LDR   03226nam^^22003133a^4500
001        FI13042448_00001
005        20130611122046.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        130611n^^^^^^^^xx^||||^o^^^^^|||^0^eng^d
024 8    |a FI13042448
245 00 |a Exploring disaster risk reduction in the built environment |h [electronic resource] |y English.
260        |a [S.l.] : |b School of the Built Environment, University of Salford (SOBE), |c 2010.
506        |a Refer to main document/publisher for use rights.
510        |a Malalgoda, C., Amaratunga, D., Pathirage, C. (2010). Exploring disaster risk reduction in the built environment. School of the Built Environment, University of Salford, United Kingdom.
520 3    |a In this publication the authors examine the impact of the construction industry and related disciplines on disaster risk reduction (DRR). It reviews the relevant literature to inform the reader on the current position of the construction-related fields in relation to risk reduction efforts, highlighting the industry’s several problem areas. Appropriate building design and construction is a critical component of risk mitigation. Risk reduction measures can be implemented at every stage of the building process, from design to maintenance. Therefore, the authors recommend that construction-related disciplines, such as architecture, engineering, and urban planning be integrated with disaster management initiatives. Appropriate land-use and the adherence to building codes can ensure that buildings are constructed with adequate mitigation measures such as sea walls and drainage systems. However, many measures are not implemented because DRR as a concept is not consistently understood across disciplines. The concept can be implemented on so many levels that its definitions are highly industry-specific. Thus, it is difficult to devise a standardized definition and set of procedures applicable to all construction-related fields. This problem is further complicated by the variation in risk types, probabilities, and vulnerability levels. These issues create a gap between mitigation concepts and their implementation. The authors recommend that the construction industry increase awareness amongst the various disciplines associated with it regarding the role each plays in the disaster mitigation process in order to facilitate the coordination and consistent implementation of DRR measures across disciplines.
520 0    |a Disaster Risk Reduction
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Florida International University, |d 2013. |f (dpSobek) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
650    1 |a Disaster response and recovery.
650    1 |a Construction industry.
650    1 |a Risk management.
700 1    |a Malalgoda, C. |u School of the Built Environment, University of Salford, UK.
700 1    |a Amaratunga, D. |u School of the Built Environment, University of Salford, UK.
700 1    |a Pathirage, C. |u School of the Built Environment, University of Salford, UK.
710 2    |a Disaster Risk Reduction Program, Florida International University (DRR/FIU), |e summary contributor.
830    0 |a dpSobek.
852        |a dpSobek
856 40 |u http://dpanther.fiu.edu/dpService/dpPurlService/purl/FI13042448/00001 |y Click here for full text
992 04 |a http://dpanther.fiu.edu/sobek/content/FI/13/04/24/48/00001/FI13042448_thm.jpg


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.