LDR   03258nam^^22003373a^4500
001        FI15062035_00001
005        20160201121854.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        150720n^^^^^^^^xx^||||^o^^^^^|||^u^eng^d
245 00 |a Rapid sea-level rise and reef back-stepping at the close of the last interglacial highstand |h [electronic resource].
260        |a [S.l.] : |b Macmillan Publishers Limited, |c 2009-04-16.
490        |a Nature Magazine Volume 458.
506        |a Please contact the owning institution for licensing and permissions. It is the user's responsibility to ensure use does not violate any third party rights.
520 3    |a Widespread evidence of a 14–6-m sea-level highstand during the last interglacial period (Marine Isotope Stage 5e) has led towarnings that modern ice sheets will deteriorate owing to global warming and initiate a rise of similarmagnitude by AD 2100 (ref. 1).The rate of this projected rise is based on ice-sheet melting simulations and downplays discoveries ofmore rapid ice loss2,3. Knowing the rate atwhich sea level reached its highstand during the last interglacial period is fundamental in assessing if such rapid ice-loss processes could lead to future catastrophic sea-level rise.The bestdirect recordof sea level during this highstand comes from well-dated fossil reefs in stable areas4–6. However, this record lacks both reef-crest development up to the full highstand elevation, as inferred7 from widespread intertidal indicators at 16m, and a detailed chronology, owing to the difficulty of replicating U-series ages on submillennial timescales8. Here we present a complete reef-crest sequence for the last interglacial highstand and its U-series chronology fromthe stable northeast Yucata´n peninsula, Mexico. We find that reef development during the highstand was punctuated by reef-crest demise at 13m and back-stepping to 16m. The abrupt demise of the lower-reef crest, but continuous accretion between the lower-lagoonal unit and the upper-reef crest, allows us to infer that this back-stepping occurred on an ecological timescale and was triggered by a 2–3-mjump in sea level. Using strictly reliable 230Th ages of corals fromthe upper-reef crest, and improved stratigraphic screening of coral ages fromother stable sites, we constrain this jump to have occurred 121 kyr ago and conclude that it supports an episode of ice-sheet instability during the terminal phase of the last interglacial period.
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Florida International University, |d 2015. |f (dpSobek) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
650    0 |a Sea level rise.
650    0 |a Reefs.
650    0 |a Ice sheets.
720 1    |a Blanchon, Paul.
720 1    |a Eisenhauer, Anton.
720 1    |a Fietzke, Jan.
720 1    |a Liebetrau, Volker.
773 0    |t Rapid sea-level rise and reef back-stepping at the close of the last interglacial highstand
830    0 |a dpSobek.
830    0 |a Sea Level Rise.
852        |a dpSobek |c Sea Level Rise
856 40 |u http://dpanther.fiu.edu/dpService/dpPurlService/purl/FI15062035/00001 |y Click here for full text
856 42 |3 Host material |u http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v458/n7240/abs/nature07933.html |y Rapid sea-level rise and reef back-stepping at the close of the last interglacial highstand
992 04 |a http://dpanther.fiu.edu/sobek/content/FI/15/06/20/35/00001/FI15062035thm.jpg
997        |a Sea Level Rise


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.