LDR   03701nam^^22003613a^4500
001        FI15061881_00001
005        20160208115342.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        150708n^^^^^^^^xx^||||^o^^^^^|||^u^eng^d
245 00 |a A New, Robust, and Accurate Method to Extract Tide-Coordinated Shorelines from Coastal Elevation Models |h [electronic resource] |y English.
260        |a [S.l.] : |b Coastal Education & Research Foundation, |c 2011.
490        |a Journal of Coastal Research Volume 28 Issue 3.
506        |a Please contact the owning institution for licensing and permissions. It is the user's responsibility to ensure use does not violate any third party rights.
520 3    |a The extraction of highly accurate shoreline data is fundamental to carrying out accurate and reliable studies to enhance our understanding of coastal evolution and coastal vulnerability. In our case, shoreline extraction was needed to develop a method based on an extrapolation process because the most suitable height for datum-coordinated shoreline extraction along Spanish coastal areas turned out to be the orthometric datum origin, i.e., the origin of the vertical reference system in Spain. Because of the microtidal nature of the Mediterranean Sea, using this vertical datum is rather troublesome for remotely extracting ground points to apply to traditional shoreline-extraction methods based on interpolation procedures. Because of these difficulties, a new method for shoreline extraction, based on extrapolation from an iterative digital-elevation model, is presented in this article. The Elevation Gradient Trend Propagation method employs the local elevation gradient to estimate the shoreline position by extrapolating the slope until the zero-elevation contour, representing the modeled intersection of the vertical datum and the beach profile, is reached. The proposed methodology was tested on a Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR)–derived digital-elevation model, which comprised a coastal area of Almerı´a (Mediterranean Sea, south Spain). The results obtained from the new approach were compared with those provided by the widely known Cross-Shore Profile (CSP) method. A validation process was conducted for both methods to highlight their advantages and shortcomings. An alternative contour level of 0.4 m was employed as a ground truth because the zero-elevation contour was not available because LIDAR returns under the water surface were unavailable. The validation process showed that the proposed method was more robust and more suitable than CSP method was for microtidal coasts and for data that need to be extrapolated to reach the desired contour level. In addition, the influence of the starting point in applying the elevation extrapolation process was also proven.
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Florida International University, |d 2015. |f (dpSobek) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
650    0 |a Climate Change.
650    0 |a Remote sensing.
650    0 |a Coastal erosion.
651    0 |a Spain.
700        |a Fernandez Luque, Ismael.
700        |a Aguilar Torres, Fernando J..
700        |a Aguilar Torres, Manuel A..
700        |a Perez Garcia, Jose L..
700        |a Lopez Arenas, Andres.
773 0    |t A New, Robust, and Accurate Method to Extract Tide-Coordinated Shorelines from Coastal Elevation Models
830    0 |a dpSobek.
830    0 |a Sea Level Rise.
852        |a dpSobek |c Sea Level Rise
856 40 |u http://dpanther.fiu.edu/dpService/dpPurlService/purl/FI15061881/00001 |y Click here for full text
856 42 |3 Host material |u http://www.jcronline.org/doi/pdf/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-11-00107.1 |y A New, Robust, and Accurate Method to Extract Tide-Coordinated Shorelines from Coastal Elevation Models
992 04 |a http://dpanther.fiu.edu/sobek/content/FI/15/06/18/81/00001/FI15061881_thm.jpg
997        |a Sea Level Rise


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.