LDR   04691nam^^22004453a^4500
001        FI13042553_00001
005        20130719164957.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        130506n^^^^^^^^xx^||||^o^^^^^|||^0^spa^d
024 8    |a FI13042553
041        |a spa |a eng
245 00 |a Marginación de las instituciones de respuesta en casos de desastre |h [electronic resource] |b la experiencia del fenomeno El Niño de 1997-1998 en Peru, Bolivia, y Ecuador |y Spanish.
246 3    |i Alternate title: |a Marginalization of disaster response institutions : the 1997-1998 El Niño experience in Peru, Bolivia, and Equador. |y English.
260        |a Boulder, CO : |b Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center. University of Colorado, |c 2000.
490        |a Special publication (University of Colorado, Boulder. Natural Hazards Research and Applications Invormation Center) |n 36-S |y English.
506        |a Refer to main document/publisher for use rights.
520 3    |a This document is a comparative study of the institutional preparedness of the Ecuadorian, Peruvian, and Bolivian governments in addressing the El Niño (the Southern Oscillation) of 1997-98. The document begins with a discussion of lessons learned and not learned following the previous El Niño in 1982-83, and the mitigation and disaster preparedness policies and programs established during periods between El Niño phenomena, if any were. Then focus is shifted towards an analysis of government action or inaction in the three Andean countries between June 1997 and August 1998 in response to the El Niño of that period. From the multiple visits to the three countries, a few common trends were revealed. First, it was not until the international media began discussing the potential threat that the 1997-98 El Niño posed to the region that these governments began to listen to their own scientific communities, who had been petitioning them to address these risks well before the foreign coverage. Second, as the effects of the 1997-98 El Niño intensified in all three countries, each government established new institutions to address the growing disaster risks rather than work through already existing civil defense structures, which were nearly completely marginalized. And lastly, each government response to the El Niño was tied to the particular socioeconomic and political contexts of that society. In Ecuador and in Peru, the El Niño and the government’s response were key campaign and election topics. In Bolivia, response efforts were strongly influenced by the process of government transition and coalition politics occurring at the time. The final section discusses the implications that these observations have for disaster mitigation and preparedness policies and programs. Two important lessons were gleaned from this study: 1) addressing disaster risk is not primarily an issue of government technical or administrative capacity, but rather a product of politics and institutional competition over the allocation of scarce resources; 2) disasters are themselves political events that place high demands on governments to take the right actions, and generate conflict over the influx of resources in response to the disaster. The types and levels of cooperation and conflict are determined by disaster needs and the socioeconomic and political context of the country at the time of the event.
520 0    |a Politics
520 0    |a General Disaster Risk Management
520 2    |a Agradecimientos y nota del editor p. 4; Resumen p. 5; I. Introducción p. 7; II. El marco de la evaluación p. 9; III. Antecedentes p. 13; IV. ENOS de 1997-1009: resumen de las consecuencias p. 15; V. Respuesta gubernamental-institucional al ENOS de 1997-1998 p. 21; VI. Causas de la marginación de la defensa civil en Ecuador, Perú y Bolivia p. 33; VII. Conclusión: ¿existe preparación para el próximo ENOS? p. 35; VIII. Epílogo: diciembre de 1999 p. 39; Referencias bilbiográficas p. 44; Los autores p. 46
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Florida International University, |d 2013. |f (dpSobek) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
650    1 |a El Niño Current.
650    1 |a Emergency management.
650    1 |a Climate change.
650    1 |a Disaster relief.
662        |a Bolivia. |2 tgn
662        |a Ecuador. |2 tgn
662        |a Peru. |2 tgn
700 1    |a Olson, Richard Stuart.
700 1    |a Sarmiento Prieto, Juan Pablo.
700 1    |a Olson, Robert A..
700 1    |a Gawronski, Vincent T..
700 1    |a Estrada, Amelia.
710 2    |a Disaster Risk Reduction Program, Florida International University (DRR/FIU), |e summary contributor.
776 1    |c Original |w (OCoLC)45076151
830    0 |a dpSobek.
852        |a dpSobek
856 40 |u http://dpanther.fiu.edu/dpService/dpPurlService/purl/FI13042553/00001 |y Click here for full text
992 04 |a http://dpanther.fiu.edu/sobek/content/FI/13/04/25/53/00001/FI13042553thm.jpg


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.