 0.02237 0.671 7:45 0.005325 7.75 7:45 0.02237 0.693 8:00 0.005325 8.00 8:00 0.02237 0.716 8:15 0.005325 8.25 8:15 0.02237 0.738 8:30 0.005325 8.50 8:30 0.02237 0.760 8:45 0.005325 8.75 8:45 0.02237 0.783 9:00 0.005325 9.00 9:00 0.02237 0.805 9:15 0.005325 9.25 9:15 0.02237 0.828 9:30 0.005325 9.50 9:30 0.02237 0.850 9:45 0.005325 9.75 9:45 0.02237 0.872 10:00 0.014000 10.00 10:00 0.05880 0.895 10:15 0.014000 10.25 10:15 0.05880 0.953 10:30 0.014000 10.50 10:30 0.05880 1.012 10:45 0.014000 10.75 10:45 0.05880 1.071 11:00 0.025000 11.00 11:00 0.10500 1.130 11:15 0.025000 11.25 11:15 0.10500 1.235 11:30 0.150000 11.50 11:30 0.63000 1.340 Sum SFWMD Unit Hydrographs SFWMD Hydrographs 24-Hour 2yr 24-Hour 4.2 inch
PAGE 178
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 2 of 2 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 11:45 0.187000 11.75 11:45 0.78540 1.970 12:00 0.037000 12.00 12:00 0.15540 2.755 12:15 0.036000 12.25 12:15 0.15120 2.911 12:30 0.019000 12.50 12:30 0.07980 3.062 12:45 0.019000 12.75 12:45 0.07980 3.142 13:00 0.014000 13.00 13:00 0.05880 3.221 13:15 0.014000 13.25 13:15 0.05880 3.280 13:30 0.012000 13.50 13:30 0.05040 3.339 13:45 0.011000 13.75 13:45 0.04620 3.389 14:00 0.009000 14.00 14:00 0.03780 3.436 14:15 0.008000 14.25 14:15 0.03360 3.473 14:30 0.008000 14.50 14:30 0.03360 3.507 14:45 0.007000 14.75 14:45 0.02940 3.541 15:00 0.008000 15.00 15:00 0.03360 3.570 15:15 0.007000 15.25 15:15 0.02940 3.604 15:30 0.008000 15.50 15:30 0.03360 3.633 15:45 0.007000 15.75 15:45 0.02940 3.667 16:00 0.004000 16.00 16:00 0.01680 3.696 16:15 0.005000 16.25 16:15 0.02100 3.713 16:30 0.005000 16.50 16:30 0.02100 3.734 16:45 0.004000 16.75 16:45 0.01680 3.755 17:00 0.005000 17.00 17:00 0.02100 3.772 17:15 0.004000 17.25 17:15 0.01680 3.793 17:30 0.005000 17.50 17:30 0.02100 3.809 17:45 0.004000 17.75 17:45 0.01680 3.830 18:00 0.005000 18.00 18:00 0.02100 3.847 18:15 0.004000 18.25 18:15 0.01680 3.868 18:30 0.005000 18.50 18:30 0.02100 3.885 18:45 0.004000 18.75 18:45 0.01680 3.906 19:00 0.005000 19.00 19:00 0.02100 3.923 19:15 0.004000 19.25 19:15 0.01680 3.944 19:30 0.005000 19.50 19:30 0.02100 3.961 19:45 0.004000 19.75 19:45 0.01680 3.982 20:00 0.003000 20.00 20:00 0.01260 3.998 20:15 0.003000 20.25 20:15 0.01260 4.011 20:30 0.003000 20.50 20:30 0.01260 4.024 20:45 0.003000 20.75 20:45 0.01260 4.036 21:00 0.003000 21.00 21:00 0.01260 4.049 21:15 0.003000 21.25 21:15 0.01260 4.061 21:30 0.003000 21.50 21:30 0.01260 4.074 21:45 0.003000 21.75 21:45 0.01260 4.087 22:00 0.003000 22.00 22:00 0.01260 4.099 22:15 0.003000 22.25 22:15 0.01260 4.112 22:30 0.003000 22.50 22:30 0.01260 4.124 22:45 0.003000 22.75 22:45 0.01260 4.137 23:00 0.003000 23.00 23:00 0.01260 4.150 23:15 0.003000 23.25 23:15 0.01260 4.162 23:30 0.003000 23.50 23:30 0.01260 4.175 23:45 0.003000 23.75 23:45 0.01260 4.187 0:00 0.000000 24.00 0:00 0.00000 4.200
PAGE 179
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 1 of 2 1.0 Sum = 5.9 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 0:00 0.005325 24-hour depth 5.9 in 0.00 0:00 0.03142 0.000 0:15 0.005325 24 peak int 4.4 in/hr 0.25 0:15 0.03142 0.031 0:30 0.005325 0.50 0:30 0.03142 0.063 0:45 0.005325 0.75 0:45 0.03142 0.094 1:00 0.005325 1.00 1:00 0.03142 0.126 1:15 0.005325 1.25 1:15 0.03142 0.157 1:30 0.005325 1.50 1:30 0.03142 0.189 1:45 0.005325 1.75 1:45 0.03142 0.220 2:00 0.005325 2.00 2:00 0.03142 0.251 2:15 0.005325 2.25 2:15 0.03142 0.283 2:30 0.005325 2.50 2:30 0.03142 0.314 2:45 0.005325 2.75 2:45 0.03142 0.346 3:00 0.005325 3.00 3:00 0.03142 0.377 3:15 0.005325 3.25 3:15 0.03142 0.408 3:30 0.005325 3.50 3:30 0.03142 0.440 3:45 0.005325 3.75 3:45 0.03142 0.471 4:00 0.005325 4.00 4:00 0.03142 0.503 4:15 0.005325 4.25 4:15 0.03142 0.534 4:30 0.005325 4.50 4:30 0.03142 0.566 4:45 0.005325 4.75 4:45 0.03142 0.597 5:00 0.005325 5.00 5:00 0.03142 0.628 5:15 0.005325 5.25 5:15 0.03142 0.660 5:30 0.005325 5.50 5:30 0.03142 0.691 5:45 0.005325 5.75 5:45 0.03142 0.723 6:00 0.005325 6.00 6:00 0.03142 0.754 6:15 0.005325 6.25 6:15 0.03142 0.785 6:30 0.005325 6.50 6:30 0.03142 0.817 6:45 0.005325 6.75 6:45 0.03142 0.848 7:00 0.005325 7.00 7:00 0.03142 0.880 7:15 0.005325 7.25 7:15 0.03142 0.911 7:30 0.005325 7.50 7:30 0.03142 0.943 7:45 0.005325 7.75 7:45 0.03142 0.974 8:00 0.005325 8.00 8:00 0.03142 1.005 8:15 0.005325 8.25 8:15 0.03142 1.037 8:30 0.005325 8.50 8:30 0.03142 1.068 8:45 0.005325 8.75 8:45 0.03142 1.100 9:00 0.005325 9.00 9:00 0.03142 1.131 9:15 0.005325 9.25 9:15 0.03142 1.162 9:30 0.005325 9.50 9:30 0.03142 1.194 9:45 0.005325 9.75 9:45 0.03142 1.225 10:00 0.014000 10.00 10:00 0.08260 1.257 10:15 0.014000 10.25 10:15 0.08260 1.339 10:30 0.014000 10.50 10:30 0.08260 1.422 10:45 0.014000 10.75 10:45 0.08260 1.505 11:00 0.025000 11.00 11:00 0.14750 1.587 11:15 0.025000 11.25 11:15 0.14750 1.735 11:30 0.150000 11.50 11:30 0.88500 1.882 Sum SFWMD Unit Hydrographs SFWMD Hydrographs 24-Hour 2yr 24-Hour 5 inch
PAGE 180
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 2 of 2 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 11:45 0.187000 11.75 11:45 1.10330 2.767 12:00 0.037000 12.00 12:00 0.21830 3.870 12:15 0.036000 12.25 12:15 0.21240 4.089 12:30 0.019000 12.50 12:30 0.11210 4.301 12:45 0.019000 12.75 12:45 0.11210 4.413 13:00 0.014000 13.00 13:00 0.08260 4.525 13:15 0.014000 13.25 13:15 0.08260 4.608 13:30 0.012000 13.50 13:30 0.07080 4.691 13:45 0.011000 13.75 13:45 0.06490 4.761 14:00 0.009000 14.00 14:00 0.05310 4.826 14:15 0.008000 14.25 14:15 0.04720 4.879 14:30 0.008000 14.50 14:30 0.04720 4.927 14:45 0.007000 14.75 14:45 0.04130 4.974 15:00 0.008000 15.00 15:00 0.04720 5.015 15:15 0.007000 15.25 15:15 0.04130 5.062 15:30 0.008000 15.50 15:30 0.04720 5.104 15:45 0.007000 15.75 15:45 0.04130 5.151 16:00 0.004000 16.00 16:00 0.02360 5.192 16:15 0.005000 16.25 16:15 0.02950 5.216 16:30 0.005000 16.50 16:30 0.02950 5.245 16:45 0.004000 16.75 16:45 0.02360 5.275 17:00 0.005000 17.00 17:00 0.02950 5.298 17:15 0.004000 17.25 17:15 0.02360 5.328 17:30 0.005000 17.50 17:30 0.02950 5.351 17:45 0.004000 17.75 17:45 0.02360 5.381 18:00 0.005000 18.00 18:00 0.02950 5.404 18:15 0.004000 18.25 18:15 0.02360 5.434 18:30 0.005000 18.50 18:30 0.02950 5.458 18:45 0.004000 18.75 18:45 0.02360 5.487 19:00 0.005000 19.00 19:00 0.02950 5.511 19:15 0.004000 19.25 19:15 0.02360 5.540 19:30 0.005000 19.50 19:30 0.02950 5.564 19:45 0.004000 19.75 19:45 0.02360 5.593 20:00 0.003000 20.00 20:00 0.01770 5.617 20:15 0.003000 20.25 20:15 0.01770 5.635 20:30 0.003000 20.50 20:30 0.01770 5.652 20:45 0.003000 20.75 20:45 0.01770 5.670 21:00 0.003000 21.00 21:00 0.01770 5.688 21:15 0.003000 21.25 21:15 0.01770 5.705 21:30 0.003000 21.50 21:30 0.01770 5.723 21:45 0.003000 21.75 21:45 0.01770 5.741 22:00 0.003000 22.00 22:00 0.01770 5.758 22:15 0.003000 22.25 22:15 0.01770 5.776 22:30 0.003000 22.50 22:30 0.01770 5.794 22:45 0.003000 22.75 22:45 0.01770 5.811 23:00 0.003000 23.00 23:00 0.01770 5.829 23:15 0.003000 23.25 23:15 0.01770 5.847 23:30 0.003000 23.50 23:30 0.01770 5.865 23:45 0.003000 23.75 23:45 0.01770 5.882 0:00 0.000000 24.00 0:00 0.00000 5.900
PAGE 181
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 1 of 2 1.0 Sum = 7.5 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 0:00 0.005325 24-hour depth 7.5 in 0.00 0:00 0.03994 0.000 0:15 0.005325 24 peak int 5.6 in/hr 0.25 0:15 0.03994 0.040 0:30 0.005325 0.50 0:30 0.03994 0.080 0:45 0.005325 0.75 0:45 0.03994 0.120 1:00 0.005325 1.00 1:00 0.03994 0.160 1:15 0.005325 1.25 1:15 0.03994 0.200 1:30 0.005325 1.50 1:30 0.03994 0.240 1:45 0.005325 1.75 1:45 0.03994 0.280 2:00 0.005325 2.00 2:00 0.03994 0.320 2:15 0.005325 2.25 2:15 0.03994 0.359 2:30 0.005325 2.50 2:30 0.03994 0.399 2:45 0.005325 2.75 2:45 0.03994 0.439 3:00 0.005325 3.00 3:00 0.03994 0.479 3:15 0.005325 3.25 3:15 0.03994 0.519 3:30 0.005325 3.50 3:30 0.03994 0.559 3:45 0.005325 3.75 3:45 0.03994 0.599 4:00 0.005325 4.00 4:00 0.03994 0.639 4:15 0.005325 4.25 4:15 0.03994 0.679 4:30 0.005325 4.50 4:30 0.03994 0.719 4:45 0.005325 4.75 4:45 0.03994 0.759 5:00 0.005325 5.00 5:00 0.03994 0.799 5:15 0.005325 5.25 5:15 0.03994 0.839 5:30 0.005325 5.50 5:30 0.03994 0.879 5:45 0.005325 5.75 5:45 0.03994 0.919 6:00 0.005325 6.00 6:00 0.03994 0.959 6:15 0.005325 6.25 6:15 0.03994 0.998 6:30 0.005325 6.50 6:30 0.03994 1.038 6:45 0.005325 6.75 6:45 0.03994 1.078 7:00 0.005325 7.00 7:00 0.03994 1.118 7:15 0.005325 7.25 7:15 0.03994 1.158 7:30 0.005325 7.50 7:30 0.03994 1.198 7:45 0.005325 7.75 7:45 0.03994 1.238 8:00 0.005325 8.00 8:00 0.03994 1.278 8:15 0.005325 8.25 8:15 0.03994 1.318 8:30 0.005325 8.50 8:30 0.03994 1.358 8:45 0.005325 8.75 8:45 0.03994 1.398 9:00 0.005325 9.00 9:00 0.03994 1.438 9:15 0.005325 9.25 9:15 0.03994 1.478 9:30 0.005325 9.50 9:30 0.03994 1.518 9:45 0.005325 9.75 9:45 0.03994 1.558 10:00 0.014000 10.00 10:00 0.10500 1.598 10:15 0.014000 10.25 10:15 0.10500 1.703 10:30 0.014000 10.50 10:30 0.10500 1.808 10:45 0.014000 10.75 10:45 0.10500 1.913 11:00 0.025000 11.00 11:00 0.18750 2.018 11:15 0.025000 11.25 11:15 0.18750 2.205 11:30 0.150000 11.50 11:30 1.12500 2.393 Sum SFWMD Unit Hydrographs SFWMD Hydrographs 24-Hour 5yr 24-Hour 7.5 inch
PAGE 182
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 2 of 2 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 11:45 0.187000 11.75 11:45 1.40250 3.518 12:00 0.037000 12.00 12:00 0.27750 4.920 12:15 0.036000 12.25 12:15 0.27000 5.198 12:30 0.019000 12.50 12:30 0.14250 5.468 12:45 0.019000 12.75 12:45 0.14250 5.610 13:00 0.014000 13.00 13:00 0.10500 5.753 13:15 0.014000 13.25 13:15 0.10500 5.858 13:30 0.012000 13.50 13:30 0.09000 5.963 13:45 0.011000 13.75 13:45 0.08250 6.053 14:00 0.009000 14.00 14:00 0.06750 6.135 14:15 0.008000 14.25 14:15 0.06000 6.203 14:30 0.008000 14.50 14:30 0.06000 6.263 14:45 0.007000 14.75 14:45 0.05250 6.323 15:00 0.008000 15.00 15:00 0.06000 6.375 15:15 0.007000 15.25 15:15 0.05250 6.435 15:30 0.008000 15.50 15:30 0.06000 6.488 15:45 0.007000 15.75 15:45 0.05250 6.548 16:00 0.004000 16.00 16:00 0.03000 6.600 16:15 0.005000 16.25 16:15 0.03750 6.630 16:30 0.005000 16.50 16:30 0.03750 6.668 16:45 0.004000 16.75 16:45 0.03000 6.705 17:00 0.005000 17.00 17:00 0.03750 6.735 17:15 0.004000 17.25 17:15 0.03000 6.773 17:30 0.005000 17.50 17:30 0.03750 6.803 17:45 0.004000 17.75 17:45 0.03000 6.840 18:00 0.005000 18.00 18:00 0.03750 6.870 18:15 0.004000 18.25 18:15 0.03000 6.908 18:30 0.005000 18.50 18:30 0.03750 6.938 18:45 0.004000 18.75 18:45 0.03000 6.975 19:00 0.005000 19.00 19:00 0.03750 7.005 19:15 0.004000 19.25 19:15 0.03000 7.043 19:30 0.005000 19.50 19:30 0.03750 7.073 19:45 0.004000 19.75 19:45 0.03000 7.110 20:00 0.003000 20.00 20:00 0.02250 7.140 20:15 0.003000 20.25 20:15 0.02250 7.163 20:30 0.003000 20.50 20:30 0.02250 7.185 20:45 0.003000 20.75 20:45 0.02250 7.208 21:00 0.003000 21.00 21:00 0.02250 7.230 21:15 0.003000 21.25 21:15 0.02250 7.253 21:30 0.003000 21.50 21:30 0.02250 7.275 21:45 0.003000 21.75 21:45 0.02250 7.298 22:00 0.003000 22.00 22:00 0.02250 7.320 22:15 0.003000 22.25 22:15 0.02250 7.343 22:30 0.003000 22.50 22:30 0.02250 7.365 22:45 0.003000 22.75 22:45 0.02250 7.388 23:00 0.003000 23.00 23:00 0.02250 7.410 23:15 0.003000 23.25 23:15 0.02250 7.433 23:30 0.003000 23.50 23:30 0.02250 7.455 23:45 0.003000 23.75 23:45 0.02250 7.478 0:00 0.000000 24.00 0:00 0.00000 7.500
PAGE 183
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 1 of 6 1.359 Sum = 9.9 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 0:00 0.001521 72-hour depth 9.9 in 0.00 0:00 0.011079 0.000 0:15 0.001521 72 peak int 5.4 in/hr 0.25 0:15 0.011079 0.011 0:30 0.001521 0.50 0:30 0.011079 0.022 0:45 0.001521 0.75 0:45 0.011079 0.033 1:00 0.001521 1.00 1:00 0.011079 0.044 1:15 0.001521 1.25 1:15 0.011079 0.055 1:30 0.001521 1.50 1:30 0.011079 0.066 1:45 0.001521 1.75 1:45 0.011079 0.078 2:00 0.001521 2.00 2:00 0.011079 0.089 2:15 0.001521 2.25 2:15 0.011079 0.100 2:30 0.001521 2.50 2:30 0.011079 0.111 2:45 0.001521 2.75 2:45 0.011079 0.122 3:00 0.001521 3.00 3:00 0.011079 0.133 3:15 0.001521 3.25 3:15 0.011079 0.144 3:30 0.001521 3.50 3:30 0.011079 0.155 3:45 0.001521 3.75 3:45 0.011079 0.166 4:00 0.001521 4.00 4:00 0.011079 0.177 4:15 0.001521 4.25 4:15 0.011079 0.188 4:30 0.001521 4.50 4:30 0.011079 0.199 4:45 0.001521 4.75 4:45 0.011079 0.210 5:00 0.001521 5.00 5:00 0.011079 0.222 5:15 0.001521 5.25 5:15 0.011079 0.233 5:30 0.001521 5.50 5:30 0.011079 0.244 5:45 0.001521 5.75 5:45 0.011079 0.255 6:00 0.001521 6.00 6:00 0.011079 0.266 6:15 0.001521 6.25 6:15 0.011079 0.277 6:30 0.001521 6.50 6:30 0.011079 0.288 6:45 0.001521 6.75 6:45 0.011079 0.299 7:00 0.001521 7.00 7:00 0.011079 0.310 7:15 0.001521 7.25 7:15 0.011079 0.321 7:30 0.001521 7.50 7:30 0.011079 0.332 7:45 0.001521 7.75 7:45 0.011079 0.343 8:00 0.001521 8.00 8:00 0.011079 0.355 8:15 0.001521 8.25 8:15 0.011079 0.366 8:30 0.001521 8.50 8:30 0.011079 0.377 8:45 0.001521 8.75 8:45 0.011079 0.388 9:00 0.001521 9.00 9:00 0.011079 0.399 9:15 0.001521 9.25 9:15 0.011079 0.410 9:30 0.001521 9.50 9:30 0.011079 0.421 9:45 0.001521 9.75 9:45 0.011079 0.432 10:00 0.001521 10.00 10:00 0.011079 0.443 10:15 0.001521 10.25 10:15 0.011079 0.454 10:30 0.001521 10.50 10:30 0.011079 0.465 10:45 0.001521 10.75 10:45 0.011079 0.476 11:00 0.001521 11.00 11:00 0.011079 0.487 11:15 0.001521 11.25 11:15 0.011079 0.499 11:30 0.001521 11.50 11:30 0.011079 0.510 Sum SFWMD Unit Hydrographs SFWMD Hydrographs 72-Hour 25 yr 72-Hour 14.5 inch
PAGE 184
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 2 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 11:45 0.001521 11.75 11:45 0.011079 0.521 12:00 0.001521 12.00 12:00 0.011079 0.532 12:15 0.001521 12.25 12:15 0.011079 0.543 12:30 0.001521 12.50 12:30 0.011079 0.554 12:45 0.001521 12.75 12:45 0.011079 0.565 13:00 0.001521 13.00 13:00 0.011079 0.576 13:15 0.001521 13.25 13:15 0.011079 0.587 13:30 0.001521 13.50 13:30 0.011079 0.598 13:45 0.001521 13.75 13:45 0.011079 0.609 14:00 0.001521 14.00 14:00 0.011079 0.620 14:15 0.001521 14.25 14:15 0.011079 0.631 14:30 0.001521 14.50 14:30 0.011079 0.643 14:45 0.001521 14.75 14:45 0.011079 0.654 15:00 0.001521 15.00 15:00 0.011079 0.665 15:15 0.001521 15.25 15:15 0.011079 0.676 15:30 0.001521 15.50 15:30 0.011079 0.687 15:45 0.001521 15.75 15:45 0.011079 0.698 16:00 0.001521 16.00 16:00 0.011079 0.709 16:15 0.001521 16.25 16:15 0.011079 0.720 16:30 0.001521 16.50 16:30 0.011079 0.731 16:45 0.001521 16.75 16:45 0.011079 0.742 17:00 0.001521 17.00 17:00 0.011079 0.753 17:15 0.001521 17.25 17:15 0.011079 0.764 17:30 0.001521 17.50 17:30 0.011079 0.776 17:45 0.001521 17.75 17:45 0.011079 0.787 18:00 0.001521 18.00 18:00 0.011079 0.798 18:15 0.001521 18.25 18:15 0.011079 0.809 18:30 0.001521 18.50 18:30 0.011079 0.820 18:45 0.001521 18.75 18:45 0.011079 0.831 19:00 0.001521 19.00 19:00 0.011079 0.842 19:15 0.001521 19.25 19:15 0.011079 0.853 19:30 0.001521 19.50 19:30 0.011079 0.864 19:45 0.001521 19.75 19:45 0.011079 0.875 20:00 0.001521 20.00 20:00 0.011079 0.886 20:15 0.001521 20.25 20:15 0.011079 0.897 20:30 0.001521 20.50 20:30 0.011079 0.908 20:45 0.001521 20.75 20:45 0.011079 0.920 21:00 0.001521 21.00 21:00 0.011079 0.931 21:15 0.001521 21.25 21:15 0.011079 0.942 21:30 0.001521 21.50 21:30 0.011079 0.953 21:45 0.001521 21.75 21:45 0.011079 0.964 22:00 0.001521 22.00 22:00 0.011079 0.975 22:15 0.001521 22.25 22:15 0.011079 0.986 22:30 0.001521 22.50 22:30 0.011079 0.997 22:45 0.001521 22.75 22:45 0.011079 1.008 23:00 0.001521 23.00 23:00 0.011079 1.019 23:15 0.001521 23.25 23:15 0.011079 1.030 23:30 0.001521 23.50 23:30 0.011079 1.041 23:45 0.001521 23.75 23:45 0.011079 1.052 0:00 0.002219 24.00 0:00 0.016163 1.064
PAGE 185
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 3 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 0:15 0.002219 24.25 0:15 0.016163 1.080 0:30 0.002219 24.50 0:30 0.016163 1.096 0:45 0.002219 24.75 0:45 0.016163 1.112 1:00 0.002219 25.00 1:00 0.016163 1.128 1:15 0.002219 25.25 1:15 0.016163 1.144 1:30 0.002219 25.50 1:30 0.016163 1.161 1:45 0.002219 25.75 1:45 0.016163 1.177 2:00 0.002219 26.00 2:00 0.016163 1.193 2:15 0.002219 26.25 2:15 0.016163 1.209 2:30 0.002219 26.50 2:30 0.016163 1.225 2:45 0.002219 26.75 2:45 0.016163 1.241 3:00 0.002219 27.00 3:00 0.016163 1.258 3:15 0.002219 27.25 3:15 0.016163 1.274 3:30 0.002219 27.50 3:30 0.016163 1.290 3:45 0.002219 27.75 3:45 0.016163 1.306 4:00 0.002219 28.00 4:00 0.016163 1.322 4:15 0.002219 28.25 4:15 0.016163 1.338 4:30 0.002219 28.50 4:30 0.016163 1.355 4:45 0.002219 28.75 4:45 0.016163 1.371 5:00 0.002219 29.00 5:00 0.016163 1.387 5:15 0.002219 29.25 5:15 0.016163 1.403 5:30 0.002219 29.50 5:30 0.016163 1.419 5:45 0.002219 29.75 5:45 0.016163 1.435 6:00 0.002219 30.00 6:00 0.016163 1.451 6:15 0.002219 30.25 6:15 0.016163 1.468 6:30 0.002219 30.50 6:30 0.016163 1.484 6:45 0.002219 30.75 6:45 0.016163 1.500 7:00 0.002219 31.00 7:00 0.016163 1.516 7:15 0.002219 31.25 7:15 0.016163 1.532 7:30 0.002219 31.50 7:30 0.016163 1.548 7:45 0.002219 31.75 7:45 0.016163 1.565 8:00 0.002219 32.00 8:00 0.016163 1.581 8:15 0.002219 32.25 8:15 0.016163 1.597 8:30 0.002219 32.50 8:30 0.016163 1.613 8:45 0.002219 32.75 8:45 0.016163 1.629 9:00 0.002219 33.00 9:00 0.016163 1.645 9:15 0.002219 33.25 9:15 0.016163 1.662 9:30 0.002219 33.50 9:30 0.016163 1.678 9:45 0.002219 33.75 9:45 0.016163 1.694 10:00 0.002219 34.00 10:00 0.016163 1.710 10:15 0.002219 34.25 10:15 0.016163 1.726 10:30 0.002219 34.50 10:30 0.016163 1.742 10:45 0.002219 34.75 10:45 0.016163 1.759 11:00 0.002219 35.00 11:00 0.016163 1.775 11:15 0.002219 35.25 11:15 0.016163 1.791 11:30 0.002219 35.50 11:30 0.016163 1.807 11:45 0.002219 35.75 11:45 0.016163 1.823 12:00 0.002219 36.00 12:00 0.016163 1.839 12:15 0.002219 36.25 12:15 0.016163 1.856 12:30 0.002219 36.50 12:30 0.016163 1.872
PAGE 186
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 4 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 12:45 0.002219 36.75 12:45 0.016163 1.888 13:00 0.002219 37.00 13:00 0.016163 1.904 13:15 0.002219 37.25 13:15 0.016163 1.920 13:30 0.002219 37.50 13:30 0.016163 1.936 13:45 0.002219 37.75 13:45 0.016163 1.953 14:00 0.002219 38.00 14:00 0.016163 1.969 14:15 0.002219 38.25 14:15 0.016163 1.985 14:30 0.002219 38.50 14:30 0.016163 2.001 14:45 0.002219 38.75 14:45 0.016163 2.017 15:00 0.002219 39.00 15:00 0.016163 2.033 15:15 0.002219 39.25 15:15 0.016163 2.050 15:30 0.002219 39.50 15:30 0.016163 2.066 15:45 0.002219 39.75 15:45 0.016163 2.082 16:00 0.002219 40.00 16:00 0.016163 2.098 16:15 0.002219 40.25 16:15 0.016163 2.114 16:30 0.002219 40.50 16:30 0.016163 2.130 16:45 0.002219 40.75 16:45 0.016163 2.147 17:00 0.002219 41.00 17:00 0.016163 2.163 17:15 0.002219 41.25 17:15 0.016163 2.179 17:30 0.002219 41.50 17:30 0.016163 2.195 17:45 0.002219 41.75 17:45 0.016163 2.211 18:00 0.002219 42.00 18:00 0.016163 2.227 18:15 0.002219 42.25 18:15 0.016163 2.243 18:30 0.002219 42.50 18:30 0.016163 2.260 18:45 0.002219 42.75 18:45 0.016163 2.276 19:00 0.002219 43.00 19:00 0.016163 2.292 19:15 0.002219 43.25 19:15 0.016163 2.308 19:30 0.002219 43.50 19:30 0.016163 2.324 19:45 0.002219 43.75 19:45 0.016163 2.340 20:00 0.002219 44.00 20:00 0.016163 2.357 20:15 0.002219 44.25 20:15 0.016163 2.373 20:30 0.002219 44.50 20:30 0.016163 2.389 20:45 0.002219 44.75 20:45 0.016163 2.405 21:00 0.002219 45.00 21:00 0.016163 2.421 21:15 0.002219 45.25 21:15 0.016163 2.437 21:30 0.002219 45.50 21:30 0.016163 2.454 21:45 0.002219 45.75 21:45 0.016163 2.470 22:00 0.002219 46.00 22:00 0.016163 2.486 22:15 0.002219 46.25 22:15 0.016163 2.502 22:30 0.002219 46.50 22:30 0.016163 2.518 22:45 0.002219 46.75 22:45 0.016163 2.534 23:00 0.002219 47.00 23:00 0.016163 2.551 23:15 0.002219 47.25 23:15 0.016163 2.567 23:30 0.002219 47.50 23:30 0.016163 2.583 23:45 0.002219 47.75 23:45 0.016163 2.599 0:00 0.005325 48.00 0:00 0.038791 2.615 0:15 0.005325 48.25 0:15 0.038791 2.654 0:30 0.005325 48.50 0:30 0.038791 2.693 0:45 0.005325 48.75 0:45 0.038791 2.732 1:00 0.005325 49.00 1:00 0.038791 2.770
PAGE 187
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 5 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 1:15 0.005325 49.25 1:15 0.038791 2.809 1:30 0.005325 49.50 1:30 0.038791 2.848 1:45 0.005325 49.75 1:45 0.038791 2.887 2:00 0.005325 50.00 2:00 0.038791 2.926 2:15 0.005325 50.25 2:15 0.038791 2.964 2:30 0.005325 50.50 2:30 0.038791 3.003 2:45 0.005325 50.75 2:45 0.038791 3.042 3:00 0.005325 51.00 3:00 0.038791 3.081 3:15 0.005325 51.25 3:15 0.038791 3.120 3:30 0.005325 51.50 3:30 0.038791 3.158 3:45 0.005325 51.75 3:45 0.038791 3.197 4:00 0.005325 52.00 4:00 0.038791 3.236 4:15 0.005325 52.25 4:15 0.038791 3.275 4:30 0.005325 52.50 4:30 0.038791 3.313 4:45 0.005325 52.75 4:45 0.038791 3.352 5:00 0.005325 53.00 5:00 0.038791 3.391 5:15 0.005325 53.25 5:15 0.038791 3.430 5:30 0.005325 53.50 5:30 0.038791 3.469 5:45 0.005325 53.75 5:45 0.038791 3.507 6:00 0.005325 54.00 6:00 0.038791 3.546 6:15 0.005325 54.25 6:15 0.038791 3.585 6:30 0.005325 54.50 6:30 0.038791 3.624 6:45 0.005325 54.75 6:45 0.038791 3.663 7:00 0.005325 55.00 7:00 0.038791 3.701 7:15 0.005325 55.25 7:15 0.038791 3.740 7:30 0.005325 55.50 7:30 0.038791 3.779 7:45 0.005325 55.75 7:45 0.038791 3.818 8:00 0.005325 56.00 8:00 0.038791 3.857 8:15 0.005325 56.25 8:15 0.038791 3.895 8:30 0.005325 56.50 8:30 0.038791 3.934 8:45 0.005325 56.75 8:45 0.038791 3.973 9:00 0.005325 57.00 9:00 0.038791 4.012 9:15 0.005325 57.25 9:15 0.038791 4.051 9:30 0.005325 57.50 9:30 0.038791 4.089 9:45 0.005325 57.75 9:45 0.038791 4.128 10:00 0.014000 58.00 10:00 0.101987 4.167 10:15 0.014000 58.25 10:15 0.101987 4.269 10:30 0.014000 58.50 10:30 0.101987 4.371 10:45 0.014000 58.75 10:45 0.101987 4.473 11:00 0.025000 59.00 11:00 0.182119 4.575 11:15 0.025000 59.25 11:15 0.182119 4.757 11:30 0.150000 59.50 11:30 1.092715 4.939 11:45 0.187000 59.75 11:45 1.362252 6.032 12:00 0.036500 60.00 12:00 0.265894 7.394 12:15 0.036500 60.25 12:15 0.265894 7.660 12:30 0.019000 60.50 12:30 0.138411 7.926 12:45 0.019000 60.75 12:45 0.138411 8.064 13:00 0.012750 61.00 13:00 0.092881 8.203 13:15 0.012750 61.25 13:15 0.092881 8.296 13:30 0.012750 61.50 13:30 0.092881 8.388
PAGE 188
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 6 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 13:45 0.012750 61.75 13:45 0.092881 8.481 14:00 0.004550 62.00 14:00 0.033146 8.574 14:15 0.004550 62.25 14:15 0.033146 8.607 14:30 0.004550 62.50 14:30 0.033146 8.640 14:45 0.004550 62.75 14:45 0.033146 8.674 15:00 0.004550 63.00 15:00 0.033146 8.707 15:15 0.004550 63.25 15:15 0.033146 8.740 15:30 0.004550 63.50 15:30 0.033146 8.773 15:45 0.004550 63.75 15:45 0.033146 8.806 16:00 0.004550 64.00 16:00 0.033146 8.839 16:15 0.004550 64.25 16:15 0.033146 8.872 16:30 0.004550 64.50 16:30 0.033146 8.906 16:45 0.004550 64.75 16:45 0.033146 8.939 17:00 0.004550 65.00 17:00 0.033146 8.972 17:15 0.004550 65.25 17:15 0.033146 9.005 17:30 0.004550 65.50 17:30 0.033146 9.038 17:45 0.004550 65.75 17:45 0.033146 9.071 18:00 0.004550 66.00 18:00 0.033146 9.105 18:15 0.004550 66.25 18:15 0.033146 9.138 18:30 0.004550 66.50 18:30 0.033146 9.171 18:45 0.004550 66.75 18:45 0.033146 9.204 19:00 0.004550 67.00 19:00 0.033146 9.237 19:15 0.004550 67.25 19:15 0.033146 9.270 19:30 0.004550 67.50 19:30 0.033146 9.303 19:45 0.004550 67.75 19:45 0.033146 9.337 20:00 0.004550 68.00 20:00 0.033146 9.370 20:15 0.004550 68.25 20:15 0.033146 9.403 20:30 0.004550 68.50 20:30 0.033146 9.436 20:45 0.004550 68.75 20:45 0.033146 9.469 21:00 0.004550 69.00 21:00 0.033146 9.502 21:15 0.004550 69.25 21:15 0.033146 9.535 21:30 0.004550 69.50 21:30 0.033146 9.569 21:45 0.004550 69.75 21:45 0.033146 9.602 22:00 0.004550 70.00 22:00 0.033146 9.635 22:15 0.004550 70.25 22:15 0.033146 9.668 22:30 0.004550 70.50 22:30 0.033146 9.701 22:45 0.004550 70.75 22:45 0.033146 9.734 23:00 0.004550 71.00 23:00 0.033146 9.767 23:15 0.004550 71.25 23:15 0.033146 9.801 23:30 0.004550 71.50 23:30 0.033146 9.834 23:45 0.004550 71.75 23:45 0.033146 9.867 0:00 0.000000 72.00 0:00 0 9.9
PAGE 189
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 1 of 6 1.359 Sum = 11 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 0:00 0.001521 72-hour depth 11.0 in 0.00 0:00 0.01231 0.000 0:15 0.001521 72 peak int 6.1 in/hr 0.25 0:15 0.01231 0.012 0:30 0.001521 0.50 0:30 0.01231 0.025 0:45 0.001521 0.75 0:45 0.01231 0.037 1:00 0.001521 1.00 1:00 0.01231 0.049 1:15 0.001521 1.25 1:15 0.01231 0.062 1:30 0.001521 1.50 1:30 0.01231 0.074 1:45 0.001521 1.75 1:45 0.01231 0.086 2:00 0.001521 2.00 2:00 0.01231 0.098 2:15 0.001521 2.25 2:15 0.01231 0.111 2:30 0.001521 2.50 2:30 0.01231 0.123 2:45 0.001521 2.75 2:45 0.01231 0.135 3:00 0.001521 3.00 3:00 0.01231 0.148 3:15 0.001521 3.25 3:15 0.01231 0.160 3:30 0.001521 3.50 3:30 0.01231 0.172 3:45 0.001521 3.75 3:45 0.01231 0.185 4:00 0.001521 4.00 4:00 0.01231 0.197 4:15 0.001521 4.25 4:15 0.01231 0.209 4:30 0.001521 4.50 4:30 0.01231 0.222 4:45 0.001521 4.75 4:45 0.01231 0.234 5:00 0.001521 5.00 5:00 0.01231 0.246 5:15 0.001521 5.25 5:15 0.01231 0.259 5:30 0.001521 5.50 5:30 0.01231 0.271 5:45 0.001521 5.75 5:45 0.01231 0.283 6:00 0.001521 6.00 6:00 0.01231 0.295 6:15 0.001521 6.25 6:15 0.01231 0.308 6:30 0.001521 6.50 6:30 0.01231 0.320 6:45 0.001521 6.75 6:45 0.01231 0.332 7:00 0.001521 7.00 7:00 0.01231 0.345 7:15 0.001521 7.25 7:15 0.01231 0.357 7:30 0.001521 7.50 7:30 0.01231 0.369 7:45 0.001521 7.75 7:45 0.01231 0.382 8:00 0.001521 8.00 8:00 0.01231 0.394 8:15 0.001521 8.25 8:15 0.01231 0.406 8:30 0.001521 8.50 8:30 0.01231 0.419 8:45 0.001521 8.75 8:45 0.01231 0.431 9:00 0.001521 9.00 9:00 0.01231 0.443 9:15 0.001521 9.25 9:15 0.01231 0.455 9:30 0.001521 9.50 9:30 0.01231 0.468 9:45 0.001521 9.75 9:45 0.01231 0.480 10:00 0.001521 10.00 10:00 0.01231 0.492 10:15 0.001521 10.25 10:15 0.01231 0.505 10:30 0.001521 10.50 10:30 0.01231 0.517 10:45 0.001521 10.75 10:45 0.01231 0.529 11:00 0.001521 11.00 11:00 0.01231 0.542 11:15 0.001521 11.25 11:15 0.01231 0.554 11:30 0.001521 11.50 11:30 0.01231 0.566 Sum SFWMD Unit Hydrographs SFWMD Hydrographs 72-Hour 25 yr 72-Hour 14.5 inch
PAGE 190
