LDR   02696nam^^22003133a^4500
001        FI15062049_00001
005        20150821132442.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        150720n^^^^^^^^xx^||||^o^^^^^|||^u^eng^d
245 00 |a Assessment of Coastal Vulnerability Through the Use of GIS Tools in South Sicily (Italy) |h [electronic resource] |y English.
260        |a [S.l.] : |b Springer, |c 2009.
490        |a Environmental Management Volume 43.
506        |a Please contact the owning institution for licensing and permissions. It is the user's responsibility to ensure use does not violate any third party rights.
520 3    |a This study assessed coastal erosion vulnerability along a 90-km sector, which included both erosional and accretionary beaches, and different levels of human occupation. Two aerial photogrammetric flights were used to reconstruct coastal evolution between 1977 and 1999. During this period, extensive accretion was recorded updrift of human structures at harbors and ports, e.g., Scoglitti (105.6 m), Donnalucata (52.8 m), and Pozzallo (94.6 m). Conversely, erosion was recorded in downdrift areas, with maximum values at Modica Stream mouth (63.8 m) and Point Castellazzo (35.2 m). Assessments were subsequently divided into four categories ranging from ‘‘high erosion’’ to ‘‘accretion.’’ Several sources were examined to assess human activities and land use. The latter was mapped and divided into four categories, ranging from ‘‘very high’’ to ‘‘no capital’’ land use. Subsequently, coastal erosion vulnerability was assessed by combining land use categories with recorded coastline behavior. Results showed ‘‘very high’’ to ‘‘high’’ vulnerability along 5.8% and 16.6%, respectively, of the littoral, while 20.9% and 56.7%, respectively, was found to exhibit ‘‘medium’’ and ‘‘low/very low’’ vulnerability. A very good agreement between predicted coastal vulnerability and coastal trend had been observed over recent years. Furthermore, several human structures and activities are located within the ‘‘imminent collapse zone (ICZ)’’ which reached maximum values of 17.5 m at Modica Stream and 13.5 m at Point Braccetto.
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Florida International University, |d 2015. |f (dpSobek) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
650    0 |a Climate change.
650    0 |a Geographic information systems.
650    0 |a Coastal management.
650    0 |a Erosion.
651    0 |a Italy.
700 1    |a Anfuso, Giorgio.
700        |a Martinez Del Pozo, Josel Angel.
830    0 |a dpSobek.
830    0 |a Sea Level Rise.
852        |a dpSobek |c Sea Level Rise
856 40 |u http://dpanther.fiu.edu/dpService/dpPurlService/purl/FI15062049/00001 |y Click here for full text
992 04 |a http://dpanther.fiu.edu/sobek/content/FI/15/06/20/49/00001/FI15062049thm.jpg
997        |a Sea Level Rise


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.