Facilitating adaptation of biodiversity to climate change
Permanent Link:

Material Information

Title:
Facilitating adaptation of biodiversity to climate change a conceptual framework applied to the world's largest Meditteranean-climate woodland
Series Title:
Climate Change
Creator:
Suzanne Prober
Kevin R. Thiele
Phillip W. Rundel
Colin J. Yates
Sandra L. Berry
Margaret Byrne
Les Christidis
Carl R. Gosper
Pauline F. Grierson
Kristina Lemson
Tom Lyons
Craig Macfarlane
Michael H. O'Connor
John K. Scott
Rachel J. Standish
William D. Stock
Eddie J. B. van Etten
Grant W. Wardell-Johnson
Alexander Watson
Publisher:
Springer
Publication Date:
Language:
English

Notes

Abstract:
The importance of ecological management for reducing the vulnerability of biodiversity to climate change is increasingly recognized, yet frameworks to facilitate a structured approach to climate adaptation management are lacking. We developed a conceptual framework that can guide identification of climate change impacts and adaptive management options in a given region or biome. The framework focuses on potential points of early climate change impact, and organizes these along two main axes. First, it recognizes that climate change can act at a range of ecological scales. Secondly, it emphasizes that outcomes are dependent on two potentially interacting and countervailing forces: (1) changes to environmental parameters and ecological processes brought about by climate change, and (2) responses of component systems as determined by attributes of resistance and resilience. Through this structure, the framework draws together a broad range of ecological concepts, with a novel emphasis on attributes of resistance and resilience that can temper the response of species, ecosystems and landscapes to climate change. We applied the framework to the world’s largest remaining Mediterranean-climate woodland, the ‘Great Western Woodlands’ of south-western Australia. In this relatively intact region, maintaining inherent resistance and resilience by preventing anthropogenic degradation is of highest priority and lowest risk. Limited, higher risk options such as fire management, protection of refugia and translocation of adaptive genes may be justifiable under more extreme change, hence our capacity to predict the extent of change strongly impinges on such management decisions. These conclusions may contrast with similar analyses in degraded landscapes, where natural integrity is already compromised, and existing investment in restoration may facilitate experimentation with higher risk options.

Record Information

Source Institution:
Florida International University
Rights Management:
Please contact the owning institution for licensing and permissions. It is the user's responsibility to ensure use does not violate any third party rights.

dpSobek Membership

Aggregations:
Sea Level Rise