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 2 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 11:45 0.001521 11.75 11:45 0.01231 0.579 12:00 0.001521 12.00 12:00 0.01231 0.591 12:15 0.001521 12.25 12:15 0.01231 0.603 12:30 0.001521 12.50 12:30 0.01231 0.615 12:45 0.001521 12.75 12:45 0.01231 0.628 13:00 0.001521 13.00 13:00 0.01231 0.640 13:15 0.001521 13.25 13:15 0.01231 0.652 13:30 0.001521 13.50 13:30 0.01231 0.665 13:45 0.001521 13.75 13:45 0.01231 0.677 14:00 0.001521 14.00 14:00 0.01231 0.689 14:15 0.001521 14.25 14:15 0.01231 0.702 14:30 0.001521 14.50 14:30 0.01231 0.714 14:45 0.001521 14.75 14:45 0.01231 0.726 15:00 0.001521 15.00 15:00 0.01231 0.739 15:15 0.001521 15.25 15:15 0.01231 0.751 15:30 0.001521 15.50 15:30 0.01231 0.763 15:45 0.001521 15.75 15:45 0.01231 0.776 16:00 0.001521 16.00 16:00 0.01231 0.788 16:15 0.001521 16.25 16:15 0.01231 0.800 16:30 0.001521 16.50 16:30 0.01231 0.812 16:45 0.001521 16.75 16:45 0.01231 0.825 17:00 0.001521 17.00 17:00 0.01231 0.837 17:15 0.001521 17.25 17:15 0.01231 0.849 17:30 0.001521 17.50 17:30 0.01231 0.862 17:45 0.001521 17.75 17:45 0.01231 0.874 18:00 0.001521 18.00 18:00 0.01231 0.886 18:15 0.001521 18.25 18:15 0.01231 0.899 18:30 0.001521 18.50 18:30 0.01231 0.911 18:45 0.001521 18.75 18:45 0.01231 0.923 19:00 0.001521 19.00 19:00 0.01231 0.936 19:15 0.001521 19.25 19:15 0.01231 0.948 19:30 0.001521 19.50 19:30 0.01231 0.960 19:45 0.001521 19.75 19:45 0.01231 0.972 20:00 0.001521 20.00 20:00 0.01231 0.985 20:15 0.001521 20.25 20:15 0.01231 0.997 20:30 0.001521 20.50 20:30 0.01231 1.009 20:45 0.001521 20.75 20:45 0.01231 1.022 21:00 0.001521 21.00 21:00 0.01231 1.034 21:15 0.001521 21.25 21:15 0.01231 1.046 21:30 0.001521 21.50 21:30 0.01231 1.059 21:45 0.001521 21.75 21:45 0.01231 1.071 22:00 0.001521 22.00 22:00 0.01231 1.083 22:15 0.001521 22.25 22:15 0.01231 1.096 22:30 0.001521 22.50 22:30 0.01231 1.108 22:45 0.001521 22.75 22:45 0.01231 1.120 23:00 0.001521 23.00 23:00 0.01231 1.133 23:15 0.001521 23.25 23:15 0.01231 1.145 23:30 0.001521 23.50 23:30 0.01231 1.157 23:45 0.001521 23.75 23:45 0.01231 1.169 0:00 0.002219 24.00 0:00 0.017959 1.182
PAGE 191
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 3 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 0:15 0.002219 24.25 0:15 0.017959 1.200 0:30 0.002219 24.50 0:30 0.017959 1.218 0:45 0.002219 24.75 0:45 0.017959 1.236 1:00 0.002219 25.00 1:00 0.017959 1.254 1:15 0.002219 25.25 1:15 0.017959 1.272 1:30 0.002219 25.50 1:30 0.017959 1.290 1:45 0.002219 25.75 1:45 0.017959 1.307 2:00 0.002219 26.00 2:00 0.017959 1.325 2:15 0.002219 26.25 2:15 0.017959 1.343 2:30 0.002219 26.50 2:30 0.017959 1.361 2:45 0.002219 26.75 2:45 0.017959 1.379 3:00 0.002219 27.00 3:00 0.017959 1.397 3:15 0.002219 27.25 3:15 0.017959 1.415 3:30 0.002219 27.50 3:30 0.017959 1.433 3:45 0.002219 27.75 3:45 0.017959 1.451 4:00 0.002219 28.00 4:00 0.017959 1.469 4:15 0.002219 28.25 4:15 0.017959 1.487 4:30 0.002219 28.50 4:30 0.017959 1.505 4:45 0.002219 28.75 4:45 0.017959 1.523 5:00 0.002219 29.00 5:00 0.017959 1.541 5:15 0.002219 29.25 5:15 0.017959 1.559 5:30 0.002219 29.50 5:30 0.017959 1.577 5:45 0.002219 29.75 5:45 0.017959 1.595 6:00 0.002219 30.00 6:00 0.017959 1.613 6:15 0.002219 30.25 6:15 0.017959 1.631 6:30 0.002219 30.50 6:30 0.017959 1.649 6:45 0.002219 30.75 6:45 0.017959 1.667 7:00 0.002219 31.00 7:00 0.017959 1.685 7:15 0.002219 31.25 7:15 0.017959 1.703 7:30 0.002219 31.50 7:30 0.017959 1.721 7:45 0.002219 31.75 7:45 0.017959 1.738 8:00 0.002219 32.00 8:00 0.017959 1.756 8:15 0.002219 32.25 8:15 0.017959 1.774 8:30 0.002219 32.50 8:30 0.017959 1.792 8:45 0.002219 32.75 8:45 0.017959 1.810 9:00 0.002219 33.00 9:00 0.017959 1.828 9:15 0.002219 33.25 9:15 0.017959 1.846 9:30 0.002219 33.50 9:30 0.017959 1.864 9:45 0.002219 33.75 9:45 0.017959 1.882 10:00 0.002219 34.00 10:00 0.017959 1.900 10:15 0.002219 34.25 10:15 0.017959 1.918 10:30 0.002219 34.50 10:30 0.017959 1.936 10:45 0.002219 34.75 10:45 0.017959 1.954 11:00 0.002219 35.00 11:00 0.017959 1.972 11:15 0.002219 35.25 11:15 0.017959 1.990 11:30 0.002219 35.50 11:30 0.017959 2.008 11:45 0.002219 35.75 11:45 0.017959 2.026 12:00 0.002219 36.00 12:00 0.017959 2.044 12:15 0.002219 36.25 12:15 0.017959 2.062 12:30 0.002219 36.50 12:30 0.017959 2.080
PAGE 192
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 4 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 12:45 0.002219 36.75 12:45 0.017959 2.098 13:00 0.002219 37.00 13:00 0.017959 2.116 13:15 0.002219 37.25 13:15 0.017959 2.134 13:30 0.002219 37.50 13:30 0.017959 2.152 13:45 0.002219 37.75 13:45 0.017959 2.169 14:00 0.002219 38.00 14:00 0.017959 2.187 14:15 0.002219 38.25 14:15 0.017959 2.205 14:30 0.002219 38.50 14:30 0.017959 2.223 14:45 0.002219 38.75 14:45 0.017959 2.241 15:00 0.002219 39.00 15:00 0.017959 2.259 15:15 0.002219 39.25 15:15 0.017959 2.277 15:30 0.002219 39.50 15:30 0.017959 2.295 15:45 0.002219 39.75 15:45 0.017959 2.313 16:00 0.002219 40.00 16:00 0.017959 2.331 16:15 0.002219 40.25 16:15 0.017959 2.349 16:30 0.002219 40.50 16:30 0.017959 2.367 16:45 0.002219 40.75 16:45 0.017959 2.385 17:00 0.002219 41.00 17:00 0.017959 2.403 17:15 0.002219 41.25 17:15 0.017959 2.421 17:30 0.002219 41.50 17:30 0.017959 2.439 17:45 0.002219 41.75 17:45 0.017959 2.457 18:00 0.002219 42.00 18:00 0.017959 2.475 18:15 0.002219 42.25 18:15 0.017959 2.493 18:30 0.002219 42.50 18:30 0.017959 2.511 18:45 0.002219 42.75 18:45 0.017959 2.529 19:00 0.002219 43.00 19:00 0.017959 2.547 19:15 0.002219 43.25 19:15 0.017959 2.565 19:30 0.002219 43.50 19:30 0.017959 2.583 19:45 0.002219 43.75 19:45 0.017959 2.601 20:00 0.002219 44.00 20:00 0.017959 2.618 20:15 0.002219 44.25 20:15 0.017959 2.636 20:30 0.002219 44.50 20:30 0.017959 2.654 20:45 0.002219 44.75 20:45 0.017959 2.672 21:00 0.002219 45.00 21:00 0.017959 2.690 21:15 0.002219 45.25 21:15 0.017959 2.708 21:30 0.002219 45.50 21:30 0.017959 2.726 21:45 0.002219 45.75 21:45 0.017959 2.744 22:00 0.002219 46.00 22:00 0.017959 2.762 22:15 0.002219 46.25 22:15 0.017959 2.780 22:30 0.002219 46.50 22:30 0.017959 2.798 22:45 0.002219 46.75 22:45 0.017959 2.816 23:00 0.002219 47.00 23:00 0.017959 2.834 23:15 0.002219 47.25 23:15 0.017959 2.852 23:30 0.002219 47.50 23:30 0.017959 2.870 23:45 0.002219 47.75 23:45 0.017959 2.888 0:00 0.005325 48.00 0:00 0.043102 2.906 0:15 0.005325 48.25 0:15 0.043102 2.949 0:30 0.005325 48.50 0:30 0.043102 2.992 0:45 0.005325 48.75 0:45 0.043102 3.035 1:00 0.005325 49.00 1:00 0.043102 3.078
PAGE 193
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 5 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 1:15 0.005325 49.25 1:15 0.043102 3.121 1:30 0.005325 49.50 1:30 0.043102 3.164 1:45 0.005325 49.75 1:45 0.043102 3.208 2:00 0.005325 50.00 2:00 0.043102 3.251 2:15 0.005325 50.25 2:15 0.043102 3.294 2:30 0.005325 50.50 2:30 0.043102 3.337 2:45 0.005325 50.75 2:45 0.043102 3.380 3:00 0.005325 51.00 3:00 0.043102 3.423 3:15 0.005325 51.25 3:15 0.043102 3.466 3:30 0.005325 51.50 3:30 0.043102 3.509 3:45 0.005325 51.75 3:45 0.043102 3.552 4:00 0.005325 52.00 4:00 0.043102 3.595 4:15 0.005325 52.25 4:15 0.043102 3.639 4:30 0.005325 52.50 4:30 0.043102 3.682 4:45 0.005325 52.75 4:45 0.043102 3.725 5:00 0.005325 53.00 5:00 0.043102 3.768 5:15 0.005325 53.25 5:15 0.043102 3.811 5:30 0.005325 53.50 5:30 0.043102 3.854 5:45 0.005325 53.75 5:45 0.043102 3.897 6:00 0.005325 54.00 6:00 0.043102 3.940 6:15 0.005325 54.25 6:15 0.043102 3.983 6:30 0.005325 54.50 6:30 0.043102 4.026 6:45 0.005325 54.75 6:45 0.043102 4.070 7:00 0.005325 55.00 7:00 0.043102 4.113 7:15 0.005325 55.25 7:15 0.043102 4.156 7:30 0.005325 55.50 7:30 0.043102 4.199 7:45 0.005325 55.75 7:45 0.043102 4.242 8:00 0.005325 56.00 8:00 0.043102 4.285 8:15 0.005325 56.25 8:15 0.043102 4.328 8:30 0.005325 56.50 8:30 0.043102 4.371 8:45 0.005325 56.75 8:45 0.043102 4.414 9:00 0.005325 57.00 9:00 0.043102 4.457 9:15 0.005325 57.25 9:15 0.043102 4.501 9:30 0.005325 57.50 9:30 0.043102 4.544 9:45 0.005325 57.75 9:45 0.043102 4.587 10:00 0.014000 58.00 10:00 0.113319 4.630 10:15 0.014000 58.25 10:15 0.113319 4.743 10:30 0.014000 58.50 10:30 0.113319 4.857 10:45 0.014000 58.75 10:45 0.113319 4.970 11:00 0.025000 59.00 11:00 0.202355 5.083 11:15 0.025000 59.25 11:15 0.202355 5.286 11:30 0.150000 59.50 11:30 1.214128 5.488 11:45 0.187000 59.75 11:45 1.513613 6.702 12:00 0.036500 60.00 12:00 0.295438 8.216 12:15 0.036500 60.25 12:15 0.295438 8.511 12:30 0.019000 60.50 12:30 0.15379 8.806 12:45 0.019000 60.75 12:45 0.15379 8.960 13:00 0.012750 61.00 13:00 0.103201 9.114 13:15 0.012750 61.25 13:15 0.103201 9.217 13:30 0.012750 61.50 13:30 0.103201 9.320
PAGE 194
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 6 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 13:45 0.012750 61.75 13:45 0.103201 9.424 14:00 0.004550 62.00 14:00 0.036829 9.527 14:15 0.004550 62.25 14:15 0.036829 9.564 14:30 0.004550 62.50 14:30 0.036829 9.601 14:45 0.004550 62.75 14:45 0.036829 9.637 15:00 0.004550 63.00 15:00 0.036829 9.674 15:15 0.004550 63.25 15:15 0.036829 9.711 15:30 0.004550 63.50 15:30 0.036829 9.748 15:45 0.004550 63.75 15:45 0.036829 9.785 16:00 0.004550 64.00 16:00 0.036829 9.821 16:15 0.004550 64.25 16:15 0.036829 9.858 16:30 0.004550 64.50 16:30 0.036829 9.895 16:45 0.004550 64.75 16:45 0.036829 9.932 17:00 0.004550 65.00 17:00 0.036829 9.969 17:15 0.004550 65.25 17:15 0.036829 10.006 17:30 0.004550 65.50 17:30 0.036829 10.042 17:45 0.004550 65.75 17:45 0.036829 10.079 18:00 0.004550 66.00 18:00 0.036829 10.116 18:15 0.004550 66.25 18:15 0.036829 10.153 18:30 0.004550 66.50 18:30 0.036829 10.190 18:45 0.004550 66.75 18:45 0.036829 10.227 19:00 0.004550 67.00 19:00 0.036829 10.263 19:15 0.004550 67.25 19:15 0.036829 10.300 19:30 0.004550 67.50 19:30 0.036829 10.337 19:45 0.004550 67.75 19:45 0.036829 10.374 20:00 0.004550 68.00 20:00 0.036829 10.411 20:15 0.004550 68.25 20:15 0.036829 10.448 20:30 0.004550 68.50 20:30 0.036829 10.484 20:45 0.004550 68.75 20:45 0.036829 10.521 21:00 0.004550 69.00 21:00 0.036829 10.558 21:15 0.004550 69.25 21:15 0.036829 10.595 21:30 0.004550 69.50 21:30 0.036829 10.632 21:45 0.004550 69.75 21:45 0.036829 10.669 22:00 0.004550 70.00 22:00 0.036829 10.705 22:15 0.004550 70.25 22:15 0.036829 10.742 22:30 0.004550 70.50 22:30 0.036829 10.779 22:45 0.004550 70.75 22:45 0.036829 10.816 23:00 0.004550 71.00 23:00 0.036829 10.853 23:15 0.004550 71.25 23:15 0.036829 10.890 23:30 0.004550 71.50 23:30 0.036829 10.926 23:45 0.004550 71.75 23:45 0.036829 10.963 0:00 0.000000 72.00 0:00 0 11
PAGE 195
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 1 of 6 1.359 Sum = 14 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 0:00 0.001521 72-hour depth 14.0 in 0.00 0:00 0.015667 0.000 0:15 0.001521 72 peak int 7.7 in/hr 0.25 0:15 0.015667 0.016 0:30 0.001521 0.50 0:30 0.015667 0.031 0:45 0.001521 0.75 0:45 0.015667 0.047 1:00 0.001521 1.00 1:00 0.015667 0.063 1:15 0.001521 1.25 1:15 0.015667 0.078 1:30 0.001521 1.50 1:30 0.015667 0.094 1:45 0.001521 1.75 1:45 0.015667 0.110 2:00 0.001521 2.00 2:00 0.015667 0.125 2:15 0.001521 2.25 2:15 0.015667 0.141 2:30 0.001521 2.50 2:30 0.015667 0.157 2:45 0.001521 2.75 2:45 0.015667 0.172 3:00 0.001521 3.00 3:00 0.015667 0.188 3:15 0.001521 3.25 3:15 0.015667 0.204 3:30 0.001521 3.50 3:30 0.015667 0.219 3:45 0.001521 3.75 3:45 0.015667 0.235 4:00 0.001521 4.00 4:00 0.015667 0.251 4:15 0.001521 4.25 4:15 0.015667 0.266 4:30 0.001521 4.50 4:30 0.015667 0.282 4:45 0.001521 4.75 4:45 0.015667 0.298 5:00 0.001521 5.00 5:00 0.015667 0.313 5:15 0.001521 5.25 5:15 0.015667 0.329 5:30 0.001521 5.50 5:30 0.015667 0.345 5:45 0.001521 5.75 5:45 0.015667 0.360 6:00 0.001521 6.00 6:00 0.015667 0.376 6:15 0.001521 6.25 6:15 0.015667 0.392 6:30 0.001521 6.50 6:30 0.015667 0.407 6:45 0.001521 6.75 6:45 0.015667 0.423 7:00 0.001521 7.00 7:00 0.015667 0.439 7:15 0.001521 7.25 7:15 0.015667 0.454 7:30 0.001521 7.50 7:30 0.015667 0.470 7:45 0.001521 7.75 7:45 0.015667 0.486 8:00 0.001521 8.00 8:00 0.015667 0.501 8:15 0.001521 8.25 8:15 0.015667 0.517 8:30 0.001521 8.50 8:30 0.015667 0.533 8:45 0.001521 8.75 8:45 0.015667 0.548 9:00 0.001521 9.00 9:00 0.015667 0.564 9:15 0.001521 9.25 9:15 0.015667 0.580 9:30 0.001521 9.50 9:30 0.015667 0.595 9:45 0.001521 9.75 9:45 0.015667 0.611 10:00 0.001521 10.00 10:00 0.015667 0.627 10:15 0.001521 10.25 10:15 0.015667 0.642 10:30 0.001521 10.50 10:30 0.015667 0.658 10:45 0.001521 10.75 10:45 0.015667 0.674 11:00 0.001521 11.00 11:00 0.015667 0.689 11:15 0.001521 11.25 11:15 0.015667 0.705 11:30 0.001521 11.50 11:30 0.015667 0.721 Sum SFWMD Unit Hydrographs SFWMD Hydrographs 72-Hour 100 yr 72-Hour 18 inch
PAGE 196
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 2 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 11:45 0.001521 11.75 11:45 0.015667 0.736 12:00 0.001521 12.00 12:00 0.015667 0.752 12:15 0.001521 12.25 12:15 0.015667 0.768 12:30 0.001521 12.50 12:30 0.015667 0.783 12:45 0.001521 12.75 12:45 0.015667 0.799 13:00 0.001521 13.00 13:00 0.015667 0.815 13:15 0.001521 13.25 13:15 0.015667 0.830 13:30 0.001521 13.50 13:30 0.015667 0.846 13:45 0.001521 13.75 13:45 0.015667 0.862 14:00 0.001521 14.00 14:00 0.015667 0.877 14:15 0.001521 14.25 14:15 0.015667 0.893 14:30 0.001521 14.50 14:30 0.015667 0.909 14:45 0.001521 14.75 14:45 0.015667 0.924 15:00 0.001521 15.00 15:00 0.015667 0.940 15:15 0.001521 15.25 15:15 0.015667 0.956 15:30 0.001521 15.50 15:30 0.015667 0.971 15:45 0.001521 15.75 15:45 0.015667 0.987 16:00 0.001521 16.00 16:00 0.015667 1.003 16:15 0.001521 16.25 16:15 0.015667 1.018 16:30 0.001521 16.50 16:30 0.015667 1.034 16:45 0.001521 16.75 16:45 0.015667 1.050 17:00 0.001521 17.00 17:00 0.015667 1.065 17:15 0.001521 17.25 17:15 0.015667 1.081 17:30 0.001521 17.50 17:30 0.015667 1.097 17:45 0.001521 17.75 17:45 0.015667 1.112 18:00 0.001521 18.00 18:00 0.015667 1.128 18:15 0.001521 18.25 18:15 0.015667 1.144 18:30 0.001521 18.50 18:30 0.015667 1.159 18:45 0.001521 18.75 18:45 0.015667 1.175 19:00 0.001521 19.00 19:00 0.015667 1.191 19:15 0.001521 19.25 19:15 0.015667 1.206 19:30 0.001521 19.50 19:30 0.015667 1.222 19:45 0.001521 19.75 19:45 0.015667 1.238 20:00 0.001521 20.00 20:00 0.015667 1.253 20:15 0.001521 20.25 20:15 0.015667 1.269 20:30 0.001521 20.50 20:30 0.015667 1.285 20:45 0.001521 20.75 20:45 0.015667 1.300 21:00 0.001521 21.00 21:00 0.015667 1.316 21:15 0.001521 21.25 21:15 0.015667 1.332 21:30 0.001521 21.50 21:30 0.015667 1.347 21:45 0.001521 21.75 21:45 0.015667 1.363 22:00 0.001521 22.00 22:00 0.015667 1.379 22:15 0.001521 22.25 22:15 0.015667 1.394 22:30 0.001521 22.50 22:30 0.015667 1.410 22:45 0.001521 22.75 22:45 0.015667 1.426 23:00 0.001521 23.00 23:00 0.015667 1.441 23:15 0.001521 23.25 23:15 0.015667 1.457 23:30 0.001521 23.50 23:30 0.015667 1.473 23:45 0.001521 23.75 23:45 0.015667 1.488 0:00 0.002219 24.00 0:00 0.022857 1.504
PAGE 197
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 3 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 0:15 0.002219 24.25 0:15 0.022857 1.527 0:30 0.002219 24.50 0:30 0.022857 1.550 0:45 0.002219 24.75 0:45 0.022857 1.573 1:00 0.002219 25.00 1:00 0.022857 1.595 1:15 0.002219 25.25 1:15 0.022857 1.618 1:30 0.002219 25.50 1:30 0.022857 1.641 1:45 0.002219 25.75 1:45 0.022857 1.664 2:00 0.002219 26.00 2:00 0.022857 1.687 2:15 0.002219 26.25 2:15 0.022857 1.710 2:30 0.002219 26.50 2:30 0.022857 1.733 2:45 0.002219 26.75 2:45 0.022857 1.755 3:00 0.002219 27.00 3:00 0.022857 1.778 3:15 0.002219 27.25 3:15 0.022857 1.801 3:30 0.002219 27.50 3:30 0.022857 1.824 3:45 0.002219 27.75 3:45 0.022857 1.847 4:00 0.002219 28.00 4:00 0.022857 1.870 4:15 0.002219 28.25 4:15 0.022857 1.893 4:30 0.002219 28.50 4:30 0.022857 1.915 4:45 0.002219 28.75 4:45 0.022857 1.938 5:00 0.002219 29.00 5:00 0.022857 1.961 5:15 0.002219 29.25 5:15 0.022857 1.984 5:30 0.002219 29.50 5:30 0.022857 2.007 5:45 0.002219 29.75 5:45 0.022857 2.030 6:00 0.002219 30.00 6:00 0.022857 2.053 6:15 0.002219 30.25 6:15 0.022857 2.075 6:30 0.002219 30.50 6:30 0.022857 2.098 6:45 0.002219 30.75 6:45 0.022857 2.121 7:00 0.002219 31.00 7:00 0.022857 2.144 7:15 0.002219 31.25 7:15 0.022857 2.167 7:30 0.002219 31.50 7:30 0.022857 2.190 7:45 0.002219 31.75 7:45 0.022857 2.213 8:00 0.002219 32.00 8:00 0.022857 2.235 8:15 0.002219 32.25 8:15 0.022857 2.258 8:30 0.002219 32.50 8:30 0.022857 2.281 8:45 0.002219 32.75 8:45 0.022857 2.304 9:00 0.002219 33.00 9:00 0.022857 2.327 9:15 0.002219 33.25 9:15 0.022857 2.350 9:30 0.002219 33.50 9:30 0.022857 2.373 9:45 0.002219 33.75 9:45 0.022857 2.395 10:00 0.002219 34.00 10:00 0.022857 2.418 10:15 0.002219 34.25 10:15 0.022857 2.441 10:30 0.002219 34.50 10:30 0.022857 2.464 10:45 0.002219 34.75 10:45 0.022857 2.487 11:00 0.002219 35.00 11:00 0.022857 2.510 11:15 0.002219 35.25 11:15 0.022857 2.533 11:30 0.002219 35.50 11:30 0.022857 2.555 11:45 0.002219 35.75 11:45 0.022857 2.578 12:00 0.002219 36.00 12:00 0.022857 2.601 12:15 0.002219 36.25 12:15 0.022857 2.624 12:30 0.002219 36.50 12:30 0.022857 2.647
PAGE 198
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 4 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 12:45 0.002219 36.75 12:45 0.022857 2.670 13:00 0.002219 37.00 13:00 0.022857 2.693 13:15 0.002219 37.25 13:15 0.022857 2.715 13:30 0.002219 37.50 13:30 0.022857 2.738 13:45 0.002219 37.75 13:45 0.022857 2.761 14:00 0.002219 38.00 14:00 0.022857 2.784 14:15 0.002219 38.25 14:15 0.022857 2.807 14:30 0.002219 38.50 14:30 0.022857 2.830 14:45 0.002219 38.75 14:45 0.022857 2.853 15:00 0.002219 39.00 15:00 0.022857 2.875 15:15 0.002219 39.25 15:15 0.022857 2.898 15:30 0.002219 39.50 15:30 0.022857 2.921 15:45 0.002219 39.75 15:45 0.022857 2.944 16:00 0.002219 40.00 16:00 0.022857 2.967 16:15 0.002219 40.25 16:15 0.022857 2.990 16:30 0.002219 40.50 16:30 0.022857 3.013 16:45 0.002219 40.75 16:45 0.022857 3.035 17:00 0.002219 41.00 17:00 0.022857 3.058 17:15 0.002219 41.25 17:15 0.022857 3.081 17:30 0.002219 41.50 17:30 0.022857 3.104 17:45 0.002219 41.75 17:45 0.022857 3.127 18:00 0.002219 42.00 18:00 0.022857 3.150 18:15 0.002219 42.25 18:15 0.022857 3.173 18:30 0.002219 42.50 18:30 0.022857 3.195 18:45 0.002219 42.75 18:45 0.022857 3.218 19:00 0.002219 43.00 19:00 0.022857 3.241 19:15 0.002219 43.25 19:15 0.022857 3.264 19:30 0.002219 43.50 19:30 0.022857 3.287 19:45 0.002219 43.75 19:45 0.022857 3.310 20:00 0.002219 44.00 20:00 0.022857 3.333 20:15 0.002219 44.25 20:15 0.022857 3.355 20:30 0.002219 44.50 20:30 0.022857 3.378 20:45 0.002219 44.75 20:45 0.022857 3.401 21:00 0.002219 45.00 21:00 0.022857 3.424 21:15 0.002219 45.25 21:15 0.022857 3.447 21:30 0.002219 45.50 21:30 0.022857 3.470 21:45 0.002219 45.75 21:45 0.022857 3.493 22:00 0.002219 46.00 22:00 0.022857 3.515 22:15 0.002219 46.25 22:15 0.022857 3.538 22:30 0.002219 46.50 22:30 0.022857 3.561 22:45 0.002219 46.75 22:45 0.022857 3.584 23:00 0.002219 47.00 23:00 0.022857 3.607 23:15 0.002219 47.25 23:15 0.022857 3.630 23:30 0.002219 47.50 23:30 0.022857 3.653 23:45 0.002219 47.75 23:45 0.022857 3.675 0:00 0.005325 48.00 0:00 0.054857 3.698 0:15 0.005325 48.25 0:15 0.054857 3.753 0:30 0.005325 48.50 0:30 0.054857 3.808 0:45 0.005325 48.75 0:45 0.054857 3.863 1:00 0.005325 49.00 1:00 0.054857 3.918
PAGE 199
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 5 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 1:15 0.005325 49.25 1:15 0.054857 3.973 1:30 0.005325 49.50 1:30 0.054857 4.027 1:45 0.005325 49.75 1:45 0.054857 4.082 2:00 0.005325 50.00 2:00 0.054857 4.137 2:15 0.005325 50.25 2:15 0.054857 4.192 2:30 0.005325 50.50 2:30 0.054857 4.247 2:45 0.005325 50.75 2:45 0.054857 4.302 3:00 0.005325 51.00 3:00 0.054857 4.357 3:15 0.005325 51.25 3:15 0.054857 4.411 3:30 0.005325 51.50 3:30 0.054857 4.466 3:45 0.005325 51.75 3:45 0.054857 4.521 4:00 0.005325 52.00 4:00 0.054857 4.576 4:15 0.005325 52.25 4:15 0.054857 4.631 4:30 0.005325 52.50 4:30 0.054857 4.686 4:45 0.005325 52.75 4:45 0.054857 4.741 5:00 0.005325 53.00 5:00 0.054857 4.795 5:15 0.005325 53.25 5:15 0.054857 4.850 5:30 0.005325 53.50 5:30 0.054857 4.905 5:45 0.005325 53.75 5:45 0.054857 4.960 6:00 0.005325 54.00 6:00 0.054857 5.015 6:15 0.005325 54.25 6:15 0.054857 5.070 6:30 0.005325 54.50 6:30 0.054857 5.125 6:45 0.005325 54.75 6:45 0.054857 5.179 7:00 0.005325 55.00 7:00 0.054857 5.234 7:15 0.005325 55.25 7:15 0.054857 5.289 7:30 0.005325 55.50 7:30 0.054857 5.344 7:45 0.005325 55.75 7:45 0.054857 5.399 8:00 0.005325 56.00 8:00 0.054857 5.454 8:15 0.005325 56.25 8:15 0.054857 5.509 8:30 0.005325 56.50 8:30 0.054857 5.563 8:45 0.005325 56.75 8:45 0.054857 5.618 9:00 0.005325 57.00 9:00 0.054857 5.673 9:15 0.005325 57.25 9:15 0.054857 5.728 9:30 0.005325 57.50 9:30 0.054857 5.783 9:45 0.005325 57.75 9:45 0.054857 5.838 10:00 0.014000 58.00 10:00 0.144224 5.893 10:15 0.014000 58.25 10:15 0.144224 6.037 10:30 0.014000 58.50 10:30 0.144224 6.181 10:45 0.014000 58.75 10:45 0.144224 6.325 11:00 0.025000 59.00 11:00 0.257542 6.469 11:15 0.025000 59.25 11:15 0.257542 6.727 11:30 0.150000 59.50 11:30 1.545254 6.985 11:45 0.187000 59.75 11:45 1.926417 8.530 12:00 0.036500 60.00 12:00 0.376012 10.456 12:15 0.036500 60.25 12:15 0.376012 10.832 12:30 0.019000 60.50 12:30 0.195732 11.208 12:45 0.019000 60.75 12:45 0.195732 11.404 13:00 0.012750 61.00 13:00 0.131347 11.600 13:15 0.012750 61.25 13:15 0.131347 11.731 13:30 0.012750 61.50 13:30 0.131347 11.862
PAGE 200
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 6 of 6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 13:45 0.012750 61.75 13:45 0.131347 11.994 14:00 0.004550 62.00 14:00 0.046873 12.125 14:15 0.004550 62.25 14:15 0.046873 12.172 14:30 0.004550 62.50 14:30 0.046873 12.219 14:45 0.004550 62.75 14:45 0.046873 12.266 15:00 0.004550 63.00 15:00 0.046873 12.313 15:15 0.004550 63.25 15:15 0.046873 12.359 15:30 0.004550 63.50 15:30 0.046873 12.406 15:45 0.004550 63.75 15:45 0.046873 12.453 16:00 0.004550 64.00 16:00 0.046873 12.500 16:15 0.004550 64.25 16:15 0.046873 12.547 16:30 0.004550 64.50 16:30 0.046873 12.594 16:45 0.004550 64.75 16:45 0.046873 12.641 17:00 0.004550 65.00 17:00 0.046873 12.688 17:15 0.004550 65.25 17:15 0.046873 12.734 17:30 0.004550 65.50 17:30 0.046873 12.781 17:45 0.004550 65.75 17:45 0.046873 12.828 18:00 0.004550 66.00 18:00 0.046873 12.875 18:15 0.004550 66.25 18:15 0.046873 12.922 18:30 0.004550 66.50 18:30 0.046873 12.969 18:45 0.004550 66.75 18:45 0.046873 13.016 19:00 0.004550 67.00 19:00 0.046873 13.063 19:15 0.004550 67.25 19:15 0.046873 13.109 19:30 0.004550 67.50 19:30 0.046873 13.156 19:45 0.004550 67.75 19:45 0.046873 13.203 20:00 0.004550 68.00 20:00 0.046873 13.250 20:15 0.004550 68.25 20:15 0.046873 13.297 20:30 0.004550 68.50 20:30 0.046873 13.344 20:45 0.004550 68.75 20:45 0.046873 13.391 21:00 0.004550 69.00 21:00 0.046873 13.438 21:15 0.004550 69.25 21:15 0.046873 13.484 21:30 0.004550 69.50 21:30 0.046873 13.531 21:45 0.004550 69.75 21:45 0.046873 13.578 22:00 0.004550 70.00 22:00 0.046873 13.625 22:15 0.004550 70.25 22:15 0.046873 13.672 22:30 0.004550 70.50 22:30 0.046873 13.719 22:45 0.004550 70.75 22:45 0.046873 13.766 23:00 0.004550 71.00 23:00 0.046873 13.813 23:15 0.004550 71.25 23:15 0.046873 13.859 23:30 0.004550 71.50 23:30 0.046873 13.906 23:45 0.004550 71.75 23:45 0.046873 13.953 0:00 0.000000 72.00 0:00 0 14
PAGE 201
Appendix 3-D SFWMD Hydrographs 25-yr 72-hr storm = 14.5" 1 of 1 7.138 Sum = 3.6 Time Rainfall Cumulative Time Distribution Hours (hrs) (in) (in) 0:00 0 72-hour depth 3.6 in 0 0 0 0 0:05 0.018 72 peak int #REF! in/hr 5 5 0.009078 0.0648 0:10 0.057 10 10 0.028748 0.2052 0:15 0.132 15 15 0.066573 0.4752 0:20 0.263 20 20 0.132642 0.9468 0:25 0.44 25 25 0.221911 1.584 0:30 0.63 30 30 0.317736 2.268 0:35 0.785 35 35 0.395909 2.826 0:40 0.88 40 40 0.443822 3.168 0:45 0.95 45 45 0.479126 3.42 0:50 0.988 50 50 0.498291 3.5568 0:55 0.995 55 55 0.501821 3.582 1:00 1 60 60 0.504343 3.6 Sum SFWMD Unit Hydrographs SFWMD Hydrographs 72-Hour 100 yr 72-Hour 20 inch
PAGE 202
Appendix F SWMM5LOS Model Results
PAGE 203
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 1 of 7 Table F-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 2-Year, 5-Year, and 10-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? ACN1-0NE 151st St & NE 8th Ave 3 Local4.0 4.2 0.2 NO 4.5 0.5 NO 5.0 1.0 ACN1-1NE 146th St & NE 8th Ave 3 Local3.5 4.2 0.7 NO 4.5 1.0 NO 5.0 1.5 ACN1-2NE 145th St W of NE 10th Ave 3 Local3.5 1.4 YES 4.5 1.0 NO 5.0 1.5 ACN1-3NE 144th St W of NE 10th Ave 3 Local3.3 3.6 0.3 NO 4.5 1.2 NO 5.1 1.8 ACN1-4NE 142nd St & NE 9th Ave 3 Local7.2 6.3 YES 6.5 YES 6.7 ACN1-4ANE 143rd St & NE 9th Ave 2 Arterial3.7 4.3 0.6 NO 4.6 0.9 NO 5.1 1.4 NO ACN1-5NE 143rd St & NE 10th Ave 2 Arterial3.1 3.7 0.6 NO 4.5 1.4 NO 5.1 2.0 NO ACN1-6NE 145th St & NE 10th Ave 2 Arterial3.4 3.9 0.5 NO 4.5 1.1 NO 5. 0 1.6 NO ACN1-7NE 147th St & NE 11th Ct 3 Local3.9 3. 0 YES 4.3 0.4 NO 5.0 1.1 ACN1-8NE 143rd St & NE 12th Ave 2 Arterial4.2 1.8 YES 4.3 0.0 NO 5.0 0.8 NO ACN1-9NE 144th St W of NE 14th Ave 4 NIC2.5 4.2 1.7 4.4 1.9 5.1 2.6 ACN1-10NE 146th St W of NE 14th Ave 4 NIC2.5 4.2 1.7 4.4 1.9 5.1 2.6 ACN3-6NE 127th St W of NE 12th Ave 3 Local5.2 5.5 0.3 NO 6.0 0.8 NO 6.7 1.5 ACS1-1NE 126th St W of NE 11th Ave 3 Local5.7 5.8 0.1 NO 6.1 0.4 NO 6.7 1.0 ACS1-2NE 123rd St W of NE 10th Ave 2 Arterial5.8 6.0 0.2 NO 6.3 0.5 NO 6.5 0.7 NO ACS1-3NE 121st St W of NE 11th Ave 3 Local3.8 6.0 2.2 NO 6.3 2.5 NO 6.6 2.8 ACS1-3ANE 125th St W of NE 11th Ave 1 Emergency7.2 5.8 6.1 6.6 ACS1-4NE 12th Ave N of NE 124th St 3 Local6.1 6.6 0.5 NO 6.8 0.7 NO 7.0 0.9 AC S1-5NE 13th Ave N of NE 125th St 3 Local6.6 5.8 YES 6.1 YES 6.7 0.1 ACS1-6NE 125th St E of NE 15th Ave 3 Local1.7 2.7 1.0 NO 3.1 1.4 NO 3.4 1.7 ACS1-7NE 121st St & NE 14th Ave 2 Arterial4.2 4.8 0.6 NO 5.1 0.9 NO 5.2 1.0 NO ACS1-8NE 124th St W of NE 17th Ave 3 Local4.2 3.8 YES 4.0 YES 4.1 ACS1-9NE 15th Ave S of NE 124th St 1 Emergency4.6 3.7 4.0 4.0 ACS2-1NE 143rd St & NE 16th Ave 2 Arterial4.8 4.7 YES 4.9 0.1 NO 5.2 0.4 NO ACS2-2NE 142nd St E of NE 17th Ave 2 Arterial3.6 3.8 0.2 NO 4.3 0.7 NO 4.6 1.0 NO ACS2-3NE 144th St & NE 18th Ave 3 Local4.0 4.7 0.7 NO 5.1 1.1 NO 5.4 1.4 ACS2-4NE 149th St & NE 18th Ave 3 Local6.8 8.6 1.8 NO 9.3 2.5 NO 10.0 3. 2 -5-year, 24-hour (5.9-inch) 2-year, 24-hour (4.2-inch) 10-year, 72-hour (9.9-inch)
PAGE 204
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 2 of 7 Table F-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 2-Year, 5-Year, and 10-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS?5-year, 24-hour (5.9-inch) 2-year, 24-hour (4.2-inch) 10-year, 72-hour (9.9-inch) ACS2-5 NE 142nd St & NE 18th Ave 3 Local 3.6 3.1 YES 3.4 YES 3.6 ACS2-6NE 144th St & NE 18th Ave 4 NIC3.9 4.1 0.2 4.3 0.4 4.6 0.7 ACS2-7NE 144th St & NE 15th Ave 4 NIC4.0 5.1 1.1 5.5 1.5 5.6 1.6 ACS3-1NE 137th St & NE 12th Ave 2 Arterial6.8 7.4 0.6 NO 7.6 0.8 NO 7.9 1.1 NO ACS3-10NE 135th St E of NE 16th Ave 1 Emergency7.3 4.2 4.7 5.6 ACS3-2NE 11th Ave S of NE 133rd St 3 Local6.8 6.7 YES 7.0 0.2 NO 7.3 0.5 ACS3-3NE 13th Ave N of NE 134th St 1 Local5.7 6.0 0.3 NO 6.5 0.8 NO 6.8 1.1 ACS3-4NE 138th St W of NE 16th Ave 3 Local6.8 7.3 0.5 NO 7.5 0.7 NO 7.9 1.1 ACS3-5NE 132nd St W of NE 14th Ave 3 Local4.5 5.3 0.8 NO 6.0 1.5 NO 6.8 2.3 ACS3-6NE 137th St E of NE 16th Ave 3 Local3.5 3.4 YES 4.2 0.7 NO 4.5 1.0 ACS3-7NE 16th Ave N of NE 135th St 3 Local6.7 3.8 YES 4.5 YES 5.2 ACS3-8NE 136th St W of NE 15th Ave 3 Local3.3 5.5 2.2 NO 6.1 2.8 NO 6.8 3.5 ACS3-8ANE 137th St & NE 16th Ave 3 Local7.2 4.7 YES 5.3 YES 5.9 ACS3-9Unnamed 3 Local3.0 3.2 0.2 NO 3.4 0.4 NO 3.5 0.5 ACS4-1Emerald NE of NE 16th Ave 3 Local4.7 2.5 YES 3.1 YES 4.3 ACS4-2 17th Ave (Moefeld) N of NE 127th St 3 Local3.8 4.3 0.5 NO 4.4 0.6 NO 4.5 0.7 ACS5-1 NE 127th St E of 17th Ave (Moefeld) 3 Local3.2 3.6 0.4 NO 3.8 0.6 NO 4.0 0.8 BE1-1NE 141st St & NE 4th Ave 3 Local2.3 2.6 0.3 NO 3.2 0.9 NO 3.6 1.3 BE1-2NE 139th St & NE 4th Ave 3 Local2.4 2.5 0.1 NO 3.0 0.6 NO 3.6 1.2 BE1-3NE 137th St & NE 4th Ave 3 Local3.3 2.9 YES 3.2 YES 3.4 0.1 BE1-4NE 6th Ave S of NE 151st St 1 Emergency5.7 6.2 0.5 6.4 0.7 6.5 0.8 BE1-5NE 6th Ave S of NE 140th St 1 Emergency9.5 8.8 8.9 9.0 BE1-6NE 138th St & NE 6th Ave 1 Emergency7.9 7.2 7.4 7.7 BE1-7NE 136th St & NE 6th Ave 1 Emergency7.6 5.8 7.0 7.7 0.1 BE1-8NE 131st St & NE 6th Ave 1 Emergency7.2 6.8 7.0 7.3 0.1 BE1-9NE 127th St & NE 6th Ave 1 Emergency7.6 5.0 5.5 6.1 BE1-10NE 125th St & NE 3rd Ave 1 Emergency5.8 5.1 5.8 0.0 5.9 0.1
PAGE 205
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 3 of 7 Table F-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 2-Year, 5-Year, and 10-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS?5-year, 24-hour (5.9-inch) 2-year, 24-hour (4.2-inch) 10-year, 72-hour (9.9-inch) BE1-11 Dixie Hwy NE of Grieffing 1 Emergency 6.1 2.1 2.5 2.8 BE1-12NE 125th St & NE 9th Ave 1 Emergency7.0 5.1 5.7 6.4 BE1-13NE 125th St & NE 10th Ave 1 Emergency7.0 6.1 6.6 6.8 BE1-14Dixie Hwy & NE 129th St 1 Emergency7.1 6.8 7.1 0.0 7.4 0.3 BE1-15Dixie Hwy & NE 134th St 1 Emergency7.8 7.5 7.7 7.9 0.1 BE1-16NE 135th St & NE 13th Ave 1 Emergency6.2 6.0 6.5 0.3 6.8 0.6 BE1-17NE 135th St W of NE 16th Ave 1 Emergency5.1 5.5 0.4 6.1 1.0 6.8 1.7 BE1-18Dixie Hwy & NE 136th St 1 Emergency8.7 8.7 8.9 0.2 9.0 0.3 BE1-19Dixie Hwy & NE 141st St 1 Emergency9.6 8.4 8.6 8.7 BE1-20Dixie Hwy & NE 145th St 1 Emergency6.7 5.7 5.8 5.8 BE2-1NE 137th St W of NE 9th Ave 2 Arterial8.3 8.3 YES 8.5 0.2 NO 8.7 0.4 NO BE2-2NE 137th St W of NE 9th Ave 2 Arterial8.3 7.8 YES 8.1 YES 8.5 0.1 NO BE2-3NE 135th St & NE 7th Ave 1 Emergency7.3 6.4 7.4 0.1 7.9 0.6 BE2-4NE 132nd St E of NE 8th Ave 3 Local7.2 7.5 0.3 NO 7.7 0.5 NO 7.9 0.7 BE2-4ANE 135th St & NE 8th Ave 1 Emergency7.8 6.7 7.6 8.0 0.2 BE2-5NE 138th St & NE 7th Ave 3 Local7.0 6.4 YES 7.4 0.4 NO 7.8 0.8 BE2-7NE 132nd St W of NE 7th Ave 3 Local7.1 7.2 0.1 NO 7.4 0.3 NO 7.9 0.8 BE2-8NE 132nd St & NE 4th Ave 3 Local5.2 5.9 0.7 NO 6.5 1.3 NO 7.2 2.0 BE3-1NE 129th St & NE 7th Ave 3 Local6.0 6.8 0.8 NO 7.1 1.1 NO 7.4 1.4 BE3-2NE 129th St & NE 8th Ave 3 Local6.5 6.9 0.4 NO 7.2 0.7 NO 7.4 0.9 BE3-3NE 129th St & NE 11th Ave 3 Local6.7 6.9 0.2 NO 7.1 0.4 NO 7.4 0.7 BE4-1NE 127th St W of NE 8th Ave 3 Local5.7 6.4 0.7 NO 7.1 1.4 NO 7.3 1.6 BE4-2NE 123rd St & of NE 9th Ave 3 Local6.0 6.5 0.5 NO 6.6 0.6 NO 6.7 0.7 BE4-3NE 8th Ave N of NE 121st St 3 Local6.0 5.6 YES 6.1 0.1 NO 6.3 0.3 BE4-4NE 7th Ave N of NE 125th St 3 Local6.6 6.4 YES 6.9 0.3 NO 7.1 0.5 BE4-5NE 124th St & NE 6th Ave 3 Local6.0 6.1 0.0 NO 6.3 0.3 NO 6.4 0.4 BE4-6NE 5th Ave N of NE 125th St 3 Local6.1 6.3 0.2 NO 6.5 0.4 NO 6.7 0.6
PAGE 206
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 4 of 7 Table F-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 2-Year, 5-Year, and 10-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS?5-year, 24-hour (5.9-inch) 2-year, 24-hour (4.2-inch) 10-year, 72-hour (9.9-inch) BE4-7 NE 4th Ave S of NE 129th St 3 Local 6.4 6.4 YES 6.6 0.2 NO 6.7 0.3 BE4-8NE 3rd Ave S of NE 126th St 3 Local5.7 5.6 YES 5.8 0.1 NO 6.0 0.3 BE4-9NE 123rd St & Grieffing 2 Arterial4.9 4.7 YES 5.4 0.5 NO 5.8 0.9 NO BE5-1NE 129th St & Grieffiing 2 Arterial5.3 3.0 YES 3.8 YES 4.0 YES BE6-1NE 11th Ave S of NE 138th St 3 Local8.4 8.2 YES 8.4 YES 8.7 0.3 BE6-2NE 138th St E of NE 13th Ave 3 Local7.2 8.2 1.0 NO 8.5 1.3 NO 8.8 1.6 BE6-3NE 141st St & NE 14th Ave 1 Emergency6.6 7.1 0.5 7.7 1.1 8.5 1.9 BE7-1NE 3rd Ave S of NE 138th St 3 Local2.7 2.8 0.1 NO 2.9 0.2 NO 3.1 0.4 BE7-2NE 2nd Ct S of NE 141st St 4 NIC2.8 3.2 0.4 3.2 0.4 3.3 0.5 BE7-3NE 4th Ave S of NE 135th St 3 Local2.5 3.4 0.9 NO 3.7 1.2 NO 4.1 1.6 BE7-4NE 131st St E of Grieffiing 3 Local3.0 2.8 YES 3.1 0.1 NO 3.3 0.3 BE7-5Grieffiing N of NE 135th St & 4 NIC4.2 2.2 2.7 3.1 BW1-1ANW 12th Ave N of NW 133rd St 2 Arterial9.7 9.0 YES 9.2 YES 10.1 0.4 NO BW1-1BNW 132nd St E of NW 16th Ave 3 Local10.1 10.1 YES 10.2 0.1 NO 10.3 0.2 BW1-1CNW 13th Ave N of NW 132nd St 3 Local9.5 9.2 YES 9.4 YES 10.1 0.6 BW1-2NW 13th Ave N of NW 128th St 3 Local9.0 9.0 0.0 NO 9.3 0.3 NO 10.1 1.1 BW1-3NW 130th St E of NW 13th Ave 3 Local9.6 9.4 YES 9.5 YES 10.1 0.5 BW1-4NW 16th Ave N of NW 123rd St 3 Local9.6 9.1 YES 9.3 YES 10.1 0.5 BW1-5NW 15th Ave N of NW 127th St 3 Local9.2 8.9 YES 9.3 0.1 NO 10.1 0.9 BW1-6NW 126th St E of NW 15th Ave 3 Local8.7 8.8 0.1 NO 9.3 0.6 NO 10.1 1.4 BW1-7NW 121st St & NW 16th Ave 3 Local9.8 9.2 YES 9.4 YES 10.1 0.3 BW1-8NW 121st St & NW 13th Ave 3 Local9.7 9.3 YES 9.5 YES 10.1 0.4 BW1-9NW 121st St E of NW 11th Ave 2 Arterial9.0 9.1 0.1 NO 9.4 0.4 NO 10.1 1.1 NO BW1-10NW 125th St & NW 11th Ave 3 Local9.6 9.1 YES 9.4 YES 10.1 0.5 BW1-10ANW 12th Ave S of NW 125th St 2 Arterial9.5 9.0 YES 9.4 YES 10.1 0.6 NO BW1-11NW 121st St E of NW 11th Ave 3 Local9.3 9.2 YES 9.5 0.2 NO 10.1 0.8 BW1-12NW 120th St W of NW 11th Ave 3 Local9.0 9.3 0.3 NO 9.5 0.5 NO 10.1 1.1
PAGE 207
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 5 of 7 Table F-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 2-Year, 5-Year, and 10-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS?5-year, 24-hour (5.9-inch) 2-year, 24-hour (4.2-inch) 10-year, 72-hour (9.9-inch) BW1-13 NW 126th St E of NW 8th Ave 3 Local 9.4 8.9 YES 9.4 YES 10.0 0.6 BW1-13ANW 125th St E of NW 9th Ave 3 Local9.4 9.0 YES 9.4 YES 10.0 0.6 BW1-14NW 8th Ave S of NW 122nd St 3 Local9.5 9.3 YES 9.5 YES 10.1 0.6 BW1-15ANW 122nd St W of NW 7th Ave 3 Emergency9.4 8.9 9.4 10.0 0.5 BW1-15BNW 119th St W of NW 10th Ave 4 NIC10.0 10.1 0.1 10.6 0.6 11.1 1.1 BW1-15CNW 15th Ave S of NW 119th St 4 NIC9.2 9.9 0.7 10.2 1.0 10.5 1.3 BW1-16NW 4th Ave S of NW 127th St 3 Local9.8 9.9 0.0 NO 9.9 0.1 NO 10.1 0.3 BW1-17NW 4th Ave S of NW 121st St 3 Local8.8 8.9 0.1 NO 9.1 0.3 NO 9.4 0.6 BW1-18NW 4th Ave N of NW 124th St 3 Local8.9 6.7 YES 7.9 YES 9.3 0.4 BW1-19NW 125th St W of NW 1st Ave 1 Emergency10.3 5.3 6.1 7.4 BW1-19ANW 1st Ave N of NW 127th St 3 Local10.8 10.1 YES 10.5 YES 11.2 0.4 BW1-20NW 120th St E of NW 1st Ave 3 Local7.6 8.4 0.8 NO 8.6 1.0 NO 9.2 1.6 BW1-21NE 1st Ave S of NE 125th St 3 Local3.8 3.0 YES 3.4 YES 4.1 0.3 BW1-22NE 123rd Rd W of NE 2nd Ave 3 Local3.8 2.7 YES 3.3 YES 4.3 0.5 BW1-23Dixie Hwy NE of NE 119th St 1 Emergency6.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 BW2-1ANW 134th St W of NW 11th Ave 3 Local9.3 9.2 YES 9.4 0.1 NO 10.0 0.7 BW2-1BNW 131st St W of NW 10th Ave 3 Local9.2 9.1 YES 9.4 0.2 NO 10.0 0.8 BW2-2NW 134th St E of NW 8th Ave 3 Local9.0 9.1 0.1 NO 9.4 0.4 NO 10.0 1.0 BW2-3NW 131st St W of NW 8th Ave 3 Local9.0 9.0 0.0 NO 9.4 0.4 NO 10.0 1.0 BW2-4ANW 8th Ave S of NW 128th St 3 Local9.0 8.9 YES 9.4 0.4 NO 10.0 1.0 BW2-4BNW 128th St W of NW 10th Ave 3 Local8.9 9.0 0.1 NO 9.4 0.5 NO 10.0 1.1 BW2-4CNW 129th St E of NW 11th Ave 3 Local9.4 9.2 YES 9.4 0.0 NO 10.0 0.6 BW2-5NW 6th Ave S of NW 130th St 2 Emergency9.0 9.0 9.4 0.4 9.9 0.9 BW2-6NW 131st St W of NW 5th Ave 3 Local9.0 3.5 YES 5.4 YES 9.4 0.4 BW2-7NW 5th Ave S of NW 129th St 3 Local9.5 4.1 YES 7.0 YES 10.0 0.5 BW2-8NW 133rd St W of NW 2nd Ave 3 Local10.1 5.1 YES 10.1 0.0 NO 10.9 0.8 BW2-9NW 130th St W of NW 2nd Ave 3 Local9.7 6.2 YES 9.6 YES 10.3 0.6
PAGE 208
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 6 of 7 Table F-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 2-Year, 5-Year, and 10-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS?5-year, 24-hour (5.9-inch) 2-year, 24-hour (4.2-inch) 10-year, 72-hour (9.9-inch) BW2-10 NW 132nd St W of NW 2nd Ave 3 Local 9.8 2.9 YES 4.5 YES 7.9 BW2-11NE 130th St W of NE 2nd Ave 3 Local3.9 1.8 YES 2.6 YES 4.0 0.1 BW3-1ANW 6th Ave S of NW 137th St 2 Emergency9.8 9.4 9.9 0.1 10.2 0.4 BW3-1BNW 7th Ave S of NW 140th St 2 Emergency11.4 10.7 11.1 11.9 0.5 BW3-1CNW 6th Ave S of NW 135th St 2 Emergency8.9 9.0 0.1 9.5 0.6 9.9 1.0 BW3-1DNW 135th St W of NW 8th Ave 1 Emergency9.4 9.3 9.4 0.0 10.0 0.6 BW3-1ENW 135th St & NW 13th Ave 1 Emergency9.2 9.1 9.4 0.2 10.1 0.9 BW3-1FNW 135th St W of NW 15th Ave 1 Emergency10.0 9.1 9.3 10.1 0.1 BW3-1GNW 135th St W of NW 18th Ave 4 NIC9.5 2.5 4.3 7.8 BW3-1HNW 17th Ave S of NW 130th St 4 NIC9.5 10.2 0.7 10.3 0.8 10.5 1.0 BW3-1INW 17th Ave S of NW 123rd St 4 NIC9.2 10.2 1.0 10.3 1.1 10.5 1.3 BW3-2NW 5th Ave S of NW 137th St 3 Local10.4 8.6 YES 10.1 YES 10.5 0.1 BW3-2ANW 135th St W of NW 5th Ave 1 Emergency10.3 4.0 5.8 9.5 BW3-3ANE 2nd Ave S of NE 135th St 3 Local2.7 1.9 YES 2.4 YES 3.4 0.7 BW3-3BNE 139th St W of Biscayne Riv Dr 4 NIC2.7 3.1 0.4 3.3 0.6 3.5 0.8 BW3-4Miami Ave S of NE 135th St 3 Local5.5 4.7 YES 5.3 YES 5.7 0.2 BW3-4BNE 1st Ave N of NE 135th St 3 Local2.5 2.2 YES 2.8 0.3 NO 3.6 1.1 BW4-1NE 133rd St W of NE 2nd Ave 3 Local3.5 3.2 YES 3.4 YES 3.5 0.0 BW5-1NE 127th St & NE 1st Ave 3 Local3.5 2.5 YES 3.3 YES 4.1 0.6 BW6-1 NE 2nd Ave N of NE 121st St 2 Arterial 4.5 4.0 YES 4.4 YES 4.9 0.4 NO 1) Where no survey was available and elevation was estimated from LIDAR 2) NIC = Not in City of North Miami limits 3) Structural flooding of private property not included in this LOS analysis
PAGE 209
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 7 of 7 Table F-1: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 2-Year, 5-Year, and 10-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS?5-year, 24-hour (5.9-inch) 2-year, 24-hour (4.2-inch) 10-year, 72-hour (9.9-inch) Streets Evaluated Criteria 2-year 5-year 10-year TotalNo. of CNM locations not meeting LOS =49 72 No. of CNM locations evaluated for LOS = 109 109% of CNM locations not meeting LOS =45% 66%LocalNo. of CNM locations not meeting LOS =41 60 No. of CNM locations evaluated for LOS = 92 92% of CNM locations not meeting LOS =45% 65%ArterialNo. of CNM locations not meeting LOS =8 12 16No. of CNM locations evaluated for LOS =17 17 17% of CNM locations not meeting LOS =47% 71% 94%EmergencyNo. of CNM locations not meeting LOS = No. of CNM locations evaluated for LOS = % of CNM locations not meeting LOS =
PAGE 210
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 1 of 7 Table F-2: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 25-Year and 100-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? ACN1-0NE 151st St & NE 8th Ave 3 Local4.0 5.1 1.1 5.4 1.4 ACN1-1NE 146th St & NE 8th Ave 3 Local3.5 5.2 1.7 5.5 2.0 ACN1-2NE 145th St W of NE 10th Ave 3 Local3.5 5.2 1.7 5.5 2.0 ACN1-3NE 144th St W of NE 10th Ave 3 Local3.3 5.2 1.9 5.5 2.2 ACN1-4NE 142nd St & NE 9th Ave 3 Local7.2 6.8 7.1 ACN1-4ANE 143rd St & NE 9th Ave 2 Arterial3.7 5.2 1.5 7.1 3.4 ACN1-5NE 143rd St & NE 10th Ave 2 Arterial3.1 5.2 2.1 5.5 2.4 ACN1-6NE 145th St & NE 10th Ave 2 Arterial3.4 5.2 1.8 5.5 2.1 ACN1-7NE 147th St & NE 11th Ct 3 Local3.9 5.2 1.3 5.5 1.6 ACN1-8NE 143rd St & NE 12th Ave 2 Arterial4.2 5.2 1.0 5.5 1.3 ACN1-9NE 144th St W of NE 14th Ave 4 NIC2.5 5.2 2.7 5.5 3.0 A CN1-10NE 146th St W of NE 14th Ave 4 NIC2.5 5.2 2.7 5.5 3.0 ACN3-6NE 127th St W of NE 12th Ave 3 Local5.2 6.9 1.7 7.3 2.1 ACS1-1NE 126th St W of NE 11th Ave 3 Local5.7 6.9 1.2 7.2 1.5 ACS1-2NE 123rd St W of NE 10th Ave 2 Arterial5.8 6.6 0.8 6.9 1.1 ACS1-3NE 121st St W of NE 11th Ave 3 Local3.8 6.6 2.8 6.9 3.1 ACS1-3ANE 125th St W of NE 11th Ave 1 Emergency7.2 6.7 7.2 YES ACS1-4NE 12th Ave N of NE 124th St 3 Local6.1 7.1 1.0 7.2 1.1 ACS1-5NE 13th Ave N of NE 125th St 3 Local6.6 6.9 0.3 7.2 0.6 ACS1-6NE 125th St E of NE 15th Ave 3 Local1.7 3.5 1.8 3.7 2.0 ACS1-7NE 121st St & NE 14th Ave 2 Arterial4.2 5.3 1.1 5.4 1.2 ACS1-8NE 124th St W of NE 17th Ave 3 Local4.2 4.2 0.0 4.4 0.2 ACS1-9NE 15th Ave S of NE 124th St 1 Emergency4.6 4.1 4. 2 YES ACS2-1NE 143rd St & NE 16th Ave 2 A rterial4.8 5.2 0.4 5.4 0.6 ACS2-2NE 142nd St E of NE 17th Ave 2 Arterial3.6 4.7 1.1 4.9 1.3 ACS2-3NE 144th St & NE 18th Ave 3 Local4.0 5.8 1.8 6.7 2.7 ACS2-4NE 149th St & NE 18th Ave 3 Local6.8 10.3 3.5 11.0 4.2 -25-year, 72-hour (11.0-inch) 100-year, 72-hour (14.0-inch)
PAGE 211
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 2 of 7 Table F-2: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 25-Year and 100-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS?25-year, 72-hour (11.0-inch) 100-year, 72-hour (14.0-inch) ACS2-5 NE 142nd St & NE 18th Ave 3 Local 3.6 3.7 0.0 4.1 0.5 ACS2-6NE 144th St & NE 18th Ave 4 NIC3.9 4.7 0.8 4.9 1.0 ACS2-7NE 144th St & NE 15th Ave 4 NIC4.0 5.7 1.7 5.9 1.9 ACS3-1NE 137th St & NE 12th Ave 2 Arterial6.8 8.0 1.2 8.1 1.3 ACS3-10NE 135th St E of NE 16th Ave 1 Emergency7.3 5.8 6.3 YES ACS3-2NE 11th Ave S of NE 133rd St 3 Local6.8 7.4 0.6 7.5 0.7 ACS3-3NE 13th Ave N of NE 134th St 1 Local5.7 7.0 1.3 7.4 1.7 ACS3-4NE 138th St W of NE 16th Ave 3 Local6.8 8.0 1.2 8.1 1.3 ACS3-5NE 132nd St W of NE 14th Ave 3 Local4.5 6.9 2.4 7.3 2.8 ACS3-6NE 137th St E of NE 16th Ave 3 Local3.5 4.6 1.1 4.7 1.2 ACS3-7NE 16th Ave N of NE 135th St 3 Local6.7 5.4 5.8 ACS3-8NE 136th St W of NE 15th Ave 3 Local3.3 7.0 3.7 7.3 4.0 ACS3-8ANE 137th St & NE 16th Ave 3 Local7.2 6.0 6.3 ACS3-9Unnamed 3 Local3.0 3.5 0.5 3.9 0.9 ACS4-1Emerald NE of NE 16th Ave 3 Local4.7 4.4 4.7 ACS4-2 17th Ave (Moefeld) N of NE 127th St 3 Local3.8 4.6 0.8 4.7 0.9 ACS5-1 NE 127th St E of 17th Ave (Moefeld) 3 Local3.2 4.0 0.8 4.2 1.0 BE1-1NE 141st St & NE 4th Ave 3 Local2.3 3.7 1.4 3.9 1.6 BE1-2NE 139th St & NE 4th Ave 3 Local2.4 3.7 1.3 3.9 1.5 BE1-3NE 137th St & NE 4th Ave 3 Local3.3 3.4 0.1 3.6 0.3 BE1-4NE 6th Ave S of NE 151st St 1 Emergency5.7 6.5 0.8 6.7 1.0 NO BE1-5NE 6th Ave S of NE 140th St 1 Emergency9.5 9.1 9.1 YES BE1-6NE 138th St & NE 6th Ave 1 Emergency7.9 7.8 7.9 0.0 NO BE1-7NE 136th St & NE 6th Ave 1 Emergency7.6 7.8 0.2 8.0 0.4 NO BE1-8NE 131st St & NE 6th Ave 1 Emergency7.2 7.4 0.2 7.7 0.5 NO BE1-9NE 127th St & NE 6th Ave 1 Emergency7.6 6.4 7.0 YES BE1-10NE 125th St & NE 3rd Ave 1 Emergency5.8 6.0 0.2 6.2 0.4 NO
PAGE 212
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 3 of 7 Table F-2: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 25-Year and 100-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS?25-year, 72-hour (11.0-inch) 100-year, 72-hour (14.0-inch) BE1-11 Dixie Hwy NE of Grieffing 1 Emergency 6.1 2.9 3.4 YES BE1-12NE 125th St & NE 9th Ave 1 Emergency7.0 6.7 7.1 0.1 NO BE1-13NE 125th St & NE 10th Ave 1 Emergency7.0 6.9 7.2 0.2 NO BE1-14Dixie Hwy & NE 129th St 1 Emergency7.1 7.5 0.4 7.7 0.6 NO BE1-15Dixie Hwy & NE 134th St 1 Emergency7.8 7.9 0.1 8.1 0.3 NO BE1-16NE 135th St & NE 13th Ave 1 Emergency6.2 7.0 0.8 7.4 1.2 NO BE1-17NE 135th St W of NE 16th Ave 1 Emergency5.1 6.9 1.8 7.3 2.2 NO BE1-18Dixie Hwy & NE 136th St 1 Emergency8.7 9.0 0.3 9.1 0.4 NO BE1-19Dixie Hwy & NE 141st St 1 Emergency9.6 8.7 8.8 YES BE1-20Dixie Hwy & NE 145th St 1 Emergency6.7 5.8 5.9 YES BE2-1NE 137th St W of NE 9th Ave 2 Arterial8.3 8.8 0.5 8.9 0.6 BE2-2NE 137th St W of NE 9th Ave 2 Arterial8.3 8.5 0.2 8.7 0.4 BE2-3NE 135th St & NE 7th Ave 1 Emergency7.3 8.0 0.7 8.1 0.8 NO BE2-4NE 132nd St E of NE 8th Ave 3 Local7.2 8.0 0.8 8.1 0.9 BE2-4ANE 135th St & NE 8th Ave 1 Emergency7.8 8.1 0.3 8.2 0.4 NO BE2-5NE 138th St & NE 7th Ave 3 Local7.0 7.9 0.9 8.1 1.1 BE2-7NE 132nd St W of NE 7th Ave 3 Local7.1 8.0 0.9 8.1 1.0 BE2-8NE 132nd St & NE 4th Ave 3 Local5.2 7.3 2.1 7.6 2.4 BE3-1NE 129th St & NE 7th Ave 3 Local6.0 7.4 1.4 7.7 1.7 BE3-2NE 129th St & NE 8th Ave 3 Local6.5 7.5 1.0 7.7 1.2 BE3-3NE 129th St & NE 11th Ave 3 Local6.7 7.4 0.7 7.6 0.9 BE4-1NE 127th St W of NE 8th Ave 3 Local5.7 7.4 1.7 7.6 1.9 BE4-2NE 123rd St & of NE 9th Ave 3 Local6.0 6.7 0.7 6.9 0.9 BE4-3NE 8th Ave N of NE 121st St 3 Local6.0 6.4 0.4 6.7 0.7 BE4-4NE 7th Ave N of NE 125th St 3 Local6.6 7.1 0.5 7.2 0.6 BE4-5NE 124th St & NE 6th Ave 3 Local 6.0 6.5 0.5 6.6 0.6 BE4-6NE 5th Ave N of NE 125th St 3 Local6.1 6.7 0.6 6.8 0.7
PAGE 213
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 4 of 7 Table F-2: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 25-Year and 100-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS?25-year, 72-hour (11.0-inch) 100-year, 72-hour (14.0-inch) BE4-7 NE 4th Ave S of NE 129th St 3 Local 6.4 6.8 0.4 6.9 0.5 BE4-8NE 3rd Ave S of NE 126th St 3 Local5.7 6.0 0.3 6.2 0.5 BE4-9NE 123rd St & Grieffing 2 Arterial4.9 5.9 1.0 6.1 1.2 BE5-1NE 129th St & Grieffiing 2 Arterial5.3 4.1 4.2 BE6-1NE 11th Ave S of NE 138th St 3 Local8.4 8.8 0.4 8.9 0.5 BE6-2NE 138th St E of NE 13th Ave 3 Local7.2 8.8 1.6 8.9 1.7 BE6-3NE 141st St & NE 14th Ave 1 Emergency6.6 8.6 2.0 8.8 2.2 NO BE7-1NE 3rd Ave S of NE 138th St 3 Local2.7 3.2 0.5 3.3 0.6 BE7-2NE 2nd Ct S of NE 141st St 4 NIC2.8 3.3 0.5 3.3 0.5 BE7-3NE 4th Ave S of NE 135th St 3 Local2.5 4.1 1.6 4.3 1.8 BE7-4NE 131st St E of Grieffiing 3 Local3.0 3.4 0.4 3.7 0.7 BE7-5Grieffiing N of NE 135th St & 4 NIC4.2 3.2 3.6 BW1-1ANW 12th Ave N of NW 133rd St 2 Arterial9.7 10.2 0.5 10.5 0.8 BW1-1BNW 132nd St E of NW 16th Ave 3 Local10.1 10.4 0.3 10.6 0.5 BW1-1CNW 13th Ave N of NW 132nd St 3 Local9.5 10.2 0.7 10.5 1.0 BW1-2NW 13th Ave N of NW 128th St 3 Local9.0 10.3 1.3 10.6 1.6 BW1-3NW 130th St E of NW 13th Ave 3 Local9.6 10.2 0.6 10.6 1.0 BW1-4NW 16th Ave N of NW 123rd St 3 Local9.6 10.3 0.7 10.6 1.0 BW1-5NW 15th Ave N of NW 127th St 3 Local9.2 10.3 1.1 10.6 1.4 BW1-6NW 126th St E of NW 15th Ave 3 Local8.7 10.3 1.6 10.6 1.9 BW1-7NW 121st St & NW 16th Ave 3 Local9.8 10.3 0.5 10.6 0.8 BW1-8NW 121st St & NW 13th Ave 3 Local9.7 10.3 0.6 10.6 0.9 BW1-9NW 121st St E of NW 11th Ave 2 Arterial9.0 10.2 1.2 10.5 1.5 BW1-10NW 125th St & NW 11th Ave 3 Local9.6 10.2 0.6 10.5 0.9 BW1-10ANW 12th Ave S of NW 125th St 2 Arterial9.5 10.2 0.7 10.6 1.1 BW1-11NW 121st St E of NW 11th Ave 3 Local 9.3 10.2 0.9 10.6 1.3 BW1-12NW 120th St W of NW 11th Ave 3 Local9.0 10.2 1.2 10.6 1.6
PAGE 214
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 5 of 7 Table F-2: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 25-Year and 100-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS?25-year, 72-hour (11.0-inch) 100-year, 72-hour (14.0-inch) BW1-13 NW 126th St E of NW 8th Ave 3 Local 9.4 10.2 0.8 10.5 1.1 BW1-13ANW 125th St E of NW 9th Ave 3 Local9.4 10.2 0.8 10.5 1.1 BW1-14NW 8th Ave S of NW 122nd St 3 Local9.5 10.2 0.7 10.5 1.0 BW1-15ANW 122nd St W of NW 7th Ave 3 Emergency9.4 10.1 0.7 10.5 1.1 NO BW1-15BNW 119th St W of NW 10th Ave 4 NIC10.0 11.2 1.2 11.7 1.7 BW1-15CNW 15th Ave S of NW 119th St 4 NIC9.2 10.6 1.4 10.8 1.6 BW1-16NW 4th Ave S of NW 127th St 3 Local9.8 10.2 0.4 10.4 0.6 BW1-17NW 4th Ave S of NW 121st St 3 Local8.8 9.5 0.7 10.2 1.4 BW1-18NW 4th Ave N of NW 124th St 3 Local8.9 9.5 0.6 10.1 1.2 BW1-19NW 125th St W of NW 1st Ave 1 Emergency10.3 7.9 9.0 YES BW1-19ANW 1st Ave N of NW 127th St 3 Local10.8 11.6 0.8 12.1 1.3 BW1-20NW 120th St E of NW 1st Ave 3 Local7.6 9.3 1.7 9.6 2.0 BW1-21NE 1st Ave S of NE 125th St 3 Local3.8 4.3 0.5 4.7 0.9 BW1-22NE 123rd Rd W of NE 2nd Ave 3 Local3.8 4.5 0.7 4.8 1.0 BW1-23Dixie Hwy NE of NE 119th St 1 Emergency6.1 1.2 1.4 YES BW2-1ANW 134th St W of NW 11th Ave 3 Local9.3 10.2 0.9 10.5 1.2 BW2-1BNW 131st St W of NW 10th Ave 3 Local9.2 10.2 1.0 10.5 1.3 BW2-2NW 134th St E of NW 8th Ave 3 Local9.0 10.2 1.2 10.5 1.5 BW2-3NW 131st St W of NW 8th Ave 3 Local9.0 10.2 1.2 10.5 1.5 BW2-4ANW 8th Ave S of NW 128th St 3 Local9.0 10.2 1.2 10.5 1.5 BW2-4BNW 128th St W of NW 10th Ave 3 Local8.9 10.2 1.3 10.5 1.6 BW2-4CNW 129th St E of NW 11th Ave 3 Local9.4 10.2 0.8 10.5 1.1 BW2-5NW 6th Ave S of NW 130th St 2 Emergency9.0 10.1 1.1 10.4 1.4 NO BW2-6NW 131st St W of NW 5th Ave 3 Local9.0 10.0 1.0 10.4 1.4 BW2-7NW 5th Ave S of NW 129th St 3 Local9.5 10.1 0.6 10.4 0.9 BW2-8NW 133rd St W of NW 2nd Ave 3 Local 10.1 11.0 0.9 11.3 1.2 BW2-9NW 130th St W of NW 2nd Ave 3 Local9.7 10.4 0.7 10.6 0.9
PAGE 215
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 6 of 7 Table F-2: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 25-Year and 100-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS?25-year, 72-hour (11.0-inch) 100-year, 72-hour (14.0-inch) BW2-10 NW 132nd St W of NW 2nd Ave 3 Local 9.8 8.6 9.9 0.1 BW2-11NE 130th St W of NE 2nd Ave 3 Local3.9 4.3 0.4 4.6 0.7 BW3-1ANW 6th Ave S of NW 137th St 2 Emergency9.8 10.3 0.5 10.6 0.8 NO BW3-1BNW 7th Ave S of NW 140th St 2 Emergency11.4 12.1 0.7 12.6 1.2 NO BW3-1CNW 6th Ave S of NW 135th St 2 Emergency8.9 10.1 1.2 10.5 1.6 NO BW3-1DNW 135th St W of NW 8th Ave 1 Emergency9.4 10.2 0.8 10.5 1.1 NO BW3-1ENW 135th St & NW 13th Ave 1 Emergency9.2 10.2 1.0 10.5 1.3 NO BW3-1FNW 135th St W of NW 15th Ave 1 Emergency10.0 10.2 0.2 10.6 0.6 NO BW3-1GNW 135th St W of NW 18th Ave 4 NIC9.5 8.6 10.1 0.6 BW3-1HNW 17th Ave S of NW 130th St 4 NIC9.5 10.6 1.1 10.8 1.3 BW3-1INW 17th Ave S of NW 123rd St 4 NIC9.2 10.6 1.4 10.8 1.6 BW3-2NW 5th Ave S of NW 137th St 3 Local10.4 10.6 0.2 10.9 0.4 BW3-2ANW 135th St W of NW 5th Ave 1 Emergency10.3 10.0 10.8 0.5 NO BW3-3ANE 2nd Ave S of NE 135th St 3 Local2.7 3.6 0.9 3.8 1.1 BW3-3BNE 139th St W of Biscayne Riv Dr 4 NIC2.7 3.6 0.9 3.8 1.1 BW3-4Miami Ave S of NE 135th St 3 Local5.5 5.7 0.2 5.8 0.3 BW3-4BNE 1st Ave N of NE 135th St 3 Local2.5 3.6 1.1 3.9 1.4 BW4-1NE 133rd St W of NE 2nd Ave 3 Local3.5 3.6 0.1 3.8 0.3 BW5-1NE 127th St & NE 1st Ave 3 Local3.5 4.3 0.8 4.6 1.1 BW6-1 NE 2nd Ave N of NE 121st St 2 Arterial 4.5 5.1 0.6 5.3 0.8 1) Where no survey was available and elevation was estimated from LIDAR 2) NIC = Not in City of North Miami limits 3) Structural flooding of private property not included in this LOS analysis
PAGE 216
Appendix F SWMM Results Appendix F-1 to F-2 SWMM_LOS_model_results_North_Miami.xls 3/7/2012 7 of 7 Table F-2: North Miami SWMM Peak Stage Results for 25-Year and 100-Year Simulations Existing Condition Existing ConditionNode Road Crown Location Road Class No. Road Type Road Crown Elev. (ft) NAVD Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS? Existing Peak Stage (ft) NAVD Flood Depth (ft) Meets LOS?25-year, 72-hour (11.0-inch) 100-year, 72-hour (14.0-inch) Streets Evaluated Criteria 25-year 100-year TotalNo. of CNM locations not meeting LOS =No. of CNM locations evaluated for LOS = -% of CNM locations not meeting LOS =-LocalNo. of CNM locations not meeting LOS = No. of CNM locations evaluated for LOS = % of CNM locations not meeting LOS =ArterialNo. of CNM locations not meeting LOS = No. of CNM locations evaluated for LOS = % of CNM locations not meeting LOS =EmergencyNo. of CNM locations not meeting LOS =24 No. of CNM locations evaluated for LOS = 34% of CNM locations not meeting LOS =71%
PAGE 217
Appendix G RationalMethod Peak Runoff Results
PAGE 218
Appendix E Rational Method Appendix G G-1 to G-2 Rational Method.xls 3/7/2012 1 of 1 Table G-1: Rational Method Calculation for Sansouci and Keystone Neighborhoods Q = C it A Equation 1 where: Q = estimated peak rate of runoff (cfs) for some recurrence interval C = runoff coefficient; fraction of runoff, expressed as a dimensionless decimal fraction, that appears as surface runoff from the contributing drainage area it = average rainfall intensity (in/hr) for some recurrence interval, T during that period of time equal to Tc. A = the contributing tributary drainage area in acres which produces the max. peak rate runoff Tc = rainfall intensity averaging time in miuntes Rational Formula Var. A C Tc TcitQ itQ Rainfall Return Period 2yr 2yr 2yr 5yr 5yr 5yr Time of Time of Rain Rain Peak Rain Rain Peak Area Runoff # concen. concen. Depth Intensity Flow Depth Intensity Flow Basin Name (ac) Coeff (min) (hr) (in) (in/hr) (cfs) (in) (in/hr) (cfs) 117RDHU 32.1 0.65 26.0 0.43 4.2 1.8 38.0 5.9 2.6 53.4 119RDHU 18.4 0.65 21.0 0.35 4.2 1.5 17.6 5.9 2.1 24.7 121RDHU 16.1 0.65 21.0 0.35 4.2 1.5 15.4 5.9 2.1 21.7 18DRVHU 19.0 0.70 22.0 0.37 4.2 1.5 20.5 5.9 2.2 28.8 19AVEHU 35.6 0.70 30.0 0.50 4.2 2.1 52.3 5.9 3.0 73.5 ALMNDAHU 39.3 0.65 30.0 0.50 4.2 2.1 53.6 5.9 3.0 75.3 BAYVIEWHU 24.3 0.65 19.0 0.32 4.2 1.3 21.0 5.9 1.9 29.5 BISCAYNEBAYHU 32.4 0.65 22.0 0.37 4.2 1.5 32.4 5.9 2.2 45.6 CORONADOHU 22.4 0.65 21.0 0.35 4.2 1.5 21.4 5.9 2.1 30.0 HIBISCUSHU 29.6 0.65 24.0 0.40 4.2 1.7 32.3 5.9 2.4 45.4 IXORAHU 31.0 0.65 22.0 0.37 4.2 1.5 31.0 5.9 2.2 43.6 KEYSTONEDRHU 19.8 0.65 24.0 0.40 4.2 1.7 21.7 5.9 2.4 30.4 LAURELAHU 37.0 0.65 30.0 0.50 4.2 2.1 50.5 5.9 3.0 70.9 MAGNOLIAHU 13.9 0.65 22.0 0.37 4.2 1.5 13.9 5.9 2.2 19.5 NBAYSHRHU 39.7 0.60 26.0 0.43 4.2 1.8 43.4 5.9 2.6 60.9 SANSOUHU 17.4 0.70 26.0 0.43 4.2 1.8 22.1 5.9 2.6 31.1 W135STHU 14.3 0.60 26.0 0.43 4.2 1.8 15.6 5.9 2.6 21.9 E135STHU 18.9 0.60 30.0 0.50 4.2 2.1 23.9 5.9 3.0 33.5 # Type D soils were estimated for soil group, A mixture of Residential with Paved roads were estimated for land type.
PAGE 219
Appendix E Rational Method Appendix G G-1 to G-2 Rational Method.xls 3/7/2012 1 of 1 Table G-2: Time of Concentration Estimation for Sansouci and Keystone Neighborhoods Hydrologic Unit117RDHU 119RDHU 121RDHU 18DRVHU 19AVEHU ALMNDAHU BAYVIEWHU BISCAYNEBAYHU CORONADOHUA. SHEET FLOW 1 Segment ID AB AB AB AB AB AB AB AB AB 2 Manning "n" 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 3 Flow Length (<300 ft.) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 4 Upstream Elevation (ft-NAVD) 5 5 5 6 6 5 5 4 4 5 Downstream Elevation (ft-NAVD) 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 3 3 6 Land Slope, s (ft./ft.) 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 7 Two Year Rainfall, p (in.) 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 8 Travel Time, t (min.) 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 B. SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW 1 Segment ID BC BC BC BC BC BC BC BC BC 2 Paved or Unpaved (P/U) P P P P P P P P P 3 Flow Length (ft.) 900 750 750 800 1000 1000 700 800 750 4 Upstream Elevation (ft-NAVD) 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 Downstream Elevation (ft-NAVD) 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 6 Watercourse Slope, s (ft./ft.) 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 7 Average Velocity, v (ft./sec.) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.7 8 Travel Time, t (min.) 22.14 16.84 16.84 18.55 25.93 25.93 15.18 18.55 16.84 Time of Concentration (min.) 26.00 21.00 21.00 22.00 30.00 30.00 19.00 22.00 21.00 Hydrologic UnitHIBISCUSHU IXORAHU KEYSTONEDRHU LAURELAHU MAGNOLIAHU NBAYSHRHU SANSOUHU W135STHU E135STHUA. SHEET FLOW 1 Segment ID AB AB AB AB AB AB AB AB AB 2 Manning "n" 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 3 Flow Length (<300 ft.) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 4 Upstream Elevation (ft-NAVD) 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 Downstream Elevation (ft-NAVD) 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 6 Land Slope, s (ft./ft.) 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 7 Two Year Rainfall, p (in.) 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 8 Travel Time, t (min.) 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 3.32 B. SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW 1 Segment ID BC BC BC BC BC BC BC BC BC 2 Paved or Unpaved (P/U) P P P P P P P P P 3 Flow Length (ft.) 850 800 850 1000 800 900 900 900 1000 4 Upstream Elevation (ft-NAVD) 5 5 5 3 4 4 5 4 4 5 Downstream Elevation (ft-NAVD) 4 4 4 2 3 3 4 3 3 6 Watercourse Slope, s (ft./ft.) 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 7 Average Velocity, v (ft./sec.) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 8 Travel Time, t (min.) 20.32 18.55 20.32 25.93 18.55 22.14 22.14 22.14 25.93 Time of Concentration (min.) 24.00 22.00 24.00 30.00 22.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 30.00
PAGE 220
Appendix H BMP Inventory
PAGE 221
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeEx filtration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0001 FD-1 EXTR-0002 FD-1 EXTR-0003 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0004 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0005 15 inch rcp EXTR-0006 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0007 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0008 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0009 15 inch rcp EXTR-0010 15 inch rcp EXTR-0011 15 inch rcp EXTR-0012 15 inch rcp EXTR-0013 15 inch rcp EXTR-0014 15 inch rcp EXTR-0015 15 inch rcp EXTR-0016 15 inch rcp EXTR-0017 15 inch rcp EXTR-0018 12 inch rcp EXTR-0019 15 inch rcp EXTR-0020 15 inch rcp EXTR-0021 12 inch rcp EXTR-0022 12 inch rcp EXTR-0023 12 inch rcp EXTR-0024 10 inch rcp EXTR-0025 15 inch rcp EXTR-0026 15 inch rcp EXTR-0027 15 inch rcp EXTR-0028 15 inch rcp EXTR-0029 12 inch rcp EXTR-0030 12 inch rcp EXTR-0031 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0032 15 inch rcp EXTR-0033 12 inch rcp EXTR-0034 15 inch rcp EXTR-0035 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0036 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0037 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0038 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0039 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0040 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0041 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0042 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0043 18 inch hdpe
PAGE 222
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeEx filtration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0044 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0045 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0046 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0047 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0048 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0049 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0050 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0051 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0052 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0053 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0054 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0055 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0056 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0057 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0058 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0059 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0060 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0061 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0062 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0063 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0064 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0065 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0066 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0067 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0068 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0069 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0070 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0071 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0072 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0073 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0074 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0075 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0076 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0077 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0078 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0079 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0080 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0081 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0082 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0083 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0084 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0085 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0086 18 inch hdpe
PAGE 223
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeEx filtration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0087 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0088 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0089 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0090 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0091 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0092 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0093 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0094 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0095 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0096 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0097 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0098 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0099 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0100 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0101 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0102 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0103 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0104 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0105 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0106 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0107 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0108 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0109 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0110 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0111 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0112 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0113 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0114 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0115 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0116 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0117 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0118 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0119 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0120 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0121 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0122 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0123 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0124 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0125 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0126 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0127 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0128 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0129 15 inch hdpe
PAGE 224
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeEx filtration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0130 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0131 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0132 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0133 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0134 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0135 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0136 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0137 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0138 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0139 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0140 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0141 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0142 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0143 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0144 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0145 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0146 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0147 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0148 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0149 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0150 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0151 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0152 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0153 15 inch rcp EXTR-0154 15 inch rcp EXTR-0155 15 inch rcp EXTR-0156 15 inch rcp EXTR-0157 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0158 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0159 14 inch rcp EXTR-0160 15 inch rcp EXTR-0161 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0162 15 inch rcp EXTR-0163 15 inch rcp EXTR-0164 15 inch rcp EXTR-0165 15 inch rcp EXTR-0166 15 inch rcp EXTR-0167 15 inch rcp EXTR-0168 15 inch rcp EXTR-0169 15 inch rcp EXTR-0170 15 inch rcp EXTR-0171 15 inch rcp EXTR-0172 15 inch rcp
PAGE 225
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0173 15 inch rcp EXTR-0174 15 inch rcp EXTR-0175 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0176 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0177 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0178 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0179 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0180 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0181 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0182 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0183 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0184 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0185 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0186 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0187 12 inch rcp EXTR-0188 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0189 FD-1 EXTR-0190 FD-1 EXTR-0191 FD-1 EXTR-0192 FD-1 EXTR-0193 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0194 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0195 FD-1 EXTR-0196 FD-1 EXTR-0197 FD-1 EXTR-0198 FD-1 EXTR-0199 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0200 FD-1 EXTR-0201 FD-1 EXTR-0202 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0203 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0204 FD-1 EXTR-0205 FD-1 EXTR-0206 FD-1 EXTR-0207 FD-1 EXTR-0208 FD-1 EXTR-0209 FD-1 EXTR-0210 FD-1 EXTR-0211 FD-1 EXTR-0212 FD-1 EXTR-0213 FD-1 EXTR-0214 FD-1 EXTR-0215 FD-1
PAGE 226
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0216 FD-1 EXTR-0217 FD-1 EXTR-0218 FD-1 EXTR-0219 FD-1 EXTR-0220 FD-1 EXTR-0221 FD-1 EXTR-0222 FD-1 EXTR-0223 FD-1 EXTR-0224 FD-1 EXTR-0225 FD-1 EXTR-0226 FD-1 EXTR-0227 FD-1 EXTR-0228 FD-1 EXTR-0229 FD-1 EXTR-0230 FD-1 EXTR-0231 FD-1 EXTR-0232 FD-1 EXTR-0233 FD-1 EXTR-0234 FD-1 EXTR-0235 FD-1 EXTR-0236 FD-1 EXTR-0237 FD-1 EXTR-0238 FD-1 EXTR-0239 FD-1 EXTR-0240 FD-1 EXTR-0241 FD-1 EXTR-0242 FD-1 EXTR-0243 FD-1 EXTR-0244 FD-1 EXTR-0245 FD-1 EXTR-0246 FD-1 EXTR-0247 FD-1 EXTR-0248 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0249 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0250 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0251 FD-1 EXTR-0252 FD-1 EXTR-0253 FD-1 EXTR-0254 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0255 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0256 FD-1 EXTR-0257 FD-1 EXTR-0258 18 HDPE FD
PAGE 227
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0259 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0260 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0261 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0262 FD-1 EXTR-0263 FD-1 EXTR-0264 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0265 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0266 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0267 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0268 FD-1 EXTR-0269 FD-1 EXTR-0270 FD-1 EXTR-0271 FD-1 EXTR-0272 FD-1 EXTR-0273 FD-1 EXTR-0274 FD-1 EXTR-0275 FD-1 EXTR-0276 FD-1 EXTR-0277 FD-1 EXTR-0278 FD-1 EXTR-0279 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0280 FD-1 EXTR-0281 FD-1 EXTR-0282 FD-1 EXTR-0283 FD-1 EXTR-0284 FD-1 EXTR-0285 FD-1 EXTR-0286 FD-1 EXTR-0287 FD-1 EXTR-0288 FD-1 EXTR-0289 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0290 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0291 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0292 FD-1 EXTR-0293 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0294 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0295 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0296 FD-1 EXTR-0297 FD-1 EXTR-0298 FD-1 EXTR-0299 FD-1 EXTR-0300 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0301 18 HDPE FD
PAGE 228
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0302 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0303 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0304 FD-1 EXTR-0305 FD-1 EXTR-0306 FD-1 EXTR-0307 FD-1 EXTR-0308 FD-1 EXTR-0309 FD-1 EXTR-0310 FD-1 EXTR-0311 FD-1 EXTR-0312 FD-1 EXTR-0313 FD-1 EXTR-0314 FD-1 EXTR-0315 FD-1 EXTR-0316 FD-1 EXTR-0317 FD-1 EXTR-0318 FD-1 EXTR-0319 FD-1 EXTR-0320 FD-1 EXTR-0321 FD-1 EXTR-0322 FD-1 EXTR-0323 FD-1 EXTR-0324 FD-1 EXTR-0325 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0326 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0327 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0328 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0329 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0330 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0331 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0332 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0333 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0334 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0335 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0336 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0337 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0338 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0339 FD-1 EXTR-0340 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0341 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0342 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0343 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0344 18 HDPE FD
PAGE 229
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0345 FD-1 EXTR-0346 FD-1 EXTR-0347 FD-1 EXTR-0348 FD-1 EXTR-0349 FD-1 EXTR-0350 FD-1 EXTR-0351 FD-1 EXTR-0352 FD-1 EXTR-0353 FD-1 EXTR-0354 FD-1 EXTR-0355 FD-1 EXTR-0356 FD-1 EXTR-0357 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0358 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0359 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0360 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0361 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0362 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0363 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0364 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0365 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0366 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0367 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0368 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0369 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0370 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0371 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0372 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0373 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0374 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0375 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0376 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0377 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0378 FD-1 EXTR-0379 FD-1 EXTR-0380 FD-1 EXTR-0381 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0382 FD-1 EXTR-0383 FD-1 EXTR-0384 FD-1 EXTR-0385 FD-1 EXTR-0386 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0387 18 HDPE FD
PAGE 230
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0388 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0389 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0390 FD-1 EXTR-0391 FD-1 EXTR-0392 FD-1 EXTR-0393 FD-1 EXTR-0394 FD-1 EXTR-0395 FD-1 EXTR-0396 FD-1 EXTR-0397 FD-1 EXTR-0398 FD-1 EXTR-0399 FD-1 EXTR-0400 FD-1 EXTR-0401 FD-1 EXTR-0402 FD-1 EXTR-0403 FD-1 EXTR-0404 FD-1 EXTR-0405 FD-1 EXTR-0406 FD-1 EXTR-0407 FD-1 EXTR-0408 FD-1 EXTR-0409 FD-1 EXTR-0410 FD-1 EXTR-0411 FD-1 EXTR-0412 FD-1 EXTR-0413 FD-1 EXTR-0414 FD-1 EXTR-0415 FD-1 EXTR-0416 FD-1 EXTR-0417 FD-1 EXTR-0418 FD-1 EXTR-0419 FD-1 EXTR-0420 FD-1 EXTR-0421 FD-1 EXTR-0422 FD-1 EXTR-0423 FD-1 EXTR-0424 FD-1 EXTR-0425 FD-1 EXTR-0426 FD-1 EXTR-0427 FD-1 EXTR-0428 FD-1 EXTR-0429 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0430 18 HDPE FD
PAGE 231
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0431 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0432 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0433 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0434 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0435 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0436 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0437 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0438 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0439 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0440 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0441 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0442 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0443 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0444 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0445 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0446 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0447 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0448 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0449 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0450 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0451 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0452 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0453 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0454 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0455 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0456 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0457 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0458 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0459 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0460 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0461 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0462 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0463 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0464 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0465 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0466 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0467 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0468 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0469 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0470 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0471 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0472 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0473 18 HDPE FD
PAGE 232
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0474 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0475 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0476 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0477 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0478 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0479 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0480 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0481 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0482 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0483 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0484 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0485 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0486 12_RCP_FD EXTR-0487 12_RCP_FD EXTR-0488 12_RCP_FD EXTR-0489 10_RCP_FD EXTR-0490 15 RCP FD EXTR-0491 15 RCP FD EXTR-0492 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0493 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0494 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0495 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0496 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0497 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0498 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0499 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0500 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0501 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0502 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0503 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0504 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0505 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0506 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0507 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0508 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0509 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0510 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0511 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0512 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0513 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0514 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0515 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0516 15 HDPE FD
PAGE 233
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0517 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0518 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0519 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0520 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0521 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0522 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0523 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0524 15 RCP FD EXTR-0525 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0526 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0527 15 CMP FD EXTR-0528 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0529 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0530 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0531 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0532 15 RCP FD EXTR-0533 15 RCP FD EXTR-0534 15 RCP FD EXTR-0535 15 RCP FD EXTR-0536 15 RCP FD EXTR-0537 15 CMP FD EXTR-0538 15 RCP FD EXTR-0539 15 RCP FD EXTR-0540 15 RCP FD EXTR-0541 15 RCP FD EXTR-0542 15 RCP FD EXTR-0543 15 RCP FD EXTR-0544 15 RCP FD EXTR-0545 15 RCP FD EXTR-0546 15 RCP FD EXTR-0547 15 RCP FD EXTR-0548 15 RCP FD EXTR-0549 15 RCP FD EXTR-0550 15 RCP FD EXTR-0551 15 RCP FD EXTR-0552 15 CMP FD EXTR-0553 15 CMP FD EXTR-0554 12_RCP_FD EXTR-0555 15 RCP FD EXTR-0556 12_RCP_FD EXTR-0557 12_RCP_FD EXTR-0558 15 RCP FD EXTR-0559 15 RCP FD
PAGE 234
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0560 15 RCP FD EXTR-0561 15 RCP FD EXTR-0562 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0563 15 RCP FD EXTR-0564 15 RCP FD EXTR-0565 15 RCP FD EXTR-0566 15 RCP FD EXTR-0567 15 RCP FD EXTR-0568 15 RCP FD EXTR-0569 15 RCP FD EXTR-0570 15 RCP FD EXTR-0571 15 RCP FD EXTR-0572 15 RCP FD EXTR-0573 15 RCP FD EXTR-0574 15 RCP FD EXTR-0575 12_RCP_FD EXTR-0576 12_RCP_FD EXTR-0577 15 RCP FD EXTR-0578 15 RCP FD EXTR-0579 15 RCP FD EXTR-0580 15 RCP FD EXTR-0581 15 RCP FD EXTR-0582 15 RCP FD EXTR-0583 15 RCP FD EXTR-0584 15 RCP FD EXTR-0585 12_RCP_FD EXTR-0586 15 RCP FD EXTR-0587 24_HDPE_FD EXTR-0588 24_HDPE_FD EXTR-0589 24_HDPE_FD EXTR-0590 24_HDPE_FD EXTR-0591 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0592 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0593 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0594 24_HDPE_FD EXTR-0595 24_HDPE_FD EXTR-0596 24_HDPE_FD EXTR-0597 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0598 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0599 15 inch cmp EXTR-0600 15 inch cmp EXTR-0601 18 inch pipe EXTR-0602 15 inch cmp
PAGE 235
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0603 15 inch cmp EXTR-0604 18 inch cmp EXTR-0605 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0606 15 inch cmp EXTR-0607 15 inch cmp EXTR-0608 15 inch rcp EXTR-0609 15 inch rcp EXTR-0610 12 inch rcp EXTR-0611 12 inch rcp EXTR-0612 12 inch clay EXTR-0613 18 inch cmp EXTR-0614 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0615 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0616 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0617 18 inch rcp EXTR-0618 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0619 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0620 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0621 18 inch pipe EXTR-0622 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0623 18 inch pipe EXTR-0624 18 inch pipe EXTR-0625 18 inch pipe EXTR-0626 18 inch pipe EXTR-0627 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0628 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0629 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0630 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0631 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0632 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0633 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0634 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0635 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0636 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0637 18 inch pipe EXTR-0638 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0639 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0640 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0641 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0642 18 inch cmp EXTR-0643 18 inch pipe EXTR-0644 15 inch cmp EXTR-0645 15 inch cmp
PAGE 236
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0646 15 inch cmp EXTR-0647 15 inch cmp EXTR-0648 15 inch cmp EXTR-0649 15 inch cmp EXTR-0650 12 inch rcp EXTR-0651 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0652 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0653 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0654 unknown EXTR-0655 20 inch hdpe EXTR-0656 20 inch hdpe EXTR-0657 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0658 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0659 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0660 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0661 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0662 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0663 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0664 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0665 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0666 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0667 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0668 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0669 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0670 FD-1 EXTR-0671 FD-1 EXTR-0672 FD-1 EXTR-0673 FD-1 EXTR-0674 FD-1 EXTR-0675 FD-1 EXTR-0676 FD-1 EXTR-0677 FD-1 EXTR-0678 FD-1 EXTR-0679 FD-1 EXTR-0680 FD-1 EXTR-0681 FD-1 EXTR-0682 FD-1 EXTR-0683 FD-1 EXTR-0684 FD-1 EXTR-0685 FD-1 EXTR-0686 FD-1 EXTR-0687 FD-1 EXTR-0688 FD-1
PAGE 237
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0689 FD-1 EXTR-0690 FD-1 EXTR-0691 FD-1 EXTR-0692 FD-1 EXTR-0693 FD-1 EXTR-0694 FD-1 EXTR-0695 FD-1 EXTR-0696 FD-1 EXTR-0697 FD-1 EXTR-0698 FD-1 EXTR-0699 FD-1 EXTR-0700 FD-1 EXTR-0701 FD-1 EXTR-0702 FD-1 EXTR-0703 FD-1 EXTR-0704 FD-1 EXTR-0705 FD-1 EXTR-0706 FD-1 EXTR-0707 FD-1 EXTR-0708 FD-1 EXTR-0709 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0710 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0711 FD-1 EXTR-0712 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0713 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0714 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0715 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0716 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0717 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0718 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0719 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0720 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0721 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0722 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0723 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0724 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0725 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0726 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0727 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0728 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0729 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0730 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0731 18 HDPE FD
PAGE 238
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0732 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0733 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0734 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0735 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0736 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0737 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0738 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0739 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0740 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0741 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0742 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0743 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0744 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0745 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0746 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0747 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0748 FD-1 EXTR-0749 FD-1 EXTR-0750 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0751 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0752 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0753 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0754 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0755 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0756 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0757 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0758 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0759 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0760 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0761 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0762 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0763 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0764 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0765 FD-1 EXTR-0766 FD-1 EXTR-0767 FD-1 EXTR-0768 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0769 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0770 FD-1 EXTR-0771 FD-1 EXTR-0772 FD-1 EXTR-0773 FD-1 EXTR-0774 FD-1
PAGE 239
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0775 FD-1 EXTR-0776 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0777 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0778 FD-1 EXTR-0779 FD-1 EXTR-0780 FD-1 EXTR-0781 FD-1 EXTR-0782 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0783 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0784 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0785 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0786 FD-1 EXTR-0787 FD-1 EXTR-0788 FD-1 EXTR-0789 FD-1 EXTR-0790 FD-1 EXTR-0791 FD-1 EXTR-0792 FD-1 EXTR-0793 FD-1 EXTR-0794 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0795 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0796 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0797 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0798 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0799 FD-1 EXTR-0800 FD-1 EXTR-0801 FD-1 EXTR-0802 FD-1 EXTR-0803 FD-1 EXTR-0804 FD-1 EXTR-0805 FD-1 EXTR-0806 FD-1 EXTR-0807 FD-1 EXTR-0808 FD-1 EXTR-0809 FD-1 EXTR-0810 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0811 15 inch hdpe EXTR-0812 FD-1 EXTR-0813 FD-1 EXTR-0814 FD-1 EXTR-0815 FD-1 EXTR-0816 FD-1 EXTR-0817 FD-1
PAGE 240
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0818 FD-1 EXTR-0819 FD-1 EXTR-0820 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0821 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0822 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0823 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0824 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0825 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0826 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0827 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0828 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0829 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0830 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0831 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0832 FD-1 EXTR-0833 FD-1 EXTR-0834 FD-1 EXTR-0835 FD-1 EXTR-0836 FD-1 EXTR-0837 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0838 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0839 0 EXTR-0840 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0841 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0842 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0843 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0844 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0845 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0846 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0847 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0848 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0849 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0850 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0851 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0852 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0853 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0854 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0855 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0856 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0857 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0858 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0859 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0860 18 HDPE FD
PAGE 241
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0861 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0862 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0863 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0864 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0865 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0866 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0867 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0868 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0869 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0870 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0871 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0872 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0873 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0874 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0875 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0876 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0877 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0878 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0879 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0880 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0881 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0882 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0883 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0884 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0885 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0886 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0887 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0888 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0889 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0890 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0891 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0892 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0893 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0894 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0895 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0896 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0897 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0898 15 CMP FD EXTR-0899 15 RCP FD EXTR-0900 15 RCP FD EXTR-0901 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0902 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0903 18 HDPE FD
PAGE 242
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0904 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0905 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0906 20_HDPE_FD EXTR-0907 20_HDPE_FD EXTR-0908 12_RCP_FD EXTR-0909 12_RCP_FD EXTR-0910 12_RCP_FD EXTR-0911 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0912 15 HDPE FD EXTR-0913 15 CMP FD EXTR-0914 15 CMP FD EXTR-0915 15 CMP FD EXTR-0916 15 CMP FD EXTR-0917 15 CMP FD EXTR-0918 15 CMP FD EXTR-0919 15 CMP FD EXTR-0920 15 CMP FD EXTR-0921 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0922 12_CLAY_FD EXTR-0923 18 CMP FD EXTR-0924 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0925 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0926 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0927 15 CMP FD EXTR-0928 15 CMP FD EXTR-0929 12 inch cmp EXTR-0930 24 inch cmp EXTR-0931 15 inch rcp EXTR-0932 15 inch rcp EXTR-0933 FD-1 EXTR-0934 FD-1 EXTR-0935 15 inch rcp EXTR-0936 FD-1 EXTR-0937 FD-1 EXTR-0938 15 RCP FD EXTR-0939 15 RCP FD EXTR-0940 24_CMP_FD EXTR-0941 12_CMP_FD EXTR-0942 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0943 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0944 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0945 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0946 18 inch hdpe
PAGE 243
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0947 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0948 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0949 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0950 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0951 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0952 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0953 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0954 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0955 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0956 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0957 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0958 18 HDPE FD EXTR-0959 15 inch rcp EXTR-0960 12 inch rcp EXTR-0961 24 inch cmp EXTR-0962 12 inch rcp EXTR-0963 12 inch rcp EXTR-0964 18 inch cmp EXTR-0965 18 inch cmp EXTR-0966 18 inch cmp EXTR-0967 18 inch cmp EXTR-0968 12 inch rcp EXTR-0969 12 inch rcp EXTR-0970 12 inch rcp EXTR-0971 12 inch rcp EXTR-0972 12 inch rcp EXTR-0973 12 inch rcp EXTR-0974 15 inch cmp EXTR-0975 15 inch cmp EXTR-0976 15 inch cmp EXTR-0977 15 inch rcp EXTR-0978 15 inch rcp EXTR-0979 15 inch rcp EXTR-0980 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0981 15 inch rcp EXTR-0982 15 inch rcp EXTR-0983 15 inch rcp EXTR-0984 15 inch rcp EXTR-0985 10 inch rcp EXTR-0986 15 inch rcp EXTR-0987 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0988 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0989 18 inch hdpe
PAGE 244
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-0990 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0991 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0992 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0993 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0994 18 inch hdpe EXTR-0995 FD-1 EXTR-0996 FD-1 EXTR-0997 FD-1 EXTR-0998 FD-1 EXTR-0999 FD-1 EXTR-1000 FD-1 EXTR-1001 FD-1 EXTR-1002 FD-1 EXTR-1003 FD-1 EXTR-1004 FD-1 EXTR-1005 FD-1 EXTR-1006 FD-1 EXTR-1007 FD-1 EXTR-1008 FD-1 EXTR-1009 FD-1 EXTR-1010 FD-1 EXTR-1011 FD-1 EXTR-1012 FD-1 EXTR-1013 FD-1 EXTR-1014 FD-1 EXTR-1015 FD-1 EXTR-1016 FD-1 EXTR-1017 FD-1 EXTR-1018 FD-1 EXTR-1019 FD-1 EXTR-1020 FD-1 EXTR-1021 FD-1 EXTR-1022 FD-1 EXTR-1023 FD-1 EXTR-1024 FD-1 EXTR-1025 FD-1 EXTR-1026 FD-1 EXTR-1027 FD-1 EXTR-1028 FD-1 EXTR-1029 FD-1 EXTR-1030 FD-1 EXTR-1031 FD-1 EXTR-1032 FD-1
PAGE 245
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-1033 FD-1 EXTR-1034 FD-1 EXTR-1035 FD-1 EXTR-1036 FD-1 EXTR-1037 FD-1 EXTR-1038 FD-1 EXTR-1039 FD-1 EXTR-1040 FD-1 EXTR-1041 FD-1 EXTR-1042 FD-1 EXTR-1043 FD-1 EXTR-1044 FD-1 EXTR-1045 FD-1 EXTR-1046 FD-1 EXTR-1047 FD-1 EXTR-1048 FD-1 EXTR-1049 FD-1 EXTR-1050 FD-1 EXTR-1051 FD-1 EXTR-1052 FD-1 EXTR-1053 FD-1 EXTR-1054 FD-1 EXTR-1055 36_HDPE_FD EXTR-1056 36_HDPE_FD EXTR-1057 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1058 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1059 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1060 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1061 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1062 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1063 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1064 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1065 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1066 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1067 10_RCP_FD EXTR-1068 15 HDPE FD EXTR-1069 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1070 12_RCP_FD EXTR-1071 12_RCP_FD EXTR-1072 12_RCP_FD EXTR-1073 15 RCP FD EXTR-1074 15 RCP FD EXTR-1075 15 RCP FD
PAGE 246
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-1076 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1077 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1078 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1079 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1080 15 RCP FD EXTR-1081 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1082 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1083 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1084 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1085 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1086 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1087 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1088 15 CMP FD EXTR-1089 15 CMP FD EXTR-1090 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1091 15 RCP FD EXTR-1092 15 RCP FD EXTR-1093 15 RCP FD EXTR-1094 15 RCP FD EXTR-1095 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1096 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1097 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1098 18 CMP FD EXTR-1099 18 CMP FD EXTR-1100 18 CMP FD EXTR-1101 18 CMP FD EXTR-1102 12_RCP_FD EXTR-1103 12_RCP_FD EXTR-1104 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1105 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1106 24_CMP_FD EXTR-1107 15 RCP FD EXTR-1108 15 RCP FD EXTR-1109 15 RCP FD EXTR-1110 12_RCP_FD EXTR-1111 12_RCP_FD EXTR-1112 12_RCP_FD EXTR-1113 12_RCP_FD EXTR-1114 15 CMP FD EXTR-1115 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1116 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1117 18 inch hdpe EXTR-1118 18 HDPE FD
PAGE 247
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeExfiltration Trench ID Attribute Data EXTR-1119 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1120 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1121 18 inch hdpe EXTR-1122 18 inch hdpe EXTR-1123 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1124 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1125 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1126 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1127 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1128 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1129 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1130 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1131 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1132 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1133 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1134 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1135 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1136 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1137 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1138 12_HDPE_FD EXTR-1139 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1140 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1141 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1142 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1143 18 HDPE FD EXTR-1144 18 HDPE FD
PAGE 248
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeRe charge Well ID ACAD Handle ACAD Layer RW-001 9F AUGER_WELL RW-002 A7 AUGER_WELL RW-003 A8 AUGER_WELL RW-004 A9 AUGER_WELL RW-005 AA AUGER_WELL RW-006 AB AUGER_WELL RW-007 AC AUGER_WELL RW-008 AD AUGER_WELL RW-009 AE AUGER_WELL RW-010 AF AUGER_WELL RW-011 B0 AUGER_WELL RW-012 B1 AUGER_WELL RW-013 B2 AUGER_WELL RW-014 B3 AUGER_WELL RW-015 B4 AUGER_WELL RW-016 B5 AUGER_WELL RW-017 B6 AUGER_WELL RW-018 B7 AUGER_WELL RW-019 B8 AUGER_WELL RW-020 B9 AUGER_WELL RW-021 BA AUGER_WELL RW-022 BB AUGER_WELL RW-023 BC AUGER_WELL RW-024 BD AUGER_WELL RW-025 BE AUGER_WELL RW-026 BF AUGER_WELL RW-027 C0 AUGER_WELL RW-028 C1 AUGER_WELL RW-029 C2 AUGER_WELL RW-030 C3 AUGER_WELL RW-031 C4 AUGER_WELL RW-032 C5 AUGER_WELL RW-033 C6 AUGER_WELL RW-034 C7 AUGER_WELL RW-035 C8 AUGER_WELL RW-036 C9 AUGER_WELL RW-037 CA AUGER_WELL RW-038 CB AUGER_WELL RW-039 CC AUGER_WELL RW-040 CD AUGER_WELL RW-041 CE AUGER_WELL RW-042 CF AUGER_WELL RW-043 D0 AUGER_WELL
PAGE 249
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeRe charge Well ID ACAD Handle ACAD Layer RW-044 D1 AUGER_WELL RW-045 D2 AUGER_WELL RW-046 D3 AUGER_WELL RW-047 D4 AUGER_WELL RW-048 D5 AUGER_WELL RW-049 D6 AUGER_WELL RW-050 D7 AUGER_WELL RW-051 D8 AUGER_WELL RW-052 D9 AUGER_WELL RW-053 DA AUGER_WELL RW-054 DB AUGER_WELL RW-055 DC AUGER_WELL RW-056 DD AUGER_WELL RW-057 DE AUGER_WELL RW-058 DF AUGER_WELL RW-059 E0 AUGER_WELL RW-060 E1 AUGER_WELL RW-061 E2 AUGER_WELL RW-062 E3 AUGER_WELL RW-063 E4 AUGER_WELL RW-064 E5 AUGER_WELL RW-065 E6 AUGER_WELL RW-066 E7 AUGER_WELL RW-067 E8 AUGER_WELL RW-068 E9 AUGER_WELL RW-069 EA AUGER_WELL RW-070 EB AUGER_WELL RW-071 EC AUGER_WELL RW-072 ED AUGER_WELL RW-073 EE AUGER_WELL RW-074 EF AUGER_WELL RW-075 F0 AUGER_WELL RW-076 F1 AUGER_WELL RW-077 F2 AUGER_WELL RW-078 F3 AUGER_WELL RW-079 F4 AUGER_WELL RW-080 F5 AUGER_WELL RW-081 F6 AUGER_WELL RW-082 F7 AUGER_WELL RW-083 F8 AUGER_WELL RW-084 F9 AUGER_WELL RW-085 FA AUGER_WELL RW-086 FB AUGER_WELL
PAGE 250
Table H-1 City of North Miami Stormwater Master Plan Update Exfiltration Trench InventoryFD = French Drain HDPE = High Density Polyethylene Pipe RCP = Reinforced Concrete Pipe CMP = Corrugated Metal PipeRe charge Well ID ACAD Handle ACAD Layer RW-087 FC AUGER_WELL RW-088 FD AUGER_WELL RW-089 FE AUGER_WELL RW-090 FF AUGER_WELL RW-091 100 AUGER_WELL RW-092 101 AUGER_WELL RW-093 102 AUGER_WELL RW-094 103 AUGER_WELL RW-095 104 AUGER_WELL RW-096 105 AUGER_WELL RW-097 106 AUGER_WELL RW-098 107 AUGER_WELL RW-099 108 AUGER_WELL RW-100 109 AUGER_WELL RW-101 10A AUGER_WELL RW-102 10B AUGER_WELL RW-103 10C AUGER_WELL RW-104 10D AUGER_WELL RW-105 10E AUGER_WELL RW-106 10F AUGER_WELL RW-107 110 AUGER_WELL RW-108 111 AUGER_WELL RW-109 112 AUGER_WELL RW-110 113 AUGER_WELL RW-111 114 AUGER_WELL RW-112 115 AUGER_WELL RW-113 116 AUGER_WELL
PAGE 251
Appendix I Conceptual Cost Estimates
PAGE 252
Table I-1: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Biscayne Canal West Problem Area Alternative 1 Within County Right-of-WayItem No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 113,000 $ 13,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 15,200 $ 5,200 $ 318-in RCP, Class III LF180 56 $ 10,080 $ 4Exfiltration Trench, 18" LF680115 $ 78,200 $ 5Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA125,000 $ 60,000 $ 6Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY9344 $ 3,734 $ 7Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY93412 $ 11,208 $ 8Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN105115 $ 12,053 $ Subtotal 194,000 $Contingency: 30%$58,200 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration: 20%$38,800 Overhead & Profit: 5%$9,700 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost301,000 $(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/A 1 9/21/2012
PAGE 253
Table I-2: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Biscayne Canal West Problem Area Alternative 2 Within City Right-of-WayItem No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 118,000 $ 18,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 18,000 $ 8,000 $ 3Pipe Removal LF 0 30 $ $ 415-in RCP, Class III LF039 $ $ 5Exfiltration Trench, 18"LF1,800115 $ 207,000 $ 6Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA65,000 $ 30,000 $ 7Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY1,9544 $ 7,816 $ 8Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY012 $ $ 9Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN0115 $ $ 10SoddingSY2,0002 $ 4,000 $ Subtotal 275,000 $Contingency: 30%$83,000 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration: 20%$55,000 Overhead & Profit: 5%$14,000 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost427,000 $(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/A 2 9/21/2012
PAGE 254
Table I-3: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Biscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 Tier 1Item No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 1119,000 $ 119,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 148,000 $ 48,000 $ 3Pipe Removal LF2,000 30 $ 60,000 $ 4Exfiltration Trench, 18" LF12,500 115 $ 1,437,500 $ 518-in RCP, Class III LF45056 $ 25,200 $ 6Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA455,000 $ 225,000 $ 7Manhole, Type D-4 to D-6EA106,000 $ 60,000 $ 8Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY14,0574 $ 56,229 $ 9Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY14,05712 $ 168,684 $ 10Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN1,578115 $ 181,502 $ 11SoddingSY3,6002 $ 7,200 $ Subtotal2,389,000 $Contingency: 30%$716,700 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration: 20%$477,800 Overhead & Profit: 5%$119,500 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost3,703,000 $(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/G 1 9/21/2012
PAGE 255
Table I-4: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Biscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 Tier 2Item No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 1211,000 $ 211,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 185,000 $ 85,000 $ 3Pipe Removal LF4,500 30 $ 135,000 $ 4Exfiltration Trench, 18" LF12,500 115 $ 1,437,500 $ 518-in RCP, Class III LF45056 $ 25,200 $ 624-in RCP, Class IIILF1,50098 $ 146,880 $ 748-in RCP, Class IIILF1,178196 $ 230,888 $ 85-ft x 10-ft RCBCLF1,0401,005 $ 1,045,200 $ 9Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA555,000 $ 275,000 $ 10Manhole, Type D-4 to D-6EA106,000 $ 60,000 $ 11Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY17,5814 $ 70,325 $ 12Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY17,58112 $ 210,972 $ 13Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN2,267115 $ 260,655 $ 14SoddingSY4,0002 $ 8,000 $ Subtotal4,230,000 $Contingency: 30%$1,269,000 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration: 20%$846,000 Overhead & Profit: 5%$212,000 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost6,600,000 $(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/G 2 9/21/2012
PAGE 256
Table I-5: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Biscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 Tier 3Item No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 1241,000 $ 241,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 196,000 $ 96,000 $ 3Pipe Removal LF4,500 30 $ 135,000 $ 4Exfiltration Trench, 18" LF12,500 115 $ 1,437,500 $ 518-in RCP, Class III LF45056 $ 25,200 $ 624-in RCP, Class IIILF1,40098 $ 137,088 $ 730-in RCP, Class IIILF100120 $ 12,000 $ 84-ft x 7-ft RCBCLF1,178599 $ 705,622 $ 95-ft x 10-ft RCBCLF1,0401,005 $ 1,045,200 $ 10Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA555,000 $ 275,000 $ 11Manhole, Type D-4 to D-6EA106,000 $ 60,000 $ 12Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY18,7954 $ 75,180 $ 13Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY18,79512 $ 225,540 $ 14Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN2,403115 $ 276,341 $ 15SoddingSY4,0002 $ 8,000 $ Subtotal4,814,000 $Contingency: 30%$1,444,200 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration: 30%$1,444,200 Overhead & Profit: 5%$240,700 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost7,950,000 $(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/G 3 9/21/2012
PAGE 257
Table I-6: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Arch Creek South/Biscayne Canal East Problem Area Tier 1Item No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 1233,000 $ 233,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 193,000 $ 93,000 $ 3Pipe Removal LF2,000 30 $ 60,000 $ 4Exfiltration Trench, 18" LF24,350 115 $ 2,800,250 $ 518-in RCP, Class III LF1,20056 $ 67,200 $ 6Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA1205,000 $ 600,000 $ 7Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY27,7354 $ 110,938 $ 8Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY27,73512 $ 332,820 $ 9Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN3,114115 $ 358,099 $ Subtotal4,656,000 $Contingency: 30%$1,396,800 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration: 20%$931,200 Overhead & Profit: 5%$232,800 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost7,220,000 $(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/M 1 9/21/2012
PAGE 258
Table I-7: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Arch Creek South/Biscayne Canal East Problem Area Tier 2Item No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 1885,000 $ 885,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 1354,000 $ 354,000 $ 3Pipe Removal LF6,000 30 $ 180,000 $ 4Exfiltration Trench, 18" LF24,350115 $ 2,800,250 $ 518-in RCP, Class IIILF1,20056 $ 67,200 $ 624-in RCP, Class IIILF1,20096 $ 115,200 $ 730-in RCP, Class IIILF570120 $ 68,400 $ 836-in RCP, Class IIILF1,270147 $ 186,690 $ 966-in RCP, Class IIILF1,750210 $ 367,500 $ 10Ductile Iron Pipe Force MainLF5,170211 $ 1,090,870 $ 11Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA1405,000 $ 700,000 $ 12Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY31,5484 $ 126,193 $ 13Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY31,54812 $ 378,576 $ 14Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN4,808115 $ 552,920 $ 15SoddingSY5,0002 $ 10,000 $ 16Pump Station (40cfs)EA4477,425 $ 1,909,698 $ 17 Griffing Park Underground Storage Vault (7 ac-ft) LS14,800,000 $4,800,000 $ 18 NE 125th St/NE 12th Ave Under g round Stora g e Vault (4.5 ac-ft) LS13,100,000 $3,100,000 $ Subtotal17,693,000 $Contingency:30%$5,307,900 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration:20%$3,538,600 Overhead & Profit:5%$884,700 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost27,500,000 $(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) Maintenance UnitQuantit y Unit CostAnnual Cost Storage Vaults clean-up (Labor)Annual212,000 $ 24,000 $ Storage Vaults clean-up (Equipment)Annual21,500 $ 3,000 $ Power UsagePeriodKWhCost KWhAnnual Cost Pump Station Power ConsumptionAnnual6,5000.28 $ 2,000.00 $ 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/M 2 9/21/2012
PAGE 259
Table I-8: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Arch Creek South Problem Area Tier 1Item No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 148,000 $ 48,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 119,000 $ 19,000 $ 3Pipe Removal LF300 30 $ 9,000 $ 4Exfiltration Trench, 18" LF4,790 115 $ 550,850 $ 518-in RCP, Class III LF39056 $ 21,840 $ 6Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA305,000 $ 150,000 $ 7Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY5,6234 $ 22,492 $ 8Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY5,62312 $ 67,476 $ 9Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN631115 $ 72,601 $ Subtotal 962,000 $Contingency: 30%$289,000 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration: 20%$192,000 Overhead & Profit: 5%$48,000 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost1,500,000 $(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/Q 1 9/21/2012
PAGE 260
Table I-9: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Arch Creek South Problem Area Tier 2Item No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 1209,000 $ 209,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 184,000 $ 84,000 $ 3Pipe Removal LF1,000 30 $ 30,000 $ 4Exfiltration Trench, 18" LF4,790 115 $ 550,850 $ 518-in RCP, Class III LF39056 $ 21,840 $ 630-in RCP, Class IIILF1,440120 $ 172,800 $ 736-in RCP, Class IIILF600147 $ 88,200 $ 842-in RCP, Class IIILF0171 $ $ 9Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA405,000 $ 200,000 $ 10Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY7,4264 $ 29,706 $ 11Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY9,15112 $ 109,812 $ 12Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN834115 $ 95,888 $ 13SoddingSY2,0002 $ 4,000 $ 14Pump Station (20cfs)EA1238,700 $ 238,700 $ 15Pump Station (15cfs)EA1200,000 $ 200,000 $ 16 Underground Storage Vault (3 ac-ft) LS12,000,000 $2,000,000 $ Subtotal4,035,000 $Contingency:30%$1,211,000 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration:20%$807,000 Overhead & Profit:5%$202,000 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost6,300,000 $(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) Maintenance UnitQuantityUnit CostAnnual Cost Storage Vaults clean-up (Labor) Annual1 12,000 $ 12,000 $ Storage Vaults clean-up (Equipment) Annual1 1,500 $ 1,500 $ Power Usage PeriodKWhCost KWhAnnual Cost Pump Station Power Consumption Annual1,400 0.28 $ 1,000.00 $ 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/Q 2 9/21/2012
PAGE 261
Table I-10: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Arch Creek South Problem Area Tier 3Item No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 1209,000 $ 209,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 184,000 $ 84,000 $ 3Pipe Removal LF1,000 30 $ 30,000 $ 4Exfiltration Trench, 18" LF4,790 115 $ 550,850 $ 518-in RCP, Class III LF39056 $ 21,840 $ 630-in RCP, Class IIILF1,100120 $ 132,000 $ 742-in RCP, Class IIILF990171 $ 169,290 $ 8Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA405,000 $ 200,000 $ 9Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY8,4064 $ 33,624 $ 10Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY9,25812 $ 111,096 $ 11Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN944115 $ 108,535 $ 12SoddingSY2,0002 $ 4,000 $ 13Pump Station (20cfs)EA1238,700 $ 238,700 $ 14Pump Station (15cfs)EA1200,000 $ 200,000 $ 15 Underground Storage Vault (3 ac-ft) LS12,000,000 $2,000,000 $ Subtotal4,093,000$Contingency: 30%$1,228,000 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration: 30%$1,228,000 Overhead & Profit: 5%$205,000 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost6,800,000$(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) MaintenanceUnitQuantityUnit CostAnnual Cost Storage Vaults clean-up (Labor)Annual112,000 $ 12,000 $ Storage Vaults clean-up (Equipment)Annual11,500 $ 1,500 $ Power UsagePeriodKWhCost KWhAnnual Cost Pump Station Power ConsumptionAnnual1,4000.28 $ 1,000.00 $ 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/Q 3 9/21/2012
PAGE 262
Table I-11: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Arch Creek North/Arch Creek South Problem Area Tier 1Item No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 1266,000 $ 266,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 1106,000 $ 106,000 $ 3Exfiltration Trench, 18" LF25,950 115 $ 2,984,250 $ 418-in RCP, Class III LF4,50056 $ 252,000 $ 5Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA1505,000 $ 750,000 $ 6Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY33,0534 $ 132,214 $ 7Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY33,05312 $ 396,636 $ 8Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN3,711115 $ 426,776 $ Subtotal5,314,000 $Contingency: 30%$1,594,200 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration: 20%$1,062,800 Overhead & Profit: 5%$265,700 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost8,300,000 $(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/UV 1 9/21/2012
PAGE 263
Table I-12: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Arch Creek North/Arch Creek South Problem Area Tier 2Item No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 1480,000 $ 480,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 1192,000 $ 192,000 $ 3Pipe Removal LF7,000 30 $ 210,000 $ 4Exfiltration Trench, 18" LF25,950 115 $ 2,984,250 $ 518-in RCP, Class III LF39056 $ 21,840 $ 636-in RCP, Class IIILF1,825147 $ 268,275 $ 748-in RCP, Class IIILF3,100196 $ 607,600 $ 860-in RCP, Class IIILF400205 $ 82,000 $ 95' x 5' Concrete Box CulvertLF1,970530 $ 1,044,100 $ 10Ductile Iron Pipe Force MainLF2,600211 $ 548,600 $ 11Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA1755,000 $ 875,000 $ 12Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY42,9044 $ 171,616 $ 13Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY42,90412 $ 514,848 $ 14Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN4,817115 $ 553,962 $ 15SoddingSY7,5002 $ 15,000 $ 16Pump Station (40cfs)EA2477,425 $ 954,849 $ 17 Regular Excavation CY20500 4 $82,000 $ Subtotal9,606,000 $Contingency: 30%$2,881,800 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration: 20%$1,921,200 Overhead & Profit: 5%$480,300 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost14,900,000 $(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) Power UsagePeriodKWhCost KWhAnnual Cost Pump Station Power ConsumptionAnnual3,3000.28 $ 1,000.00 $ 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/UV 2 9/21/2012
PAGE 264
Table I-13: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost Biscayne Canal East Problem Area 1 Tier 1Item No. Item Description UnitQtyUnit CostCapital Cost 1Mobilization (approx. 5 percent) LS 113,000 $ 13,000 $ 2Traffic Control (approx. 2 percent) LS 15,200 $ 5,200 $ 318-in RCP, Class III LF180 56 $ 10,080 $ 4Exfiltration Trench, 18" LF900115 $ 103,500 $ 5Ditch Bottom Inlet, Type J-bottom, <10'EA125,000 $ 60,000 $ 6Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, 2" Average DepthSY1,1724 $ 4,689 $ 7Optional Base Group 04 (Limerock)SY1,17212 $ 14,064 $ 8Asphaltic Concrete FC-12.5TN132115 $ 15,137 $ Subtotal 226,000 $Contingency: 30%$67,800 Legal, Engineering, and Adminstration: 20%$45,200 Overhead & Profit: 5%$11,300 Total Preliminary Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost360,000 $(Rounded to the nearest $1,000) 1of1NM SWMPCost Estimates(final report).xlsx/X 1 9/21/2012
PAGE 265
Appendix J MS4 NPDES Inspection and Maintenance Schedule
PAGE 276
Appendix K 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes
PAGE 277
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes OCTOBER 20, 2011
PAGE 278
Contents Section 200 Procedures .........................................................................................1Activity 310 Elevation Certificates ......................................................................5Activity 320 Map Information Service .................................................................6Activity 330 Outreach Projects .............................................................................8Activity 340 Hazard Disclosure .........................................................................10Activity 350 Flood Protection Information ........................................................11Activity 360 Flood Protection Assistance ..........................................................13Activity 370 Flood Insurance Promotion ...........................................................14Section 402 Impact Adjustments for Areas ........................................................15Activity 410 Floodplain Mapping ......................................................................16Activity 420 Open Space Preservation ...............................................................18Activity 430 Higher Regulatory Standards ........................................................22Activity 440 Flood Data Maintenance ................................................................30Activity 450 Stormwater Management ...............................................................31Activity 510 Floodplain Management Planning .................................................32Activity 520 Acquisition and Relocation ...........................................................33Activity 530 Flood Protection ............................................................................34Activity 540 Drainage System Maintenance ......................................................36Activity 610 Flood Warning and Response ........................................................37Activity 620 Levees ............................................................................................39Activity 630 Dams ..............................................................................................40Special Hazard Credits ...........................................................................................42Appendices .............................................................................................................43 Note on this paper: This document summarizes the non-edit orial changes expected to be included in the 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual The actual language is being drafted and is subject to the approval of FEMA. The complete 2012 Manual is expected to be approved and available in the first quarter of 2012.
PAGE 279
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 1 October 20, 2011 Section 200 Procedures 211 Prerequisites a. Timing of Prerequisites: A participating CRS community will need to meet the current and new prerequisites at the time of its cycle ve rification visit. No ne w requirements, including annual recertification requirement s, will take effect until th e ISO/CRS Specialist reviews them one-on-one with the comm unity at the cycle visit. b. Application/Participation (Class 9) Insurance Prerequisite: Item 4 reads The community must maintain all flood insurance policies that it has been required to carry on properties owned by the community. The following will be added to the statement signed by the CEO: We understand that disaster assistance for any community-owned building located in the Special Flood Hazard Area is reduced by the amount of NFIP flood insurance coverage (structural and contents) that a community should be carrying on the building, regardless of whether the community is carrying a policy. c. Class 7 BCEGS Prerequisite: The BCEGS prerequisite to be a CRS Class 7 or better will change to a Class 6 prerequisite. It will read: In addition to having sufficient points, in order to be a Class 7 6 or better, a community must have received a classification of 6/6 5/5 or be tter under the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS). Both BCEGS classifications (residential/personal and commercial) must be a class 6 5 or better. In accordance with Section 113, communities ma y propose alternative approaches to meet the objectives of a prerequisite. For example, communities that are prohibited by state law from adopting and enforcing building codes may submit comprehensive building construction regulations and administration and inspection procedures for review to determine the equivalent BCEGS classification. Such regulations must be enforced throughout the community, not just in the floodplain. d. Class 4 Prerequisites: 1. The current Class 4 prerequisites relate d to credits under Ac tivities 430 Higher Regulatory Standards, 450 Stormw ater Management, and 510 Floodplain Management Planning 2. The BCEGS prerequisite to be a CRS Class 4 or better will change from 5/5 to 4/4. As with the Class 6 prerequis ite, a community may propose an alternative approach. 3. Class 4 or better communities will need to obtain a minimum total score of ___ points [points to be determined soon] (after the impact adjustment) from one or a combination of the following elements that credit protecting natural fl oodplain functions: 420 Natural functions open space (NFOS) 420 Natural shoreline protection (NSP) 430 Prohibition of fill (DL 1)
PAGE 280
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2 October 20, 2011 444 Additional map data (AMD) natural functions layer 450 Low impact development (LID) 450 Watershed management plan (WMP) items c, e, f, and g 450 Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) 450 Water Quality (WQ) 510 Natural floodplain functions plan (NFP) 3. Class 4 600 Series Prerequisite: A Cla ss 4 or better community must document the following life safety measures: (a) Have an inventory of levees that would result in a flood of developed areas if they failed or were overtopped during a flood, including a map of the area(s) affected. (b) Have an inventory of dams that would result in a flood of developed areas if they failed, including a map of the area(s) affected. (c) Assess the impact of a flood caused by the failure of the levees and dams on life and property. (d) Obtain ____ points for Activity 610 Flood Warning and Response. [Points to be determined soon.] e. Class 1 Prerequisites: 1. Item 2.(c)(2), the requirement to receiv e credit under Activity 610 Flood Warning and Response, will be replaced by the Class 4 prerequisite. 2. Item 2.(c)(5) states At least 50% of the buildings in the communitys SFHA must be covered by a flood insurance policy. A community may opt for an alternative: obtain at least 50% of the total poin ts under the new Activity 370 Flood Insurance Promotion. 3. Class 1 or better communities will need to obtain a minimum total score of ___ points [points to be determined soon] (after the impact adjustment) from one or a combination of the natural floodplain functions elemen ts listed under the Class 4 prerequisite. 4. The rest of the Class 1 prerequisites will remain unchanged. 212 Application Documents The current 50-page CRS Application will be replaced by a shorter Quick Check that will identify if the community is likel y to receive at least 500 points fo r its activities. If so, a visit by an ISO/CRS Specialist will be scheduled. There will still be a need for the letter of full compliance from the FEMA Regional Office, which usua lly requires a Community Assistance Visit. The Quick Check will be available for completion online or downloading. It is hoped that states will help tailor the Quick Check for their states conditions.
PAGE 281
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 3 October 20, 2011 214 Recertification No changes to recertification procedures or documentation will take effect until after the communitys cycle verification visit. The only ch ange planned is the following data table. Data table: The table below will be in a new worksheet. It will need to be completed when a community joins the CRS and submitte d with every annua l recertification. This new recertification requirement will take eff ect after the communitys next cycle verification visit, not for all communities in 2012, as was originally proposed. At the cycle visit, the ISO/CRS Specialist will explain the requirement and provide guidance on how to obtain the data. The data will help both FEMA and the comm unity track floodplain development and mapping changes. It will be used by FEMA to help schedule assistance activities and set mapping priorities. Accurate building counts help determ ine insurance market penetration and can guide insurance promotional efforts (which can be credited under the new Activity 370 Flood Insurance Promotion). 215 Modifications Modifications are requests to revise the scores for selected activities. If the modification is for only a one-class improvement, the 2007 CRS Coordinators Manual policy has been to only verify the activities submitted in the modification. If the modification will result in a two-class improvement, the communitys entire program is verified and the cycle schedule starts again. Application and Recertification Program Data In the SFHA In a regulated floodplain outside the SFHA In the rest of the community 1. Number of buildings in the SFHA (bSF) as of last report 2. Number of new buildings construct ed in the SFHA since last report + If available, the following data would be useful: a. Number of new manufactured homes installed since last report + b. Number of other new 1 4 family stru ctures constructed since last report + c. Number of all other structures cons tructed/installed since last report + 3. Number of buildings removed/demolished since last report 4. Number of buildings affected by map revisions since last report (+ or -) 5. Number of buildings affected by corporate limits changes (+ or -) 6. Current total number of buildings in the SFHA (bSF) (sum of lines 1 7) 7. Number of substantial improvement/ damage projects since last report 8. Number of repetitive loss properties mitigated since last report 9. Number of LOMRs and map revision s (not LOMAs) since last report 10. Acreage of area(s) (aSFHA) as of the last report 11. Acreage of area(s) affected by map revisions since last report (+ or -) 12. Acreage of area(s) affected by corporate limits changes (+ or -) 13. Current acreage of the SFHA (aSFHA) (sum of lines 12 14)
PAGE 282
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 4 October 20, 2011 Because of all the changes in the 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual this policy will change. If the non-modified activities are changed in the 2012 Manual then they will be ve rified, too. In effect, if a community submits a modification and has unmodified activities a nd elements that are substantially changed, then the communitys entire program will be verified and the cycle schedule will start over. 240 Community Flood Ri sk Assessment A new tool will be explained in this new section. It is an on-line interactive assessment to help communities identify which CRS activities would be of most benefit to them. The Demo version is available for anyone to try at www.crs2012.org under Community Self-Assessment. Certified Floodplain Managers who complete the Demo version and provide comments on it can earn three continuing education credits (CECs) through the Asso ciation of State Floodplain Managers CFM program. Doing the assessment is voluntary. It is a recommended tool for local officials who want to step back, look at their communities flood problems, and identify programs and activities that best deal with those problems. Selected sections of the Community Flood Risk A ssessment, or a similar assessment that looks at the same concerns, such as a floodplain management plan, will be a prerequisite for: Developing a Program for Public Informati on under Activity 330 Outreach Projects, The flood insurance coverage assessme nt under Activity 370 Flood Insurance Promotion, and The documentation to support Activity 610 Flood Warning and Response. The Class 4 prerequisite for a le vee and dam failure assessment.
PAGE 283
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 5 October 20, 2011 Activity 310 Elevation Certificates Objective: Maintain correct FEMA Elevation Certifi cates for new and substantially improved buildings in the SFHA 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points EC ECs after joining CRS 56 Same 38 ECPO Post-FIRM ECs 56 Same 48 ECPR Pre-FIRM ECs 15 Same 30 ECCF ECs in Computer Format 15 Dropped, new credit in 440 AMD ECWS ECs on Website 20 Moved to 350 Website credit ORS Off-site Record Storage 10 Moved to 430 Regulations Administration Max 172 116 EC Elevation Certificates: The FEMA Floodproofing Certif icate (FEMA Form 81-65) is required for floodproofed buildings. Communities will also need to provide a V Zone Certificate for new construction in the V Zone. An example form will be in the 2012 Manual Communities that want to use a different form will need to show that it includes the same information that is needed for flood insurance rating for a new building in the V Zone. ECPO Elevation Certificates for post-FIRM buildings: Only the points are changing. ECPR Elevation Certificates for pre-FIRM buildings: Only the points are changing. ECCF Elevation Certificates in a computer format: The credit is being dropped from the CRS. The software was very expensive for FEMA to keep updated and the data were never used for its original purpose. However, a new, simila r credit is being added to Activity 440 Flood Data Maintenance, Additional Map Data (AMD), new item m. ECWS Elevation Certificates on the communitys website: This element is being moved to Activity 350 Flood Protection Information, with th e rest of the CRS website credits. ORS Off-site record storage is being moved to a new elemen t, Regulation Administration in Activity 430 Higher Regulatory Standards. That element will also have credit for inspections and photographs at the time of th e final Elevation Certificate. Verification: Beginning with its next cycle verificati on visit, a community will need to provide (1) a list of all new buildings and substantial improvements in the SFHA since the last visit and (2) copies of all of the Certif icates issued since the last vi sit. This can be done digitally. The verification threshold for credit for EC, ECPO, and ECPR will be increased from 80% to 90%. This means that for any credit, at least 90 % of the Elevation Certificates reviewed must contain no errors or omissi ons (also known as gigs). Recertification: After the next visit, (1) the list of new buildings and improvements and (2) copies of all of the previous years certifi cates will need to be submitted annually, with each recertification. This can be done digitally. ISO will provide feedback on problems that are found.
PAGE 284
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 6 October 20, 2011 Activity 320 Map Information Service Objective: Provide inquirers with flood hazard information 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points Read the FIRM for inquirers 140 MI 1 Same service 30 MI 2 LiMWA/floodway info/CBRS area 18 new MI 3 Other flood problems not shown on FIRM 18 new MI 4 Flood depth data (formerly in Activity 360) 18 new MI 5 Special flood-related hazards 18 new MI 6 Historical flood information/repetitive flood losses 18 new MI 7 Natural floodplain functions 18 Max 140 90 The current credit is for reading the communitys Flood Insurance Rate Map to inquirers and to provide basic information needed for rating an in surance policy (e.g., date of the FIRM). When the CRS was initiated in 1990, this was an import ant role, as most people did not have access to FIRMs and many had trouble reading them. Things have changed since 1990. We now have a map determination industr y that helps lenders. Insurance companies contract for centralized ma p information services for their agents. The public has direct access to FIRMs through FEMAs website. Accordingly, this credit will be reduced in the next CRS Coordinators Manual The remaining credit (MI 3 7) can be earned by providing additional flood hazard information from information sources other than the FIRM. To receive the credit the community must Be receiving credit for reading the FI RM for inquirers (MI 1 is required); Have a map (or GIS layer) that shows the information provided; Volunteer the information to the inquirer (i.e., if the property is in an X Zone, but also in a repetitive loss area, the community does not wa it for the inquirer to ask about any other hazards); Keep a log or other record of the service (no change from 2007); and Publicize the service (no change from 2007). There are three possible ways to do this: o An outreach project to the entire community, such as an article in a newsletter or a notice in a utility bill, o Notices sent to all local insurance agen ts, real estate agents, and lenders, or o Another approach as determined by a Progr am for Public Information (see Activity 330 Outreach Projects) The additional credit points add up to more than 100%, so the community can select what information it wants to provide and still receive the maximum credit.
PAGE 285
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 7 October 20, 2011 Here are more details about the seven credited elements: MI 1 Same service, i.e., provide all informatio n found on a FIRM that is needed for rating a flood insurance policy. MI 2 LiMWA/floodway info/CBRS area: provide additi onal information found on a FIRM that is not related to rating the policy MI 3 Other flood problems not shown on FIRM. Examples include areas predicted to flood in the future because of climate change or sea level rise, local drainage problems, areas mapped outside the SFHA (e.g., in smaller watersheds), and a dam failure inundation zone. MI 4 Flood-depth data: the service would provide both the BFE and the ground or building elevation for a site or depths of flooding. The latter could be from flood depth maps that may be produced by RiskMAP. MI 5 Special flood-related hazards: advising inquirers about the property being subject to one of the special flood-related hazards recognized for CRS credit, such as coastal erosion, migrating channels, and ice jams. The affected area will need to be mapped, but not necessarily regulated. MI 6 Historical flood information/repetitive flood loss es: areas flooded in the past (in or out of the SFHA), historic high water levels, mapped repetitive loss areas. MI 7 Natural floodplain functions: areas mapped in the National Wetlands Inventory, designated habitat areas, areas receiving natural floodplain functions credit in Activity 420 Open Space Preservation, etc.. The 240 Community Flood Risk Assessment can help the community determine what additional information (MI 3 7) could and should be provided.
PAGE 286
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 8 October 20, 2011 Activity 330 Outreach Projects Objective: Provide information needed to increase awareness and motivate actions to reduce flood damage, encourage flood insurance coverage and protect natural floodplain functions 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points OPA Additional Outreach Projects OPC Outreach Projects to Community OPF Projects to Floodplain properties 250 OP Outreach Projects 175 OPS Public information Program Strategy125 PPI (OP) Program for Public Information 55 new STK Stakeholder delivery 40 new ACT Action resulting from outreach 60 new FRP Flood response preparations 50 new PPI (FRP) Program for Public Information 20 PFI promotion of flood insurance 65 Moved to new Activity 370 Max 380 350 Note that the communitys points could add up to more than 350, but the credit for OP is capped at 175 points and the total cre dit is capped at 350 points. The changes are explained in a more detailed report, Changes to CRS Activity 330 Outreach Projects. These pages only summarize the high points. There will be two basic elements: Outreach projects (OP) and flood response preparations (FRP). In both elements, the community must id entify the messages it wants to deliver and who they go to. For communities without a Program for Public Information (PPI), only messages that relate to the six priority CRS topics are credited: 1. Know your flood hazard (including the future flood hazard, e.g., sea level rise) 2. Insure your property for your flood hazard (at least one project must include this topic) 3. Protect people from the hazard 4. Protect your property from the hazard 5. Build responsibly 6. Protect natural floodplain functions These six priority CRS topics replace the current 10 national topics. Communities with a PPI can add up to four more flood-related topi cs customized to local conditions. A project disseminates a message. Certain projects are more eff ective at motivating change, so they are worth more points. For scoring pur poses, there are three types of projects. 1. Informational materials: putting brochures and other materials out at public places; worth one point per message 2. General outreach: projects that reach out to people in general; worth two points per message 3. Targeted outreach: projects that reach out to 90% of the properties in the SFHA, the communitys repetitive loss areas, or other target audiences identified in the PPI; six points per message
PAGE 287
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 9 October 20, 2011 The credit points for OP are based on how ma ny times the projects convey the same message each year. The credit for OP and FRP can be increased by 40% if the projects are designed as part of a Program for Public Information (PPI). A PPI is a plan, prepared by a committee in a similar manner as the current public information program stra tegy (OPS) or floodplain management plan (in Activity 510 Floodplain Manageme nt Planning). Other activities credits can be increased by a PPI, too. As with 510, the PPI will need to be updated at least every five years. The credit for OP can be increased even more if there is a PPI and the projects are implemented by stakeholders (STK % bonus multiplier) and/or it can be shown that the messages have resulted in some desirable actions (ACT 45% bonus multiplier). Because the maximum for OP is 175, OP plus the bonus credits could be greater than 350. However, the maximum possible score will be capped at 350. FRP Flood response preparations credits having a pre-flood plan of public information activities (news rele ases, handouts, templates, etc.), ready in advance of the next flood. The preparations must include proof copies of materials to be used, but they do not have to be copied or distributed until the flood occurs FRP points are also increased if the projects are described in the PPI, but FRP is not eligible for the STK and ACT multiplier bonus points. The scoring is based on the type of projects, th e number of messages, the number of times the messages are repeated, plus the PPI, STK and ACT bonuses. This makes for a complicated scoring system that is best done on a spreadsheet. The following spreadsheet will be included with the 2012 Manual and will be available on-line as a Microsoft Excel file.
PAGE 288
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 10 October 20, 2011 Activity 340 Hazard Disclosure Objective: Disclose the flood hazard before the lender notifies prospective buyers of the need for flood insurance 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points Max W/PPI DFH: Real estate agents disclosure 46 Same 25 35 or State disclosure law 20 Dropped ODR: Other disclosure requirements 15 Same 25 25 REB: Real estate brochure 10 Same 8 12 DOH: Disclosing other hazards 10 Same 8 8 Max 81 66 80 Credit is given for disclosing the flood hazar d before the mortgage lender has to notify prospective buyers of the hazard and of the need for flood insurance. Two elements (DFH and REB) receive a 42% bonus if they are designed in a Program for Public Information (element PPI under Activity 330) or if the comm unity worked with real estate agents to design them. If the latter, there needs to be an annual meeting with the real estate represen tatives to evaluate and revise the program, similar to th e PPI annual evaluation requirement. DFH Disclosure of flood hazard by real estate agents. This cr edit is keyed to disclosing the Special Flood Hazard shown on a Flood Insurance Rate Map. The minimum requirement for credit will also include a disclosure if the prope rty is in a designated Coastal Barriers Resource System area, which is also shown on the FIRM. The 20 point credit for a state disclosure law will be dropped, but still kept as creditable under ODR (5 points). This change is because upon cl oser review during the uniform minimum credit work, it was found that no state deserved the 20 points. If there is an eff ective state law, it would be reflected in a fully veri fied 46 points credit for DFH. ODR Other disclosure requirements such as sellers must tell of known problems, the floodplain boundary must be shown on plats, or landlords must te ll prospective tenants. Credit can be provided for state or local laws that require disclosure. A community can receive credit for up to five such requirements instead of three. REB Real estate disclosure brochure that advises the reader to check out if theres a hazard. As with DFH, full credit is only provided if the brochure was reviewed by the PPI committee or drafted with the involvement of real estate agents It is recommended that real estate agents or communities provide the brochures to lenders as they would be valuable for people seeking preapproval for a mortgage before they start house hunting. DOH Disclosure of other hazards by real estate agents, provi ding the community is already getting DFH credit. Creditable hazards must be flood-related, such as the coastal A Zone, erosion, subsidence, or wetlands. The 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual will also include dam or levee failure flooding, coastal storm surge, a nd the seven CRS-credite d special hazards as eligible for credit.
PAGE 289
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 11 October 20, 2011 Activity 350 Flood Protection Information Objective: Provide the public with additional information 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points Max W/PPI LIB Flood protection library 25 Specific list of documents in library 16 16 LPD Locally pertinent documents 5 Specific local documents 6 6 WEB Website Prerequisites revised WEB: 10 topics from 330 40 WEB 1 6 points per topic 36 60 WEB: Posting warning information 20 WEB 2 Same 10 15 WEB: Posting real time gage links 10 WEB 3 Same 10 10 WEB: noting where ECs are available 2 Part of WEB 4 310 ECWS Posting Elevation Certificates 20 WEB 4 Posting ECs on the site 20 20 Max 102 98 127 The objective of this activity is to provide more detailed information on the messages that are introduced in the communitys Activity 330 outr each projects and additional information that websites are very effective at disseminating, such as real time gage data. Full credit for two items is dependent on the community having a Program for Public Information (PPI) that includes these items as projects to be implemented and monitored. There are three elements in the activity. LIB Keeping publications in a library. Full credit will be for having 12 specific FEMA publications (listed below) cataloged in the communitys public library. All of them are available at no cost in hard or digital copy from FEMA. If the state, region, community, or other en tity has published documents that are more appropriate to the communitys situation, then th ose may be substituted. References that are not relevant (e.g., the community has no coastal fl oodplain or manufactured homes) do not have to be included. Above the Flood: Elevating Your Floodprone House, FEMA-347 Coastal Construction Manual, FEMA-55 Elevated Residential Structures, FEMA-54 Engineering Principles and Practices for Retrof itting Flood Prone Residential Buildings, FEMA-259 Floodproofing Nonresidentia l Structures, FEMA-102 Homeowners Guide to Retrofitting: Six Ways to Protect Your House from Flooding. FEMA-312 Mandatory Purchase of Flood Insurance Guidelines, FEMA-186 Manufactured Home Installation in Flood Hazard Areas, FEMA-85 Mitigation of Flood and Erosion Damage to Residential Buildings in Coastal Areas, FEMA-257, Protecting Building Utilities From Flood Damage, FEMA-348 Protecting Floodplain Resources, FEMA-268. Repairing Your Flooded Home, FEMA-234
PAGE 290
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 12 October 20, 2011 LPD Keeping locally pertinent documents available in the library. Examples of creditable documents include: Floodplain management ordinance Flood Insurance Rate Map Flood Insurance Study Floodplain management or hazard mitigation plan Other relevant plan, such a comprehensive plan or the beach management plan Others documents as identified in the communitys PPI. Documents for LIB or LPD credit may be hard copi es or digital versions that one can view on a monitor in the library. Digital versions mu st be located in the library and not be dependent on links to an outside source. WEB Providing information via a website. The website must meet the following criteria: 1. There must be a flood information home page, with a directory of the sites flood information. For examples, see www.pbcgov.com/publicsafety /emergencymanagemen t/floodawareness, and www.floodhelp.uno.edu. There will be no credit fo r items that are not connected to this flood information home page. 2. The flood information home page must include in formation on the communitys flood assistance services, such as the map information service and flood protection assistance credited under Activities 320 and 360. 3. For full credit, coverage of the topic must be more thorough than what is provided in an outreach project. Simply posting the written portions of an outreach project does not earn full credit. The objective is to provide more in-depth information. 4. There must be a link to FloodSmart or FEMAs flood insurance page 5. The community must check and fix the sites links at least monthly (there is free or low-cost software that can identify broken links automatically). It must review the content to ensure that it is still current and pertinent at least annually (e.g ., make sure names, addresses, phone numbers, etc. are still correct, update any ordinance changes, etc.). A community can receive credit for a county or regional site, provided th ere is a link from the communitys website and the inform ation is locally pertinent. WEB 1 points are provided for website coverage of the six topics list ed in Activity 330. A community with a Program for Public Informa tion (PPI) credited in Activity 330 can add additional topics that are described in its PPI. WEB 1 and WEB 2 credit will be increased by 42% if the community has a Program for Public In formation (PPI) that includes these topics as website projects to be implemented and monitored. The Elevation Certificate website credit former ly in Activity 310 (ECWS) will be moved to WEB 4. Credit will be provided if the entire certificate is viewable online or if the site has a list of addresses that have Elevation Certificates and instructions on how the user can obtain them. Documentation: No documentation will be required for WEB credit, as it will be verified on-line.
PAGE 291
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 13 October 20, 2011 Activity 360 Flood Protection Assistance Objective: Provide one-on-one help in protecting property from flooding 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points Max W/PPI Site-specific flood data 10 Moved to 320 Names of qualified contractors 4 Dropped (can be in 330) Handouts on contractors 3 Dropped (can be in 330) Retrofitting advice 14 PPA Property protection advice 25 40 Site visits 35 PPV Advice after a si te visit 30 47 new FAA Financial assistance advice 10 15 School trained advisor 5 TNG New credit for grants training 10 10 Max 71 75 112 Credit is given to communities that provide one-on-one advice and assistance to residents on protecting their prop erty from flooding. As seen in the table above, some points previously available are being moved to Sections 320 or 330 and some items points will be increased if the community has a Program for Public Information ( PPI) that includes these items as projects to be implemented and monitored. PPA Property protection advice: This is for face-to-face advice and/or assistance about property protection, such as retrofitting techni ques, local drainage improvements, and flood insurance. PPV Property protection site visit: If the community receives credit for PPA, additional points are available for making site visits to review flooding, drainage, and sewer problems and providing one-on-one advice to th e property owner about protecti on of property. No credit is provided if the only purpose of the site visit is to verify complian ce with a regulation or to see if drainage work is needed by the city. FAA Financial assistance advice: There is additional credit if the face-to-face property protection advice includes advice on financial assistance that may be available, including FEMA mitigation grants and Increased Cost of Compliance. TNG Training credit is provided if the person providing the advice and assistance has graduated from Emergency Management Institute courses on retrofitting or grants programs. The prerequisites have not been changed: To qualify for this credit, the service must be publicized through an outreach project that reaches ev eryone in the commun ity, a project that reaches everyone in the floodplain, or other pr oject identified in the communitys PPI. Publicity: The service must be public ized through an outreach project that reaches everyone in the community, a project that reaches everyone in the floodplain, or via another approach as determined by a Program for Public Information (no change from 2007). Documentation: Records must be kept of the advice given (no change from 2007).
PAGE 292
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 14 October 20, 2011 Activity 370 Flood Insurance Promotion Objective: Improve flood insurance coverage in the community. 2012 Manual Max Points FIA Assessment of Flood Insurance coverage: review of existing policies in various target areas 15 CP Coverage improvement Plan: the communitys plan to increase coverage in targeted areas 15 PI Plan Implementation: more credit is provided for doing more projects 60 TA Technical Assistance: offering flood insurance advice and assistance to residents 20 CI Coverage Improvement: bonus points if the projects result in a measurable increase in coverage 30 140 The changes are explained in a more detailed report, CRS Activity 370 Flood Insurance Promotion. This page only summarizes the high points. This new activity credits communities that take an active role in encouraging residents and businesses to purchase and maintain adequate flood insurance coverage. Credit is for a four-step process that allows communities to assess their own needs and receive credit for improving their coverage. Credit for the four st eps is provided incrementally. Prerequisite: The community must prepare an inventory of all buildings owned by the community located in a floodprone area and note whether each building is insured for flood damage. See the more detailed report not ed above for more information on this. Step 1. FIA Assessment of flood insurance coverage: the credit is provided for the assessment document. The assessment starts with the new Community Flood Risk Assessment that will be in Section 240 and policy data supplied to ISO every year. Errors found in the policy data (e.g., wrong community numbe r) are reported to ISO. Step 2. CP Coverage improvement Plan: the plan is prepared by a committee that has representation from local insurance agents a nd lenders. The committees recommended plan is submitted to the governing council. There is credit even if the plan is not adopted or implemented. The objective is to raise awareness of the current level of coverage and ways that it could be improved. Step 3. PI Plan Implementation: Projects are implemented pursuant to the plan. At least one of the projects must involve public support for fl ood insurance by one or more elected officials. Step 4. CI Coverage Improvement: Extra credit is provided if coverage goes up. A three-year r unning average is used to exclude short term variations in coverage. TA Technical assistance: Separate from the four planning steps, credit is available for having an expert advise people about flood insurance, similar to the credit for property protection advice under Activity 360. There will be more cr edit if the advisor is a licensed insurance agent and even more fo r an Associate in National Flood Insurance (ANFI). See www.aicpcu.org/anfi for more information. The planning process, adoption criteria, and scoring of projects is the same as for a Program for Public Information, credited in Activity 330. Having the same committee prepare one document that covers both activities is recommended, but not required.
PAGE 293
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 15 October 20, 2011 Section 402 Impact Adjustments for Areas Changes in calculating the impact adjustment: 1. aRF The term area of the regulatory floodplain, or aRF, will be replaced by the area of the Special Flood Hazard Area, or aSFHA. Co mmunities that regulate an area larger than the SFHA shown on their Flood Insurance Rate Map will receive extra credit through the impact adjustment, up to a maximum of 150%. For example, if the communitys SFHA is 1,000 acres and it regulates new development in an area that totals 1,200 acres, the impact adjustment formula will multiply the credit times 1.2. 2. Coastal wetlands: Areas with coastal wetlands or mars hes had been excluded from the area of the regulatory floodplain. This previous ex clusion was based on an understanding that Corps of Engineers Section 404 permits and other regulatory programs effectively prevented development in these areas. This exclusion will be dropped. This will likely increase the denominator used for the impact adjustment for many coastal communities, resulting in a reduction in cred it. However, communities (and states) that prohibit development in their coastal wetlands will likely see an increase in credit in Activity 420 Open Space Preservation. 3. Default values: Most activities have had an Option 2 default impact adjustment value. For example, communities that had at least five acres preserved as open space could use Option 2 and get 5% of the maximum credit (rOS = 0.05). The Option 2 default value will be dropped from Activity 420 Open Space Preservation. For the credit for any element in Activity 420, the actual acreage of the open space and th e SFHA will need to be calculated. In most cases, it is expected that communities will receive higher scores because most of those using Option 2 have more than 5% of their SFHA in parks and other creditable preserved open space. It is expected that large communities have GIS that can easily calculate these areas. The ISO/CRS Specialists will help small communities that may have to do this manually. Note also that the total area of the SFHA is part of the new data table required at recertification. 4. Developed areas: Certain elements, such as the new Open Space Incentives (OSI) in Activity 420 and Development Limitations (DL) in 430, are not credited in areas already developed. The impact adjustment sections will explain where this happens. 5. Undevelopable areas: It is has been noted that the CRS impact adjustment for areas treats all of the SFHA the same. Remote, undevelopa ble areas have equal weight with areas on the urban fringe that are prime for development. Rather than try to define, delineate, and eliminate such undevelopable areas from the impact adjustment formula, communities should zone them for little or low density development and receive LZ credit for those areas. LZ (low density zoning) will be moved from 430LD to 420.
PAGE 294
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 16 October 20, 2011 Activity 410 Floodplain Mapping Objective: Regulate areas based on flood data not pr ovided by FEMA, prepared to a higher study standard, and/or sharing in the cost of a Flood Insurance Study. The new name for this activity reflects this objective. 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points NS New Study 410 Reduced credit for independent review 290 with review SR State Review 60 LEV Leverage 1.0 Factor remains the same, 1.0 HSS Higher Study Standards 160 Up to 3 higher standards can be credited 160 FWS More restrictive floodway standard 200 Same 110 CTP1 Cooperating Technical Partners 1 20 Same 20 CTP2 Cooperating Technical Partners 2 1.1 Multiplier increased to 1.18 112 AFDSH Special Hazards credit 50 MAPSH same credit, new acronym TBA Max 1386 752 Higher points are possible if the im pact adjustment is greater than 1.0 NS New study credit is for regulations based on fl ood elevations and othe r data not provided by FEMA. Credit is also for conduc ting restudies and assisting in FEMA funded flood insurance studies, subject to the leve rage multiplier (LEV). Credit under study scopes 3 or 4 will be provided for regulatory data based on high water marks that are higher than existi ng base flood elevations. SR State review is a new element that replaces the wit h review points in NS. It is provided where a study was given a deta iled review by a qualifying state or regional agency. While a separate credit, the points are show n with NS in the table below. Study scope Original FIRM Zone B, C, D, or X A or V AE, VE, A# New Study State review New Study State review New Study State review 1. Delineation of an approximate A Zone 70 60 2. Flood elevations for a site at time of development 100 20 80 20 45 10 3. New profile or length of shoreline, base flood elevations/depths in AH and AO zones. 225 45 175 35 110 20 4. New profile with floodway, length of shoreline with coastal velocity zone delineation, or converting coastal A Zones to V Zones or mapping the LiMWA. 290 60 230 45 140 25
PAGE 295
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 17 October 20, 2011 HSS Higher study standard credit is for conducting a stud y using future conditions, better topography, or other higher standard. Future cond itions will be clarified to include sea level rise, subsidence, and climate change as well as watershed development, flood control projects, and new bridges. Up to three higher sta ndards will be credited, instead of two. FWS Floodway standard credit is for mapping the floodway using less than a 1 foot surcharge. Along with the reduction in points, the scoring is simplified: 1. FWS = 110, if the allowable rise was from 0 to 0.10 foot, 1. FWS = 90, if the allowable rise was from 0.11 to 0.25 foot, 2. FWS = 50, if the allowable rise was from 0.26 to 0.50 foot, or 3. FWS = 25, if the allowable rise was from 0.51 to 0.99 foot. CTP Cooperating Technical Partner This is a bonus credit for being a CTP with FEMA. Studies completed pursuant to a CTP agreement will get a 18% credit bonus, up from 10%. MAPSH Special hazard credit is for mapping areas subject to one of the seven identified special flood-related hazards. Special hazards cred its and points for all aff ected activities will be determined and published separately. Study scope Original FIRM Zone Max per Study B, C, D, or X A or V AE, VE, A#, V# 1. Delineation of an approximate A Zone 20 15 60 2. Flood elevations for a site at time of development 30 20 15 90 3. New profile or length of shoreline 80 60 40 160
PAGE 296
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 18 October 20, 2011 Activity 420 Open Space Preservation Objectives: (1) Prevent flood damage by keeping floodprone lands free of development and (2) Protect and enhance na tural floodplain functions 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points OS Open Space Preservation 725 Same (new acronym: OSP) 1,450 DR Deed Restrictions 75 Same 50 NB Natural and Beneficial functions 100 NFOS Natural Functions Open Space 350 SHOS Special Hazard Open Space 50 Same TBA 430LD LDC Land Development Criteria 100 OSI Open Space Incentives 250 430LD LZ Low density Zoning 600 Same 600 430 NBR Natural functions Regulations 30 NSP Natural Shoreline Protection 120 Max 980 1,970 These regulations are not credited in preserved open space areas that ar e credited under 420 OSP. The impact adjustment accounts for this mutual exclusivity. Therefore, they are not included in the totals. OSP Open space preservation credits keeping vacant lands vacant through ownership by a public agency, non-profit organiza tion (such as a church camp), or restrictive regulations. To qualify, a property must be open, meaning there are no buildings, filling, or st orage of materials. Note that OSP credit is limited to properties in the communitys regulatory floodplain. If there are preserved open spaces outside this area that have a flood protection be nefit, they may qualify for credit under watershed management plan credit (WMP) in Activity 450 Stormwater Management. DR Deed restrictions: bonus credit for ensuring that parcels credited for OSP will never be developed. No change is proposed other th an a reduction in the maximum points. NFOS Natural functions open space: This new element will replace Natural and Beneficial Functions Open Space (NB). It has credit for ha ving parcels credited for OSP preserved in or restored to their natural state, with bonus credits for additiona l attributes. The area affected must be mapped and the natural function being preserved or protected must be documented. Natural Functions Open Space Credit Max Points 1. Parcel is credited as OSP and is preserved in its natural state (required fo r any NFOS credit). 170 2. Parcel is designated in a plan to protect natur al functions, e.g., a habitat conservation plan 50 3. Parcel is designated as critical habitat for threat ened or endangered species or the species is present 50 4. Parcel is in a designated open space corridor or connected network 60 5. There is educational material on the sites natural functions (10 points without a PPI) 20 Total 350 1. Parcel is credited as OSP and is preserved in its natural state: There is less credit if the area is preserved only for a set number of years. Th e property must be managed to stay in the natural state or otherwise managed to keep its designation. This will also credit areas restored
PAGE 297
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 19 October 20, 2011 for a natural floodplain function, such as bioe ngineered channel stab ilization projects, removal of seawalls to allow beach erosion, wetland or riparian ha bitat restoration, and moving levees back to allow channel meandering. 2. Parcel is designated in a plan to protect natural functions: The plan must meet the criteria for a Natural Floodplain Functions Plan (NFP) credit in 510.c. 3. Parcel is designated as critical habitat for threatened or endangered species or the species is present: Threatened or endangered species in clude those on a Federa l or state list and those on an official Federal or state list as a species of concern or pending listing. 4. Parcel is in a designated open sp ace corridor or connected network: This credits a designated open space corridor or connected network of wetlands, woodlands, wildlife habitats, wilderness and other areas that support native species, maintain natural ecological processes, and sustain air and water resources. Designated open space corridor means the property has been identified for its corridor or network value in an approved plan. In some areas, this is considered green infrastructure. 5. There is educational material on the sites natu ral functions: Full cred it is provided only if the information is covered in the communitys Program for Public Information, credited in Activity 330. Such a program can be developed by a regional group. SHOS Special hazard open space: preserved open space in areas subject to a special floodrelated hazard. Special hazards credits and points for all affected activit ies will be determined and published separately. OSI Open space incentives: This is a new element, but parts come from land development criteria (LDC) in 430LD. It will credit requirements and incen tives that keep floodprone portions of developments open. OSI credit will not be provided in areas alre ady developed or areas preserved as open space and credited under OSP. Open Space Incentives Credit Points 1. The regulations set aside all floodprone lands in a subdivision as open space, or otherwise keep them free from development. The credit can be prorated if smaller areas are set aside. 250 2. Each lot in a new subdivision must provide a bui lding site that is on natural high ground, out of the regulatory floodplain. 150 3. To the extent possible each lot in a new subdivision must provide a building site that is on natural high ground, out of the regulatory floodplain. If a lot does not have a buildable site out of the regulatory floodplain, all new structures, pavement, and other development must be sited on the highest land on the lot. 65 4. The regulations include transfer of development rights language to encourage staying out of the floodplain. Fewer points are provided for a density bonus within the same development. 70 5. The regulations allow cluster development or PUDs. 25 6. The communitys land use plan recommends open space use or low density development of floodprone areas. 25 These credits are mutually exclusive, so the points do not add up.
PAGE 298
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 20 October 20, 2011 LZ Low density zoning provides credit for zoning districts th at require lot sizes of one acre or larger. New in 2012: if the area is vacant, credit is only provided for mini mum lot sizes of five acres or larger. LZ credit is not provided in areas preserved as open space and credited as OSP. New language will be included for non-residen tial development and accounting for the number of units and lot coverage, rather than relying solely on the lot size to indicate low density zoning. NSP Natural shoreline protection: This new element credits programs that protect natural channels and shorelines, the area most valuable for protecting natural floodplain functions. The programs can be local policies followed on public lands and/or regul ations that govern development on private lands. The credit will only be available for those channels or shorelines that are currently in their approximate natural st ate, i.e., there is no concrete, rip rap, levees, armoring, beach nourishment, dams, or other human intervention that constrains the natural processes of the river, stream, lake, or ocean shoreline. While OSP and NFOS provide credit for open space and open areas with natural floodplain functions benefits, they treat all floodplain areas the same. NSP identifies the channel or shoreline, i.e., the area closest to the water, the first to flood, and the most important area to aquatic and riparian habitat, as worthy of special attention and additional cr edit. The credit is for allowing these areas to follow their natural processes, such as channel meandering and beach erosion, and to encourage natural shorelines th at provide water quality benefits for runoff. The credit is for a regulation or pr ogram that prohibits the following: 1. In channels and channel banks in riverine areas: rip rap or armoring, channel alterations, dredging, filling, or re moval of vegetation. 2. On shorelines of lakes or oceans: filling or other alterations to a beach, including beach nourishment projects; alterations to sand dunes; or construction of seawalls, bulkheads, armoring, or other shoreline stabilization structures. The regulation or program may allow human altera tions that have a natu ral floodplain functions benefit, such as removing a levee, restoring ha bitat, reducing bank erosio n with bio-engineering techniques, or planting to preserve sand dunes. The following types of programs can be credited: 1. An ordinance or regulation that gove rns public and private activities, or 2. A written community policy that covers shorelines on the communitys property, such as in city parks. Programs to restore natural floodplain functions, such as re-establishing a wetland, are credited under NFOS. Regulations to require restoration activities, such as requiring a developer to set aside a habitat corridor, are credited under OSI.
PAGE 299
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 21 October 20, 2011 There is only one score for the program. Unlik e NFOS, there are no gradations of points. Therefore, the size of a buffer zone is irrelevant. However, a setback or buffer that prohibits buildings and filling can also qualify as preser ved open space (OSP), subject to the OSP impact adjustment. The larger the buffer zone, the greater the OSP credit. The impact adjustment for NSP will not be base d on the area of the SFHA, but on the percentage of the length of affected shorelines divided by th e total length of shorelines in the community. The impact adjustment ratio is: rNSP = aNSP where aNSP = the length of shoreline affected by the program aSL and aSL = the total length of shorelin e in the communitys SFHA Armored or concrete channels and ditches are counted toward aSL, but not toward aNSP. The option 2 default credit will be the same as fo r 430 elements, 0.25. Every channel that is counted towards CDR credit in Activity 540 Drainage System Maintenance must be part of aSL. Therefore, the impact adjustment map will have to be in agreement with the impact adjustment map for Activity 540. Credit for Natural Shoreline Protec tion can be provided in areas credited as preserved open space (OSP) to encourage communities to protec t the shorelines on public lands. Impact Adjustments The table below summarizes what areas are included in the impact adjustment for the various elements in Activity 420. Credits for open sp ace parcels (OSP, DR, NFOS, and SHOS) are only provided in areas that qualify fo r OSP. Credits for the regulatory elements (OSI, LZ, and all 430 elements except for BC and RA) are not provided in parcels that alrea dy qualify as preserved open space (OSP). Similarly, there is no 420 open space credit in areas al ready developed. The exception to these rules is that credit for pr otecting shorelines (NSP) will be available everywhere. Activity 420 Impact Adjustment Criteria New Element Open Space (OSP) Developed areas Open space preservation (OSP) Included Excluded Deed restrictions (DR) Included Excluded Natural functions open space (NFOS) Included Excluded Special hazard open space (SHOS) Included Excluded Open space incentives (OSI ) Excluded Excluded Low density zoning (LZ) Excluded Excluded Natural shoreline protection (NSP) Included Included
PAGE 300
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 22 October 20, 2011 Activity 430 Higher Regulatory Standards Objective: Require that new development be provided with more protection than is required by the NFIPs minimum criteria 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points new DL Development Limitations 1,330 FRB Freeboard 300 More credit if fill prohibited ** 500 FDN Foundation Protection 35 More credit if fill prohibited ** 80 CSI Cumulative Substantial Improvement 110 Same 90 LSI Lower Subs. Improvement threshold 90 Same 20 PCF Protection of Critical Facilities 100 More flexible cr edit for partial protection 80 PSC Protection of Storage Capacity 80 Moved to new DL credit NBR Natural/Beneficial Functions Regs 40 Moved to 420 Natural Shoreline Protection ENL Enclosure Limits 300 Same ** 240 BC Building Code 190 Same 100 450 FRX Freeboard in X Zones LDP Local Drainage Protection 120 STF Staffing 50 Moved to new RA credit MHP Manufactured Home Parks 50 Same 15 CAZ Coastal A Zones 650 Same ** 650 SHR Special Hazards Regs Same TBA OHS Other Higher Standards 100 Some credit incorporated in new DL credit 20 SMS State-Mandated Standards 45 Insurance agent training moved to new 370 20 new RA Regulations Administration 67 430LD LDC Land Development Criteria 100 Moved to 420 Open Space Incentives 430LD LZ Low density Zoning 600 Moved to 420 Low density Zoning Max 2840 ** 1,862 These regulations are not credited in preserved open space areas that are credited under 420 OSP. The impact adjustment accounts for this mutual exclusivity. ** FRB, FDN, ENL, and CAZ are mutually exclusive from DL, so they are not included in the total points Filling: The use of fill to elevate buildings has several advantages that make it very desirable for developers and homeowners. But, there are problems with using fill: it reduces floodplain storage capacity and it has an adverse impact on native vegetation, wetlands, drainage, and water quality. One method to offset the impacts of the us e of fill is to require compensatory storage, but that does not compensate for the adve rse impact on natural floodplain functions. It was noted that all of the benefits of filling accrue to the development and the property owner while all of the problems accrue to neighbors, taxpayers, the community, the NFIP, or the environment. Therefore, the 2012 Manual is intended to show that filling is not a desirable floodplain management activity. This will be done by revising the credit criteria for three elements:
PAGE 301
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 23 October 20, 2011 420 Development Limitations (DL) will incorporate 430 s Protection of floodplain Storage Capacity (PSC) and increase the credit, 430 Freeboard (FRB) will tie bonus credit for freeboard to restrictions on filling, 430 Foundation protection (FDN) will tie full credit for foundations on fill to compensatory storage. In all three cases, the new credits will address th e two major concerns with filling: in riverine areas it has adverse impacts on natural floodplain functions a nd it can increase flood heights elsewhere due to loss of storag e. In coastal areas it has adve rse impacts on natural floodplain functions (flood heights are not impa cted by fill in coastal areas). Full credit will be provided in riverine areas where both impacts are addressed with a fill prohibition. Half credit will be provi ded for a compensatory storage requirement in riverine areas because comp storage does not protect natural floodplain functions. Half the credit will be provided in coastal floodplains because prohibiting fill only affects the adverse impacts on natural floodplain functions. In all cases, filling will be allowed to support pr ojects to protect or restore natural floodplain functions, such as a chan nel restoration project. DL Development Limitations. This is a new credit for prohibiting fill (from the old PSC), prohibiting buildings, and/or prohibiting storage of materials in the floodplain. If all three items are included in the communitys regulations, the area affected probably qualifies for the higher credit for open space preservation (OSP in Activity 420). Note that there is no credit for DL and other higher regulatory standards in areas credited as OSP. In areas where the community prohibits new buildings under DL 2, there will be no credit for the following higher standards for new buildings: freeboard (FRB), foundation protection (FDN), enclosure limitations (ENL), and coastal A Zone regulations (CAZ). Partial credit will be provided under DL 3 (pr ohibit storage of materials) for prohibiting the storage of hazardous materials. Somewhat less credit will be provided for requiring hazardous materials to be stored ab ove the base flood elevation. FRB Freeboard: credit will be provided for up to three feet of freeboard. There will be additional credit if (1) the community prohibits construction of new buildings on fill or (2) requires compensatory storage where filling is allowed. Development Limitations Credit Points 1. Prohibit fill (including no CLOMR-Fs and LOMR-Fs) in riverine areas 280 1.a. Prohibit fill (including no CLOMR-Fs and LOMR-Fs) in coastal areas or require compensatory storage in riverine areas: 130 2. Prohibit new buildings (pro-rated for prohibiting some types of buildings, e.g., residential) 1,000 3. Prohibit storage of materials 50 3.a. Prohibit storage of hazardous materials: 20 3.b. Require hazardous materials to be stored above the base flood elevation: 10 points Total 1,330
PAGE 302
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 24 October 20, 2011 The table on the right shows the points. Separate credit may be developed to recognize more than three feet of freeboard where there are assurances that there is real growth potential, fill is prohibited, and the community does a thorough enforcement job. The filling restrictions credit will be prorated if the community allows buildings on stem walls without compensatory storage. The current approach to providing more points for lower levels of freeboard in shallow flooding AO Zones w ill be kept. There will be additional credit if the freeboard requirement extends to propert ies outside the SFHA (e.g., all buildings on ground that is below the BFE + 2 must be elevated to two feet above the BFE, regardless of its FIRM Zone, up to the 150% limit on the impact adjustment). There had been a proposal to provide credit for up to five feet of free board. That will still be possible, but it will be spelled out in a separate element, with additional provisions, such as a demonstrated expectation of new growth in the floodplain. FDN Foundation protection: requiring foundations to be engineered or constructed on compacted fill that is protected from erosion a nd scour. More emphasis will be placed on the engineering and less on filling. This credit is not available in V Zones because an engineered foundation is a minimum NFIP requirement in V Zones. The new credit is provided in more detail: 1. 80 points if ALL new buildings in the regulatory floodplain: (a) Must be constructed on foundations that ar e designed and sealed by a registered design professional as complying with the requirem ents of the International Building Code, the International Residential Code, or ASCE 24, and (b) New buildings are not allowed on fill. 2. 60 points if all new buildings built on fill in the regulatory floodplain must be (a) Constructed on properly designed and compacted fill (e.g., Section 1803.5.8 and Section 1804.4 of the International Building Code, Section 2.4 of ASCE 24, as specified or equivalent), (b) The fill has appropriate protec tion from erosion and scour, and (c) In riverine areas, the building and fill must meet a compensatory storage requirement that meets the credit criteria of Section 431.__. Development Limitations (DL1a). 3. 35 points if all new buildings built on fill in the regulatory floodplain must be (a) Constructed on properly designed and compacted fill (e.g., Section 1803.5.8 and Section 1804.4 of the International Building Code, Section 2.4 of ASCE 24, as specified or equivalent), and (b) The fill has appropriate prot ection from erosion and scour. Freeboard Credit Freeboard No filling restrictions Riverine areas: Comp storage required Coastal areas: fill prohibited Riverine areas: fill prohibited 1 foot 100 110 120 2 feet 225 250 280 3 feet 375 440 500 Foundation Protection Credit Points 1. Engineered foundations, no buildings on fill 80 2. Buildings on compacted fill, protected from erosion. In riveri ne areas, compensatory storage must be required 60 3. Buildings on compacted fill, protected from erosion and scour 35
PAGE 303
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 25 October 20, 2011 CSI Cumulative substantial improvements: counting multiple improvements so when they add up to 50% of the buildings value, the substantial improvement rule applies. No change is proposed, other than a change in the points. LSI Lower substantial improvements threshold: having the substantial improvement rule apply when a project is valued at less than 50% of the buildings value (e.g., 40%). A recent ruling by FEMA that Increased Cost of Complian ce (ICC) will be made available to buildings that are deemed by a higher local code standard to be substantially damaged should make CSI and LSI more attractive to communities. PCF Protection of critical facilities: The maximum credit will be for preventing new critical facilities from being located in the 500-year floodplain. It is not feasible for some communities to locate critical facilities outsi de the floodplain, but they may be ab le to take some steps towards reducing future risk to these faci lities and partial cred it will be considered. Therefore, there will be gradations of credit to lesser standards. This will provide more opportunities for partial credit for different levels of protection to di fferent types of cr itical facilities. The following list is taken from community ordina nces and suggestions and shows the variations in protection standards that could be submitted: Prohibiting all new critical facilities from the 500-year floodplain. Requiring all new critical facilities to be protected to the 500-year flood level + 1 foot of freeboard either by elevation or dry floodproofing. Regulating only one type of critical facility, such as hazardous materials sites or critical facilities owned and managed by the community A substantial improvement shall require the entire fa cility to be protected to the required elevation All additions (including those not meeting the substantial improvement threshold) must be protected to the required elevation. All new critical facilities must have access unless it is determined by the permitting authority that access is not needed. Full credit for access would necessitate an engineering study to ensure that the road (1) can withstand a 500-year flood and (2) would not cause an obstruction to flows. ENL Enclosure limits: Credit is for prohibiting enclosing the bottom floor of elevated bui ldings or requiring a nonconversion agreement. There will be a change: to receive credit for limiting enclosures to less than 300 square feet, there must be a nonconversion agreement. Enclosure Limits Credit Points 1. Regulations prohibit any building enclosures, including breakaway walls, below the base flood elevation, OR 240 2. Regulations prohibit enclosures of areas of 300 square feet or greater, including breakaway walls, below the base flood elevation and a. There is a nonconversion agreement that meets the criteria of 3, below, OR 190 b. There is no nonconversion agreement 95 points 3. Regulations require that the owner of a building sign a nonconversion agreement, promising not to improve, finish, or otherwise convert the area below the lowest floor and a. The community will inspect the enclosed area at least once a year, OR 90 b. Granting the community the right to inspect the enclosed area at any time 60 points. OR c. No mention is made of inspections 30 points.
PAGE 304
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 26 October 20, 2011 This change resulted from FEMAs experiences with claim payments for flooded buildings that had small enclosures that were converted to living areas. Credit points are further prorated based on the communitys ability to inspect the enclosed area. BC Building code: credit is provided for adoption and enforcement of th e International Codes or their equivalent. Enforcement of the codes will be verified. Where a community has two different BCEGS classes, the higher number will be used to calculate the credit. The current approach of not having an impact adjustment for BC will be kept because (1) building codes help reduce flood and drainage problems outside the SFHA and (2) one of the main reasons for the credit is reduction of losses from other natural hazards. LDP Local drainage protection: ensuring that new buildings are well above the street level or otherwise protected from shallow drainage flooding. This was moved from 450 FRX. Items 3 and 4 in the table have new language. MHP Manufactured home parks: removing the elevation exemption for manufactured homes placed in existing manufactured home parks. The current exemption from having an impact adjustment will be kept because there wont be many points for this element and manufactured home parks comprise a small area of a floodplain. However, the community will need to provide (1) Elevati on Certificates for recently installed manufactured homes and (2) documentation that the homes meet the required anchoring standards. CAZ Coastal A Zones: enforcing V Zone rules and ENL enclosure limits inland from the V Zone boundary. The credited regulati ons and the total point s are not proposed for change, but the impact adjustment needs to be clarified: 1.0, if 100% of the communitys SF HA is covered by CAZ regulations. 0.5, if the community has a LiMWA or has map ped an area using the same criteria and 100% of that area is covered by CAZ regulations. Option 3, the actual ratio, can be used where the area subject to CAZ regulations is larger than 50% of the SFHA. Building Code Credit Points Points Adoption of the International Building Code 20 Residential Code 20 Plumbing Code 3 Mechanical Code 3 Fuel Gas Code 2 Private Sewage Disposal Code 2 Total for code adoption 50 BCEGS classification of 5/5 10 BCEGS classification of 4/4 20 BCEGS classification of 3/3 30 BCEGS classification of 2/2 40 BCEGS classification of 1/1 50 Max for BCEGS 50 Total 100 Local Drainage Protection Credit Points 1. Credit is based on how high the lowest floor (including basement) must be above the crown of the nearest street or the highest grade adjacent to the building); [maximum is for 3 feet] OR 120 2. if the regulations requir e that as a condition for a building permit, the applicant must prepare a site plan that accounts for street flooding, local drainage from and onto adjoining properti es and that protects the building from local drainage flows; OR 40 3. if the regulations requir e that the applicant provide positive drainage away from the building site to an approved point of collectio n that does not create a hazard or problem on neighboring properties. OR 20 4. if the regulations require that the increased volume of runoff due to the development is kept on site, such as via a low impact development measure. 20
PAGE 305
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 27 October 20, 2011 0.1, if the regulations apply to a community-defined coastal A Zone that does not meet FEMAs LiMWA mapping criteria. SHR Special hazards regulations: enforcing appropriate cons truction standards in areas subject to a special flood-rela ted hazard. Special hazards credits and points for all affected activities will be determined and published separately. OHS Other higher standards: credit for regulations not credited elsewhere. Some past credits, such as prohibiting certain types of buildings, will be in DL. SMS State-mandated regulatory standards: bonus credit if a regulat ory standard is required by the state. The part of this element that cr edits state insurance training requirements will be dropped as no state has ever met the credit criteria. RA Regulations administration: This is a new element with five parts, as shown in the table. 1. Staff training: The current element for staffing (STF) will be put in this new element (although the credit points may be different). STF provides five points for each Certified Floodplain Manager and each graduate of several four day classes conducted or sponsored by FEMAs Emergency Management Institute. 2. IAS is the International Accreditation Service, an arm of the Internati onal Code Council. It has a new program that reviews and accredits bu ilding department. The program is explained at www.iasonline.org/Building_Department_ Program. 3. Conducting three detailed inspections : On the next page are specific criteria for when the inspections are conducted, wh at is inspected, and what documentation is needed. 4. Conducting reinspections, i.e., in specting buildings when they ar e sold or rented to a new tenant or when a home improvement permit is applied for. For CRS cr edit, the regulations must clearly state that the communitys inspec tor has a right to enter the building at the designated occurrences (e.g., sale of the propert y) and will inspect for compliance with the floodplain management permit that was previously issued. Documentati on of the inspections will be needed at verification. 5. The off-site records storage cred it is being moved from Activity 310 Elevation Certificates. There will be more specific information on what qualifies as a secure location and how to credit off-site backups of digital data. Because all Elevation Certificat es will be collected with each years recertification (see Activity 310) there will be no cred it for off-site storage of Elev ation Certificates. All of the credit will based on backup stor age of other permit records. Regulations Administration Credit Points 1. Staff training 25 2. Building department is IAS accredited 5 3. Conducting 3 detailed inspections 16 4. Conducting reinspections 16 5. Off-site record storage (old ORS) 5 67
PAGE 306
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 28 October 20, 2011 Regulations Administration Credit for Inspections There will be a new credit for conducting three inspec tions as described below. There is no partial credit for two inspections or doing less than what is listed here. For credit, the community must conduct at least thre e inspections for each permitted development project in the regulatory floodplain according to the following criteria: 1. The permit application records mu st include a site plan that shows: a. The site plans scale and north orientation arrow b. The parcel boundaries and the location and names of adjacent streets c. All watercourses on the parcel d. All floodplain, V Zone, coastal A Zone, and floodway boundaries that run through the parcel e. All required buffer or setback lines from shorelines or channel banks f. All drainage and utility easements g. All areas to be cleared, cut, graded, or filled h. The location of all existing and propos ed fences, walls, and other structures 2. If the permit includes a new building or an expansion to an existing building: a. The site plan must show the footprint of all existing and proposed buildings and building additions. b. The permit application papers must include: c. The elevation of the lowest floor of the build ing (or addition) and of an attached garage, including the elevation of the interior grade or floor of a crawlspace, d. The location and elevation of all mechanical and utility equipment servicing the building, and e. For buildings with solid foundation walls and buildings with enclosures below the BFE, the total area of each enclosed area (sq. ft.) measured on the outside, the lo cation and specifications of all flood openings, and (a) the total net open area (s q. in) of flood openings below the BFE, accounting for screens, louvers, faceplates, and grilles; or (b) a statement of certification if engineered openings are specified (s ee NFIP Technical Bulletin #1). 3. The first inspection is conducted when the site is staked out or otherwise marked. The inspector checks that areas subject to special requirements are clearly marked on the ground. For example, if the floodway, coastal A Zone, or V Zone line goes through the parcel or there is a natural area that is not to be disturbed, it could be staked out. If there are no such areas, then this inspection does not need to be conducted for CRS credit (however, it is st ill a good idea to place stakes or other markings to show the building footprint in order to verify setbacks and other code requirements). 4. The second inspection is conducted when the projec t involves a building. The builder provides the community with documentation of the surveyed lowest floor elevation. The inspector checks that: a. The foundation or forms for the structure are correctly located on the site, b. Where buildings have foundation walls or other enclosures below the BFE, the location and size of the openings are as specif ied on the approved plans. The inspection records must include a record that th e elevation of the lowest floor or the forms for the foundation walls were surveyed and found to be compli ant. This could be, but does not have to be, a FEMA Elevation Certificate. At this point the inspector verifies that the lowest floor will be at or above the required elevation. This inspection is not needed if the project does not involve construction of a new building or a substantial improvement.
PAGE 307
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 29 October 20, 2011 Regulations Administration Credit for Inspections (Continued) 5. The final inspection is conducted when the project is finished, the Elevation Certificate is submitted, and before a certificate of occupancy is issued. The inspector checks that: a. The foundation and floor elevation have not been altered since the second inspection, b. The buildings lowest floor is at or above t he required elevation and the correct information is recorded on the Elevation Certificate, c. All areas below the required elevation are constructed with materials resistant to flood damage, d. All required manufactured home tie downs are in place, e. Where buildings have foundation walls or other enclosures below the BFE, the location and size of the openings are as specified on the approved plans and recorded on the Elevation Certificate, f. All electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, air conditioning, ductwork, and other equipment is located, elevated or protected as specified on the approved plans and recorded on the Elevation Certificate. g. In coastal high hazard areas (Zone V) and coastal A Zones, slabs placed under the building are not connected to the foundation. h. The Elevation Certificate is complete and appears correct (e.g., the height of the lowest floor above the highest adjacent grade is accurate). i. V Zone and Breakaway Wall Certificates are obtained, as appropriate, for new and substantially improved buildings in V Zone and coastal A Zone areas. j. Buildings with enclosures in coastal A Zones meet the A Zone vent requirements. The inspection records must include: Photographs of all si des of the structure, Close up photographs of typical openings, Photographs of all mechanical and utility equipment located outside the building, and A completed FEMA Elevation or Flo odproofing Certificate, as appropriate. Documentation: The community must have records fo r each inspection available for the verification visit that show that show how each item was checked. The records must include copies of the photographs and elevation surveys.
PAGE 308
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 30 October 20, 2011 Activity 440 Flood Data Maintenance Objective: Make the communitys floodplain data more current, useful, or accurate to improve local regulations, planning, disclosu res, and property appraisals 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points AMD Additional Map Data 129 Two new credited attributes 160 BMM Benchmark Maintenance 90 Alternative approaches to be credited 27 EDM Erosion Data Maintenance Same TBA FM FIRM Maintenance 20 Same 15 Max 239 202 AMD Additional map data credit is for incorporating FIRM data into the communitys GIS and using the results in its regulatory and mitig ation programs. The minimum requirement is for a layer that shows the items in the first line, below. Additional cred it is provided for having layers for other attributes, as listed below, with the new points. Items l and m are new for 2012. Additional Map Data Points a. Floodplain boundaries, corporate limits, streets, and parcel or lot boundaries 20 b. Buildings, building outlines, or building footprints 26 c. Floodways or coastal high hazard areas 12 d. Showing base flood elevations 12 e. FIRM zone attributes (e.g., A3, VE, etc.) 10 f. 500-year floodplain elevations or boundaries 10 g. Areas subject to other natural hazards 10 h. (2) Including contour lines at a smaller contour interval than on USGS quads 8 i. Floodplain data in the tax assessment data base 10 j. All FIRMs in effect after the date of the communitys application to the CRS 6 k. Other data used for regulation or mitigation programs 8 l. Areas with natural floodplain functions (e.g., wetlands, designated riparian habitat) 14 m. Building elevation data 14 160 BMM Benchmark maintenance credit is for ensuring that benchmarks are accurate and maintained. The 2012 Manual will recognize more frequent re-surveying of benchmarks that dont have the stability ratings of A or B and CORS systems that support GPS surveying. The credit will be based on the number of qualifying benchmarks and CORS stations in floodplains with regulatory flood elevations, rather than all floodplains. EDM Erosion data maintenance is a special flood-re lated hazard. Special hazards credits and points for all affected activities will be determined and published separately. FM FIRM maintenance credit is for keeping copies of all old FIRMs, Flood Insurance Studies and Flood Hazard Boundary Maps. Digita l or paper copies will be credited.
PAGE 309
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 31 October 20, 2011 Activity 450 Stormwater Management Objective: Minimize the impact of new developments on surface water drainage and runoff. 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points SMR Stormwater Mgmt. Regulations 225 380 SZ Size of development regulated 25 Same 110 DS Design Storm 110 New credit for managing volume 225 PUB Public maintenance 90 Credit only for the requirement 20 new LID Low Impact Development 25 WMP Watershed Master Plan 225 Same 315 FRX Freeboard in X Zones 150 Moved to activity 430, LDP ESC Erosion and Sedimentation Control 45 Less credit for NPDES criteria 40 WQ Water Quality regulations 25 Same 20 Max 520 755 SMR Stormwater management regulations credits requiring all new developments to manage their excess stormwater runoff on site. It will have four sub elements, one more than in the past, the scores for which are summed to obtain the score for SMR. 1. SZ Size of development regulated: minimum credit is for re gulating developments of five acres or smaller, maximum credit is for regulating all development. 2. DS Design storm: minimum credit is for managing the 10-year storm, maximum credit is for managing all storms up to the 100-year. Th is credit has previously been limited to managing peak flows, but there will be more points for also limiting increases in the volume of stormwater runoff leaving the site. 3. PUB Public maintenance: requiring new stormwater management facilities to be maintained and subject to inspection. The cr edit in 450 will be limited to the regulatory requirement. There is a new credit in 540 Drainage System Maintenance for the inspections and maintenance of storage facilities. 4. LID Low impact development: This is a new element for requiring developers to use low impact development or similar soft techniques to minimize the size of on-site detention and to replicate natural stormwater characteristics. WMP Watershed master plan credit is for having a master pl an to best determine how to manage stormwater, using open space, man-made and natural approaches. There will be a new credit for having a dedicated s ource of funding for implementation, such as a stormwater utility. ESC Erosion and sedimentation control regulations credit is for management of sedimentladen runoff from construction sites. ESC will provide minimal credit for programs that do not regulate construction sites smaller than the na tional NPDES requirement, one acre. Credit for regulating agricultural lands will be dropped. WQ Water quality regulations: requiring stormwater management facilities to incorporate permanent best management practices (BMPs) for water quality. No change is proposed.
PAGE 310
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 32 October 20, 2011 Activity 510 Floodplain Management Planning Objective: Produce a program of activities that will best tackle the communitys vulnerability to the hazard and meet other community needs 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points FMP Floodplain Management Planning 294 Refinements in the steps expected 417 RLAA Repetitive Loss Area Analyses 50 Wider distribution of the analyses 140 HCP Habitat Conservation Plan 15 NFP Natural floodplain functions plan 100 Max 359 657 FMP Floodplain management planning credits a 10-step proce ss to prepare, adopt and implement a plan to mitigate the communitys flood problems and prot ect natural floodplain functions. The major 2012 changes to the 10 steps are noted below. Step 1. Organize to prepare the plan Step 2. Involve the public Step 3. Coordinate: This step will be simplified. Step 4. Assess the hazard Step 5. Assess the problem: Must cover all haza rds identified in Step 4 and repetitive loss areas. Communities will get extra credit for assessi ng the impact of climate change, including sea level rise. Step 6. Set goals: Must address a ll problems identified in Step 5. Step 7. Review possible activities: The plan must describe the communitys capability to implement the activities reviewed. Step 8. Draft an action plan: Must addr ess all problems identified in Step 5. Step 9. Adopt the plan Step 10. Implement, evaluate, and revise The University of North Carolina reviewed 60 510 plans and found that ma ny did not relate the problem to the recommended solutions. Therefor e, plans will need to show how the problems described in Step 5 are addresse d in steps 6 and 8. For example, if repetitive flood losses are a problem, the plan will need to show how the actio n plan relates to mitigating repetitive losses. RLAA Repetitive loss area analyses credits more detailed plans for identified repetitive loss areas, following a five step process. In 2012, the an alysis reports must be made available to all the property owners in the repetitive loss areas and be submitted to and approved by the governing council. There must be annual progres s reports. The National Flood Mitigation Data Collection Tool will be recommended, but no longer required. NFP Natural floodplain functions plan: HCP Habitat Conservation pl an will be replaced by credit for a natural floodplain functions plan that protects natural f unctions of the communitys floodplain. Examples include a habitat c onservation or restora tion plan or a green infrastructure plan.
PAGE 311
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 33 October 20, 2011 Activity 520 Acquisition and Relocation Objective: Acquire, relocate, or otherwise clear buildings out of the flood hazard area 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points 520 Acquisition/Relocation 3,200 Same 1,866 This activity has always been straightforward: the number of points is based on the number of buildings that have been cleare d out of the floodplain. Credit is also for clearing repetitive loss properties in any locatio n. With the change in the maximum points for this activity, credit for each building removed will be reduced Double and triple points are pr ovided for clearing out repeti tive loss propertie s and severe repetitive loss properties, respectively. This credit will be dependent on the community submitting updated AW-501 repeti tive loss worksheets. The changes include: 1. Double credit will be provided for removing critical facilities from the floodplain. This will treat critical facili ties and repetitive loss propertie s the same way in both 520 and 530. 2. There will be a 50% credit bonus for buildings that are removed from the V Zone, coastal A Zone, or coastal erosion area. If a building was moved, it would have to be moved to a site outside these zones. 3. For CRS credit purposes, FIRM zone boundaries sh all be as shown on the current FIRM or on a published preliminary FIRM, whic hever shows the larger floodplain. 4. There will be new environmental review criteria to ensure that the CRS is not rewarding projects that have a negative impact on environmental, historical and cultural resources. Depending on the type of project, the procedures will require a review in accordance with applicable sections of the Federal programs listed in the bo x and corresponding state rules. Environmental Review Regulations National Historic Preservation Act Archeological & Historical Preservation Act Endangered Species Act Fish & Wildlife Coordination Act Clean Water Act Sec. 10 Rivers and Harbors Act Farmlands Protection Policy Act E.O. 11988 Floodplain Management E.O. 11990 Wetlands Protection E.O. 12898 Environmental Justice Coastal Zone Management Act Coastal Barriers Resources Act
PAGE 312
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 34 October 20, 2011 Activity 530 Flood Protection Objective: Protect existing buildings from flood damage 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points* 530 TU Techniques Used Elevation 2,800 Same 1,540 Dry floodproofing Same 635 Wet floodproofing Same 675 Sewer backup protection 200 Same 455 Barriers, levees, floodwalls Same 810 Reservoirs, detention, retention Must account for future flood increases 1,300 Channel modifications 1,000 Must account for future flood increases 1,110 The maximum points shown are the maximum points that a community can receive for that flood protection technique. The maximum credit a community can earn for Activity 530 for all protected buildings is 1,540 points. Activity 530 credit is based on the flood protec tion technique used to protect buildings that remain in the floodplain. Credit is also provided for protecting repetitive loss properties in any location. The credit in 530 is pro-rated based on the impr ovement in the flood protection level. In the 2007 CRS Coordinators Manual, t he maximum 530 credit is for elev ating a building to one foot above the base flood elevation or to the 500-ye ar flood elevation. The maximum credit level will change to the flood protection le vel designated in ASCE 24-09. An excerpt is on the next page: For example, for Category II buildings, full credit w ill be provided if the building is protected to the base flood elevation plus one foot in an A Zone, or the design flood el evation (the BFE plus the communitys freeboard), whichever is higher. Pa rtial credit will continue to be provided for lower levels of protection. Full credit for Category IV buildings will be based on either the standard in the table or the standard in Activity 430 Higher Regulatory Standards for protecti ng critical facilities (the 500year flood elevation), whichever is higher. Note that the DFE is defined by the community. A communitys DFE may be the BFE plus 2 or more feet of freeboard. For CRS credit purposes, the base flood elevation shall be as shown on the current FIRM or on a current published preliminary FIRM, whichever is higher. The new environmental review criteria discussed for 520 will also apply to 530.
PAGE 313
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 35 October 20, 2011 Category I Category II Ca tegory III Category IV Elevation of Lowest Floor (A Zone) All A Zones not identified as Coastal A Zones: elevation of lowest floor DFE BFE +1 foot or DFE, whichever is higher BFE +1 foot or DFE, whichever is higher BFE +2 foot or DFE, whichever is higher Elevation of Bottom of Lowest Horizontal Structural Member (V Zone) All V Zones and Coastal A Zones: where the lowest horizontal structural member is parallel to direction of wave approach DFE DFE BFE +1 foot or DFE, whichever is higher BFE +1 foot or DFE, whichever is higher All V Zones and Coastal A Zones: where the lowest horizontal structural member is perpendicular to direction of wave approach DFE BFE +1 foot or DFE, whichever is higher BFE +2 feet or DFE, whichever is higher BFE +2 feet or DFE, whichever is higher BFE: base flood elevation DFE: design flood elevation, i.e., the BF E plus the locally required freeboard. Category I: Structures that repres ent a low hazard to human life in the event of failure including, but not limited to agricultural facilities, certain temp orary facilities, and minor storage facilities. Category II: All structures except t hose listed in Categories I, III and IV Category III: Structures that represent a substantial hazard to human life in the event of failu re including, but not limited to schools, jails, health care facilities (see ASCE 24 for the full list) Category IV: Structures designated as essential facilitie s including but not limited to hospitals, police stations, emergency shelters (see ASCE 24 for the full list) For credit for structural flood c ontrol projects (reservoirs, dete ntion, retention, pump stations, and channel modifications): The project must either have been designed to account for future changes in flood levels (including sea level rise expe cted over the next 100 year s) or the community must regulate the watershed to ensure no increases in future flood levels If the project depends on a non-accredited levee (e.g., an improvement to a pump station), the community must also qualif y for credit under Activity 620 Levees. If the project changes the base flood elev ation shown on the FIRM, credit will be dependent on submittal of a request for a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR). This is required by 44 CFR Section 65.3 of the NFIP regulations.
PAGE 314
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 36 October 20, 2011 Activity 540 Drainage System Maintenance Objective: Keep the channels and storage basins clear of debris in order to maintain their flood carrying and storage capacity 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points CDR Channel and basin Debris Removal200 CDR Inspecting and maintaining channels 208 new SBM Inspecting/maintaining storage basins 118 More attention to problem sites 50 PSM Problem site maintenance 50 Capital improvement program 50 CIP Capital improvements program 70 SDR Stream Dumping Regulations 30 SDR w/o publicity: 15, w/publicity: 25, w/PPI: 32 EPM Coastal Erosion Protection Maint. Same TBA Max 330 The original CDR Channel and basin debris removal will be divided into four parts: CDR Channel debris removal: Inspecting channels and removing debris to maintain conveyance. This will cover all natural, private and publicly owned drai nage channels to ensure flood elevations along a channel do not increase due to debris. SBM Storage basin maintenance: Inspecting retention and detent ion basins and maintaining them as needed. This will cover flow control facilities that retain, detain, or infiltrate stormwater runoff to prevent downstream increases in flow Communities that received public maintenance credit (PUB) in Activity 450 Stormwater Management should be able to qualify for this credit. The revised PUB regulation will be a prerequisite for this credit. PSM Problem site maintenance: Providing special attention to known problem sites, such as more frequent inspections CIP Capital improvements program: Having a capital improveme nts program, i.e., a longterm program to correct or replace drainage problem sites There will be better guidance on the definition of the drainage sy stem for full credit. To receive full credit for inspecting and maintaining storag e basins, underground facilities will need to be included. Annual inspections will continue to be required for credit. The new environmental review criteria discussed for 520 will also apply to 540. SDR Stream Dumping Regulations will continue, with half of the points provided for the regulations and half for publicizing the regulatio ns. Publicity will be scored using the same approach as outreach projects in Activity 330 Ou treach Projects. This will mean more credit for more projects and extra cred it if the outreach is designed by a Program for Public Information, up to the maximum point s available in SDR.
PAGE 315
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 37 October 20, 2011 Activity 610 Flood Warning and Response Objective: Provide timely identification of impending flood threats, disseminate warnings to appropriate people, and coordi nate flood response activities 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points FTR Flood threat recognition system 40 More credit for predicting areas affected 75 EWD Emergency warning dissemination 60 More attention to prepared messages 75 ORE Other response efforts 50 FRO flood response operations 120 CFP Critical facilities planning 50 Same 75 SRC StormReady community 25 Same 20 TsunamiReady community 30 TRC TsunamiReady Community 30 Max 395 There will be new names for the 600 Series and all three activities. The series name will change from Flood Preparedness to Warning and Response. New prerequisite: The commun ity must provide information to residents and businesses on safety measures people should take before, during, and after a flood. Communities with riverine flooding must meet this requirement by sending a notice to at least 90% of the communitys properties annuall y. The notice will be eligible for credit as an outreach project (OP) under Ac tivity 330 Outreach Projects. Coastal jurisdictions with flooding only from tr opical storms and hurricanes can meet this requirement by either (1) sending the annua l notice described above or (2) providing repeated watch, warning and safety informati on, using written notices or mass media, and beginning at least 72 hours in advance of the storm. The second approach could be credited under Activity 330s new flood response preparations element (FRP). A community that has more than one source of flooding may need to do different types of outreach to different audiences. A community with a Program for Public In formation may use a different approach, providing the PPI document expl ains how the approach meets the objective of this prerequisite. FTR Flood threat recognition system credit is for having a system that forecasts flood elevations and arrival times at specific locati ons within the community. The element will have two parts: 1. Data collection, i.e., receiving predicte d flood levels (40% of the credit) and 2. Flood forecast, i.e., relating the predictions to the areas affect ed through real time models or flood stage forecast maps (60% of the credit).
PAGE 316
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 38 October 20, 2011 EWD Emergency warning dissemination credits disseminating the warning to the general public using a variety of means. Full credit fo r door-to-door warnings and using the Emergency Alert System will require more advance prep arations and messaging. New credit will be provided for critical faciliti es having NOAA Weather Radios and having prepared public messages for different scenarios. Th is section will also remind reader s that there is credit for preand post-flood outreach efforts under Activity 330 s flood response preparat ions element (FRP). FRO Flood response operations credits a plan with specific ta sks to be taken at various flood stages to reduce or prevent thr eats to health, safety, and propert y. New credits are provided for more detailed planning and for including mitigation actions in the emergency response plan. CFP Critical facilities planning provides credit for coordination of flood warning and response activities with the operators of critical facilities, such as hospi tals, nursing homes, and hazardous materials storage sites. SRC StormReady community and TRC TsunamiReady community: These designations are made by the National Weather Service. No change in the credit criteria is proposed. Recertification: The community will need to provide after action reports evaluating plan implementation during each years response plan exercise or afte r a flood. The type of drill or exercise a community uses must be related to its flood hazard. A table top exercise, a full scale drill, or an actual event wher e the communitys emergency operati ons center is fully activated will meet this requirement.
PAGE 317
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 39 October 20, 2011 Activity 620 Levees Objective: Reduce the threat of a levee failure, but prepare for the flood if a failure does occur 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points LPL Level Protection Level 900 Dropped as the basis for credit Prerequisite: Levee built before 1991 and protects to the 25 100-year flood Removed, but the st ructure must meet FEMAs criteria for a levee Levee maintenance LM Levee maintenance 97 Emergency plan new LFR Levee failure recognition system 30 new LFW Levee failure warning 30 new LFO Levee failure operations plan 50 new LCF Levee failure critical facilities planning30 Max 900 237 Previously, this credit has only been provided for structures built before 1991 that are not recognized as 100-year levees on a Flood Insurance Rate Map. The points were based on the level of protection provided by the levee. All three of these prerequisites will be dropped. The credit points for a community with a 50-year levee will be the same as for a 200-year levee, because the credit will not be for the protection level it will be for maintaining the levee in good shape and preparing for the flood that will occur when the levee fails or is overtopped. There will be an outreach project prerequisite. It will not be a credited element in 620, but the project can receive credit under Activity 330 Outreach Projects. LM Levee maintenance: All levees will need to have an operations and maintenance plan and conduct and pass annual maintenance inspections. This will be a prerequisite for all the other credits, but it will also be worth points for non-accredited levees. Credit points are not available for accredited levees because maintenance is a minimum requirement for accreditation (but accredited levees are eligible for the rest of the activitys credits). LFR Levee failure recognition system: This is similar to 610s FTR Flood threat recognition system. It is for having a system to advise the emergency manager when a levee may be in danger of failure or overtopping. The system must be tested monthly with communication checks between the levee owner and the communitys emergency manager. This is required for the following credits. LFW Levee failure warning: This is similar to 610s EWD Emergency warning dissemination, credit for different ways to warn people threatened by a levee that may overtop or fail. LFO Levee failure operations plan: This is similar to 610s FRO flood response operations, specified steps to be taken at different flood leve ls. LFR and LFW are prerequisites. There must be annual exercises or drills of the plan. LCF Levee failure critical facilities planning: This is similar to 610s CFP critical facilities planning. There will be more credit for more detailed coordination with the facilities. A separate paper is available on how the new credits relate to the National Levee Safety Committees draft report to Congress.
PAGE 318
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 40 October 20, 2011 Activity 630 Dams Objective: Reduce the threat of a dam failure, but prepare for the flood if a failure does occur 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points SDS State Dam Safety Program Revised criteria new Condition Assessment (CA) 15 Regs of Construction of New Dams (CND) 15 Regs of Modifications to Existing Dams (MED) 15 Emergency Action Planning (EAP) 6 Emergency Action Pl anning (EAP) 15 Dam Owner Responsibility (DOR) 3 Public Information and Training (PIT) 6 Risk Communication/Public Awareness 15 Technical Staff (TSF) 24 Staff Education and Training (SET) 6 Total SDS 75 45 DFP Dam Failure Response Plan Dam failure recognition 25 DFR Dam failure recognition system 26 Dam failure warning dissemination 25 DFW Dam failure warning 26 Evacuation/critical facilitie s coord/notification 50 DFO Dam failure operations plan 35 new DCF Dam failure critical facilities planning26 Total DFP 100 113 Max 175 158 SDS State Dam Safety Program credit has provided the st ate programs score to all communities in a state. In 2012, SDS credit will be limited to communitie s downstream of a dam that could be flooded if the dam failed. It will be up to the community to obtain the dam failure inundation map(s) (or other documentation from the state dam safety office) needed to document this prerequisite. This will encourage community officials to determine if they face such a threat. The 2012 credit criteria for SDS will reflect FEMAs efforts to get state programs more involved in emergency planning for dam failures and to work more with communities and the public. There will be three parts to this credit, each worth up to 15 points for a maximum of 45 points: a. Condition Assessment (CA) (maximum credit: 15 points) New criteria b. Risk Communication/Public Awareness (RC/PA) (maximum credit: 15 points) More points for current criteria c. Emergency Action Planning (EAP) (maximum credit: 15) New criteria The one credit for local dam failure preparedness will be expanded into three elements that mirror the elements in 610 and 620.
PAGE 319
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 41 October 20, 2011 DFR Dam failure recognition system: This is similar to 610s FTR Flood threat recognition system. It is for having a system to advise the emergency manager when a dam may be in danger of failure. The system must be tested monthly with communica tion checks between the operator of the dam and the communitys emergency manager. DFW Dam failure warning: This is similar to 610s EWD Emergency warning dissemination credit for different ways to warn people threatened by a da m that may fail. There are two prerequisites: DFR and a targeted outreach projec t, credited in Activity 330. The project must be targeted to the residents in the affected area and must advise them of the dam failure threat, and warning, evacuation, and safety procedures. There is no extra credit for th is prerequisite in 630, but the outreach project can receive credit in 330. DFO Dam failure operations plan: This is similar to 610s FRO flood response operations, specified steps to be take n at different flood levels. DFR a nd DFW are prerequisites. There must be annual exercises or drills of the plan. DCF Dam failure critical facilities planning: This is similar to 610s CFP critical facilities planning. There will be more credit for more detailed coordination with the facilities.
PAGE 320
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 42 October 20, 2011 Special Hazard Credit The CRS provides credit for mapping, preserving open space, and regulating new development in areas subject to seven designa ted special flood-related hazards: 1. Uncertain flow paths: alluvial fans, moveabl e bed streams, and other floodplains where the channel moves during a flood. 2. Closed basin lakes: lakes that have a small or no outlet that may stay above flood stage for weeks, months, or years. 3. Ice jams: flooding caused when warm weather and rain break up a frozen river. The broken ice floats downriver until it is blocked by an obs truction, such as a bridge, creating a dam. 4. Land subsidence: lowering of the land surface caused by withdrawal of subsurface water or minerals or by compaction of organic soils. 5. Mudflow hazards: a river, flow, or inundation of liquid mud down a hillside, usually as a result of a dual condition of loss of brush cover and the subsequent accumulation of water on the ground, preceded by a period of unusually heavy or sustained rain. 6. Coastal erosion: areas subject to the wearing away of land masses caused primarily by waves on the oceans, Gulf of Mexico, and the Great Lakes. 7. Tsunamis: large ocean waves caused by an underwater earthquake or volcano. These special flood-related hazards are addressed in separate publications that discuss their credit points, impact adjustment, and documentation requirements. They will be available after the 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual is completed. The following changes to the credit criteria are planned: 1. Alluvial fans and ice jams: 410 MAPSH credit will be provided for mapping alluvial fans and areas subject to ice jams. Because there are mapping criter ia for these two hazards in FEMAs Guidelines and Specification fo r Flood Hazard Mapping Partners, the policy had been to treat mapping them as a minimum requi rement of the NFIP. However, few, if any regular Flood Insurance Studies have mapped these hazards. 2. Coastal erosion: a. Include setbacks as eligible for ope n space preservation credit (420 SHOS) b. Expand the open space preservation credit ( 420 SHOS) to include all of the lands within the erosion setback area and the coasta l VE and AE zone areas, not just areas forward of the frontal dune. c. Increase the maximum credit for coastal hazards open space (420 SHOS). d. Increase the credit for prohibiting hardened structures (430 SHR). 3. Tsunami: To receive any credit, a community must map and regulate the area affected by the special hazard. It is very difficult to regu late new construction for a tsunami hazard that may exceed the base flood elevation by 10 or more feet. Therefore, an a lternative prerequisite for tsunamis will be that the community map the hazard and have an appropriate tsunami warning and response program.
PAGE 321
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 43 October 20, 2011 Appendices The 2007 CRS Coordinators Manual has nine appendices, an Index, and the Activity Worksheets. Appendices A, G, and H will be eliminated because this information can be better kept up to date and made available more widely on a website. Appendix C will be eliminated. This is a half page table that related points to classe s and premium reductions. It was originally included as an appendix because it was thought that it might change. It has not changed in 15 years. It will be moved to the introductor y section of the Manual Appendix F will be eliminated because it is not needed any more. There have been no reports of anyone using it and the For More Information sections of each activity will have a list of relevant assistance agencies and links to their websites. Appendix I will be eliminated because of the move to a less formal Quick Check approach that will replace the formal appli cation procedures. Appli cation prequisites will still be covered in Sections 212 and 213. Most of the activity worksheet s will be eliminated as a se parate publicatio n. Well still keep those that a community needs to complete such as the verification cover sheet that needs the CEOs signature and the 450 Stormwater Management and 610 Flood Warning and Response worksheets needed for the technical reviewers. The ISO Calculation Software will still be made avai lable to communities, which is an automated version of the worksheets, but there is no requirement that a community fill them out. These changes will leave us with three a ppendices acronyms, comparison with NFIP regulations, and CRS publications and the Index. The acronyms will be changed substantially. These changes are shown here. Section Acronym Description B-1 XXX element acronym or variable number 110 CRS Community Rating System 111 NFIP National Flood Insurance Program 113 FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency 113 FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map 113 ISO The Insurance Services Office 130 BFE base flood elevation 130 CEO Chief Executive Officer of a community 130 NAVD North American Vertical Datum 130 NGVD National Geodetic Vertical Datum 130 SFHA Special Flood Hazard Area 210 AW-nnn activity worksheet number nnn 211 BCEGS Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule 211 LiMWA limit of moderate wave action 2007 Manua l Appendices App A FEMA Regional Offices App B Acronyms App C Classification Points App D Comparison with NFIP Regs App E CRS Publications App F Assistance Agencies App G ISO/CRS Specialists App H State Coordinators App I Application Procedures Index Activity Worksheets
PAGE 322
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 44 October 20, 2011 Section Acronym Description 220 rXXX ratio of the buildings or area affected by XXX 222 XXXn element number n, e.g., OPAn = OPA1, OPA2, and OPA3 223 cXXX credit points for element or activity XXX 302 bXXX number of buildings affected by element XXX 303 bSF number of buildings in the SFHA 310 CFR Code of Federal Regulations (in the Federal Register) 311 EC maintaining FEMA elevation certificates 311 ECCF maintaining elevation certificates in computer format 311 ECPO maintaining post-FI RM elevation certificates 311 ECPR maintaining pre-FIRM elevation certificates 311 ECWS posting elevation certificate data on a website 311 ORS off-site records storage 312 bPO number of post-FIRM buildings in the SFHA 312 bPR number of pre-FIRM buildings in the SFHA 320 CBRA Coastal Barrier Resources Act 321 LOMA Letter of Map Amendment 321 LOMR Letter of Map Revision 321 MI providing map information and FIRM data 330 PFI promotion of flood insurance 331 ACT actions resulting from outreach projects 331 FRP flood response preparations 331 OP outreach projects 331 OPA additional outreach projects 331 OPC outreach project to the entire community 331 OPF outreach project to floodplain residents 331 OPS outreach project based on a strategy 331 PPI Program for Public Information 331 STK stakeholder implementation 340 MLS Multiple Listing Service 341 DFH disclosure of the flood hazard by real estate agents 341 DOH disclosure of other hazards, such as subsidence 341 ODR other disclosure requirements 341 REB real estate agent brochure (explains flood hazards) 351 LIB flood protection library 351 LPD locally pertinent documents for a library 351 URL universal resource locator 351 WEB flood protection website 361 FAA financial assistance advice 361 FPA flood protection assistance 361 PPA property protection advice 361 PPV flood protection site visit 361 TNG training credit 364 EMI FEMAs Emergency Management Institute 371 CI coverage improvement 371 CP coverage improvement plan 371 FIA assessment of flood insurance coverage 371 PI plan implementation 371 SMT state-mandated agent training 371 TA technical assistance 401 SH special flood-related hazard 402 aRF area of the regulatory floodplain 402 aSFHA area of the Special Flood Hazard Area 402 aXXX area affected by element XXX 411 AFD additional flood data 411 AFE advisory flood elevations 411 CTP Cooperating Technical Partner 411 DAYS the number of days before adoptio n of advisory flood elevations 411 FWS more restrictive floodway standard
PAGE 323
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 45 October 20, 2011 Section Acronym Description 411 HSS higher study standard 411 LEV leverage 411 MAP mapping credit (replaces AFD, the sum of all 410 elements) 411 NS new flood study 411 SR state review of a new flood study 421 DR deed restrictions placed on open space properties 421 LZ low density zoning 421 LZs zoning: s = maximum minimum number of acres per building 421 NB open space with natural and beneficial functions 421 NFOS natural functions open space 421 NSP natural Shoreline Protection 421 OS floodplain lands preserved as open space 421 OSI open space incentives 421 OSP open space preservation 430 SHR special hazard regulations 431 ASFPM Association of State Floodplain Managers 431 BC building code 431 CAZ coastal A zone regulations 431 CFM Certified Floodplain Manager 431 CSI cumulative substantial improvement regulations 431 DL development limitations 431 ENL regulations limiting enclosures below elevated floors 431 FB feet of freeboard above t he base flood elevation 431 FDN foundation protection regulations 431 FRB floodplain regulations that require freeboard 431 ICC increased cost of compliance 431 LDP local drainage protection 431 LSI lower substantial improvement threshold 431 MHP manufactured home park regulations 431 NBR regulations to protect natural and beneficial functions 431 OHS other higher regulatory standards 431 PCF regulations that protect critical facilities 431 PSC regulations that protect floodplain storage capacity 431 RA regulations administration 431 SFIP Standard Flood Insurance Policy 431 SMS state-mandated regulatory standards 431LD LDC land development criteria 441 AMD additional map data 441 aRFM area of the regulatory floodplain measured in square miles 441 BMM benchmark maintenance 441 CAD computer aided design (computer program) 441 EDM erosion data maintenance 441 FHBM Flood Hazard Boundary Map 441 FM FIRM maintenance 441 GIS geographic information system 441 NGS National Geodetic Survey 441 NSRS National Spatial Reference System 441 YCM number of years between checks of reference marks 451 BMP best management practices (for stormwater quality) 451 DS design storms used in st ormwater management regulations 451 ESC erosion and sedimentation control regulations 451 FRX freeboard for new buildings in B, C, D, and X Zones 451 LID low impact development 451 PUB stormwater facilities subject to public maintenance 451 SMR stormwater management regulations 451 SZ size of development subject to stormwater management 451 WMP watershed master plan 451 WQ stormwater management regulations for water quality
PAGE 324
2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual Changes 46 October 20, 2011 Section Acronym Description 452 aW area of a communitys watersheds 510 FMA Flood Mitigation Assistance program 510 HMGP Hazard Mitigation Grant Program 511 FMP floodplain management planning 511 HCP Habitat Conservation Plan 511 NFP natural floodplain functions plan 521 AR acquisition or relocation of floodprone buildings 521 bAR number of buildings acquired or relocated, or otherwise removed 521 bRL number of buildings on the repetitive loss lis t acquired or relocated, or otherwise removed 521 bSRL number of Severe Repetitive Loss Properti es acquired, relocated, or otherwise removed 531 FPB flood protection level before the project was constructed 531 FPI flood protection improvement 531 FPP flood protection provided by the project 531 PB protected buildings 531 PBi protection credit for building i 531 TUi technique used to protect building i 541 CDR channel and basin debris removal 541 CIP capital improvements plan 541 EPM coastal erosion protection maintenance 541 PSM problem site maintenance 541 SBM storage basin maintenance 541 SDR stream dumping regulations 542 aDC area of the developed portion of the community 611 CFP critical facilities planning 611 EWD emergency warning dissemination 611 FRO flood response operations 611 FTR flood threat recognition system 611 ORE Other flood response efforts 611 SRC StormReady community 611 TRC TsunamiReady community 621 LCF levee failure critical facilities planning 621 LFO levee failure operations plan 621 LFR levee failure recognition system 621 LFW levee failure warning 621 LM levee maintenance 621 LOP levee outreach project 621 LP levee protection 621 LPL levee protection level 630 ASDSO Association of State Dam Safety Officials 631 DF Dam failure critical facilities planning 631 DFO dam failure operations plan 631 DFP dam failure emergency action response plan 631 DFR dam failure recognition system 631 DFW dam failure warning 631 EAP dam failure emergency action plan 631 NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 631 SDS state dam safety program 635 NID National Inventory of Dams 710 AGR average growth rate 711 CGA community growth adjustment 711 CMGR community-supplied growth rate 711 USGR U.S. Census growth rate 720 cT communitys total CRS credit points
PAGE 325
Appendix L Proposed Changes to CRSActivity 330
PAGE 326
` Proposed Changes to CRS Activity 330 Outreach Projects October 20, 2011 Notes: 1. All items listed in this document are proposed revisions for the 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual 2. Comments on these proposals are welcome Please submit them via the Outreach and Feedback page on www.CRS2012.org.
PAGE 327
Changes to Activity 330 October 20, 2011 Proposed Changes to CRS Activity 330 Contents Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 Highlights of the Proposed Changes ....................................................................1 Credited Elements ................................................................................................2 Messages and Projects .............................................................................................3 Messages ..............................................................................................................3 Projects .................................................................................................................4 Basic Scoring ........................................................................................................6 Bonus Credits ...........................................................................................................8 PPI Program for Public Information .................................................................8 STK Stakeholder Delivery ................................................................................9 PPI and STK Scoring Example ..........................................................................11 ACT Action results .........................................................................................11 Comparison to 2007 CRS Scoring .....................................................................13 FRP Flood Response Preparations ......................................................................14 Example FRP ......................................................................................................14 Developing a Program for Public Information ......................................................16 1. The PPI Committee ........................................................................................16 2. Needs Assessment ..........................................................................................18 3. Messages ........................................................................................................20 4. Projects ...........................................................................................................21 5. Coordination ...................................................................................................21 6. The PPI Document .........................................................................................22 7. Monitoring and Evaluation .............................................................................23
PAGE 328
Changes to Activity 330 1 October 18, 2011 Introduction The proposed changes for Activity 330 Outreach Projects are based on input from communities, NFIP stakeholders, behavioral science research, evaluations, recommendati ons from the CRS Task Force 330 evaluation committee, interviews wi th local CRS Coordinators, and other sources of information. Based on this feedback, the elements in 330 were redesigned to provide more flexibility to localities, enco urage better public information, and recognize communities that engage in more thorough, critical thinking about their public information need swhat they want people in their communities to know and do with regard to fl oodplain resources and the identified flood hazards. One key to doing a good job is for a community to have its own, home-grown plan and program for public information. Along these lines, CRS co mmunities have indicated that they would prefer more flexibility in wh at kinds of public informati on efforts they undertake. Highlights of the Proposed Changes Credit is more dependent on repeating a message via different types of outreach projects. Communities are credited for innovative approa ches and are no longer constrained by a prescriptive list of how much must be covered under each topic. The former elements OPC (outreach projects to the community), OPF (outreach projects to floodplain properties), and OPA (additional outreach projects) have been combined into a new element, OP (outreach projects) to emphasize the importance of tailoring the information provided to the topic, to the audi ence, and to the desired behavioral change. The former element OPS (outreach projects pursuant to a public information strategy) has been expanded to a new element, Program for Public Information (PPI), which is developed according to guideli nes discussed on page 16. Proj ects carried out pursuant to the communitys Program for Public Information (PPI) receive more points under Activity 330 and under several others in the 300 series of public in formation activities. Having a PPI (Program for Public Information) also makes the community eligible for bonus points for outreach messages that involve other stakeholders (STK) and for instances in which the community can show that its messages have been effective and have achieved results (ACT). A new element, Flood Response Preparations (FRP ) is introduced. It provides credit for communities that design and prepare public information projects to be implemented when the next flood occurs. Promotion of Flood Insurance (PFI) was moved to a new Activity 370 Flood Insurance Promotion. However, at least one Activity 330 project must include a message promoting flood insurance. Objective of Activity 330 Provide information needed to increase awareness and motivate actions to o Reduce flood damage, o Encourage flood insurance coverage, and o Protect the natural functions of floodplains.
PAGE 329
Changes to Activity 330 2 October 18, 2011 Credited Elements Table 1 summarizes the changes for Activity 330 and introduces the proposed elements to be credited. This table is based on a total of 350 points for Activity 330. Table 1. Credited Elements 2007 Manual Max Points 2012 Manual Max Points OPA Additional Outreach Projects OPC Outreach Projects to Community OPF Projects to Floodplain properties 250 OP Outreach Projects 175 OPS Public information Program Strategy125 PPI (OP) Program for Public Information 55 new STK Stakeholder delivery 40 new ACT Action resulting from outreach 60 new FRP Flood response preparations 50 new PPI(FRP) Program for Public Information 20 PFI promotion of flood insurance 65 Moved to new Activity 370 Max 380 350* *Note that the points could add up to more than 350, but the credit for OP is capped at 175 point s and the total credit is capped at 350 points. As seen in Table 1, it is proposed that the 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual have two main elements: OP Outreach projects, with a maximum of 175 points (and eligible for bonus points if the community has a Program for Public Information that identifies the communitys outreach projects), and FRP Flood response preparations, with a maximum of 50 points (and eligible for bonus points if the community has a Program for Public Information). There are three bonus point elements. 1. Bonus points are available for a PPI Program for Public Information. The points for OP and FRP can be increased if the community prepares and adopts a Program for Public Information. All projects implemented pursuan t to the PPI can receive a 40% bonus. This applies to both OP and FRP projects. Two additional types of bonus points ar e available only for OP projects: 2. Projects that are recommended by the PPI and implemented by an agency or organization other than the CRS communit y, can receive a 30% bonus. This is under the new element STK Stakeholder delivery For example, a CRS city can receive the STK bonus for messages that are delivered by a utility comp any, a homeowners asso ciation, or the county emergency manager. 3. Messages that can be shown to result in the desired actions id entified in the PPI can receive the ACT Action results bonus (45%). This is explaine d in more detail on page 11.
PAGE 330
Changes to Activity 330 3 October 18, 2011 Messages and Projects Credit for Activity 330 is based on the number of tim es an outreach message is repeated and on the types of projects that convey the message. Messages Messages are the heart of outreach projects. Messag es are specific statements that the community considers important for its audiences. For commu nities without a PPI, Activity 330 only credits messages that relate to the six priority CRS topics. Communities with a PPI can add up to four more flood-related topics customized to loca l conditions. The six priority CRS topics and example messages appear in Table 2. Table 2. Topics and Example Messages Topic Example Messages 1. Know your flood hazard Your property is subject to flooding You are in a repetitively flooded area Floods kill: five people died in the 2002 flood 2. Insure your property for your flood hazard Note: at least one project must include a message from this topic All residents in the SFHA should have flood insurance Renters should buy flood insurance for their contents Take advantage of a low-cost Preferred Risk Policy 3. Protect people from the hazard Turn around, dont drown Know the flood warning signals Designate a place where your family can rendezvous after an evacuation order is issued 4. Protect your property from the hazard Replace your flooded furnace with one elevated above the flood level Keep debris and trash out of the streams and ditches We can help you get a grant to elevate your home 5. Build responsibly Get a permit before you build Know the substantial damage rules (and the ICC benefits) All projects should be at least 10 feet from the property line so you dont alter the drainage between homes 6. Protect natural floodplain functions Dont dump in the storm drains, they drain to the bay Protect our turtle nesting areas Preserve our wetlands they clean the water and protect us from flooding Additional PPI topics (examples) 7. Hurricane preparedness Know your evacuation route 8. General preparedness Inventory and photograph your hom es contents and put important papers and insurance policies in a safe place 9. Basement flooding Check your downspout drain away from the house 10. Flood education School children should learn about flooding as part of their science or geography classes Example topics 7 and 8 could also be listed under CRS topic 3 -Protect people from the hazard. By listing them as separate topics in its PPI, the community can receive credit for covering three different topics in each project. Similarly, example topic 9 could be covered un der CRS topic 4. All four additional topics need to be explained in the Program for Public Information.
PAGE 331
Changes to Activity 330 4 October 18, 2011 Projects A project disseminates a message. Certain projects are more eff ective at motivating change, so they are worth more points. For scoring pur poses, there are three types of projects. 1. Informational materials (worth 1 point per message), such as brochures, flyers, and similar documents that are made available upon request or are placed in a static location, such as a city hall lobby. Because they do not r each out to the public, they receive only one point per message. Examples: The building department has one-page handout s on permit requirements and substantial improvement/substantial damage which are available to people who come in to the permit office. The department also has a brochure prepared by FEMA on flood insurance. There are no extra points for putting the same document out on display in different locations. However, more points are available if the document is delivered to an identified audience via one of the next two types of projects. 2. General outreach projects (w orth 2 points per message), such as newspaper articles, signs, and presentations that reach out an id entified general audience. Since they do reach out to the public, they recei ve two points per message. Examples: The regional newspaper has a flood preparedness supplement at the beginning of flood season. A city employee gives a talk about floodplain cons truction rules to the annual meeting of the local homebuilders association. The handout on permit requirements is passed out. 3. Targeted outreach projects (worth 6 points per message) that are directed to a specific audience. Research has shown these to be the most effective way to reach people, provided they address the audience and focus on the audiences concerns. They receive six points per message. To qualify for this type of pr oject, there must be an identified target audience. If a community does not have a PPI, the only target audiences recognized for credit are (1) floodplain residents and businesses, and (2) repe titive loss area residents and businesses. A PPI can identify additional target audiences. These can be people in a specific geographical area (e.g., floodplain or repetiti ve loss area residents, downtown businesses, etc.) or a functional group (e.g., insurance ag ents, building contractors, dr ivers, etc.). For credit, communities must demonstrate that the targeted outreach projects reach at least 90% of the targeted audience and the message must clearly explain that the recipi ent is receiving the message because he/she is part of the targeted audience. Examples: The mayor sends a letter to all residents of the floodplain. (This is called an outreach project to floodplain properties (OPF) under the 2007 CRS Coordinators Manual .) A presentation is made to a neighborhood meeting attended by 90% of the repetitive loss areas residents.
PAGE 332
Changes to Activity 330 5 October 18, 2011 Examples of Outreach Projects Informational Materials (1 point per message): brochures, flyers, and similar documents that are made available upon request or are placed on display for people to take. These passive approaches are not sent out or disseminated to identified audiences. Examples include, but are not limited to: A brochure or flyer made available in public places Multiple-page booklet made available in public places General Outreach (2 points per message): materials that are disseminated to people who did not ask for them, presentations made to groups, and similar activi ties that reach out to people. Examples include, but are not limited to: Newspaper supplements and articles Newsletter articles Utility bill stuffers Radio and television ads or public service announcements Staffed booth or display at public functions, shopping malls, etc. Flyers or booklets distributed throughout residential neighborhoods or given to visitors to a booth Billboards Letters, newsletters, or e-mail messages sent to subscribers Presentations to homeowners, ci vic, and business associations Short statements posted outdoors, such as no dumping, drains to the river and high water mark signs Local television shows Cable television news tickers or crawlers that display a message at the bottom of the screen Programs for school children Training for citizens, such as CERT teams and weather spotters Targeted Outreach (6 points per message): materials that are delivered to at least 90% of a target audience. The project must clearly explain that the recipients property is subject to flooding or otherwise explain why the recipient is getting the notice. This is similar to the current requirement for OPF and repetitive loss outreach projects. These differ from gener al outreach projects in that almost everyone in an identified audience is expected to be reached and t he message is tailored to that audience. Examples include, but are not limited to: Mailer or e-mail sent to all properties in the floodplain (OPF) Mailer or e-mail sent to all properties in a target area designated in a PPI (e.g. all downtown business owners or residents behind a levee) A presentation to all drivers education classes where the designated target audience is students learning to drive, as explained in a PPI If a community does not have a PPI, the only targeted audiences that can be credited are the properties in the floodplain and the properties in repetitive loss areas, identified in accordance with Section 503 of the Coordinators Manual To receive credit for a project targeted to any other audience, such as downtown businesses or drivers edu cation students, the community must have a PPI that identifies both the target audience and the project.. Notes: Providing information from a FIRM or other flood hazard map is credited in Activity 320. Real estate disclosure projects are credited in Activity 340. Use of a website or library is credited in Activity 350. One-on-one discussion and advice is credited in Activity 360. Additional credit for projects that promote flood insurance are credited in Activity 370.
PAGE 333
Changes to Activity 330 6 October 18, 2011 Training or projects direct ed at local government staff, elected officials, or members of advisory bodies do not qualify as outreac h projects under this activity. Audiences: Note that messages are directed at audi ences and should be ta ilored accordingly. Targeted outreach projects must address the target audience. For example, if there are a lot of non-English speakers in the audience, the message needs to be in the appropriate language. Messages and projects may be directed at audi ences outside the community, provided they have a direct relationship to flooding in the community and the message explains why the recipient is being targeted. Examples: Messages to contractors or insurance agents that serve th e metropolitan area, Advice to people upstream of the community to not dump waste in streams, or Projects distributed through the only home improvement stores in the county. Note that each community on a multi-jurisdictional PPI committee will be scored separately, based on the messages and projects that aff ect that community. Multi-jurisdictional PPI committees are further explained on page 17. Basic Scoring Researchers have found that the messages that are most effective in changing behavior are those that are repeated numerous times, sent through various means, and distributed from various sources. The 330 scoring system builds on this fi nding. As noted earlier, the score for Activity 330 is based on the types of projects and the number of times a message is repeated. Here are the basic scoring criteria: The same message can (and should) be c onveyed via different projects and multiple methods. Only projects with messages tied to the six CRS priority topics (or th e six topics plus the four determined by a PPI) are scored. The co mmunity may have to demonstrate to the CRS reviewer how a message is related to an approved topic. At least one project must convey a me ssage that promotes flood insurance. Each project provides 1, 2, or 6 points for each message that is conveyed. A project can have up to six messages, one under each topic. If the community identifies four additional topics in its PPI, a project can be scored for up to 10 messages, one under each topic. Separate projects can disseminate different messages under the same topic. For example, one project could promote Turn around, dont drown, and another project could explain the flood warning signals. Each different pr oject would count toward disseminating a message under topic 3, Protect people from the hazard. With or without a PPI, a single project can only convey one message per topic. For example, a booklet for floodplain property owne rs will get credit for covering the topic of protecting people. It will not get credit for multiple messages by parsing the topic into smaller pieces, such as safety in cars, ev acuation routes, warning signals, etc. If the community has a PPI that identif ies safety in cars as a 7t h topic deserving dissemination,
PAGE 334
Changes to Activity 330 7 October 18, 2011 it could get credit for messages under two separate topics: CRS topic 3 protecting people, and PPI topic 7 safety in cars. Informational materials are counted as c onveying their messages only once each year. For example, messages in a brochure that sits in City Hall for people to pick up as they pass by are counted as being delivered once each year. To be considered as disseminating a message more than once each year, a general outreach project must either (1) use di fferent media or (2) involve two-way communication with the same audience. Examples: Having the same message in newspaper articl es, posted on billboards, and included in utility bills is counted as delivering the me ssage three times each year. Each of these projects uses different media. Making presentations each year to two differe nt associations or groups (using the same messages) is counted as delivering the me ssages once to each audience. Looked at another way, each presentation would be counted as a separate project because it involves two-way communication. Posting the same message on ten different signs around town is considered as disseminating the message once because the same medium is used and it does not involve two-way communication. Repeating the same message on a cable TV crawler several times each week is considered as disseminating the message once because the same medium is used and it does not involve two-way communication. Targeted outreach projects that are repeated to 90% of the identified audience (e.g., more than one mailing to the same people each year) are counted as separate projects. Examples: Making two presentations each year to the residents of the communitys repetitive loss areas is counted as the same project delivering the messages twice. Including the same messages in one presentation to the residents of the repetitive loss areas and in a mailing to the residents of the repetitive loss areas is counted as delivering the messages twice. Scoring is based on the types of projects and the number of times messages are delivered, as shown in the examples in Table 3. This is a project targeted to floodplain residents. It clearly states that the recipientis in a floodprone area.
PAGE 335
Changes to Activity 330 8 October 18, 2011 Table 3. Basic Scoring Example Projects (no PPI) Example Outreach Projects (OP) A Points per Message B # of Floodrelated Topics C Times Delivered Score (A x B x C) OP 1. Brochure on flood insurance produced by FEMA, which is set out in various public places (informational material1 point per message) 1 1 1 1 OP 2. Local insurance agents have agreed to advise their clients that flood insurance is a good idea and give them the OP 1 brochure (general outreach2 points per message) 2 1 1 2 OP 3. Presentations to five neighborhood associations with messages under CRS topics 1, 2, 4 and 5 (general outreach points per message). The OP 1 brochure is handed out to everyone present. 2 4 5 40 OP 4. The neighborhood association presentation is taped and repeated twice a month on t he public service cable TV channel (general outreach2 points per message). This does not involve two-way communication, so it is counted as being delivered once a year. 2 4 1 8 OP 5. A mailing is sent each year to all residents of the SFHA (targeted outreach). It has messages under the first five CRS topics. (targeted outreach points per message) 6 5 1 30 OP 6. Do not dump stencils are sprayed next to storm drain inlets (general outreach points per message) 2 1 1 2 OP 7. The floodplain manager meets twice a year with the home builders association to discuss construction regulations and ways to incorporate flood mitigation into home improvement projects (general outreach2 points per message, CRS topics 4 and 5). 2 2 2 8 Total 91 * There is a maximum credit of 175 points for projects without a PPI (see Table 1). Bonus Credits There are three elements that provide additional cr edit to the outreach pr oject scores. All three are provided only if the community prepares a nd adopts a Program for Public Information. The process for preparing a PPI is described starting on page 16. PPI Program for Public Information To receive the bonus credit (an additional 40% of the projects score), the messages and the projects must be described in the PPI. Messages: The PPI must identify the messages that are important to the community and the audience that should be reached. For each message, there must be a measurable desired outcome. Examples are shown in Table 4. The PPI can identify up to four new topics, provi ded they are related to the goals of the CRS. Safety messages for tornadoes (e.g., go to the basement) would not qualify, but messages that apply to both floods and other hazards (e.g., develop a family disaster plan) would qualify.
PAGE 336
Changes to Activity 330 9 October 18, 2011 Some outcomes can be objectively measured. For example, insurance policy information is sent to each CRS community once each year and can be used as a baseline and to measure improvement. Other outcomes are not as easy to measure. Topic 7 in Table 4 was added by the PPI committee and is a good example of this. The PPI committee needs to determine how to measure progress toward every desired outcome, keeping in mind that some outcomes may not lend themselves to numerical measurement. Projects: After the PPI committee determines the audiences and the messages to be disseminated, it identifies what projects best do the job. For the PPI bonus, each project needs to be described, along with who will do it and when. Examples are shown in Table 5. There is no limit to the number of projects a co mmunity can undertake, bu t there is a limit of 175 points for the projects scores (OP), before the bonus points. STK Stakeholder Delivery If a project is implemented by st akeholders, it receives more point s via the STK bonus. (an additional 30% of the projects score). A stak eholder can be any agency, organiza tion, or person (other than the community itself) that is actively involved in getting the message out to the audience. Examples of stakeholders include FEMA, when a FEMA brochure is used as an informational material (as in the OP 1 example in the tables); An insurance company that published a broc hure on flood insurance (with the companys name on the brochure), even if it is set out at City Hall; A local newspaper that publishes a flood or hurricane season supplement each year; Table 4. Example PPI Messages and their Desired Outcomes Example Message Example Desired Message Outcome Topic 1. Know your flood hazard Message 1. Is your house in the floodplain? Increase in the number of map information inquiries (tracked in Activity 320) Topic 2. Insure your property for your flood hazard Message 2. All residents in floodprone areas should have flood insurance The total number of SFHA policies increases Topic 3. Protect people from the hazard Message 3. Turn around, dont drown There are fewer reports of water rescues and police ticketing drivers who ignore barricades Topic 4. Protect your property from the hazard Message 4.a. Dont dump in our streams and ditches Message 4.b. You can protect your house from flood damage a. Drainage system inspectors report a decrease in the amount of trash removed b. Increase in the number of home improvement permits that include flood mitigation features Topic 5. Build responsibly Message 5. Floodplain filling needs a permit The number of citations for filling without a permit is reduced Topic 6. Protect natural floodplain functions Message 6. Dont dump in the storm drains, they drain to the bay Water quality is improved as measured by the Surface Water Management Office PPI Message 7. Know your evacuation route and have a family rendezvous point More families have prepared evacuation plans
PAGE 337
Changes to Activity 330 10 October 18, 2011 A local newspaper that publishes articles and editorials (but advertisements paid for by the community do not qualify for STK credit, unless other sponsors or supporters are listed); A neighborhood or civi c association that sponsors and hosts a presentation by a community employee (as in the OP 3 example in the tables;) Schools that implement outreach activities; and A utility company that runs pertinent articles in its newsletter. Other examples are listed in Table 5. The stakeholder does not have to be on the PPI committee, nor does the stakeholder have to write or prepare the project for the project to receive the STK bonus. What counts is that it is clear that the message is coming from someone other than the community or is sponsored or supported by the st akeholder. Therefore, stencils on city storm drains appear to come from the city, even if the stencils were applied by a volunteer organization. If the organizations name were in the message, then it would qualify for STK credit. Note that STK is only available if the community has a PPI Program for Public Information. Table 5. Example PPI Projects Project (Table 3) Messages (Table 4) Assignment Schedule Stakeholder OP 1. FEMAs brochure on flood insurance Msg 2 Floodplain manager Printed and displayed by February 28 FEMA OP 2. Local insurance agents advise their clients Msg 2 Insurance agency representative on the PPI committee Explain at the March insurance association meeting Insurance agencies OP 3. Presentations to five neighborhood associations Messages 1, 2, 4.a, 5, 7 Floodplain manager Set up the five presentations by January 31 Neighborhood associations OP 4. Presentation on cable TV Messages 1, 2, 4.a, 5, 7 Floodplain manager and public information officer Tape the first two presentations and use the best scenes Cable TV company OP 5. Mailing sent each year to residents of the SFHA Messages 1, 2, 3, 4.b, 5 Floodplain manager and public information officer Disseminate in May, before hurricane season OP 6. Stencils on storm drains Msg 6 Director of Public Works Use summer help and complete by August 31 OP 7. Meetings with home builders association Messages 4.b and 5 Floodplain manager Before and after construction season This handbook clearly shows three sponsoring organizations (see red arrows) and would receive STK credit
PAGE 338
Changes to Activity 330 11 October 18, 2011 PPI and STK Scoring Example Table 6 shows how the eight projects listed in Tabl e 5 would score if they were all developed as part of the PPI Program for Public Information with st akeholder support. See the notes, below, for explanations of how the sc oring changed from Table 3. Table 6. PPI and STK Scoring Examples Project A Points per Message B # of Floodrelated Topics C Times Delivered OP Score (A x B x C) PPI 40% STK 30% Total (OP + PPI + STK) OP 1. FEMAs brochure on flood insurance 1 1 1 1 0.40 0.30 1.70 OP 2. Local insurance agents advise their clients 2 1 1 2 0.80 0.60 3.40 OP 3. Presentations to five neighborhood associations 2 5 a 5 50 20.00 15.00 85.00 OP 4. The neighborhood association presentation on cable TV 2 5 a 1 10 4.00 3.00 17.00 OP 5. Mailing sent each year to residents of the SFHA 6 6 a 1 36 14.4 50.4 OP 6. Stencils on storm drains 2 1 1 2 0.80 2.80 OP 7. Meetings with home builders association. 6b 2 2 24 9.60 33.60 Total 125 50.00 18.90 193.90 Notes to Table 6. a. When the PPI added a 7th message, projects 3, 4, and 5 receive more points than shown in Table 3. b. The PPI also identified building cont ractors as a target audience, so the semi-annual meetings in OP 7 are now considered targeted outreach projects. This is not a simp le change of numbers. To continue to receive this higher credit, the PPI committee must track progress towards t he desired outcomes and evaluate and revise the project each year as needed. ACT Action results If the projects are successful in getting people to change their ways (e.g., more people have insurance, there are fewer water rescues for peopl e driving in flooded street s, or there are fewer citations of people build ing without a permit), then the cred it for the messages is increased by 45% by the ACT Action results bonus. For each message, the PPI must list a desired outcome. This is explained on page 20, and examples are provided in Table 4 on page 9. Th e PPI committee must review the implementation of each project every year. It should also check to see how we ll the messages are getting across by seeing whether the outcomes are being met. If they are, ACT credit can be provided. ACT credit is a 45% bonus added to the credit for every message that showed progress. Note that this adjusts the credit for the message s, not the projects. If a project conveys three messages, but only one message shows progress, the bonus will be limited to the points for that message.
PAGE 339
Changes to Activity 330 12 October 18, 2011 Scoring example: After two years, the PPI committee documented progress on two messages: Message 2: All residents in the SFHA should ha ve flood insurance. There was an increase in the number of flood insurance policies on existing build ings (it was not due to new construction or a new FIRM showing a larger SFHA). This message was disseminated via projects OP 1, OP 2, OP 5, and OP 7. Message 4.a: Dont dump in our streams and di tches. The drainage maintenance crews report that instead of the usual five truckloads of debris removed during an average year, only three truckloads of debris were removed since the projects were implemented. Message 4 was disseminated by projects OP 3 and OP 4. Table 6 follows the format of Table 3, but adds the bonus point for PPI and STK. Table 7 adds the bonus for ACT. This can be confusing because ACT is a bonus for the messages, not the projects. Since the scores are based on the projects and the messages, a spreadsheet (Table 7) can show the scoring (project s in rows, messages in columns) and calculate the credit points. Instead of just 91 OP points for the seven projects, the community receives 208.75 points for the projects because of the additional credit for the PPI (and credit for the additional topics), stakeholder delivery (STK), and progress toward the messages desired outcomes (ACT). Table 7. ACT Scoring Examples Msg 1Msg 2Msg 3M 4.aM 4.bMsg 5Msg 6Msg 7Msg 8Msg 9PPI?PPISTK?STK OP 1 Insurance brochure 1 1 1y0.40y0.30 OP 2 Insurance agents 2 1 2y0.80y0.60 O P 3 P r e s e n t a t i o n s2555555 0y2 0 0 0y1 5 0 0 O P 4 C a b l e T V2111111 0y4 0 0y3 0 0 OP 5Mailing to SFHA6111 11 1 36y14.40 0.00 OP 6Storm drain stencils2 1 2y0.80 0.00 OP 7Home builders meeting s 6 22 24y9.60 0.00 OP 8 00 0 00 0 0 OP 9 00 0 00 0 0 OP 10 00 0 00 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 Messages 00 0 00 0 0 Msg 1 Is your house in the floodplain? 00 0 00 0 0 Msg 2 All residents in the SFHA should have flood insurance 00 0 00 0 0 Msg 3 Turn around, dont drown 00 0 00 0 0 M 4.a Dont dump in our streams and ditches 00 0 00 0 0 M 4.b Protect your house from flooding 00 0 00 0 0 Msg 5 Floodplain filling needs a permit 00 0 00 0 0 Msg 6 Dont dump in the storm drains, they drain to the bay 00 0 00 0 0 Msg 7 Know your evacuation route and have a family rendezvous point 00 0 00 0 0 OP =125PPI = 50.00STK =18.90 ACT? y y ACT message points 021012 000000ACT bonus0.009.450.005.400.000.000.000.000.000.00ACT = 14.85c330 = OP125 + PPI50.00 + STK18.90 + ACT14.85 = 208.75 Outreach Project WorksheetOutreach Projects Project Points Number of times message is repeated OP Multipliers
PAGE 340
Changes to Activity 330 13 October 18, 2011 Comparison to 2007 CRS Scoring The proposed changes are based on two objectives: 1. Give more points to projects that ar e shown to be more effective, and 2. Give flexibility to communities who strive to find creative and innovative ways to implement public outreach projects. The ne w approach is far less prescriptive than previous approaches, but it requires communities to engage in a planning process in order to achieve the same number of points as before. Communities that do not develop a Public Inform ation Plan (PPI) and continue to implement OPA, OPF, and OPC projects as before (under the 2007 Manual ) will receive considerably fewer points under the proposed scoring system. A community could implement more projects to increase its score under the new system, but the score will be capped at 175 points if there is no PPI. It is impossible to automatica lly convert a communitys outreach projects scored under the 2007 CRS Coordinators Manual directly to the proposed system. The ISO/CRS Specialist or the communitys CRS Coordinator can do this manually. However, we can score the seven example projects to show what they would have received under the 2007 Manual This is done in Table 8. The seven ex ample projects would receive 130 points under the 2007 CRS Coordinators Manual Under the proposed scoring, a community would receive 209 points for these projects, more poi nts because the use of a PPI committee and stakeholders has been shown to be more effec tive and two of the messages have been shown to have an impact on people. Table 8. 2007 Scoring Examples Project Project Type Points per topic Number of topics Total OP 1. Brochure on flood insurance OPA 2 1 2 OP 2. Local insurance agents advise their clients OPA 2 1 2 OP 3. Presentations to five neighborhood associations OPA 2 5 10 OP 4. The neighborhood association presentation on cable TV OPA 2 4 8 OP 5. Mailing sent each year to resi dents of the SFHA OPF 13 8 104** OP 6. Stencils on storm drains OPA 2 1 2 OP 7. Meetings with home builders association OPA 2 1 2 Total 130 While this project covers more topics, the maximum score under the 2007 CRS Coordinators Manual is for three OPA projects, so no topic can be counted more than three times under OPA. ** The average score for OPF in 2011 is 88 points. This comparison also shows how the 2007 system discourages a variety of projects beyond three OPAs. Under the 2012 proposal, there is no limit to the number of projec ts, only to the total score for the projects.
PAGE 341
Changes to Activity 330 14 October 18, 2011 FRP Flood Response Preparations This new element credits having a pre-flood plan fo r public information activ ities, news releases, handouts, etc., ready in advance of the next flood. FRP credit is provided for developing outreach projects to be implement ed before, during and after a fl ood. FRP projects are scored the same as OP outreach projects, but they are not eligible to recei ve STK (stakeholder involvement) or ACT (actions or results) cred it. More credit is available if th e FRP projects are part of the PPI and reviewed annually. A Flood Response Preparations (FRP) package would be a collection of documents and materials prepared in advance, such as templates and mast er copies. The preparations must include master copies of materials to be used, but they do not have to be copied until the flood occurs. The materials would cover key messages that need to be disseminated before, during, and after a flood. Example messages: Evacuation routes (CRS Topic 3) Shelter locations (CRS Topic 3) Turn Around Dont Drown (CRS Topic 3) When its safe to go back (CRS Topic 3) Dont enter a flooded building until its been cleared by an inspector (CRS Topic 3) Get a permit for repairs (CRS Topic 5) Substantial damage rules (CRS Topic 5) Mitigation opportunities during repairs (CRS Topic 4) Information on mitigation grants (CRS Topic 4) FRP projects only have to be prepared to receiv e credit. The projects are implemented when a flood is imminent materials are reproduced and distribut ed, messages are disseminated, notices are posted on doors, etc. To receive the credit e ach year, the community must either use the FRP in response to a flood or review it and update it as needed. If there isn t a flood, the review and update could be conducted as a part of an annual flood response drill or exercise (required for credit under Activity 610 Flood Warning Program). If the co mmunity has a PPI, the evaluation could also be part of the annual ev aluation of the OP outreach projects. The community will not lose OP credit during the year of the flood if implementing the FRP projects diverts resources needed to implement other OP projects. The community will lose its FRP credit if it does not implement its FRP projects when there is a flood or if it does not evaluate the FRP projects each year. Example FRP As with a PPI, the first part of preparing an FRP package is determining the key messages. As with OP, there can be one message per topic per project. If the community has a PPI, additional messages can be identified for credit (as in the PPI Topics 8 and 9 examples, below). Communities should develop messages keyed to the flood and post-flood situation, which are not necessarily the same messages that are needed for OP projects in a pre-flood situation.
PAGE 342
Changes to Activity 330 15 October 18, 2011 Example FRP messages: Topic 3. Protect people from the hazard Message 3: Dont enter a flooded building until its been cleared by an inspector Topic 4. Protect your property from the hazard Message 4: Mitigation while you repair Topic 5. Build responsibly Message 5: Get a permit for repairs PPI Topic 8: Message 8: ICC can help pay to mitigate substantially damaged buildings PPI Topic 9: Message 9: Apply for a mitigation grant Example FRP projects: FRP 1: A media kit with backgrounder inform ation for reporters on all five FRP messages FRP 2: Public service announcements that cover FRP messages 3 and 5 FRP 3: Door hangers that explain all five FRP messages All three projects are in the PPI. The scoring for these projects is shown in Tabl e 9, with the expanded spreadsheet used in Table 7. These projects total 44 points, plus 40% more (17.60 points) for having the messages and projects in the PPI. The tota l additional credit is 61.60 points. Table 9. FRP Scoring Example Msg 1Msg 2Msg 3M 4.aM 4.bMsg 5Msg 6Msg 7Msg 8Msg 9PPI?PPISTK?STK OP 1 Insurance brochure 111y0.40y0.30 OP 2 Insurance agents 212y0.80y0.60 OP 3Presentations25555550y20.00y15.00 OP 4Cable TV21111110y4.00y3.00 OP 5Mailing to SFHA611111136y14.400.00 OP 6Storm drain stencils212y0.800.00 OP 7Home builders meeting s 6 22 24y9.60 0.00 OP 8 0 0.00 0.00 OP 9 0 0.00 0.00 OP 10 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 Messages 0 0.00 0.00 Msg 1 Is your house in the floodplain? 0 0.00 0.00 Msg 2 All residents in the SFHA should have flood insurance 0 0.00 0.00 Msg 3 Turn around, dont drown 0 0.00 0.00 M 4.a Dont dump in our streams and ditches 0 0.00 0.00 M 4.b Protect your house from flooding 0 0.00 0.00 Msg 5 Floodplain filling needs a permit 0 0.00 0.00 Msg 6 Dont dump in the storm drains, they drain to the bay 0 0.00 0.00 Msg 7 Know your evacuation route and have a family rendezvous point 0 0.00 0.00 OP =125 PPI =50.00 STK =18.90 ACT? y y ACT message points021012000000ACT bonus0.009.450.005.400.000.000.000.000.000.00ACT = 14.85 FRP ProjectsPointsMsg 1Msg 2Msg 3Msg 4Msg 5Msg 6Msg 7Msg 8Msg 9Msg 10 FRP 1Media kits21111110y4.00 FRP 2Pub svc announcemnts2114y1.60 FRP 3Door hangers61111130y12.00 FRP 4 0y0.00 FRP 5 00.00 FRP =44 PPI(FRP) = 17.60c330 = OP125 + PPI67.60 + STK18.90 + ACT14.85 + FRP44 = 270.35 Outreach Project WorksheetOutreach Projects Project Points Number of times message is repeated OP Multipliers
PAGE 343
Changes to Activity 330 16 October 18, 2011 Developing a Program for Public Information The Program for Public Information is an ongoi ng public information effort to design and transmit the messages determined to be most im portant to the communit y. To develop a PPI, the community establishes a committee that assesses the local public information needs, designs the program based on those needs, monitors implemen tation of outreach projects, and performs an annual evaluation of their effectiveness. Th ere are seven parts to preparing a PPI. 1. The PPI Committee The communitys Program for Public Informati on must be developed by a committee. The PPI committee is responsible for: Assessing the communitys publ ic information needs, Determining the appropriate messages to meet those needs, Planning the ways in which the community a nd its stakeholders can implement outreach projects to convey the messages, and Evaluating progress and maki ng revisions as needed. This process resembles the floodplain manageme nt planning process th at is described and credited under CRS Activity 510. The PPI Committ ee and the 510 planning team could be the same. The PPI committee could also be an existing committee, such as a mitigation planning committee or advisory board, or a subcommittee of an existing group, as long as it meets the membership criteria The community should also review Activity 370 Flood Insurance Promotion which credits a similar planning committee. If th e community is interested in e ither 510 or 370 credit, then the committee should be designed so that it will qualify for the other activities as well. Membership: The committee must have members from both inside and outside the local government. The number of participants and thei r identities are determined by the community, but there must be at least five people. At least half of the member s must be from outside the local government, especially stakeholders and othe r organizations that conduct their own public information activities. Note that there is no pror ation of the PPI bonus credit if fewer than half the members are from outside the communitys government. If it is difficult to find non-governmental volunteers, it is suggested that the number of government members be reduced so that the public, stakeholders, and other non-governmental representatives have a major influence on the design of the PPI. Example local government participants ( note that any of these participan ts can be a contractor if the person has been regularly involved with the community in the past): Floodplain manager Emergency manager Public information officer Planning department representative Code enforcement or build ing department representative Public works, drainage maintenance, regional flood district representative.
PAGE 344
Changes to Activity 330 17 October 18, 2011 Stakeholders: The more often a message is received from different sources, the more likely it is that the desired action or behavior will take place. For this reason, the CRS encourages the education and engagement of groups and people ou tside the local government (stakeholders) in planning and conducting outreach projects. At least one-half of the members of the PPI comm ittee must be representatives from outside the local government. These could be members of the public representatives of key community organizations, and/or agencies and organizati ons that will likely implement recommended outreach projects. Example stakeholder participants: Floodplain resident(s) Emergency/disaster responders, e.g., Red Cross, Salvation Army Utility companies Chamber of commerce/business organization Builders/developers/contractors trade association Environmental organizations, Friends of the River, etc. Real estate agents Insurance agencies Major employer(s) Bonus points are provided for outreach projects that are carried out in whole or in part by stakeholders, under element STK, described on page 9. Multi-jurisdictional committees: There are occasions when CRS communities in a metropolitan area or members of a CRS users group w ould like to develop a joint or coordinated PPI. This approach has the advantage of shari ng resources, avoiding dupl ication of effort, and capitalizing on regional media, such as a ne wspaper, television station, or a metropolitan organization like a county chapter of the Ameri can Red Cross or a council of governments. This approach can also have a disadvantage if an individual communitys needs are lost in the bigger operation. Accordingly, in order to avoid th is, if a community want s to participate in a multi-jurisdictional PPI committee: 1. The community must send at least two re presentatives to the regional committee, 2. At least half of the representatives must be from outside the local government, and 3. At least half of the representatives must attend all the meetings of the regional committee. In effect, there must be a quorum from each community. Remote attendance, e.g., via a webinar that allows for everyone to talk, is permissible. There is no separate score for the PPI document. Each CRS communitys score is calculated separately, depending on which messages and projects apply to it. For example, an inland community would not benefit from projects oriented to beachfront target a udiences, nor would a community benefit from a project conducted at a shopping mall 25 miles away from the community. Therefore a regional Plan should de tail the projects not only by audience and method, but also by communities reached. A separa te section for each participating community is recommended for this purpose.
PAGE 345
Changes to Activity 330 18 October 18, 2011 Activity 370 Flood Insurance Promotion: Activity 370 calls for a planning committee to develop a flood insurance coverage improvement plan. It is recommended that the PPI committee serve both functions and the PPI documen t include the projects designed to promote insurance coverage. To do this, the PPI comm ittee needs to include representatives from: The communitys floodplain management office, The communitys public information office or someone else from the local government experienced and involved with public information or education (a representative of the local schools would qualify where there is no public information staff), Local insurance agencies, and Local lending institutions. 2. Needs Assessment Before it can develop a local program for rais ing public awareness about flood related issues,, the committee must identify the communitys charac teristics and public information needs. This assessment identifies and catalogs what populati ons, neighborhoods, floodplain areas, etc., need information about the flood hazard and floodplai n resources and functions. The PPI committee should use this information and consider what information is already being conveyed to its residents and whether that information is effectively informing people and fostering appropriate action. The needs assessment can be prepared by staff, but the committee as a whole needs to review it. Self-Assessment: The first step in the needs assessmen t is to complete the CRS Self-Assessment described in Section 240 of the CRS Coordinators Manual This is an on-line tool that guides the user through a series of questions to identify the charac teristics of the community and the population as they relate to the communitys flood hazard. This exercise will help the PPI committee by compiling the necessary information in the context of a flood hazard related public outreach effort. The on-line CRS Self-Assessment tool can be skipped if the community has a floodplain management or hazard mitigation plan that identifi es target areas and target audiences or if it has another documented process that meets these criteria. Target Areas: Target areas are neighborhoods, districts, or other areas of the community with similar flooding, building, and populati on characteristics. It may be useful to assign names or labels to the areas, and some of them may be gr ouped together if they overlap or have the same characteristics. Example target areas Developed parts of the Special Flood Hazard Area The downtown business district Repetitive loss areas An area subject to an unmapped special hazard, such as sinkholes or ice jams An area protected by a levee Beachfront hotels and rental units
PAGE 346
Changes to Activity 330 19 October 18, 2011 Target audiences: A target audience is one that has specific public information needs based either on its geographic locati on (e.g. floodplain, rep loss areas upstream communities with a direct impact on natural floodplain functions downstream) or its community function (e.g. building contractors, real estate agents, downtown business owners ). For each Target Area, the PPI committee should consider who lives, works, or visits there or who/what has a direct impact on the communitys flood hazard resiliency. This is the target audience for public information needs in that area. See also the discussion on audiences on page 6. The characteristics of those peopl e will influence the type of pub lic information they need and how it should be delivered. The list below gives some examples of demographic and other characteristics that may be pertinent. Example geographical target audiences: Example functional target audiences Residential neighborhoods Tourists and part-time residents Repetitive loss areas Contractors Renters Elderly or infirm Downtown businesses Non-English-speakers Properties protected by a levee Student drivers Upstream polluters Areas outside the SFHA with historical flooding Note that for the increased credit for a targeted outreach project, at least 90% of the target audience needs to be reached. There may be more than one target audience in each area. The self-assessment needs to identify whether there are non-Englis h speaking audiences who will need translated outreach message s, elderly populations who may not be reached by social media, downtown businesses who are closed on weekends and would not benefit from a door-to-door campaign, etc.. Each area needs to be examined and the target audiences selected accordingly. Current projects: For each target audience, the committ ee should identify any public information activities that are currently discussing the flood hazard or the value of the local natural floodplain functions. Who else is conveyi ng similar messages to these people? Examples of organizations and agencies to check: The communitys public information officer The public works or drainage maintenance office The parks and recreation office The county emergency manager The office responsible for the National Po llutant Discharge Elimination System permit Regional planning agency or council of governments Regional or metropolitan sewer or flood control district State NFIP Coordinator Local businesses, especially insurance agencies and banks Utility companies Environmental and recreational organizations (e.g., Isaac Walton League, Audubon Society) Homeowner/Neighborhood associations Area newspapers Area radio and television stations
PAGE 347
Changes to Activity 330 20 October 18, 2011 The committee needs to list the organizations or agencies that are sending the messages and what the messages are. This job can be easier if these kinds of organi zations are invited to be on the PPI committee and if members share the workload. Activity 370 Flood Insurance Promotion: If the community wants the PPI to include the assessment need for Activity 370 credit, the assessment must include: The number of insurable build ings in each target area, The number of policies in force and past claims (provided by ISO to CRS communities at least once each year), and An executive summary that discusses the current level of coverage by target area. 3. Messages For each target audience, the PPI committee shou ld determine what public information message is needed, considering the hazards and/or floodpla in functions/resources present in the target area, the characteristics of the audien ce, and other factors as appropriate. Six broad messages are particularly important to the CRS (see Tabl e 2 on page 3). At least one message must be on flood insurance. The PPI committee may develop others as appropriate for its target audiences. The additional messages designated by the PPI committee must be related to flooding, drainage, stormwater, natural floodplai n functions, or flood-related hazards. Or, the committee may decide to devote more attenti on to a particular aspect of one or more of the six listed CRS messages. For example, if the communitys assessment indicates that there is habitat suitable for endangered species within a ta rget area, then the committee may elect to send additional, more detailed message s about that issue, pursuant to CRS topic #6 (protect natural floodplain functions). Examples of messages are shown in Table 4 on pa ge 9. In designing each outreach project, the PPI committee will want to convert these broad messages into more specific language, as appropriate. Outcomes: For each message, the committee needs to de termine what outcome it would like to see. Some guidance on outcomes: Outcomes are what youd like to see happen, su ch as a reduction in flood deaths or an increase in the number of people who know they live in a hazard area. Outcomes determine whether you are maki ng progress, whether people are doing the right thing. They are the ba sis for the bonus credit ACT Action results, and they should be used by the committee to determin e which projects to continue and which ones to modify or stop because the messa ges are not producing the desired outcome. Outcomes need to be objectiv e, observable and measurable. Outcomes are not outputs, like distribut e 10,000 flyers or talk to homeowners. Examples of outcomes are in Table 4, page 9.
PAGE 348
Changes to Activity 330 21 October 18, 2011 Activity 370 Flood Insurance Promotion: If the community wants the PPI to qualify for 370 credit, there needs to be at least one flood insura nce message for at least one target audience. The message(s) need to include increasing the appr opriate type of coverage as an outcome. 4. Projects Once the needed messages and desired outcomes have been agreed upon, the PPI committee should consider what media, disseminated throug h what specific projects, would best convey the message(s) to the target audien ce(s). For each message, the PPI document lists the projects, who will do them and when. The projects are then implemented over the following year. Examples of projects are listed in Table 5 on page 10. 5. Coordination A Program for Public Information should not addr ess only outreach projects. It should look at all the activities a community should pursue to inform people and motivate them to protect life and property buy insurance, and protect natural fl oodplain functions. The CRS credits other public information work besides 330 Outreach Projects. It has been proposed that the 2012 CRS Coordinators Manual provide extra credit in some activiti es, if they are included in the PPI: Activity 320 Map Information Service: The priority messages identified in the PPI should be conveyed when inquiries are made The step 2 Needs Assessment may identify areas that should be mapped and incl uded in the map information service. Activity 340 Hazard Disclosure: If real estate agencies are represented on the PPI committee and their disclosure practice(s) and informational brochures are reviewed in the PPI, then extra credit is provided. Activity 350 Flood Protection Information: As with outreach projects, credit fo r the website (WEB) is based on the number of topi cs covered. If there is a PPI, the community can receive additional credit for covering up to ten topics, instead of just six. The WEB credit for information on flood warning is also increased if it is coordinated with other warning messages in the PPI. Activity 360 Flood Protection Assistance: The credits for the first three elements, property protection advice (PPA), advice after a site visit (PPV ), and financial assistance advice (FAA) can all be increased if th e services are included in the PPI. Activity 370 Flood Insurance Promotion: It is recommended that the plan to improve insurance coverage be part of the PPI and be prepared by the same committee, provided that the committee includes the prerequisites for 370 credit. Notes on how to do this have been included in this section. Activity 510 Floodplain Management Planning: Some communities have prepared public information program strategies (OPS) as part of their fl oodplain management or hazard mitigation plans. Both PPI and fl oodplain management planning (FMP) provide credit for having committees and the same committee can fulfill both activities credit criteria. Note that to receive the extra PPI credit, these activities would need to be based on appropriate messages, which have desired outcomes discussed in the PPI. The activities would also need to be evaluated by the committee and reviewed in the annual report (see section 7).
PAGE 349
Changes to Activity 330 22 October 18, 2011 Activity 540 Drainage System Maintenan ce provides extra cred it for publicizing dumping regulations. The PPI c ould include this message (C RS topic 4) and determine the best way to disseminate it. Activities 610 Flood Warning and Response, 620 Levees, and 630 Dams each have an outreach project prerequisite for any credit. The PPI could include the needed messages and determine the best way to di sseminate them. The project(s) would be credited under Activity 330, as outreach proj ects (OP) eligible for the PPI, STK, and ACT bonus points. 6. The PPI Document The committees work needs to be recorded in a formal written document and adopted by the communitys governing body. The PPI and the annual report can be standalone documents or they can be sections or chapters in a credited floodplain management plan and its annual report. The PPI document need not be long and complicated. It could be fewer than 10 pages, as long as each of the items listed below is summarized. After the community completes the assessment of its public information needs, the PPI and its desc riptive document could be completed in one or two meetings of the PPI committee. The document must show that the community has incorporated the procedures and considerations described above in preparing its PP I. The PPI document that is submitted the first time the community requests PPI credit must include 1. A list of the members of the PPI committee and their affiliations. The committee must include stakeholders from outside th e local government and the community. 2. A summary of the CRS Self-A ssessment (Activity 240 or a similar summary from the community hazard mitigation plan) of the lo cal flood hazard and the communitys natural floodplain and coastal functions and resources. [Note: This may be a report generated by the self-assessment this is still under development.] 3. A summary of the public information need s assessment, including the other public information activities currently bein g implemented within the community. 4. A list of the target audiences, the messages se lected for each audience, and their desired outcomes. 5. A description of each outreach project inte nded to be carried out, who will do it, and when it will be done (s ee Table 5 on page 10). 6. If the community is applying for the PPI bonus credit for its flood response preparations credit, the FRP projects need to be listed, too. 7. If the community is reques ting the PPI bonus credit for Activities 320, 340, 350, or 360, a discussion of how those activities are coordinated with the PPI and its projects. As discussed in Section 5. Coordination, if the co mmittee identifies homeowners as a target audience and retrofitting th eir homes as a message, the PPI should describe how the library and website (Activity 350) will provide appropriate materials and information and what kind of advice staff should provide (Activity 360). 8. If the community is using the PPI to qualify for credit under Activity 370, the 370 criteria need to be included.
PAGE 350
Changes to Activity 330 23 October 18, 2011 9. The process that will be followed to monitor and evaluate the public information projects, including a reporting procedure or other te chnique by which the PPI committee will make sure the projects are done (see section 7). Items 4 and 5 can be done graphically. An example is Table 10. The pilot test PPI committees found this kind of approach helpful in determin ing which messages were appropriate for which audiences and which projects were best for which message. Communities will be scored based on the impact of the projects on each community. Therefore, if the PPI document is prepared by a multi-jurisdi ctional committee, it needs to identify how each project affects each community. This can be a li st by projects by commun ity or an additional column in a matrix like Table 10. Adoption: The document must achieve formal (offici al) status within the community, so that local government departments and offices will be aware of the public information efforts and cooperate. Ways to achieve offi cial status could include Formal adoption by the communitys governing board; Written acceptance as policy by the communitys CEO; A letter from the communitys counsel stating that the document is community policy; or Having the PPI Committee and process formally recognized in the communitys floodplain management or hazard mitigation plan. 7. Monitoring and Evaluation As with all planning efforts, completion of the do cument is just the beginning. The projects need to be implemented, monitored, evaluated, and revised as needed. The PPI document needs to describe how the monitoring, evaluation and revisi on will be conducted (item 9 in the previous section). The monitoring and evaluation must be conducted by the PPI committee. Staff can collect data and make recommendations, but for CRS credit, the committee must review progress and agree on any changes. The committee also needs to review and approve the annual evaluation report that is submitted to the governing body and to FEMA via the annual CRS recertification. This work will be more effective if the committee meets several times during the year and monitors the implementation of each outreach project. Evaluation report: There is no required report format, but the annual report must include the following items: 1. The target audiences and the messages and desired outcomes for each. 2. The projects in the PPI that were to convey the messages 3. Which projects were implemented 4. Why some projects were not implemented (if any) 5. Which desired outcomes were met 6. What should be changed (including what me ssages, outcomes, and projects should be dropped, and what new ones should be initiated)
PAGE 351
Changes to Activity 330 24 October 18, 2011 Note that the community may use any 12-month peri od for its public inform ation year. If there is a defined hurricane or flood s eason, for example, the public information schedule may be tied to that. At the end of that year, the committee woul d conduct its annual evaluation of the PPI, produce the annual report of that evaluation, and then submit th e report along with its next annual CRS recertific ation package. If this annual evaluation shows that a project ha s brought about desirable re sults or actions, then the CRS credit for the project is increased under element ACT. The annual report could use the spreadsheet in Table 10, with added columns after each message, outcome, and project to note the stat us and recommendations for change.
PAGE 352
Changes to Activity 330 25 October 18, 2011 Table 10. Spreadsheet for Planning PPI (Pr ogram for Public Information) Projects
PAGE 353
Appendix M Standard Operating Procedures
PAGE 355
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Chemical Application Pesticides, Herbicides, Fertilizers In accordance with our MS4 permit, the City of North Miami continues to endeavor to minimize its use of pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers on public property. The procedures used to achieve this are as follows: Description: This section contains information on the application of Pesticides, Herbicides and F ertilizers. Including how to prepare, take care, and disposal of chemical products. Applicability: Using chemicals in city parks. 1. Preparation a. Calibrate fertilizer and pesticide application equipment to avoid excessive application. b. Use pesticides only if there is an actual pest problem c. Time and apply the application of fertilizers, herbicides or pesticides to coincide with the manufacturer's recommendation for best results ("Read the Label"). d. Know the weather conditions. Do not use pesticides if rain is expe cted. Apply pesticides or herbicides only when wind speeds are low(less than 5 mph). 2. Process a. Always follow the manufacturer's recommendations for mixing, application and disposal. ("Read the Label"). b. Do not mix or prepare pesticides for application near storm drains. c. Employ techniques to minimize off-target application (e.g. spray drift, over broadcasting.) of pesticides and fertilizers. 3. Clean -up a. Sweep pavements or sidewalks where fertilizers or other solid chemicals have fallen, back onto grassy areas before applying irrigation water. b. Triple rinse containers, and use rinse water as product. Dispose of unused pesticide as hazardous waste. c. Always follow all federal and state regulations governing use, storage and disposal of fertilizers, herbicides or pesticides and their containers. ("Read the Label") 4. Documentation a. Keep copies of MSD sheets for all pesticides, fertilizers and other hazardous products used. b. Record fertilizing and pesticide application activities, including date, individual who did the application, amount of product used and approximate area covered. Pesticides & Herbicides Only personnel and contractors who have proof of certification and licensing by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) for the application of pesticides and herbicides, are allowed to apply these products.
PAGE 356
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Fertilizers (By January 1, 2014), All personnel and contractors who apply fertilizers must demonstrate proof of training through the Green Industry BMP Program. In addition, contracted applicators are required to prove certification for urban landscape commercial fertilizer application. Until January 1, 2014, personnel will continue to receive annual training on the proper application practices for fertilizers. Annually, or more often, training on the proper storage and handling of these products is provided to all relevant personnel. A list is main tained of all personnel and contractors who have received training, licensing, certification, and annual refresher training.
PAGE 368
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Reactive Inspection Program Section III.A.7.c Illicit Discharges and Improper Disposal Inspection and Investigation of Suspected Illicit Discharges and/or Improper Disposal This permit element requires a written reactive investigation program for susp ected illicit discharges that are reported by others. Reporting Illicit Discharges Illicit discharges may be reported through the City of North Miami Public works Department at 305-8959874 or 305-953-2854 after working hours or verbally while inspectors i n field or at the office. After receiving a report of a suspected illicit discharge City staff will fill out the below form, determine the location and zone of the site, and refer the report to the inspector for that zone. Inspection and enforcement proced ures will follow the Proactive Inspection Program 5-10.
PAGE 369
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Reactive Investigation of Reported Illicit Discharge/Illegal Connection/Illegal Dumping Date suspected illicit was reported: __________________ Date of investigation: __________________ MS4 potential Receiving system: _________________________________________________________ If not within MS4, date and to whom referral made: __________________ Verification of problem: __________________ Type of discharge/connection/dumping: ___________________________________________________ Determined Source: ____________________________________________________________________ Type of enforcement action taken: ________________________________________________________ Date to verify elimination: __________________ Date of Referral to FDEP of facility that may require MSGP: __________________
PAGE 371
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Maintenance /Equipment Yard Pr actices And Inspections The attached map depicts the location of the City-owned (or operated) equipment yard(s) and m aintenance shops (that support road maintenance activities). Below or the standard practices in place at th ose facilities. General Housekeeping: Keep your Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan upto -date, and implement accordingly. Place adequate stockpiles of spill cleanup materials where they are readily accessible. Keep work sites clean and orderly. Remove debris in a timely fashion. Spot clean leaks and drips routinely. Leaks are not cleaned up until the absorbent is picked up and disposed of properly. Clean leaks, drips, and other spills with as little water as possible. Use rags for small spills, a damp mop for general cleanup, and dry absorbent material for larger spills. Use the following three-step method for cleaning floors: Clean spills with rags or other absorbent materials Sweep floor using dry absorbent material Mop the floor. Mop water may be discharged to the sanitary sewer via a toilet or sink. Sweep the maintenance area weekly, if it is paved, to coll ect loose particles. Do not hose down the area to a storm drain. Report leaking vehicles to fleet maintenance. Ve hicle/Equipment Fueling: Design fueling area to prevent stormwater runoff and spills. Apply a suitable sealant that protects the asphalt from spilled fuels in areas where covering is infeasible and the fuel island is surrounded by pavement. Use secondary containment when transferring fuel from the tank truck to the fuel tank. Cover storm drains in the vicinity during transfer. Maintain clean fueldispensing areas using dry cleanup methods such as sweeping for removal of litter and debris, or use of rags and absorbents for leaks and spills. Do not wash down areas with water. Post signs at the fuel dispenser or fuel island warning vehicle owners/operators against "topping off" of vehicle fuel tanks.
PAGE 372
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Vehicle/Equipment Washing: If possible, use properly maintained offsite commercial washing and steam cleaning businesses whenever possible. These businesses are better equipped to handle and properly dispose of the wash waters. Consider washing vehicles and equipment inside the building if washing/cleaning must occur on-site. This will help to control the targeted constituents by directing them to the sanitary sewer. Design wash areas to properly collect and dispose of wash water when engine cleaning is conducted and when chemical additives, solvents, or de greasers are used. This may include installation of sumps or drain lines to collect wash water or construction of a berm around the designated area and grading of the area to collect wash water as well as prevent stormwater run -on. Post signs stating tha t only washing is allowed in wash area and that discharges to the storm drain are prohibited. Use biodegradable, phosphatefree detergents for washing vehicles as appropriate. Use hoses with nozzles that automatically turn off when left unattended. Disc harge equipment wash water to the sanitary sewer, a holding tank, or a process treatment system, regardless of the washing method used. Discharge vehicle wash water to (1) the sanitary sewer, a holding tank, or process treatment system or (2) an enclosed recycling system. Vehicle/Equipment Repair: Move maintenance and repair activities indoors whenever feasible. If outside, use a vehicle maintenance area designed to prevent stormwater pollution minimize contact of stormwater with outside operations through berming and appropriate drainage routing. If temporary work is being conducted outside, use a tarp, ground cloth, or drip pans beneath the vehicle or equipment to capture all spills and drips. Designate a special area to drain and replace motor oil, coolant, and other fluids. This area should not have any connections to the storm drain or the sanitary sewer and should allow for easy clean up of drips and spills. Drain all fluids from wrecked vehicles immediately. Ensure that the drain pan or dri p pan is large enough to contain drained fluids (e.g. larger pans are needed to contain antifreeze, which may gush from some vehicles). Do not pour liquid waste to floor drains, sinks, outdoor storm drain inlets, or other storm drains or sewer connections. Dispose of all waste materials according to applicable laws and regulations.
PAGE 373
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Collect leaking or dripping fluids in drip pans or containers. Fluids are easier to recycle if kept separate. Promptly transfer used fluids to the proper waste or recycling drums and store in an appropriately designed area that can contain spills. Dont leave drip pans or other open containers lying around. Do not dispose of oil filters in trash cans or dumpsters, which may leak oil and contaminate stormwater. Place the oil filter in a funnel over a waste oil recycling drum to drain excess oil before disposal. Most municipalities prohibit or discourage disposal of these items in solid waste facilities. Oil filters can also be recycled. Ask your oil supplier or recycler about recycling oil filters. Avoid hosing down your work areas. If work areas are washed, collect and direct wash water to sanitary sewer. Storage: If possible, store materials and wastes under cover whenever possible. Minimize stormwater runon by enclosing the area or building a berm around it. C over the containers where they are stored. Raise the containers off the ground by use of pallet or similar method, with provisions for spill control and secondary containment. Use covered dumpsters for waste product containers. Contain the material in such a manner that if the container leaks or spills, the contents will not discharge, flow, or be washed into the storm drainage system, surface waters or groundwater. Store cracked and/or dead batteries in a non -leaking covered secondary container and dispose of properly at recycling or household hazardous waste facilities. If equipment (e.g., radiators, axles) is to be stored outdoors, oil and other fluids should be drained first. This is also applicable to vehic les being stored and not used on a regular basis. Try to keep chemicals in their original containers, and keep them well labeled. Store idle equipment containing fluids under cover. Inspections: The attached form is used for the inspection of each sit e on an annual/monthly/weekly/ daily basis.
PAGE 374
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Equipment Yard/Maintenance Shop Inspection Form Facility: ______________________________________ Date of Inspection: _____________ Address: ____________________________________________________________________ If site discharges to MS4, provide: Latitude/Longitude of discharge point: ___________________________ and receiving water body: ____________________________________ YES NO N/A Materials/chemicals are stored, handled, and discarded in a manner to reduce the potential risk of spills entering the MS4 A spill kit is on sit e O utfalls, inlets and outlets of stormwater treatment system s are free of debris/pollutants S torage tanks are clearly marked, properly contained and protected from potential damage Loading, unloading, and transfer areas are neat and f ree of spills/debris/pollutants Vehicle maintenance areas are properly maintained and d raining to the tr eatment system or sanitary sewer line Outdoor manufacturing areas are properly maintained and free of spills or debris Outdoor stockpile/materi al handling areas are properly maintained and the materials are properly c ontained (i.e., no potential to leak or leach poll utants) Trash and debris areas are conspicuous and properly protected from stormwater runoff Fueling stations are free of petroleum product spills/leaks Vehicle wash and rinse areas are draining to the treatment system or sanitary sewer line The site was free of any visual indication of potential illicit connection/illicit discharge to the MS4. If no, note type of i ndication: Odor Color Foam Sheen Surface Scum Solids Turbidity INDUSTRIAL SITES ONLY MSGP Notice of Intent (FDEP Form 62 -621.300(5)(b)) was submitted to DEP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan was on site and implemented, per the MSGP Required SWPPP inspection and maintenance report forms completed, per the MSGP Use reverse side of form for comments.
PAGE 377
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Plan to Eliminate Wastewater Contamination in Stormwater T he North Miami operates the wastewater collection and transmission system within our jurisdiction. Identified indications of wastewater contamination are documented in the Illicit Discharge log. Followup with the Public Works Department is conducted so that documentation of the response and resolution can also be made in the log In addition, the Public Works Department provides information on other reported wastewater spills for inclusion in the log.
PAGE 378
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Proactive Inspection Program 1. Procedure and Criteria for identifying priority areas/facilities For consistency with the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, the following areas are considered a priority in the inspection program: o Areas with older infrastructure o Industrial commercial, or mixed use areas o Areas with history of past illicit discharges and/or illegal du mping o Areas with on site sewage disposal systems o Areas upstream of sensitive or impaired water bodies The attached map depicts the areas zoned as industrial or commercial, that lie within our MS4 contributing area or in an area that discharges from an outfall for which we are responsible. The map is updated each year typically in the month of October, by the Public Works department and saved as a PDF format file for use by all. Older infrastructure is not indicative of an increased potential to contain incidences of illicit discharges/connections/dumping. 2. List of identified priority areas/facilities Each year, a list of addresses is created from an overlay of the map created above and the County's current parcel map and associated database. This list is cross referenced with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) list of facilities that have coverage under the Multi Sector Generic Permit (MSGP) If any facilities that appear to require an MSGP are not on the FDEP list, the names and add resses of those businesses are referred to FDEP. The annual creation of the list of addresses and cross-referencing with the FDEP MSGP database is typically done in the month of October each year. 3. Annual schedule for inspections All priority areas/facilities are inspected at least once within the current fiveyear permit term. The inspection area has been divided into three zones One zone will be inspected during each year of the permit term. If an area is found to have illicit discharges/con nections/dumping, it is re inspected for compliance and if warranted, specific facilities within that area are considered for placement on the high risk facility list for more frequent inspection In addition, inspections for signs of illicit discharges are part of the Standard Operating Procedure for all structural control inspections and maintenance. A "checkbox" for this activity is included on the inspection forms for those activities. If a suspected illicit is identified, it is reported to Public Works for investigation under Reactive Investigations program. Finally, all appropriate field personnel receive illicit discharge and illegal dumping identification and notification training If a suspected illicit is identified during the course of performing their regular activities, it is reported to Public Works for investigation under the Reactive Investigations program. 4. Procedure f or conducting inspections The inspector( s) patrols the prioritized area searching for indications of illicit discharges/connections/dumping into the City's MS4, in accordance with the training received If any are identified, the inspector makes a cursory attempt at identifying the source of the illicit. If the source is identified, the inspector makes the decision to either approach the facility
PAGE 379
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 owner or refer the finding to his supervisor for further action. In speaking with the facility owner or operator, the inspector advises of the findings and cites the ordinance which prohibits such discharges. The inspector may use photo documentation to support the inspection. The inspector indicates his/her intention to return to verify that the problem has been corrected If no source is identified, the findings are reported to the inspector s supervisor for further investigation. Pro -active inspections also take place during the inspection of structural controls and other MS4 components by stormwater personnel t hat are trained in illicit discharge identification and reporting. 5. Procedure for tracing source of discovered illicit discharge Visual observation, investigation, and testing if necessary, are used to identify the source of an illicit discharges/connection s/dumping 6. Procedure for eliminating the discharge If an illicit connection to the MS4 through a pipe is identified, it is immediately terminated (plugged or removed) If the illicit is traced back to a property owner/operator, the owner of the property is contacted by the city engineer. The owner is notified of the problem and asked to address the situation immediately. The owner is also notified of the reinspection date, typically one week. 7. Procedure for documenting the inspections and enforcement activi ties The MSGP coverage research and reporting is documented by the copies of the lists generated during each step (list of facilities within MS4 that are commercial/industrial), list of facilities in the City with MSGP coverage, list of facilities that appear to need MSGP coverage but appear not to have it) These lists will be maintained with other back up documentation to support the annual permit activities conducted by the City. The list of facilities that appear to need MSGP coverage will be sent to FDEP for follow-up. 8. Procedures for enforcement actions (or referrals to appropriate jurisdictional authority) For cases within North Miami's MS4 contributing area, an unresolved matter is handled by the Public Works department. For cases outside North Miami's MS4, the appropriate entity is notified (FDOT, Miami -Dade County, etc. ) by the Public Works department. 9. Identification of staff / department/outside entity responsible for inspections and for enforcement Inspection activities are carried out by Miami -Dade County. Follow-up and management are provided by Miami-Dade County. Documentation is handled by the IW-5 section.
PAGE 380
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Proactive Illicit Discharge/Illegal Connection Inspection Form Date of Inspection: _________________ Address of Facility OR General Description of Area Inspected: __________________________________ Identification of MS4 component that could receive discharge from this site/area: _________________ If Facility inspection, does type of business require an MSGP? Yes___ No___ If yes does this facility have one? Yes___ No___ Findings: Evidence of illicit connections to storm sewer? Yes___ No___ Evidence of dumping/spills to storm sewer? Yes___ No___ Evidence of wash water going to storm sewer? Yes___ No___ Storage tanks leaking or improperly contained? Yes___ No___ Stockpiles/debris piles uncontained? Yes___ No___ If yes, to any above, describe: ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Type of Enforcement Action Taken: ______________________________________________________ Date to verify elimination: __________________ Date of referral to FDEP of Facility that may require MSGP: ___________________________________
PAGE 381
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Roadway Maintenance Pr actices To Reduce Pollutants Road way repairs and maintenance may take place anywhere throughout t he Citys jurisdictional area, and is conducted o n an as -needed basis. Major repair work is typically done as a construction project by a contractor. These projects most often required a Notice of Intent under the States Generic Construction Permit, which requires a Stormwater Pollution Protection Plan. Routine inspections are done as part of the construction site inspection program. Minor repairs, completed by municipal staff, are performed using the following practices: Painting, striping, marking, and asphalt and concrete cutting or repair activities are done in dry weather. Nearby storm drain inlets are protected by covers, straw bales, sand bags, filter fabric or plastic to reduce the possible entry of wastes, dusts, overspray and/or slurry. All waste and debris remaining after the work is swept up and removed Water use is minimized when saw cutting concrete. The waste slurry is a llowed to dry and then swept up or a wet vacuum is used to pick up the waste slurry during or immediately after cutting. Maintenance supplies (e.g., cement bags, sealants and tars) are stored under cover and away from drainage areas. Waste, scraps, rust an d paint from any sandblasting or painting projects is collected and disposed of properly
PAGE 383
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 3316 1 305.893.6511 Spill Prevention & Response Training P lan Following is the City of North Miami plan for training the appropriate personnel in preventing and responding to spills within our jurisdictional area. Who The following personnel shall receive annual training: Topics The information covered by the training includes: Practices to prevent spills How to recognize & assess the nature of a spill How to contain a spill How to report a spill that is hazardous, too large to manage, or threatens a water body Method The training is presented via EXCAL employee training videos. The primary videos for spill prevention & response are Spills & Skills and Controlling Oil: Spill Prevention, Control & Countermeasure. A question and answer period follows the training video. Presenter The training is presented by ______________________. Schedule The training is presented annually, usually in _______. Training Documentation Attendance at the training session is documented by signin sheets.
PAGE 391
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Street Sweeping A map of the street sweeping routes is attached. _____ miles of public roadway are in the program. Roadways without curb and gutter, and roadways not owned/maintained by City of North Miami, are not included in the program. The frequency of sweeping is: Daily/weekly/monthly As shown on the map (because it varies by location) Frequency has been established based on historical information about collected amounts over the past ___ years. The areas swept most frequently are the priority areas. Documentation of volume of street sweeping collection is kept in a log book by date and is summarized for reporting each year. An estimate of the total phosphorus and total nitrogen collected by the street sweeping is performed based on the Florida Stormwater Associations determinations of street sweeping removal rates project. All street sweeping collection is properly disposed of in accordance with DEPs Guidance For The Management Of Street Sweepings, Catch Basin Sediments and Stormwater System Sediments.
PAGE 392
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Florida Stormwater Association Street Sweeping Nutrient Removal Rates Based on the May 31, 2011 Final Report Quantifying Nutrient Loads Associated with Urban Particulate Mat ter (PM), and Biogenic/Litter Recovery Through Current MS4 Source Control and Maintenance Practices and Table 8 in the report (pg.41), the following values may be used to estimate nutrient removal values from street sweeping activity: Median Value of Nutr ient Removal per Unit of Material Collected Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen 0.000361 0.000563 Example Calculations: In fiscal year 2010, Palm Beach County collected 1,915 cubic yards of material with the street sweeping program. Assuming the average density of the street sweeping material is 2,295 pounds per cubic yard,* then 4,394,925 pounds were collected. Using the table above, the total phosphorus removed would be estimated at (4,394,925)(0.000361) = 1,587 pounds. The total nitrogen removed wou ld be estimated at (4,394,925)(0.000563) = 2,474 pounds. Last year the Town of Jupiter collected 35.8 dry tons (71,600 pounds) of street sweeping material from residential areas. The estimated nutrient removal rates for total phosphorous and total nitrog en would be (71,600 pounds)(0.000361) = 26 pounds, and (71,600)(0.000563) = 40 pounds, respectively. Alternatively, the State has provided a spreadsheet tool, wherein the user has only to enter the cubic feet OR wet or dry pounds of street sweepings collected, in order to determine the pounds of TP and TN removed by the activity. This spreadsheet is available on the Palm Beach County MS4 NPDES website. This assumption is based on information from the Study referenced above.
PAGE 393
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Exfiltration Trench Structural Control Inspection Standard Operational/Maintenance/Documentation Protocol There are 9.5 linear feet (or miles ) of exfiltration trench that are part of our MS4; the systems are located as shown on the following map. Inspec tions : Established exfiltration trench is inspected once every three years, using the following Structural Control Inspection Form. New exfiltration trench is inspected annually for the first two years of operation. If chronic problems are identified with a run of exfiltration trench, it is inspected annually until the problem is resolved (two consecutive annual inspections without an issue). The inspection to check for proper function is conducted close to the recovery time of that exfiltration trench system (generally 72 hours after a significant rainfall event) to verify that the system still functions as intended. The inspection for sediment accumulation in the system is conducted in dry weather. Inspections are conducted in accordance with the follow ing Structural Control Inspection Form. Maintenance 1. Remove sediment in pipe(s) and/or upstream and downstream structures This may be done by flushing or vacuuming. : There are several maintenance activities that may be associated with exfiltration trench The appropriate activity is chosen to correspond to the reported condition. The following activities may be required: 2. Remove trash and debris from the system and dispose of properly. 3. Total rehabilitation (removal and replacement) of the exfiltration trench system may be required when the system fails to function at the design capacity. Documentation The documentation for the inspection and maintenance activities related to exfiltration trench is kept on file. :
PAGE 394
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Exfiltration Trench Structural Control Inspection Facility /Segment ID: ________________________ Date: _________________ Inspection conducted _______ days/hours after significant rainfall event. FUNCTION: Standing water in o bservation well, inspection port or inlet? YES NO Standing wat er above inlet grate s? YES NO If YES report to supervisor for further investigation or schedule for maintenance GENERAL : Sediment amount less than one foot below pipe invert in up or downstream structure? YES NO Sediment visible in pipe? YES NO Debris accumulation at weir ? YES NO If YES describe and schedule for maintenance: _____________________________________________________________________ Any indications of illicit discharge or illegal dumping? YES NO If YES, describe and report to supervisor for proper response: _________________________________________________________
PAGE 395
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Major Stormwater Outfalls Structural Control Inspection Standard Operational/Maintenance/Documentation Protocol There are two (2) major stormwater outfalls (MSWOs) that are part of our MS4. A MSWO is defined as: an outfall pipe larger than 36inch inside diameter (or its equivalent), OR discharge from a single conveyance other than a pipe that serves a drainage area of 50 acres or more, OR an outf all pipe larger than 12 inches inside diameter (or its equivalent) that serves a drainage area containing industrial land uses, OR discharge from a single conveyance other than a pipe that serves a drainage area of 2 acres or more than include industrial land uses. The MSOWs within our MS4 are located on the following map. Inspections : MSWOs are inspected annually, or more frequently if historic operations indicate that its needed for a particular MSWO. Inspections are conducted in accordance with the following Structural Control Inspection Form. The anticipated inspection schedule follows. [List the Major Stormwater Outfalls and provide inspection dates] Maintenance 1. Remove trash and debris and dispose of properly. : There are several maintenance activities that may be associated with MSWOs. The ap propriate activity is chosen to correspond to the reported condition. The following activities may be required: 2. Remove accumulated vegetative matter and dispose of properly. 3. Remove accumulated sediment and dispose of properly. 4. Maintain earthen bank adjacent to the discharge pipe or headwall. 5. Maintain the headwall at the outfall, if applicable. 6. Repair/replace pipe if needed.
PAGE 396
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Documentation : The documentation for the inspection and maintenance activitie s related to major st ormwater outfalls is kept on file.
PAGE 397
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Major Stormwater Outfalls Structural Control Inspection Facility ID: ________________________ Date: _________________ FUNCTION: Debris or sediment accumulation in pipe? YES NO Barnacle accumulation in pipe? YES NO Sediment accumulation in receiving water? YES NO Pipe in need of repair/replacement ? YES NO If YES report to supervisor for further investigation or schedule for maintenance. GENERAL: Any indications of illicit discharge or illegal dumping? YES NO If YES describe and report to supervisor for proper response: _________________________________________________________ Signs of erosion on bank near outfall? YES NO Rip rap in need of maintenance? YES NO Headwall in need of repair/replacement? YES NO If YES schedule for maintenance.
PAGE 398
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Pollution Control Device Structural Control Inspection Standard Operational/Maintenance/Documentation Protocol There are ______ pollution control devices (PCDs) that are part of our MS4; the y are located as shown on the following map. The purpose of PCD s is the removal of debris, sediment, oils, and/or other materials from the stormwater stream before it discharges into a receiving water body. Thus, the more material removed by these devices, the better. Frequent inspection and maintenance is the key t o the proper function of these units. Inspections : PCDs are inspected quarterly, unless historic operations indicate that a less or more frequent inspection schedule is needed for particular PCDs. Inspections are conducted in accordance with the PCD manu facturers recommendations. In general, inspections will include the items listed on the following Structural Control Inspection Form. Inspections are conducted in accordance with the following inspection form. Maintenance 1. Remove trash and debris from system and dispose of properly. : There are several maintenance activities that may be associated w ith PCD s. The appropriate activity is chosen to correspond to the reported condition. The following activities may be required: 2. Remove accumulated vegetative matter and dispose of properly. 3. Remove accumulated sediment and dispose of properly. 4. Replace absorbent materials as required. 5. Repair damage to structure, inflow or outflow pipes. Documentation : The documentation for the inspection and maintenance activi ties related to pollution control devices is [describe documentation system or procedures. This could be paper file copies or inspection forms and/or maintenance work orders, or an electronic database, or any other method used by your MS4 to manage field work performed]
PAGE 399
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 PCD Structural Control Inspection Facility ID: ________________________ Date: _________________ FUNCTION: Sediment accumulation? YES NO Debris accumulation? YES NO Absorbent materials need replacement ? YES NO If YES report to supervisor for further investigation or schedule for maintenance GENERAL: Any indications of illicit discharge or illegal dumping? YES NO If YES describe and report to supervisor for proper response: _________________________________________________________ Inlets/Outlets damaged or obstructed ? YES NO If YES schedule for maintenance.
PAGE 400
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Pipes/Culverts and Inlets/Manholes Structural Control Inspection Standard Operational/Maintenance/Documentation Protocol There are 38.8 linear feet/ miles of pipe/culvert that are part of our MS4. The locations are shown on the following map. This value and the locations on the map do NOT include exfiltration trench, which is catalogued separately. Each pipe segment (between two structures or between a structure and an outfall) has a unique identification. This information is stored in a geographic in formation system (GIS ). There are 2,659 inlets/catch basins/manholes that are part of our MS4. The ir locations are also shown on the following map. Each structure has a unique identification. This information is stored in a geographic information syst em (GIS). Inspections : At least 10% of the total number of linear feet of pipe/culvert is inspected each year. The inlets, catchbasins, and manholes associa ted with a pipe/culvert system are inspected concurrently. Visual inspections are conducted in accordance with the checklist /procedure that follow s Inspection forms are not used. The GIS is coded to identify the last inspection date for each facility. If warranted as a result of the visual inspection, a work order for maintenance, repair, or a mor e detailed pipe or structure investigation is generat ed. A more detailed investigation may include televising the pipe, or using mirrors or other devices, as appropriate, to determine the condition of the pipe/culvert As a result of the more detailed in vestigation, a work order for maintenance or repair may be generated. Maintenance 1. Remove trash and debris and dispose of properly. : There are several maintenance activities that may be associated w ith stormwater networks The appropriate activity is chosen to correspond to the reported condition. The following activities may be required: 2. Remove accumulated vegetative matter and dispose of properly. 3. Remove accumulated sediment and dispose of properly. 4. Remove barnacles and/or other marine life and disp ose of properly. 5. Repair/replace the headwall at the end of the pipe if applicable. 6. Repair/replace pipe or structure, if needed.
PAGE 401
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Documentation The documentation for the inspection and maintenance activities related to the pipes/culverts and inlets/manh oles is kept on file. :
PAGE 402
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Pipes/Culverts Structural Control Inspection VISUAL INSPECTION : Evidence of settling above the pipe alignment ? YES NO Sediment accumulation in pipe ( viewed from inlets, manholes, etc.) ? YES NO Barnacle accumulation in pipe (vie wed from inlets, manholes, and/or outfall) ? YES NO If YES schedule for maintenance and report to supervisor for further i nvestigation.
PAGE 403
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Stormwater Pump Station Structural Control Inspection Standard Operational/Maintenance/Documentation Protocol There are 4 stormwater pump stations ( SWPS s) that are part of our MS4; the y are located as shown on the following map. Inspections : SWPSs are inspected semi -annually, or more frequently if historic operations indicate that its needed for a particular SWPS Because these structures are each unique, their inspection protocol is specific to each structure. The anticipated inspection schedule fo llows. [List the Stormwater Pump Stations and provide inspection dates] Maintenance 1. Remove trash and debris and dispose of properly. : There are several maintenance activities that may be associated w ith SWPS s. The appropriate activity is chosen to correspond to the reported condition. The following a ctivities may be required: 2. Remove accumulated vegetative matter and dispose of properly. 3. Remove accumulated sediment and dispose of properly. 4. Maintain pump in accordance with pump manufacturers recommend ations. 5. See Sumps and Injection Wells SOP for more information/ Documentation The documentation for the inspection and maintenance activities related to stormwater pump stations is kept on file. :
PAGE 404
776 NE 125 Street | North Miami | Florida | 33161 305.893.6511 Stormwater Pump Station #_______ Inspection Procedure/Che cklist/Form Facility ID: ________________________ Date: _________________ FUNCTION: [develop one for each unique pump station] YES NO GENERAL: Any indications of illicit discharge or illegal dumping? YES NO If YES describe and report to supervi sor for proper response: _________________________________________________________ Debris accumulation upstream or downstream of structure? YES NO Sediment accumulation upstream or downstream of structure? YES NO Headwall in need of repair/replacement? YE S NO If YES schedule for maintenance.
|